Saturday, September 26, 2026
MiningNewsTerminal
Saturday, September 26, 2026 Admin

GFG.V ·

GFG Outlines 5 Priority Targets from Regional Till Sampling Program at the Pen Gold Project Near Timmins, ON

Exploration Programs Sampling & Geoscience Results

Media Release

Release: Immediate

GFG Outlines 5 Priority Targets from Regional Till Sampling

Program at the Pen Gold Project Near Timmins, ON

September 20, 2018, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada: GFG Resources Inc. (TSXV: GFG)

(OTCQB: GFGSF) (“GFG” or the “Company”) confirms camp scale targets and outlines new

highly prospective areas from its regional till sampling program at its 100% owned Pen Gold

Project (“Project”) in Ontario, Canada. The Project, located 40 kilometres from the prolific

Timmins Gold Camp, is a consolidated land package which consists of approximately 475 square

kilometres. Since acquiring the Project in March, GFG has conducted extensive surface exploration

programs with the objective s to build a district model to prioritize and test drill targets with

approximately 5,000 to 6,000 metres of drilling.

Highlights:

• Completion of Phase 1 till program outlines 5 priority target areas that are associated with

highly prospective regional structures and confirms regional gold prospectivity;

• Returns results of up to 2,470 ppb gold and 142 gold grains from regional till sampling;

• Advances multiple IP grids to refine drill targets associated with significant till anomalies

and along major structural corridors; and

• Confirms Phase 1 drill program to begin in October and will consist of approximately 5,000

- 6,000 meters testing 5 to 7 regional targets.

Brian Skanderbeg, President and CEO, commented, “Our multi-disciplinary exploration strategy is

clearly demonstrating the regional prospectivity of the Project. With a district scale land package

and well-developed regional structural framework in hand, we are excited with the magnitude and

location of the till anomalies. The high gold grain counts and pristine grain textures are consistent

with a proximal source and provide strong evidence to support our existing targets as well as

generating new targets.”

Mr. Skanderbeg added, “With the advancement of the Project to drilling in October and the recently

announced option and earn-in agreement with Newcrest on our Rattlesnake Hills Project, GFG will

have multiple aggressive drill programs moving through 2018 and into 2019.”

2018 Exploration Update

Till Sampling Program

Results from the Phase 1 till sampl ing program has outlined 5 priority regional till anomalies

returning up to 2,470 ppb gold and 142 gold grains (see Figure 1). For many of the samples with

anomalous gold grain counts, the majority of the grains are pristine-shaped indicating the gold was

likely transported less than 1 kilometre from the bedrock source. The total number of grains

reported and aerial extent of the anomalies further confir ms the district endowment and

prospectivity. Photomicrographs of the gold grains recovered from one of the samples (see Figure

2) provides an example of pristine, modified and re -shaped grains. Of the 359 sample sites, 33

geochemical samples and 51 bulk till samples have anomalous values, exceeding the regional

background of 8 ppb gold and 15 gold grains respectively.

2

The till results highlight kilometer-scale, regional targets at Jehann, Slate Rock, Hoodoo, Deerfoot

and Chabot. At Jehann, the anomalous till samples, including two samples with >85 pristine gold

grains (see Figure 1), occur along a 5 kilometre segment of the Porcupine-Destor Fault Z one

(“PDFZ”). A historic till sample collected by the Ontario Geological Survey located within the

target area returned 7.2 grams of gold per tonne (“g/t Au”) confirming the high gold content of the

till in the area . The anomaly remains open and further sampling is on- going. This area hosts

multiple splays of the PDFZ that offset the Reeves Ultramafic Complex and has seen limited

previous drilling. H istoric prospecting of the target area outlined broad, strong carbonate and

fuchsite alteration, numerous occurrences of quartz veining and felsic porphyry intrusives.

In the western portion of the property, the Phase 1 till survey has outlined priority anomalies in the

Slate Rock and Hoodoo target areas. At Slate Rock, a 4 -kilometre-long, open-ended anomaly is

associated with the intersection of a first-order regional shear zone and northeast-trending second-

order shear zones. Several altered and mineralized porphyry intrusives have been outlined with

historic rock samples of felsic intrusive rocks up to 3.6 g/t Au in outcrop , up to 16.1 g/t Au in

boulders, and historic drilling up to 1.3 g/t Au over 1.4 met res. To the southwest at Hoodoo, a

number of regional sample sites hosting highly-pristine gold grains are associated with two parallel,

first and second-order shear zones. The results near the historic Joburke gold mine serve to validate

till sampling as an effective property-scale target identification tool as well as outline the down-ice

(to the south) dispersion train from an existing deposit.

