Saturday, September 26, 2026
MiningNewsTerminal
Saturday, September 26, 2026 Admin

GLD.V ·

GoldON Outlines Lithium Pegmatite Discovery Potential at its McInnes Lake Greenstone Belt Property Elevated lithium values of up to 1,126 ppm in metavolcanic host-rocks distributed proximal to the main plutons triggered comprehensive review

Exploration Programs

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

GoldON Outlines Lithium Pegmatite Discovery Potential at

its McInnes Lake Greenstone Belt Property

Elevated lithium values of up to 1,126 ppm in metavolcanic host-rocks distributed

proximal to the main plutons triggered comprehensive review

VICTORIA, BC – April 24, 2023 – GoldON Resources Ltd. (TSX-V: GLD) (“GoldON” or the

“Company”) is pleased to provide an overview of th e fertile peraluminous granite plutons and

lithium pegmatite potential at its 100%-owned McI nnes Lake property (the “Property”) that is

located approximately 50 kilometres (km) southwest of Frontier Lithium’s Pakeagama Lake area

lithium deposits and covers the majority of the McInnes Lake greenstone belt in northwestern

Ontario.

Highlights:

 Fertile lithochemical signature recognized in McInnes North pegmatitic granite pluton

from GoldON’s latest fieldwork on the 11,424-hectare Property.

 Anomalous bulk rock lithium (Li), beryllium (Be), rubidium (Rb), cesium (Cs), tantalum

(Ta), and niobium (Nb) in McInnes Lake pluton compare with fertile, peraluminous

granite plutons elsewhere in Ontario such as the Allison Lake batholith and the MNW

stock in Georgia Lake region.

 Analytical results from the latest fieldwork included a database of 480 bulk rock samples

with 67 exceeding 50 parts per million (ppm) lithium.

 Elevated lithium values newly discovered ranging from 50 to 1,126 ppm in metavolcanic

host-rocks distributed proximal to the main plutons in the McInnes Lake greenstone belt

may reflect exomorphic dispersion outwards from exposed and blind pegmatitic granite

plutonic centres.

 Peraluminous granitic magma generation and emplacement are possibly controlled by the

inferred northern continuation of a 100 -750 metres (m) wide, deep seismic tapping,

E1/E2 extensional shear zones and associated second order shears, which also underlie the

Red Lake Mine Complex and greenstone slivers to the north (Red Lake Extension)

 Major fault zone control of peraluminous granite plutons and derivative lithium-rich

pegmatites is evident elsewhere in northwestern Ontario, including 50 km to northeast of

the McInnes North pluton, along the Bearhead fault system at Pakeagama Lake, where

Frontier Lithium14 has delineated NI 43-101 Measured & Indicated (M&I) resources of 26

million tonnes (mt) of 1.62% Li2O and Inferred resources of 32.4 mt of 1.41% Li2O.

Figure 1. Granitic pegmatite sample from >70 m wide pegmatite zone on the east show of McInnes Lake.

“GoldON’s fieldwork has discovered several new showings that confirm the presence of a fertile

peraluminous granite setti ng. Geological similarities include the E1 fault that is inferred to pass

right through the pluton area an d may have been a controlling st ructure for the emplacement of

fertile granites and related lithium-rich pegmatite melts. This is a similar setting to the Pakeagama

Lake peraluminous parent granite and derived LCT-petrogenetic family pegmatites located 50 km

to the northeast,” said GoldON’s Technical Advisor, Frederick Breaks, PhD, P.Geo. “The McInnes

Lake project checks all the boxes, and I have recommended a follow -up fieldwork program to be

conducted as soon as possible.”

Recognition of fertile peraluminous granites is o bviously one important aspect of exploration for

potential derivative rare-element pegmatite deposits of the lithium-cesium-tantalum (LCT)

petrogenetic family1. These plutons are widespread in the Superior Province of northern Ontario2

and especially in high to gran ulite metamorphic grade, migmatized, clastic-metasedimentary-

dominant belts, such as the English River and Quetico terranes, where 5,000 sq. km of

peraluminous granite was delineated in the form er by regional mapping programs of the Ontario

Geological Survey3.

This news release documents a fertile granite, th e McInnes North pluton (MNP), situated in the

McInnes Lake greenstone belt (MLGB) of the North Caribou La ke terrane of northwestern

Ontario4, based upon the compilation of existing published lithochemistry data (480 bulk rock

samples) and petrographic attributes stemming from an extensive review of the literature.

