Saturday, September 26, 2026
MiningNewsTerminal
Saturday, September 26, 2026 Admin

FWZ.V ·

Fireweed Metals Announces Mineral Resources for the Mactung Project: the Largest High-Grade Tungsten Deposit in the World*

Corporate Updates

1

NEWS RELEASE

June 13, 2023 TSXV: FWZ

OTCQB: FWEDF

FSE:20F

Fireweed Metals Announces Mineral Resources for the Mactung Project:

the Largest High-Grade Tungsten Deposit in the World*

• Mactung is the world’s largest high-grade deposit of the critical mineral tungsten*.

• Mineral resources total 41.5 Mt Indicated Resource at 0.73% WO3 and 12.2 Mt Inferred

Resource at 0.59% WO3.

• In addition, an Exploration Target is estimated at 2.5 Mt to 3.5 Mt at a grade between 0.4%

and 0.6% WO3, within the mining shapes that constrain the Mineral Resource.

• The resource estimate includes estimates for the critical mineral copper in addition to gold

and metallurgical test work is underway to determine recoveries of these by -product

metals.

• Mactung is contiguous with Fireweed’s Macmillan Pass zinc-lead-silver project, accessible

by the North Canol Road, and provides potential for future project synergies.

Vancouver, British Columbia: FIREWEED METALS CORP. (“Fireweed” or the “Company”)

(TSXV: FWZ; OTCQB: FWEDF) is pleased to announce a new mineral resource estimate for its

Mactung Project located in Yukon and Northwest Territories, Canada (Map 1) , within the

Traditional Territories of the Kaska Dena Nation and First Nation of Na-Cho Nyäk Dun, and the

Sahtú Settlement Area.

CEO Statement

Brandon Macdonald, CEO, stated “In one year we have gone from signing an initial Letter of Intent

to a Definitive Asset Purchase Agreement to the publication of new mineral resource for Mactung.

We have taken the historic resource through a process involving relogging, resampling, and a

rigorous, modern estimation methodology, and confirmed an impressive and world-class tungsten

resource at Mactung*. This not only reaffirms Mactung's unmatched combination of grade and

scale but establishes it as a truly strategic critical minerals project for the West with the

underground resource alone able to supply much of North America’s expected demand for

decades. Fireweed is looking forward to collaborating with federal, territorial , and Indigenous

governments to advance Mactung through the permitting and detailed engineering stages of this

unique project.”

2

Table 1: Mineral Resource Statement(1,2,3,4) for the Mactung Project.

Classification Cut-off Tonnage WO3 Contained

Grade (tonnes) Grade WO3

WO3 (%) (%) (mtu5)

Indicated (underground) 0.50 12,168,000 1.05 12,789,000

Indicated (open pit) 0.25 29,319,000 0.59 17,367,000

Total Indicated (OP+UG) 0.25/0.50 41,487,000 0.73 30,156,000

Inferred(4) (underground) 0.50 2,817,000 0.73 2,066,000

Inferred(4) (open pit) 0.25 9,430,000 0.55 5,139,000

Total Inferred(4) (OP+UG) 0.25/0.50 12,247,000 0.59 7,205,000

For table footnotes 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 see page 9.

Mineral Resource Estimate

The current Mineral Resource at Mactung ranks it the largest high-grade tungsten resource in the

world and it is a clear statistical outlier in terms of grade and contained metal*. It is a tungsten

skarn deposit associated with Tombstone-Tungsten suite granitic intrusions that are more broadly

linked to a variety of gold and tungsten deposits across Yukon-Northwest Territories. The

Mactung deposit is sub -divided into an upper and lower zone that both occur at surface and

extend to depths of approximately 400 m below surface.

A very high-grade portion of the resource was constrained by underground mining volumes at a

0.5% WO3 cut-off grade, within the gently to moderately dipping, roughly tabular, lower zone that

is approximately 20-30 m thick, extending for a kilometre in strike and up to 380 m down-dip.

In the upper zone, a high-grade open pit resource was constrained by a conceptual pit shell at a

0.25% WO3 cut-off grade.

