Saturday, September 26, 2026
MiningNewsTerminal
Saturday, September 26, 2026 Admin

FWZ.V ·

Fireweed Intersects 14 m True Width of 11.45% Zinc, 5.86% Lead, and 126.3 g/t Silver at the New Tom South Zone

Drill Results

1

NEWS RELEASE

February 1, 2024 TSXV: FWZ

OTCQB: FWEDF

FSE:M0G

Fireweed Intersects 14 m True Width of 11.45% Zinc, 5.86% Lead, and 126.3 g/t

Silver at the New Tom South Zone

Vancouver, British Columbia: FIREWEED METALS CORP. (“Fireweed” or the “Company”)

(TSXV: FWZ; OTCQB: FWEDF; FSE: M0G ) is pleased to report the final results from the 2023

drilling campaign at its Tom and Jason deposits, Macmillan Pass (“Macpass”) Project, Yukon,

Canada.

Highlights

 Hole TS23-009 intersected 17.95 m (est. 14 m true width) of 11.45% zinc, 5.86% lead and

126.3 g/t silver, including 6.6 m of 19.33% zinc, 8.42% lead, and 225.1 g/t silver.

 Hole TS23-009D2 intersected 18.78 m (est. 9.8 m true width) of 9.82% zinc, 11.65% lead,

and 180.1 g/t silver, including 11.75 m of 11.93% zinc, 16.17% lead, and 260.5 g/t silver.

 Both TS23-009 and TS23-009D2 intersected the new Tom South zone which was not in

the 2018 mineral resource. There is substantial potential in this zone beyond what was

intersected this year.

 Drill results are now fully disclosed for the 2023 drilling campaign at Macpass.

CEO Statement

Brandon Macdonald, CEO, stated, “ The intersection of continuous high-grade feeder style

mineralization at Tom South is arguably one of the most significant discoveries at this deposit in

decades and is a >100-metre step-out beyond the known Tom resource. These intercepts provide

a tantalizing glimpse that Tom Southeast and Tom West may form a continuous zone of stratiform

and massive sulphide mineralization connected around a fold hinge at Tom South. We are excited

at the prospect of exploring this concept in 2024 and are reminded that despite generations of

work, the Tom and Jason deposits may still have surprises in store for us.”

2

Summary

The mineralization from drill holes in this release primarily comprise stratiform (layer-parallel) and

massive (>50% sulphides) sulphides in Tom West, Tom South and Jason South. At T om West

and Tom South this mineralization forms a continuous steeply dipping domain with sharp margins,

occurring from surface to at least a depth of 750 m and across a strike length of 1,500 m. At Jason

South, mineralization occurs as a series of steeply dipping stratiform lenses from 250 m below

surface to a depth of at least 730 m and a strike length of 450 m. The intersections in holes

TS23-009, TS23-009D1, and TS23-009D2 represent a significant 100 m step out from

mineralization included in the current Tom resource and comprise high-grade massive sulphides

associated with feeder style mineralization.

Results

The drill holes in this release are located at Tom West, Tom South, and Jason South and targeted

stratiform and massive sulphides with a focus on step outs from the current mineral resource that

was last updated in 2018. Holes TS23-009, TS23-009D1, and TS23-009D2 stepped out from an

isolated intersection in historical hole TS90-012 which was not included in the 2018 resource. All

three holes intersected high-grade stratiform and massive sulphides, which support the idea there

is a continuous domain of mineralization outside of the 2018 resource that remains open along

strike. Holes TS23-001 to TS23-008 intersected stratiform zinc mineralization, successfully

stepping-out downdip and northwest from the known mineral resource at Tom West.

Table 1: Assay highlights for 2023 holes at Tom and Jason.

Drillhole Interval From

(m) To (m)

Interval

Width

(m)

Est. True

Width

(m) †

Zinc

(%)

Lead

(%)

Silver

(g/t)

Bulk

Density

(t/m3)