Fertile Peraluminous Granite Plutons

The degree of chemical evolution varies significantly in the peraluminous granite suite of S-type

affiliation, and consanguineous pegmatites with rare-element mineral potential are largely

restricted to terrane boundary zones with lower-g rade greenstone belt-rich domains such as the

western Uchi terrane and associated with major deep crustal fault systems such as the Sydney Lake-

Lake St. Joseph fault5.

Examples of fertile granite plutons in this setting are found at the Allison Lake batholith 5 and

Separation Rapids pluton7, areas of extensive mineral exploration for lithium mineralization.

A second setting involves peraluminous granite plutons entirely enclosed within greenstone belts,

such as the 0.5 sq. km, unnamed pluton of tourmaline-garnet-muscovite pegmatitic granite situated

just east of the Musselwhite mine 6, a plausible source of spodumene pegmatite dykes found in

underground workings8, and at the McInnes North and Lower Bay plutons.

The size of fertile pegmatitic granite plutons varies considerably from large batholiths such as the

30 by >100 km Glacier Lake batholith 9 to the 1.5 by 2.8 km Separa tion Rapids pluton, the latter

being the most evolved fertile granite known in Ontario7. The McInnes North pluton occurs in the

northern part of the Property and, at a minimum size of 1.5 by 1.9 km, is similar in size to the

2,646±2 Ma Separation Rapids pluton. A second, smaller, 0.4 km diameter body, called the Lower

Bay pluton, occurs in the southern part of the Property.

Figure 2. Regional map with location of McInnes Lake and GoldON’s other properties.

Geological Setting

The MLGB is one of several supracrustal slivers that reside in the core of the predominantly

Mesoarchean North Caribou Lake terrane4. Cycle 2 intermediate volcanism in the greenstone belt

has an age spread of 2,975.4±0.8 Ma to 2,928.7±0.6 Ma 13. The peraluminous granite plutonism is

undated and plausibly developed late in the history of the terrane.

From seismic studies in the Red Lake area10,11,12, it is inferred that the MLGB lies along the northern

continuation of the deep crustal E1/E2 extensional shear zone, which also underlies the Red Lake

Mine Complex and greenstone slivers to the south of MLGB, called the Red Lake Extension. The

Central sliver13 50 km south of the MLGB, is a shear zone approximately 100 -750 m wide and is

coincident with a prominent first vertical derivative magnetic low that has numerous second-order

shears.

Deep crustal level fault zones may have impor tantly acted as pera luminous granitic magma

generation sites and conduits for emplacement along the length of the greenstone belt as suggested

by the appearance of pegmatite bodies of various sizes distributed in the MLGB over a strike length

of at least 30 km.

The Sydney Lake fault, south of Red Lake, demonstrates that significant volumes of peraluminous

granitic magma can be generated within major d eep crustal fault structures, as exemplified by a

conspicuous, linear-shaped, garnet-cordierite-muscovite granite mass, 0.3 to 2 km in breadth and

a minimum 130 km in strike length, entirely confined within this major fault system3.

Major fault zone control of peraluminous gran ite plutons and derivative 2,672 Ma lithium-rich

pegmatites is evident elsewhere, as 50 km to northeast of th e McInnes North pluton, along the

Bearhead fault system at Pakeag ama Lake, where Frontier Lithium 14 has delineated NI 43-101

resources of 26 mt (M&I) of 1.62% Li2O and 32.4 mt (Inferred) 1.41% Li2O.

McInnes North Pluton

The McInnes North pluton (MNP) was previously briefly described in several Ontario Geological

Survey mapping studies13,15,16. Rock types comprise massive, undeformed, medium-grained, two-

mica granite and associated pegmatitic granite units such as potassic pegmatite 15. Graphic K-

feldspar megacrysts are also present suggestive of pegmat itic leucogranite phases. Mineralogy

comprises deep pink, blocky K-feldspar, plagiocl ase, quartz, accessory muscovite, tourmaline,

garnet, and biotite13.

The MNP has an apparent exocontact pegmatite sw arm that extends for at least 1 km to the

southeast18 into mafic and intermediate metavolcanic host rocks. Dykes of similar rock also occur

up to 6 km north of the pluton 18. The Lower Bay pluton, 20 km south, lacks bulk rock chemistry

data but appears similar to the MNP, in descriptions of the previous work 15,16,17. Peraluminous

granitic pegmatite dykes also are evident and occur through the MLGB13,15,19.