The Mineral Resource estimate considers and employs reasonable prospects for eventual

economic extraction, is applied within classification domains that are continuous, and uses a

classification scheme involving a drill spacing that was based on drill-spacing studies. Additional

bulk density and assay data were collected during an extensive Fireweed campaign of re-

sampling historic drill core in late 2022 and early 2023, and a new geological interpretation of the

deposit has been made. These factors have resulted in a robust estimate of the Mineral Inventory

at Mactung, providing a solid foundation for future mine development studies.

Copper and gold by-product reporting

Copper and gold were estimated as by -product metals for underground constrained resources

only (Table 2). No metallurgical test work has been conducted to assess the recovery of copper

or gold at Mactung. Based on historic al production of small quantities of gold and of copper

concentrate from the geologically similar Cantung mine †, it has been reasonably assumed that

gravity separation and a copper circuit could be incorporated into the flowsheet to recover a

portion of the gold and copper in the Current Mineral Resource to satisfy the reasonable prospects

of eventual economic extraction. Fireweed and its consultants are currently completing

metallurgical test programs to validate the recovery of tungsten and assess the recovery of gold

and copper at Mactung. Grades of copper and gold were considered too low to include within the

Mineral Resource Statement for open-pit constrained resources.

3

Table 2: Copper and gold by-product metals for underground mineral resources subdivided by

geological unit(1,2,3,4)

Unit

Cut-off

WO3

(%)

Tonnage

(tonnes)

Grade

WO3

(%)

Contained

WO3 (mtu5)

Copper

(%)

Contained

Copper

(lbs)

Gold

(g/t)

Contained

Gold (troy

oz)

Indicated

20 0.50 3,710,000 0.83 3,076,000 0.010 834,000 0.034 4,000

21 0.50 1,845,000 1.21 2,229,000 0.036 1,448,000 0.060 4,000

22 0.50 6,496,000 1.13 7,366,000 0.093 13,261,000 0.107 22,000

23 0.50 55,000 1.28 70,000 0.092 111,000 0.205 0

3D 0.50 62,000 0.78 48,000 0.011 15,000 0.018 0

Total 0.50 12,168,000 1.05 12,789,000 0.058 15,666,000 0.078 30,000

Inferred

21 0.50 932,000 0.83 775,000 0.014 288,000 0.023 1000

22 0.50 638,000 0.66 420,000 0.047 654,000 0.016 0

23 0.50 6,000 0.84 5,000 0.108 14,000 0.068 0

3D 0.50 1,241,000 0.70 866,000 0.009 252,000 0.013 1000

Total 0.50 2,817,000 0.73 2,066,000 0.020 1,208,000 0.017 2,000

For table footnotes 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 see page 9.

Sensitivity to Cut-Off Grade

A range of cut-off grades were applied to the estimate within the mining volumes established for

open-pit and underground resources (Tables 4 and 5).

Table 3: Sensitivity to Underground Cut-Off Grade (Current Resource Highlighted) (2,4)

Underground

Cut-off Grade

(WO3%)

Tonnage (tonnes) WO3 grade

(%)

Copper

grade (%)

Gold

grade (g/t)

Indicated

0.40 12,885,000 1.02 0.074 0.057

0.45 12,548,000 1.03 0.076 0.058

0.50 12,168,000 1.05 0.078 0.058

0.55 11,702,000 1.07 0.080 0.059

0.60 10,979,000 1.11 0.083 0.061

Inferred

0.40 3,231,000 0.70 0.016 0.019

0.45 3,062,000 0.71 0.016 0.019

0.50 2,817,000 0.73 0.017 0.019

0.55 2,521,000 0.76 0.018 0.020

0.60 2,042,000 0.80 0.019 0.020

For table footnotes 2, and 4 see page 9.

4

Table 4: Sensitivity to Open-pit Cut-Off Grade (Current Resource Highlighted) (2,4)

Open-pit

Cutoff Grade

(WO3%)

Tonnage

(tonnes)

WO3

grade

(%)

Indicated

0.15 36,452,000 0.51

0.20 32,668,000 0.55

0.25 29,319,000 0.59

0.30 26,207,000 0.63

0.35 23,395,000 0.67

Inferred

0.15 11,335,000 0.49

0.20 10,143,000 0.52

0.25 9,430,000 0.55

0.30 8,699,000 0.57

0.35 7,539,000 0.61

For table footnotes 2, and 4 see page 9.