TS23-003 Primary 250.80 280.50 29.7 22 3.59 0.31 1.5 2.84

TS23-003 Including 261.75 271.00 9.25 6.9 6.24 0.54 1.8 2.94

TS23-009 Primary* 719.00 736.95 17.95 14 11.45 5.86 126.3 3.04

TS23-009 Including* 723.60 730.20 6.6 5.1 19.33 8.42 225.1 3.23

TS23-009D1 Primary 715.74 736.44 20.7 20 4.83 3.32 52.4 2.87

TS23-009D1 Including 728.61 736.44 7.83 7.7 10.63 7.08 112.2 3.08

TS23-009D1 >Including 729.61 736.44 6.83 6.7 11.70 7.89 123.7 3.12

TS23-009D2 Primary 794.20 812.98 18.78 9.8 9.82 11.65 180.1 3.39

TS23-009D2 Including 796.45 811.57 15.12 7.9 10.95 13.53 211.3 3.51

TS23-009D2 >Including 799.82 811.57 11.75 6.1 11.93 16.17 260.5 3.66

JS23-001D1 Primary 595.98 621.55 25.57 Unknown 3.75 2.50 30.7 3.13

JS23-001D1 Including 595.98 612.95 16.97 Unknown 4.18 2.98 39.3 3.16

* Denotes intervals with recovery of less than 85%.

† See “Data Verification” for a description of true width calculations

At the Tom deposit, mineralization is contained within tabular zones, that dip outwards around the

margins of a doubly-plunging, kilometre-scale anticline fold. The deposit is subdivided into several

zones, Tom West (or Tom Main zone), Tom East, and Tom Southeast. Tom North was drilled and

re-discovered in 2019, interpreted as a northern extension of Tom West that is not included in the

3

current mineral resource (see Fireweed news release dated August 20, 2019). New drilling at

Tom South indicates it is a southern extension of Tom West on the nose of an anticline fold. 2023

drilling tested Tom South with hole TS23-009 and two directional -splay holes TS23-009D1 and

TS23-009D2. Mineralization at Tom is subdivided into geological domains, based on mineralogy

and texture: massive sulphide, and pink facies, grey facies, and black facies based on the colour

of the sphalerite (zinc) mineralization. Examples of the high-grade massive to laminated sulphides

encountered at Tom South, and the black -facies and grey-facies mineralization within hole from

Tom West can be seen in Photos 1 to 3. Assays have now been received for all 2023 Tom and

Jason holes (Tables 1 and 3). Summaries for new drill results reported in this news release are

as follows:

 Hole TS23-009 intersected 17.95 m ( 14 m est. true width) of massive and stratiform

sulphide grading 11.45% zinc, 5.86% lead, and 126.3 g/t silver, incl uding 6.60 m grading

19.33% zinc, 8.42% lead, and 225.1 g/t silver. Recovery in this mineralized intercept was

64%—below the recovery threshold of 85% typically deemed acceptable at the project,

and as a result a secondary hole was drilled as TS23-009D1.

 Hole TS23-009D2 intersected 18.78 m (est. true width 9.8 m) of massive and stratiform

sulphide grading 9.82% zinc. 11.65% lead and 180.1 g/t silver, including 11.75 m grading

11.93% zinc, 16.17% lead, and 260.5 g/t silver.

 Hole TS23-009D1 intersected 20.70 m (est. true width of 20 m) of massive and stratiform

sulphide grading 4.83% zinc, 3.32% lead, and 52.4 g/t silver, including 7.83 m grading

10.63% zinc, 7.08% lead, and 112.2 g/t silver.

 Hole JS23- 001D1 intersected 25.57 m grading 3.75% zinc. 2.50% lead, and 30.7 g/t

silver, including 16.97 m grading 4.18% zinc, 2.98% lead, and 39.3 g/t silver.

 Hole TS23-007 intersected 31.58 m (est. true width 19 m) of stratiform sulphide grading

4.49% zinc and 0.53% lead.

 Hole TS23-006 intersected 24.47 m (est. true width 21 m) of stratiform sulphide grading

4.16% zinc, 2.00% lead and 6.2 g/t silver.

 Hole TS23-003 intersected 29.7 m (est. true width 22 m) of stratiform mineralization

grading 3.59% zinc and 0.31% lead, including 9.25 m grading 6.24% zinc and 0.54% lead.

 Hole TS23- 008 intersected 22.10 m ( est. true width 19 m) of stratiform mineralization

grading 2.86% zinc and 0.12% lead.

 Hole TS23- 005 intersected 17.12 m (est. true width 16 m) of stratiform mineralization

grading 3.72% zinc.

 Hole TS23-004 intersected 11.76 m (est. true width 8.7 m) of stratiform mineralization

grading 3.33% zinc, 0.32% lead and 1.5 g/t silver.

 Hole JS23-001 intersected 2.02 m of stratiform mineralization grading 8.69% zinc and 3.6

g/t silver.

 Hole TS23-002 intersected 3.06 m grading 6.34% zinc, 0.98% lead, and 8.5 g/t silver.

 Hole TS23-001 intersected 0.6 m grading 3.8% zinc.

