Saturday, September 26, 2026
MiningNewsTerminal
Saturday, September 26, 2026 Admin

GFG.V ·

GFG Provides Exploration Update and Expands High-Grade Gold at Montclerg, East of the Prolific Timmins Gold District

Drill Results Exploration Programs

Media Release

TSX.V: GFG | OTCQB: GFGSF

GFG Provides Exploration Update and Expands High-Grade

Gold at Montclerg, East of the Prolific Timmins Gold District

KEY HIGHLIGHTS:

• 2021 Step-out drilling on the MC East returned high-grade gold intercepts 8.26 grams

of gold per tonne (“g/t Au”) over 1.0 metres (“m”) and 6.63 g/t Au over 1.5 m from hole

MTC-21-012

• Expands high-grade gold mineralization, from hole MTC-21-05 (4.82 g/t Au over 26.0

m) and MTC-21-06 (8.34 g/t Au over 7.5 m) within the MC Central target, 100 m to the

east into the MC East target

• Successfully completed the Phase 1 2022 drill program with 17 holes totalling 4,200 m,

which confirmed regional scale gold mineralization

• 2022 Phase 1 infill and step -out drilling at the Montclerg Gold Project intercept ed

broad zones of sulphidation, quartz veining and alteration similar to holes MTC-21-05

and -06

April 26 , 2022, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada: GFG Resources Inc. (TSXV: GFG )

(OTCQB: GFGSF) (“GFG” or the “Company”) reports encouraging final assay results from its

2021 drill program and that it has complete d the Phase 1, 4, 200 m, 2022 drill program at the

Montclerg Gold Project (the “Project” and/or “Montclerg”), located 48 kilometres (“km”) east of

the prolific Timmins Gold District in Ontario, Canada (See Figure 1). In 2022, GFG plans to drill

at least 10,000 m, in three phases, at Montclerg in parallel with a significant regional exploration

program at its Goldarm and Pen gold properties , which are also located in the Timmins Gold

District.

Today’s assay results summarize the inaugural drill program at Montclerg which was completed in

the fourth quarter of 2021. The assay results from the inaugural drill program of 14 holes have

successfully returned both high-grade and bulk tonnage intercepts from the MC Central and MC

East target (See Table 1 and Figures 1 - 3), demonstrating gold mineralization over a strike length

of 400 m and to depths of more than 300 m.

The 2022 Phase 1 drill program was designed to confirm continuity within the MC Central target,

evaluate and expand the gold system via larger step-out holes focused over a strike length of 1 km

and to complete an initial test of the CX (Canamax) target. The Company expects to report assay

results from the 2022 drilling over the coming months and is planning additional follow-up holes

that prioritize both the MC and CX trends and additional regional targets that have little to no

drilling historically.

Brian Skanderbeg, President and CEO of GFG, stated, “GFG acquired the Montclerg property and

subsequently consolidated the regional-scale Goldarm Property with a view that there is very high

prospectivity, low exploration maturity due to extensive till cover; reflecting excellent potential to

yield relevant gold discoveries. Drilling to date has demonstrated both bulk tonnage and high-grade

potential at Montclerg , and in Phase 1 2022 drilling, we are now seeing the system expand

materially in step-out holes to the east and west. Based on these positive results, we anticipate

expanding the pace of drilling and exploration programs.”

2

Technical Commentary from Phase 1 2021 Drilling

In the fourth quarter of 2021, the Company drilled a total of 3,210 m from 14 holes in its inaugural

Phase 1 drill program (See Table 1 and Figures 2-3). The 14 holes varied in length from 125 to

400 m and tested a strike length of over 500 m. The program systematically tested the strike and

dip-extensions of MC Central and MC East and the prospective MC Footwall zone.

Interpretation by GFG of the historic drilling at Montclerg completed by previous operators

outlined multiple zones of broad low-grade gold mineralization hosted within felsic volcanic and

associated porphyry as well as indications of several higher-grade intervals hosted in footwall mafic

volcanic hosted stratigraphy. The majority of this drilling was completed prior to 1967, was only

intermittently sampled and generally drilled oblique to the interpreted trend. Based on 2021 drilling

by GFG, an Upper and Lower Main Zone and an Upper and several Lower Footwall Zones are now

modelled, in addition to multiple other gold intercepts that have not been assigned to a zone to date.

From these recent results and new modelling, a much larger gold system is present than previously

believed and remains open in most directions.