Within the Deerfoot target area, till samples returned up to 44 pristine gold grains (>80% of total

grain count). This highly anomalous sample was collected 900 metres to the south of gold

mineralization within the recently acquired Sewell Patents (see news release dated June 1, 2018 ,

“GFG Acquires Strategic Claims Adjacent to its Pen Gold Project West of Timmins, Ontario ”)

confirming southward till dispersion and transport . Historic drilling of this occurrence returned

values up to 60.2 g/t Au over 1.3 metr es associated with pyrite- bearing quartz veins in sheared

mafic intrusive rocks.

At Chabot, in the southeast part of the Property, till samples define a 2 kilometre trend of anomalous

pristine gold grain counts. Historic drilling in the area returned only anomalous gold values (0.5

g/t over 7 metres) however some of the anomalous till samples are located further to the north

suggesting that the bedrock source has not yet been located and further data review and prospecting

is justified.

Given the success of the Phase 1 till program in confirming and highlighting new regional targets,

GFG has commenced a Phase 2 till program to increase sample density in the anomalous areas and

to expand regional coverage over other priority areas (Figure 1). A total of approximately 110

samples are planned for Phase 2, with the program to be completed early in Q4.

IP Program

In 2018, t wo target areas (Deerfoot & Reeves) were prioritized for ground -based IP surveying.

Surveying has been completed on the Deerfoot grid (100-metre line spacing; 45-line kilometres)

and results are expected in the next few weeks. Th is important layer of geophysical data will be

incorporated with the results from the surface sampling and historic drilling and will undergo a 3D

inversion to generate a series of depth slices to form the basis for refining drill targets to be tested

during the upcoming drill program. Surveying of the Reeves grid (200-metre line spacing; 68-line

kilometres) has commenced with expected completion in 6 weeks.

Outlook

For the remainder of 2018, the Company will focus on completing and analyzing the IP survey data

at the Reeves and Deerfoot targets, executing the P hase 2 till sampling program and drill test 5 to

7 targets with approximately 5,000 to 6,000 metres of drilling. Drilling is anticipated to begin in

3

early October and run through to December. Given the logistical setting of several of the priority

targets, the Company anticipates a follow-up Phase 2 winter drill program to be launched early in

Q1 2019.

Figure 1: Overview map of regional till sampling results and Phase 2 till sampling targets, click

here: https://s21.q4cdn.com/712049373/files/doc_news/2018/Figure-1-

Pen_Till_Results_Overview_Map_Sept-2018.JPG

Figure 2: Photomicrographs of the gold grains recovered from one of the samples with examples

of pristine, modified and re-shaped grains, click here:

https://s21.q4cdn.com/712049373/files/doc_news/2018/Figure-2-GoldGrains_Samp258-Sept-20-

2018.jpg

Qualified Persons

Brian Skanderbeg, P.Geo. and M.Sc., President and CEO, is the Qualified Person for the

information contained in this press release and is a Qualified Person within the meaning of National

Instrument 43-101. Mr. Skanderbeg has reviewed the sampling and QA/QC procedures and results

thereof as verification of the sampling data disclosed above and has approved the information

contained in this news release.

Sampling and Quality Control

Till Samples were collected from hand-dug pits by experienced samplers at depths up to 1 meter in

a grid pattern with nominal spacing of 500 by 1000m in areas of till cover. Geochemical samples

(~2 kilograms) were sieved to minus 230 mesh and analyzed for gold and multi -element using an

aqua regia digest ion and ICP -ES/MS finish by Bureau Veritas Commodities Canada Ltd . in

Vancouver in facilities accredited by the Standards Council of Canada. Gold grains were separated

from bulk till samples (~10 kilograms) at IOS Services Geoscientifiques Inc. using their ArtPhot

optical recognition methodology. Composition of separated gold grains were confirmed using a

Scanning Electron Microscope. Comparison of geochemical results with accepted values for

inserted certified reference materials confirms the accuracy of gold concentration results.