4

See Tables 1, 3, 4, and 5, Cross Sections TA–TA’, TB–TB’, TC–TC’, TD–TD’, TE–TE’, TF–TF’,

JA–JA’, Long Section TG–TG', and Maps 2, 3, 4, and 5 below for further details.

2023 Prospecting Program

Fireweed conducted a s hort prospecting program at Macpass in 2023, focusing around

geochemical and geophysical anomalies that could be related to reduced intrusion related gold

systems. Prospecting crews took 535 rock samples, with gold grades between 1 and 3,121 parts-

per-billion (ppb) gold. Results over 100 ppb gold (12 samples) are presented in Table 2. Evidence

of arsenic-bismuth bearing ~NW-SE trending and NE dipping veins with generally low and spotty

gold values was located within hornfels rock at the newly defined Neptune showing, interpreted

as distal alteration around a Mid-Cretaceous buried reduced intrusion. The depth to the

hypothesized intrusion cannot be accurately estimated with the current observations and more

work is required to accurately assess the potential at Neptune.

Fireweed intends to continue prospecting in the upcoming 2024 field season, with an emphasis

on following up anomalies in a commodity agnostic manner, using a data-driven approach.

Fireweed owns almost 1,000 square kilometres of mineral tenure within the Selwyn basin, one of

the world’s most significant basins for zinc mineralization, where Fireweed sees great potential

for additional zinc discoveries. Fireweed’s ground is also within the Mayo-Tombstone-Tungsten

belt of intrusive rocks that on Fireweed’s claims, host the world's largest high-grade tungsten

deposit**, Mactung, and off Fireweed’s claims, also includes the past-producing Cantung tungsten

mine, and emerging gold discoveries.

Table 2: Rock samples over 100 ppb gold from the 2023 prospecting program

Sample Au (ppb) Ag (ppm) As (ppm) Bi (ppm) Te (ppm)

4303342 3173 4.65 79107 259.5 0.5

4303156 1174.6 2.97 89178 73.3 N/A

4303283 737.5 9.1 >100000 88.6 0.3

4303438 725 5.5 >100000 58.5 1.0

4303437 620 9.37 >100000 30.5 2.0

4303231 338.3 1.225 20870 10.5 12.0

4303420 276.5 6.4 26559 0.3 0.5

C0042653 251.5 4.35 1375 7.7 0.5

4303344 232 1.4 97909 17 0.5

4303202 165 17.47 241 0.9 N/A

4303345 131.5 1.2 59373 21.4 1.3

4303311 109.5 2.63 308 1.2 0.5

About Fireweed Metals Corp. (TSXV: FWZ; OTCQB: FWEDF; FSE:M0G): Fireweed Metals is a

public mineral exploration company on the leading edge of Critical Minerals project development.

Fireweed is well-funded, with a healthy balance sheet, and has three projects located in Canada:

5

 Macpass Project (Zinc-Lead-Silver): Fireweed owns 100% of the district-scale 940 km2

Macmillan Pass (“Mac pass”) Project in Yukon, Canada, which is host to one of Earth’s

largest undeveloped resources of zinc**, a Critical Mineral. The Tom and Jason zinc-lead-

silver deposits have current Mineral Resources1 (11.21 Mt Indicated Resource at 6.59%

zinc, 2.48% lead, and 21.33 g/t silver; and 39.47 Mt Inferred Resource at 5.84% zinc,

3.14% lead, and 38.15 g/t silver) and a Preliminary Economic Assessment 2 (PEA). In

addition, Boundary Zone, Tom North, Tom South, and End Zone have significant zinc -

lead-silver mineralization drilled but not yet classified as mineral resources. The Project

also includes large blocks of adjacent claims with known showings and significant upside

exploration potential.

 Mactung Project (Tungsten) : The Company owns 100% interest in the 37.6 km 2

Mactung Project located adjacent to the Mac pass Project. Recently announced Mineral

Resources for Mactung (41.5 Mt Indicated Resource at 0.73% WO 3 and 12.2 Mt Inferred

Resource at 0.59% WO3)3 make it the world’s largest high-grade resource of the Critical

Mineral tungsten** . Located in Canada, it is one of the rare large tungsten resources

outside of China**.

 Gayna Project (Zinc-Lead-Gallium-Germanium): Fireweed owns 100% of the 128.75

km2 Gayna Project located 180 km north of the Macp ass Project. It is host to extensive

mineralization including Critical Minerals zinc, gallium and germanium as well as lead and

silver, outlined by 28,000 m of historical drilling. A recent reevaluation of the geology

supported by recent ground gravity geophysics results, soil surveys, and high grade rock

samples, indicate drill targets with potential for high-grade Kipushi-style massive sulphide

mineralization.