Cut-Off Grade and Prospects for Eventual Economic Extraction

The cut-off grades of 0.5% WO3 for underground mining and 0.25% WO3 for open-pit mining were

selected based on a tungsten concentrate price assumption of approximately US D$240/mtu,

supported by updated estimates from trading companies that specialize in tungsten, and

preliminary estimates of operating costs (Table 5).

Reasonable prospects for eventual economic extraction of the mineral resources, as required by

NI43-101, were demonstrated by developing underground constraining volumes, conceptual pit

shells using a Lerchs -Grossman algorithm and input parameters derived from preliminary cost

estimates (see Map 2 and Cross -Sections). Only mineral resources above these cut-offs and

within the mineral resource-limiting underground constraining volumes and pits are reported;

mineralization falling below this cut- off grade or outside the resource-limiting volumes or pits is

not reported, irrespective of the grade. Potential underground resources are constrained initially

to only the lower zone ( 2B unit) and a portion of the upper zone (3D unit) below the pit shell

leaving a crown pillar. The potential open-pit resource was optimized for only the upper zone (3C,

3D, 3E, 3F, 3G and 3H units). Gold and copper are considered by-products and were not utilized

in cut-off grades, pit optimizations , underground constraints , or for establishing reasonable

prospects of eventual economic extraction. Sensitivity to cut-off grade is reported in Tables 3 and

4 above.

5

Table 5: WO3 Cut-off Grade Calculation Assumptions

Input Parameters Unit Value Notes

OP Mining Cost – Resource or Waste US$/tonne mined 3.00

UG Mining Cost – Resource US$/tonne mined 38.00 Incl. maintenance and surface

Processing Cost US$/tonne milled 32.00

G&A and Site Services Cost US$/tonne milled 20.00

WO3 Recovery % 82

Royalties % 2 Assumes buy-down from 4%

Pit Slopes degrees 50

WO3 Concentrate Selling Price US$/mtu con 240.00

Mining dilution % 0

Mining recovery % 100

Assumptions used to derive the cut-off grades and define the resource-limiting pits are estimated

in order to meet the NI43-101 requirement for mineral resource estimates to demonstrate

“reasonable prospects for eventual economic extraction”.

Updated Technical Report

The details of the updated mineral resource estimate for Mactung will be provided in a Technical

Report compliant with NI43-101 to be filed on www.sedar.com in the next 45 days.

2023 Mineral Resource Estimate Methodology

The mineral resource estimate for Mactung was completed by Garth Kirkham, P.Geo., of Kirkham

Geosystems Ltd. using commercial mine-modeling and geostatistical software and adhering to

Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum (CIM) Estimation of Mineral Resources

and Mineral Reserves Best Practice G uidelines (adopted by CIM council November 29, 2019) .

The deposit was segregated into multiple estimation domains based on a re vised geological

model. The lower zone is hosted by Unit 2B (see Cross Sections), and this is subdivided into four

spatial zones (20, 21, 22, and 23). The upper zone is hosted by Units 3C, 3D, 3E, 3F, 3G, and

3H (see Cross Sections). Grades of WO3, copper and gold were estimated using ordinary kriging

interpolation of capped composites in multiple estimation passes. Search ellipse orientation and

anisotropy were based on structural and geological controls and/or variogram models with first

pass major axis search distances generally 100 m, and subsequent pass distances generally 60

m.

Mineral Resources are classified under the categories of Measured, Indicated and Inferred

according to CIM Definition Standards for Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves (Adopted by

CIM council May 19, 2014) . Mineral resource classification for WO 3 was based primarily on an

analysis of viability and risk, drillhole spacing and on continuity of mineralization. In ferred and

Indicated resources were defined as using increasing thresholds of continuity, confidence, and

data density . No Measured resources were defined. Final resource classification shells were

manually constructed using interpreted solids. Gold and copper are not classified separately and

are reported as by -products based on WO3 classification. A full description of the modeling

methodologies for each deposit will be included in a Technical Report scheduled for release within

45 days.