The Upper Main Zone occurs in massive to locally flow-banded and/or fragmental rhyolite that is

moderately to intensely sericite and silica altered. Extensional quartz veins occur throughout the

interval and typically comprise 5 to 25% of the rock. Pyrite and arsenopyrite occur throughout the

altered host rock as fine -grained disseminations with contents ranging from trace amounts up to

10% at vein margins. True widths are interpreted to vary between 15 and 40 m with grades ranging

from 0.67 to 2.86 g/t Au. The Upper Main Z one has been modelled over a strike length of

approximately 250 m within the MC Central target area and remains open to west and east whe re

it may link to mineralization intercepted in holes MTC-22-012 and -013.

The Lower Main Zone occurs in massive, brecciated and tuffaceous rhyolite that is moderately to

intensely sericite, silica and chlorite altered. Similar to the U pper Main Zone, extensional quartz

veins are typically centimeter-scale with vein densities ranging from less than 1% and up to 30%

of the rock. Finely disseminated pyrite and arsenopyrite occur throughout the zone with abundances

ranging from trace amounts up to 5%. A higher-grade core to the Lower Main Zone is marked by

an increase in vein density and sulphide. True widths are interpreted to vary between 10 and 40 m

with grades ranging from 0.78 to 1.24 g/t Au. The Lower Main Z one has been modelled over a

strike length of approximately 250 m within the MC Central target area and remains open to west

and east where it may link to mineralization intercepted in holes MTC-22-012 and -013.

The Upper Footwall Zone hosts significantly higher gold grades (Hole MTC-21-005: 4.82 g/t Au

over 26.0 m ) and sulphide content and is focused along the felsic volcanic and mafic volcanic

contact at depths of between 65 and 100 m. It is characterized by intense sericite, carbonate and

silica alteration, moderate quartz veining from 1 to 10%, and up to 25% locally of disseminated

pyrite and arsenopyrite. True widths are interpreted to vary between 7 and 26 m with grades ranging

from 2.42 to 8.35 g/t Au. Higher grade sub-zones are present as stacked lenses, ranging from 2 to

5 m in thickness with grades in the 10 to 15 g/t Au range. The Upper Footwall Z one has been

modelled over a strike length of approximately 200 m within the MC C entral target area and

remains open along strike to the west and east as well as up-dip.

Modelling also reveals the presence of multiple other footwall zones moving to depth. Historic and

recent drilling has outlined at least three other zones localized along the felsic volcanic and mafic

volcanic contact. These share characteristics to the Upper Footwall Zone although have only been

tested with widely spaced holes to date , insufficient to assess strike continuity . Grades generally

3

range from 1.20 to 1.75 g/t Au and widths from 6 to 15 m, with higher grade sub-intervals ranging

from 1 to 2.5 m in thickness with grades in the 5 to 12 g/t Au range.