Qualified Person Statement

Technical information in this news release has been approved by Fireweed’s Senior Geologist,

Ian Carr, P.Geo. (BC), a ‘Qualified Person’ as defined under Canadian National Instrument

43-101.

In Canada, Fireweed (TSXV: FWZ) trades on the TSX Venture Exchange. In the USA, Fireweed

(OTCQB: FWEDF) trades on the OTCQB Venture Market (www.otcmarkets.com) and is DTC

eligible for enhanced electronic clearing and settlement. In Europe, Fireweed (FSE: M0G) trades

on the Frankfurt Stock Exchange.

Additional information about Fireweed and its projects can be found on the Company’s website

at FireweedMetals.com and at www.sedarplus.com

ON BEHALF OF FIREWEED METALS CORP.

“Brandon Macdonald”

CEO & Director

6

Contact: Brandon Macdonald

Phone: (604) 646-8361

Email: [email protected]

Neither the TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in the

policies of the TSX Venture Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release.

Data Verification

The diamond drill core logging and sampling program was carried out under a rigorous quality assurance /

quality control program using industry best practices. Drill intersections in this release are NQ2 size core

(50.5 mm/ 1.99-inch diameter) with recover ies typically above 85% unless otherwise noted in the results

tables. After drilling, core was cleaned, logged for geology, structure, and geotechnical characteristics, then

marked for sampling and photographed on site. Certain cores were selected for core scanning. The cores

for analyses were marked for sampling based on geological intervals with individual samples 2 m or less in

length, with 1 m samples within mineralized zones. Drill core was cut lengthwise in half with a core saw;

half-core was sent for assays reported in this news release, and the other half is stored on site for reference.

Bulk density was determined on site for the entire length of each assay sample by measurement of mass

in air and mass in water. Sample duplicate bulk density determinations and in-house bulk density standard

determinations were each made at a rate of 5%. Since 2017, four in- house bulk density standards

(mineralized drill core from the Tom deposit that span a range of densities) have been used and show an

acceptable long-term precision. Certified standard masses are used to calibrate the scale balance used for

bulk density determinations.

A total of 5% assay standards or blanks and 5% core duplicates are included in the sample stream as a

quality control measure and are reviewed after analyses are received. Standards and blanks in 2023 drill

results to date have been approved as acceptable. Duplicate data add to the long- term estimates of

precision for assay data on the project and precision for drill results reported is deemed to be within

acceptable levels. S amples were sent to the Bureau Veritas (BV) preparation laboratory in Whitehorse,

Yukon, where the samples were crushed and a 500 g split was sent to the BV laboratory in Vancouver, B.C

to be pulverized to 85% passing 200 mesh size pulps. Clean crush material was passed through the crusher

and clean silica was pulverized between each sample. The pulps were analyzed by 1:1:1 Aqua Regia

digestion followed by Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry (ICP -ES/ICP-MS) multi -element

analyses (BV Code AQ270). All samples were also analyzed for multiple elements by lithium borate fusion

and X-ray fluorescence analysis (XRF) finish (BV Code LF725). Over-limit lead (>25.0%) and zinc (>24.0%)

were analyzed by lithium borate fusion with XRF finish (BV Code LF726). For BV samples, silver is reported

in this news release by method AQ270, and zinc and lead are reported by LF725 or LF726. Bureau Veritas

(Vancouver) is an independent, international ISO/IEC 17025:2017 accredited laboratory.

Surface samples from the gold program described in this release were submitted with 5% standards or

blanks and 2% duplicates that were reviewed after receipt of assays and approved as acceptable. Samples

were sent to the BV preparation laboratory in Whitehorse, Yukon, and prepared using the same crushing

and pulverizing methods as drill core samples . The resulting pulps were analyzed by 1:1:1 Aqua Regia

digestion followed by Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry (ICP -ES/ICP-MS) multi -element

analyses (BV Code AQ270). Gold values were determined by lead collection fire assay fusion followed by

ICP-ES analysis (BV Code FA330). Any rock sample that initially assayed greater than 0.1 ppm gold was

re-assayed from both pulps and coarse rejects and results were found to be repeatable, with variations

within the range expected given the nature of the duplicate samples. Reported values for rock samples in

Table 2 constitute a mean between initial and re- assayed values for all reported analytes excepting Te,

which was only reported in the reanalysis.