Lithochemistry

Published lithochemistry data for the MLGB, with Li, Be, Rb, Cs, Ta, and Nb, comprise 142 bulk

rock analyses from the 2006 Far North Initiative Ontario Geological Survey mapping project13 and

338 analyses in a 2021 belt-wide mineralization-geochemical investigation19.

Six bulk rock analyses from the McInnes Nort h pluton were compiled from these sources and

summarized in Table 1 with a comparison to various fertile granite plutons in other parts of Ontario

previously investigated2,5,7. Key attributes of fertile granites a nd their internal pegmatitic granite

phases were initially documented and classified in the Cat Lake-Winnipeg River pegmatite field of

southeast Manitoba20.

Table 1. Summary of Rare-Element Bulk Rock Data for McInnes North Pluton

Compared to Other Fertile Peraluminous Granite Complexes in Ontario.

nS o u r c e

Mean Range Mean Range Mean Range Mean Range Mean Range Mean  Range

McInnes  North pluton 65 49  ‐ 99 384 218  ‐ 526 8.6 7.0  ‐ 10.0 16.8 9.7  ‐ 24.7 2.6 2.12  ‐ 3.25 141 125  ‐ 173 6 1,2

Allison Lake batholith 80 18  ‐ 190 226 117  ‐ 587 17.4 2.7  ‐ 90 10.1 2.7  ‐ 58.7 1.2 0.61  ‐ 12.9 176 49  ‐ 323 19 3

MNW stock 107 45  ‐ 179 390 314  ‐ 660 35.5 12.7  ‐ 36.3 25.1 16.7  ‐ 82 9 2.05  ‐ 66 118 81  ‐ 165 10 4

Barbara Lake stock 108 30  ‐ 415 333 68  ‐ 601 25.6 3.9  ‐ 62.4 23.8 6.9  ‐ 92.1 10.6 1.4  ‐ 91.1 106 51  ‐ 260 17 4

Separation Rapids pluton 160 53  ‐ 235 921 726  ‐ 984 30.0 11.8  ‐ 58 73 41  ‐ 94 22.1 9.2  ‐ 28.7 21 0.6  ‐ 42 5 5

n= number of samples

3. Tindle,  A.G., Selway, J.B. and Breaks,  F.W. 2002.  Ontario   Geological  Survey, MRD 111.

5. Breaks , F.W. and Tindle , A.G. (2001 ).  p.172‐173 in CIMM Speci al Vol ume 53. Industrial  Minerals  in Canada.

K/Rb

1. MacL achlan,  B. and Robertson, C. 2022.  GoldON Resources  Ltd. Report on the May to June and Sept 2021  Expl orati on Programs  on the McInnes  La ke property. As s es s ment 

Work Report, Ontario  MNDM: Grab sam ple s 277167  ‐277171.

2. Buse, S. and Prefontaine,  S. 2006.  Open File  Report 6210,  Appendix 2, Sample 06‐SP‐1104.

4. Tindle,  A.G., Breaks,  F.W., and Selway, J.B. 2008.  Ontario   Geological  Survey, MRD 231.

Lithium (ppm) Rubidium  (ppm) Cesium  (ppm) Niobium  (ppm) Tantalum  (ppm)

Figure 3. Lithium vs Rubidium (log10) in the McInnes North pluton compared with other fertile granite plutons

in the northwestern Superior Province of Ontario.

Figure 3 depicts Rb vs Li variation in MNP comp ared with other fertile granite plutons in the

region. The MNP plots mid-way betw een the variation fields of the Allison Lake batholith and

Separation Rapids pluton and define a trend of increasing fertile granite evolution. The MNP has

elevated lithium (mean 65 ppm; range 53-99 ppm) , and Rb values (mean 384 ppm; range 218 to

526 ppm) mostly exceed the Allison Lake bath olith (Rb mean 226 ppm; range 117 to 587 ppm),

albeit with a small overlap in the data fields (Figure 3). Mean Ta and Nb are higher in the MNP

versus Allison Lake batholith with lower mean Cs (8.6 vs 15.6 ppm), but the Cs ranges mutually

overlap. The Allison batholith, delineated in 20015, contains several rare-element mineral showings

including recently discovered spodumene by Green Technology Metals14.