Till is a transported surficial media produced during active glaciation that is affected by subsequent

surficial process that may affect the gold content and lead to further transport. As such the

occurrence of a gold anomaly in till is not conclusive evidence of a mineral deposit existing within

the Property.

Sampling protocol, quality control and assurance measures and geochemical results related to

documented historic till, rock grab, and drill core samples have not been verified by the Qualified

Person. However, the grades and locations of these samples have been cross referenced with

available maps and reports and GFG believes them to be of reasonable accuracy.

About GFG Resources Inc.

GFG Resources is a North American precious metals exploration company headquartered in

Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada, whose shares trade on the TSX Venture Exchange (GFG) and

on the OTCQB (GFGSF). The Company owns 100% of two large and highly prospective gold

properties west of the prolific gold district of Timmins, Ontario, Canada. The Ontario properties

are comprised of the 4 7,500-hectare Pen Gold Project and the 20,000- hectare Dore Gold Project.

The consolidated land packages have the same geological setting that hosts most of the gold

deposits found in the Timmins Gold Camp which has produced over 70 million ounces of gold.

The Company also controls 100% of the Rattlesnake Hills Gold Project, a district scale gold

exploration project located approximately 100 kilometres southwest of Casper, Wyoming, U.S. The

4

geologic setting, alteration and mineralization seen in the Rattlesnake Hills are similar to other gold

deposits of the Rocky Mountain alkaline province whic h, collectively, have produced over 50

million ounces of gold.

For further information, please contact:

Brian Skanderbeg, President & CEO

Phone: (306) 931-0930

or

Marc Lepage, Vice President, Business Development

Phone: (306) 931-0930

Email: [email protected]

Website: www.gfgresources.com

CAUTION REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION

All statements, other than statements of historical fact, contained in this news release constitute “forward-looking information” within

the meaning of applicable Canadian securities laws and “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the United States Private

Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (referred to herein as “forward-looking statements”). Forward-looking statements include, but

are not limited to, the future price of gold, success of exploration activities and metallurgical test work, permitting time lines, currency

exchange rate fluctuations, requirements for additional capital, government regulation of exploration work, environmental ris ks,

unanticipated reclamation expenses, title disputes or claims and limitations on insurance cov erage. Generally, these forward -looking

statements can be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as “plans”, “expects” or “does not expect”, “is expected”,

“budget”, “scheduled”, “estimates”, “forecasts”, “intends”, “anticipates” or “do es not anticipate” or “believes”, or the negative

connotation thereof or variations of such words and phrases or state that certain actions, events or results, “may”, “could”, “would”,

“will”, “might” or “will be taken”, “occur” or “be achieved” or the negative connotation thereof.

All forward -looking statements are based on various assumptions, including, without limitation, the expectations and beliefs of

management, the assumed long-term price of gold, that the Company will receive required permits and access to surface rights, that the

Company can access financing, appropriate equipment and sufficient labour, and that the political environment within Canada a nd the

United States will continue to support the development of mining projects in Canada and the United States. In addition, the similarity

or proximity of other gold deposits to the Rattlesnake Hill Gold Project, the Pen Gold Project and the Dore Gold Project is not necessary

indicative of the geological setting, alteration and mineralization o f the Rattlesnake Hills Gold Project, the Pen Gold Project and the

Dore Gold Project.

Forward-looking statements are subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause the actual results,

level of activity, performance or achievements of GFG to be materially different from those expressed or implied by such forward -

looking statements, including but not limited to: actual results of current exploration activities; environmental risks; future prices of

gold; operating risks; accidents, labour issues and other risks of the mining industry; delays in obtaining government approvals or

financing; and other risks and uncertainties. These risks and uncertainties are not, and should not be construed as being, exhaustive.

Although GFG has attempted to identify important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those contained i n

forward-looking statements, there may be other factors that cause results not to be as anticipated, estimated or intended. There can be

no assurance that such statements will prove to be accurate, as actual results and future events could differ materially from those

anticipated in such statements. In addition, forward -looking statements are provided solely for the purpose of prov iding information

about management’s current expectations and plans and allowing investors and others to get a better understanding of our oper ating

environment. Accordingly, readers should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements.

Forward-looking statements in this news release are made as of the date hereof and GFG assumes no obligation to update any forward-

looking statements, except as required by applicable laws.