6

Mactung Exploration Potential

It is estimated that there is the potential for an Exploration Target at Mactung of between 2.5 and

3.5 Mt at a grade of between 0.4 and 0.6% WO 3 in addition to the current Mineral Resources

disclosed in this news release. The Exploration Target is within the current geological model,

supported by drilling and surface mapping. The Exploration Target includes material located

beyond the boundaries of the Inferred and Indicated resource classification but is located within

the boundaries of the open-pit shell and underground volumes used to constrain the current

Mineral Resource.

The Exploration Target is conceptual in nature and requires additional drilling to test the geological

model, grade continuity , and extent of mineralization. It is uncertain if additional drilling will

validate the geological potential or fulfill the mining and economic criteria necessary to establish

reasonable prospects of eventual economic extraction to lead to the classification of the

Exploration Target as Mineral Resources.

Data Validation and QA/QC

Fireweed and its consultants conducted extensive statistical analyses to assess the quality of the

pre-Fireweed legacy drill hole data in preparation for this mineral resource estimate. The recent

re-assaying program has generally shown the data to be of good quality, but use of historical data

still presents certain risks in mineral resource estimation due to historical drilling, surveying,

sampling, and assaying methodologies. Data from a selection of assay intervals were checked

from each year of historical drilling against the original assay certificate or logs, representing 6%

of all samples, and was found to be free of errors with minor exceptions.

Assay standards, blanks and duplicates were monitored in Fireweed’s resampling program and

were found to be within acceptable levels of precision and accuracy. Surface assay samples were

taken by Garth Kirkham in 2022 and confirm the presence of tungsten in the locations tested. The

presence of UV-fluorescent scheelite was confirmed visually in outcrop and in core by the use of

a blacklight. A subset of historic al collar locations were surveyed by Fireweed personnel using

differential GPS and historical drillpad locations were further validated against a Digital Elevation

Model derived from a 2022 airborne LiDAR survey with good accuracy.

Mactung Location & History

Mactung straddles the Yukon and Northwest Territories border and is located 13 km north of

Fireweed’s Macmillan Pass Project camp and the government-maintained Macmillan Pass airstrip

(Map 1). It can also be accessed via the North Canol Road about 230 km from the town of Ross

River, Yukon.

Mactung was discovered and staked in 1962 by an Amax company geologist. Extensive drilling,

metallurgical testing, and multiple historical resource estimates were completed over the next

twenty years. The property changed ownership several times and was subsequently acquired by

North American Tungsten Corporation (“NATC”) in 1997. In 2007 NATC published updated

mineral resources (see Table 2) and in 2009 published a positive feasibility study (available at

www.sedar.com under the NATC profile). The Yukon Environmental and Socio-economic

Assessment Board (“YESAB”) Executive Council issued its Referral Report and New

Recommendation for Project Number 2008-0304 for the Mactung Mine Project in June 2014.

Following a recommendation to Decision Bodies that the Project be allowed to proceed to

7

licensing without review, subject to specific terms and conditions, Decision Documents were

issued by the Yukon Government and Federal Government on September 3, 2014 and

August 1, 2014, respectively.

Subsequently, in June 2015, NATC filed for and was granted creditor protection mainly related to

operation of their Cantung mine located to the south. The Government of Northwest Territories

(“GNWT”) purchased the Mactung Project for $4.5 mill ion in 2015, and subsequently obtained a

Class 4 Mining Land Use Approval in 2020 for mineral exploration activities in the Yukon .

Fireweed recently signed a definitive Asset Purchase Agreement for the Mactung Project with the

GNWT (see Fireweed news release dated February 28, 2023 for details).

Mactung Geology & Mineralization

Mactung is a tungsten skarn deposit located on the eastern margin of the Selwyn basin in the

Canadian Cordillera’s Tombstone-Tungsten Belt (“TTB”). The mid-Cretaceous TTB spans Alaska,

Yukon, and Northwest Territories , and hosts many other significant mineral deposits. The

Mactung deposit is associated with Tungsten Suite intrusions that intruded late Precambrian to

Palaeozoic age, variably metamorphosed clastic and interbedded carbonate rocks of the Selwyn

Basin. The tungsten mineralization at Mactung i s comprised mostly of scheelite (CaWO4) and is

dominated by calcic mineral assemblages associated with abundant pyrrhotite that developed

within permeable limestone units of the Cambrian-Ordovician host rocks near a granite intrusion

contact.