7

Assay values may appear rounded to one decimal place but are given in full in Table 1, Table 2, and Table

3, and Cross Sections where zinc and lead grades are reported to two decimal places.

Drilling results in this news release are length and bulk-density weighted averages as would be used in a

Mineral Resource estimate. Length and bulk-density weighted averages have been reported as these most

accurately represent the average metal-content of the intersections.

True widths for primary intervals are estimated by measuring perpendicular to strike within the short axis of

a stratiform wireframe that has been constructed in 3D around the mineralized intercepts at Tom based on

assay results, geological logging, stratigraphic correlation, and bedding measurements from oriented core.

The mineralization at Tom is stratiform (oriented parallel to bedding), therefore the true width, or thickness,

of the zone is estimated perpendicular to both the strike and dip direction of bedding. True widths are

rounded to the nearest metre for widths over 10 m and to the nearest 0.1 m for widths less than 10 m , as

this better reflects the precision of the estimates. True widths should be regarded as approximate as these

are derived from an estimation that uses a preliminary interpretation of the geological model. True widths

for nested intervals (marked as “Including” in results tables) are estimated using a ratio of included to

primary intersected widths to attribute appropriate portions of the true width of the primary interval to the

nested intervals.

Cautionary Statements

Forward Looking Statements

This news release contains “forward- looking” statements and information (“forward- looking statements”).

All statements, other than statements of historical facts, included herein, including, without limitation,

statements relating to interpretation of drill results and projections of mineralization, future work plans, the

use of funds, and the potential of the Company’s projects, are forward looking statements. Forward-looking

statements are frequently, but not always, identified by words such as "expects”, "anticipates”, "believes”,

"intends”, "estimates”, "potential”, "possible”, and similar expressions, or statements that events, conditions,

or results "will”, "may”, "could”, or "should” occur or be achieved. Forward-looking statements are based on

the beliefs of Company management, as well as assumptions made by and information currently available

to Company management and reflect the beliefs, opinions, and projections on the date the statements are

made. Forward-looking statements involve various risks and uncertainties and accordingly, readers are

advised not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements. There can be no assurance that such

statements will prove to be accurate, and actual results and future events could differ materially from those

anticipated in such statements. Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from the

Company's expectations include but are not limited to, exploration and development risks, unanticipated

reclamation expenses, expenditure and financing requirements, general economic conditions, changes in

financial markets, the ability to properly and efficiently staff the Company’s operati ons, the sufficiency of

working capital and funding for continued operations, title matters, First Nations relations, operating

hazards, political and economic factors, competitive factors, metal prices, relationships with vendors and

strategic partners, governmental regulations and oversight, permitting, seasonality and weather,

technological change, industry practices, uncertainties involved in the interpretation of drilling results and

laboratory tests, and one -time events. The Company assumes no obligation to update forward ‐looking

statements or beliefs, opinions, projections or other factors, except as required by law.

8

Footnotes and References

** References to relative size and grade of the Mactung resources and Macpass resources in comparison

to other tungsten and zinc deposits elsewhere in the world, respectively, are based on review of the

Standard & Poor’s Global Market Intelligence Capital IQ database.

1: For details, see https://www.sedarplus.ca/ Fireweed Technical Report titled “NI 43-101 Technical Report

on the Macmillan Pass Zinc-Lead-Silver Project, Watson Lake and Mayo Mining Districts Yukon Territory,

Canada” filed on https://www.sedarplus.ca/ on February 23, 2018, and Fireweed News Release dated

January 10, 2018.

2: For details, see https://www.sedarplus.ca/ Fireweed Technical Report titled “NI 43-101 Technical Report

Macmillan Pass Project Yukon Territory Canada” filed on https://www.sedarplus.ca/ on July 9, 2018, and

Fireweed News Release dated May 2 3, 2018. This Technical Report includes a Preliminary Economic

Analysis disclosing an economic analysis of mineral resources that is preliminary in nature and does not

include any mineral reserves. It is equally emphasized that the mineral resources disclosed within this

Technical Report are not mineral reserves and do not have demonstrated economic viability.

3: For details, see Fireweed news release dated June 13, 2023 “Fireweed Metals Announces Mineral

Resources for the Mactung Project: the Largest High- Grade Tungsten Deposit in the World” and the

technical report entitled “NI 43 -101 Technical Report, Mactung Project, Yukon Territory, Canada,” with

effective date July 28, 2023 filed on https://www.sedarplus.ca/