Table 1: Final Assay Results from 2021 Drilling at the Montclerg Gold Project

Hole ID From (m) To (m) Length (m) Au g/t Zone

MTC-21-0011 62.5 90.0 27.5 1.56 Upper Main

incl. 63.5 66.0 2.5 8.42

incl. 65.4 66.0 0.6 26.90

incl. 71.5 74.0 2.5 4.30

and 126.0 166.5 40.5 0.78 Lower Main

incl. 130.8 138.0 7.3 2.20

MTC-21-0021 357.2 363.5 6.3 1.75 Lower Footwall

incl. 359.7 362.0 2.3 4.13

MTC-21-0031 abandoned hole

MTC-21-0041 39.8 64.0 24.2 0.73 Upper Main

and 75.7 86.1 10.4 1.24 Lower Main

incl. 81.0 85.1 4.1 2.37

and 230.5 246.0 15.5 1.23 Lower Footwall

incl. 241.7 245.0 3.3 3.09

MTC-21-0051 86.0 112.0 26.0 4.82 Upper Footwall

incl. 94.3 96.1 1.8 15.96

and 103.8 109.3 5.5 12.32

and 118.9 120.6 1.7 11.29

MTC-21-0061 20.8 28.8 8.0 0.82 Upper Main

and 60.5 68.3 7.8 0.99

and 85.4 88.5 3.1 2.03

and 98.3 105.8 7.5 8.34 Upper Footwall

incl. 98.3 101.0 2.7 15.04

MTC-21-0071 65.4 95.6 31.1 1.40 Upper Main

and 108.0 131.0 23.0 1.11 Lower Main

MTC-21-008 104.7 110.0 5.3 1.11 Upper Main

and 119.0 125.5 6.5 0.75

and 336.5 344.0 7.5 1.22 Lower Footwall

incl. 336.5 338.3 1.8 3.29

MTC-21-0091 45.0 60.00 15.0 1.23 Upper Main

MTC-21-0101 79.5 106.5 27.0 1.05 Upper Main

incl. 89.6 100.5 10.9 1.84

and 135.8 150.0 14.2 0.77 Upper Footwall

and 177.5 180.6 3.1 3.52

MTC-21-011 no significant assays

MTC-21-012 47.5 59.5 12.0 0.29

To be determined and 98.5 99.5 1.0 8.26

and 103.6 106.5 2.9 3.80

incl. 105.0 106.5 1.5 6.63

MTC-21-013 53.6 68.2 14.6 0.40

To be determined and 78.0 82.5 4.5 1.19

06-Mat-08-21A

(extension)

no significant assays

1 Previously released

4

*Drill intercepts are presented using a 0.20 g/t Au cut-off and as drilled length. Composites include internal dilution of

up to 3 m at grades less than 0.2 g/t Au. True width is estimated to be 50 to 90% of drilled length.

Phase 1 2022 Drill Program

The Company has completed 17 holes in its Phase 1 2022 drill program at Montclerg. This 4,200

m drill program focused on infill and step-out holes over a one km segment of the MC Central, MC

West and MC East targets (See Figure 2), testing for extensions of the Upper and Lower Main

Zones, the high-grade Upper and Lower Footwall zones and the CX target.

Drill core logging from numerous holes within the MC Central target returned strong alteration,

sulphidation and quartz veining similar to that previously documented for these zones infilling and

extending the Upper Footwall Zone to the east and up-dip. Furthermore, drill core from the furthest

eastern step -out hole, MTC-22-024, returned several zones of broad sulphidation, carbonate

alteration and quartz veining over intervals of up to 15 m; internally hosting zones of intense

sulphidation and veining on the scale of 2 to 5 m. Mineralized and veined porphyry dyking was

also intercepted associated with the ultramafic contact at depth. These holes combined with

encouraging step-outs holes to the west are demonstrating the kilometre scale extent of the gold

system.

Initial drilling also tested the CX target where historic drilling has identified gold mineralization in

ultramafic (14.30 g/t Au over 1.0 m and 16.50 g/t Au over 1.0 m), felsic porphyry and sedimentary

rock units with quartz-carbonate veining and alteration that is analogous to the Clavos gold deposit

located 7.5 km to the west. Two drill holes were completed on the target returning multiple intervals

of mineralized porphyry dyking and highly strained, sericite-altered, veined and sulphized

ultramafic host stratigraphy.

Outlook

In 2022, the Company plans to complete at least 10,000 m of drilling in three phases on its Timmins

portfolio. In addition to the 2022 drill programs, GFG will continue additional regional exploration

activities and drill target development across the Goldarm Property and the Pen Gold Project. The

regional programs will include airborne geophysics, sonic and conventional till sampling programs

and data compilation. Meanwhile, assay results are pending for the 17 holes from the Phase 1 2022

drill program and the Company expects to report these results in the coming months.

Following the successful initial test work that exceeded recovery rate expectations at the

Rattlesnake Hills Gold Project (“RSH Project”) (See news release dated March 15, 2022 ), the

Company’s option partner, Group 11 Technologies Inc. (“Group 11”) , will proceed to conduct

further in-situ recovery analys es and data review . The technical review will further assess the

amenability and recovery rates for extracting gold using an eco-friendly water-based solution. Next

steps to advance the RSH Project to include additional laboratory tests, additional drill tests and

related project permitting. At present, the Company has received notice from Group 11 to extend

the term of Stage 1 of the Option Agreement to complete additional studies that could not be

completed due to external factors. Discussion is on-going and the Company will provide a formal

update once completed.

5

Figure 1: Regional Map of GFG Gold Projects in the Timmins Gold District

Figure 2: Montclerg Gold Project Plan View Map

6

Figure 3: Montclerg Gold Project - Cross Section Map C

About the Montclerg Gold Project

The Montclerg Gold Project is part of the recently consolidated Goldarm Property which consists

of more than 15,000 hectares and covers over 30 km of the prospective Pipestone and North

Pipestone deformation zones which hosts multiple gold deposits and mines in one of the most

prolific gold districts in the world. The Project is strategically located east of the prolific Timmins

Gold Camp and is surrounded by significant infrastructure (See Figure 1). The Project consists of

patented and unpatented mining claims that cover 10 km of the highly prospective Pipestone

Deformation Zone.