Lithium Dispersion Halos

Numerous localities along the MLGB trend rev eal anomalous lithium values in mafic and

intermediate metavolcanic rocks 13,19 in the range 55 ppm to 1,126 ppm, relative to the Upper

Continental Crust mean lithium abundance of 20 ppm 22, that may signify e xomorphic dispersion

outward from fertile pegmatitic granite bodies.

The highest lithium values of 304, 340, and 1,126 ppm 19 are situated within 0.8 to 1 km of the

McInnes North pluton, and occur in a fragmental, angular, possible debris flow/conglomerate rock

of float origin that may represent disrupted parts of a nearby lithium dispersion halo. Other lithium

anomalies, in the 68 to 376 ppm range, were documented in metavolcanic and banded iron

formation bedrock within 6 km of the MNP 19 and such anomalies require further field definition

as does a lithium value of 180 ppm in metagabbro situated about 10 km southeast of the MNP23.

Follow-up field investigation focused on lithium mineralization in known peraluminous plutons

and related exocontact dykes is planned in the forthcoming field to further unravel the potential for

LTC-class pegmatites. The source of the numerous lithium anomalies, which may have developed

via dispersion from lithium-rich pegmatites hosted in the metavolcanic and banded iron formation

bedrock, is presently unclear and will also require further field investigation.

“We originally staked the underexplored McInnes Lake property for its deep crustal-scale features

and similarities to the Red Lake Camp and have been successful in discovering several new gold

showings. However, the discovery of elevated lithium values that compare with other fertile,

peraluminous granite plutons in Ontario is a pleasa nt surprise,” said Mike Romanik, president of

GoldON. “Lithium and rare earth ex ploration is a specialized field, and we are very fortunate to

have Dr. Breaks coordinating our exploration strategy.”

The technical information presented in this ne ws release has been reviewed and approved by

Frederick W. Breaks, PhD, P. Geo, a qualified person for exploration, as defined by National

Instrument 43-101, Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects.

About GoldON Resources Ltd.

GoldON is an exploration compan y focused on discovery-stage prop erties located in the prolific

greenstone belts of northwestern Ontario, Canada . Our current project portfolio includes six

properties in the Red Lake Mining Distri ct (McDonough, McInnes Lake, Pakwash North,

Pipestone Bay, Springpole East, and West Madsen) and a seventh property in the Patricia Mining

District (Slate Falls).

For more information, you can visit our website at goldonresources.com, download our investor

presentation by clicking here, and follow us on Twitter at https://twitter.com/GoldONResources.

ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD

Signed “Michael Romanik”

Michael Romanik, President

GoldON Resources Ltd.

Direct line: (204) 724-0613

Email: [email protected]

179 - 2945 Jacklin Road, Suite 416

Victoria, BC, V9B 6J9

Forward-Looking Statements:

This news release may contain “forward-looking st atements” that involve k nown and unknown risks,

uncertainties, assumptions, and other factors that may cause the actual results, performance, or achievements of

the Company to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or

implied by the forward-looking statements. Any forward-lo oking statement speaks only as of the date of this

news release and, except as may be required by applicable securities laws, the Company disclaims any intent or

obligation to update any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future events, or

results or otherwise.

Neither TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in the

policies of the TSX Venture Exchange) accept responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release.

Referenced Sources

1. Černý, P.C. and Ercit, T.S.E. 2005. The Classification of granitic pegmatites revisited. The Canadian

Mineralogist Vol. 43, pp. 2005-2026.

2. Breaks, F.W., Selway, J.B. and Tindle, A.G. 2006. Fertile and peraluminous granites and related rare-

element mineralization in pegmatites, north-central and northeastern Superior Province, Ontario; Ontario

Geological Survey, Open File Report 6195, 143p.

3. Breaks, F.W. and Bond, W.D. 1993. The English River Subprovince - an Archean gneiss belt: geology,

geochemistry, and associated mineralization; Ontario Geological Survey, Open File Report, 5846, 882p.

4. Stott, G.M., Corkery, M.T., Percival, J.A., Simard, M. and Goutier J. 2010. A Revised Terrane

Subdivision of the Superior Province; in Summary of Field Work and Other Activities 2010, Ontario

Geological Survey, Open File Report 6260, p.20-1 to 20-8.