About Tungsten

Tungsten is the hardest metal with the highest melting point, which makes it an important and

often essential metal for use in the automotive, tec hnology, energy, military, and manufacturing

industries. World tungsten production is dominated by China and there is currently limited

Western tungsten production, which has led tungsten to be listed as a critical mineral by many

governments, including Canada. The Canadian government has developed several initiatives to

support and advance the exploration and mining of critical minerals in Canada, including zinc and

tungsten.

Sustainability Context

Fireweed respectfully acknowledges that the Mactung Project is located within the T raditional

Territories of the Kaska Dena Nation and First Nation of Na-Cho Nyäk Dun, and the Sahtú

Settlement Area. For the benefit of present and future generations, Fireweed will conduct mineral

development activities in a sustainable manner by working collaboratively with Indigenous groups

and local communities, establishing a respectful and safe working environment, achieving a high

standard of environmental stewardship, and undertaking studies and implementing measures to

address local interests and issues.

Qualified Person Statement

Jack Milton, Ph.D., P.Geo. (BC), Fireweed’s VP Geology , and a Qualified Person as defined

under Canadian National Instrument 43-101, approved the technical information in this news

release except for information related to the Mactung mineral resource estimates. The re-

assaying activities at Mactung carried out by Fireweed were undertaken under the supervision of

Jack Milton.

8

Garth Kirkham, P.Geo., of Kirkham Geosystems Ltd. is the Qualified Person, as defined in

National Instrument 43-101, is responsible for the Mactung mineral resource estimate and directly

related information as reported herein. He has read and approved the relevant technical portions

of this news release related to the mineral resource estimates for which he is responsible.

About Fireweed Metals Corp. (TSXV: FWZ; OTCQB: FW EDF; FSE:20F): Fireweed is a public

mineral exploration company on the leading edge of Critical Minerals project development.

Fireweed is well-funded, with a current cash position of over C$30,000,000 and is well-positioned

to carry out a large 2023 exploration program . The Company has three projects located in

Canada:

• Macmillan Pass Project (Zinc-Lead-Silver): Fireweed owns 100% of the district-scale

940 km2 Macmillan Pass project in Yukon, Canada, which is host to one of the largest

undeveloped zinc resources in the world* where the Tom and Jason zinc -lead-silver

deposits have current Mineral Resources 1 (11.21 Mt Indicated Resource at 6.59% zinc,

2.48% lead, and 21.33 g/t silver; and 39.47 Mt Inferred Resource at 5.84% zinc, 3.14%

lead, and 38.15 g/t silver ) and a Preliminary Economic Assessment 2 (PEA). In addition,

Boundary Main, Boundary West, Tom North and End Zone have significant zinc -

lead-silver mineralization drilled but not yet classified as mineral resources. The project

also includes large blocks of adjacent claims with known showings and significant upside

exploration potential.

• Mactung Project (Tungsten): The Company recently signed a definitive Asset Purchase

Agreement and acquired 100% interest in the 37.6 km2 Mactung Project located adjacent

to the Macmillan Pass Project. New mineral resources for Mactung described above

(41.5 Mt Indicated Resource at 0.73% WO3 and 12.2 Mt Inferred Resource at 0.59% WO3)

make it the world’s largest high-grade resource of the critical mineral tungsten*. Located

in Canada, it is one of the rare large tungsten resources outside of China.

• Gayna River Project ( Zinc-Lead-Gallium-Germanium): Fireweed has 100% of the

128.75 km 2 Gayna River project located 180 kilometres north of the Macmillan Pass

project. It is host to extensive mineralization including Critical Minerals zinc, gallium and

germanium as well as lead and silver, outlined by 28,000 metres of historic al drilling and

significant upside potential.

In Canada, Fireweed (TSXV: FWZ) trades on the TSX Venture Exchange. In the USA, Fireweed

(OTCQB: FWEDF) trades on the OTCQB Venture Market (www.otcmarkets.com ) and is DTC

eligible for enhanced electronic clearing and settlement. In Europe, Fireweed (FSE: 20F) trades

on the Frankfurt Stock Exchange.

Additional information about Fireweed and its projects can be found on the Company’s website

at FireweedMetals.com and at www.sedar.com.

ON BEHALF OF FIREWEED METALS CORP.

“Brandon Macdonald”

CEO & Director