About GFG Resources Inc.

GFG is a North American precious metals exploration company focused on district scale gold

projects in tier one mining jurisdictions, Ontario and Wyoming. In Ontario, the Company operates

three gold projects, each large and highly prospective gold properti es within the prolific gold

district of Timmins, Ontario, Canada. The projects have similar geological settings that host most

of the gold deposits found in the Timmins Gold Camp which have produced over 70 million ounces

of gold. The Company also owns 100% of the Rattlesnake Hills Gold Project, a district scale gold

exploration project located approximately 100 k m southwest of Casper, Wyoming, U.S. In

Wyoming, the Company has partnered with Group 11 through an option and earn-in agreement to

advance the Company’s Rattlesnake Hills Gold Project with a technology that could revolutionize

the gold mining industry.

All scientific and technical information contained in this press release has been prepared under the

supervision of Brian Skanderbeg, P.Geo. President, CEO and Director of GFG, a qualified person

within the meaning of National Instrument 43-101.

7

Drill intercepts are historical and presented u sing a 0.20 g/t Au cut -off and as drilled

length. Composites include internal dilution of up to 3 m at grades less than 0.2 g/t Au. True width

is estimated to be 50 to 90% of drilled length.

Sampling protocols, quality control and assurance measures and geochemical results related to

historic drill core samples quoted in this news release have not been verified by the Qualified Person

and therefore must be regarded as estimates.

For further information, please contact:

Brian Skanderbeg, President & CEO

Phone: (306) 931-0930

or

Marc Lepage, Vice President, Business Development

Phone: (306) 931-0930

Email: [email protected]

Website: www.gfgresources.com

Stay Connected with Us

Twitter: @GFGResources

LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/gfgresources/

Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/GFGResourcesInc/

CAUTION REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION

All statements, other than statements of historical fact, contained in this news release constitute “forward -looking information” within

the meaning of applicable Canadian securities laws and “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the United States Private

Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (referred to herein as “forward-looking statements”). Forward-looking statements include, but

are not limited to, the Company’s future exploration plans with respect to its property interests and the ti ming thereof, the prospective

nature of the projects, future price of gold, success of exploration activities and metallurgical test work, permitting time lines, currency

exchange rate fluctuations, requirements for additional capital, government regulatio n of exploration work, environmental risks,

unanticipated reclamation expenses, title disputes or claims and limitations on insurance coverage. Generally, these forward -looking

statements can be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as “plans”, “expects” or “does not expect”, “is expected”,

“budget”, “scheduled”, “estimates”, “forecasts”, “intends”, “anticipates” or “does not anticipate” or “believes”, or the negative

connotation thereof or variations of such words and phrases or state t hat certain actions, events or results, “may”, “could”, “would”,

“will”, “might” or “will be taken”, “occur” or “be achieved” or the negative connotation thereof.

All forward -looking statements are based on various assumptions, including, without limita tion, the expectations and beliefs of

management, the assumed long-term price of gold, that the Company will receive required permits and access to surface rights, that the

Company can access financing, appropriate equipment and sufficient labour, and that the political environment within Canada and the

United States will continue to support the development of mining projects in Canada and the United States. In addition, the similarity or

proximity of other gold deposits to the Company’s projects is not nec essary indicative of the geological setting, alteration and

mineralization of the Rattlesnake Hills Gold Project, the Goldarm Property, the Pen Gold Project and the Dore Gold Project.

Forward-looking statements are subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause the actual results,

level of activity, performance or achievements of GFG to be materially different from those expressed or implied by such forw ard-

looking statements, including but not limited to: actual results of current exploration activities; environmental risks; future prices of

gold; operating risks; accidents, labour issues and other risks of the mining industry; availability of capital, delays in obtaining

government approvals or financing; and other risks and uncertainties. These risks and uncertainties are not, and should not be construed

as being, exhaustive.

Although GFG has attempted to identify important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those cont ained in

forward-looking statements, there may be other factors that cause results not to be as anticipated, estimated or intended. There can be

no assurance that such statements will prove to be accurate, as actual results and future events could differ materially from those

anticipated in such statements. In addition, forward -looking statements are provided solely for the purpose of providing information

about management’s current expectations and plans and allowing investors and others to get a better understanding of o ur operating

environment. Accordingly, readers should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements.

Forward-looking statements in this news release are made as of the date hereof and GFG assumes no obligation to update any forward-

looking statements, except as required by applicable laws.