5. Breaks, F.W., Selway, J.B. and Tindle, A.G. 2003. Fertile peraluminous granites and related rare-element

mineralization in pegmatite, Superior Province, northwest and northeast Ontario: Operation Treasure Hunt;

Ontario Geological Survey, Open File Report 6099, 179p.

6. Breaks, F.W., Osmani, I.A. and deKemp, E.A. 1987. Precambrian geology of the Opapimiskan–

Neawagank lakes area, western part (Opapimiskan Lake project), Kenora District (Patricia Portion);

Ontario Geological Survey, Preliminary Map P. 3080.

7. Breaks, F.W. and Tindle, A.G. 2002. Rare-element mineralization of the Separation Lake area, northwest

Ontario: characteristics of a new discovery of complex-type, petalite-subtype, Li-Rb-Cs-Ta pegmatite; in

Industrial minerals of Canada, Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum, Special Volume

53, p.159-178.

8. Taylor, R.P., and Henham, R. (2001): The Nature and Distribution of Tantalum-bearing Minerals in Newly

Discovered, Rare-Element Pegmatites at the Musselwhite Mine, Northwestern Ontario. Exploration and

Mining Geology 10(1/2), 85-93.

9. Breaks, F.W., Selway, J.B. and Tindle, A.G. 2008. The Georgia Lake rare-element pegmatite field and

related S-type, peraluminous granites, Quetico Subprovince, north-central Ontario; Ontario Geological

Survey, Open File Report 6199, 176p.

10. Zeng, F., & Calvert, A. J., 2006. Imaging the upper part of the Red Lake greenstone belt, a. northwestern

Ontario, with 3-D travel time tomography. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 43(7), p. 849-863.

11. Lewis, S.O. 2021. Deep tapping seismic structure in the Red Lake district; in Ontario Geological Survey,

Resident Geologist Program, Recommendations for Exploration 2020-2021, p.9-13.

12. Zeng, F. and Calvert, A. 2011. Imaging the upper part of the Red Lake greenstone belt, northwestern

Ontario, with 3-D traveltime tomography. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, v.43. p.849-

863. https://doi.o rg/10.1139/e06-027.

13. Buse, S. and Préfontaine, S. 2007. Precambrian geology of the McInnes Lake greenstone belt, the

supracrustal remnants study area and the Frame Lake pluton, Berens River Subprovince, Ontario; Ontario

Geological Survey, Open File Report 6210, 128p.

14. Frontier Lithium:

https://www.frontierlithium.com/_files/ugd/dec7de_844a5e2cc2234a1babbbea1879ce5573.pdf

15. Cortis, A.L., Stott, G.M., Osmani, I.A., Atkinson, B. and Thurston, P.C. 1988. A geological re-evaluation

of northwestern greenstone belts; in Summary of Field Work and Other Activities 1988, Ontario

Geological Survey, Miscellaneous Paper 141, p.28-52.

16. Stone, D. 1998. Precambrian geology of the Berens River area, northwest Ontario; Ontario Geological

Survey, Open File Report 5963, 116p.

17. Préfontaine, S. and Mumford, T. 2007. Precambrian geology of the McInnes Lake greenstone belt,

northwestern Ontario—south sheet; Ontario Geological Survey, Preliminary Map P.3590,

18. Préfontaine, S. and Mumford, T. 2007. Precambrian geology of the McInnes Lake greenstone belt,

Northwestern Ontario—north sheet; Ontario Geological Survey, Preliminary Map P.3589, scale 1:20 000.

19. MacLachlan, B. and Robertson, C. 2022. GoldON Resources Ltd. Report on the May to June and

September Exploration Programs in the McInnes Lake Property. Assessment Work Report, MNDM,

Sudbury, Ontario.

20. Černý, P. and Meintzer. R.E. 1988. Fertile granites in the Archean and Proterozoic fields of rare-element

pegmatites: crustal environment, geochemistry, and petrogenetic relationships; p. 170-206 in Recent

Advances in the Geology of Granite-Related Mineral Deposits, The Canadian Institute of Mining and

Metallurgy, Special Publication 39.

21. Green Technology Metals: https://www.greentm.com.au/overview

22. Taylor, S.R. and McClennan, S.M.1985. The continental crust: its composition and evolution; Blackwell,

Oxford.

23. Stone, D. 1998. Chemical Analyses of Minerals and Rocks of the Berens River Area; Ontario Geological

Survey, Miscellaneous Release-Data 32.