Saturday, September 26, 2026
MiningNewsTerminal
Saturday, September 26, 2026 Admin

FVI.TO ·

Fortuna delivers robust Feasibility Study for the Diamba Sud Gold Project in Senegal: After -tax IRR of 60% and NPV 5% of US$1 billion using US$3,500/oz (All financial information contained herein are expressed in US dollars

Economic Studies

1

Fortuna delivers robust Feasibility Study for the Diamba Sud Gold

Project in Senegal: After -tax IRR of 60% and NPV 5% of US$1 billion

using US$3,500/oz

(All financial information contained herein are expressed in US dollars unless otherwise stated)

Vancouver, June 29, 2026: Fortuna Mining Corp. (NYSE: FSM | TSX: FVI) announces

positive results from the feasibility study (“FS”) for its Diamba Sud Gold Project in Senegal, confirming

an economically robust open-pit conventional carbon-in-leach (“CIL”) gold mine and advancing one of

Fortuna’s key growth opportunities.

Jorge A. Ganoza, President and CEO of Fortuna, commented, “Diamba Sud is a standout growth

project with high returns, fast payback, and is expected to be our lowest -cost mine. Together with our

Séguéla mine expansion, Diamba Sud supports our plan to grow o ur annual gold production rate by

approximately 60% to more than 500,000 ounces in 2028.” Mr. Ganoza concluded, “With the recent

receipt of the environmental decree from the Senegalese government and the feasibility study

complete, we are ready to move Dia mba Sud toward a final investment decision upon completion of

the mining permit process.”

Feasibility Study Highlights

Financial

• After-tax NPV5% of $1 billion, IRR of 60%, and 1-year payback at $3,500/oz gold

• At $4,000/oz gold, returns increase to NPV5% of $1.3 billion, IRR of 72%, and 11-month

payback

Production and Cost

• Strong first 4 years: Average annual gold production of 158,000 ounces

• 9.4-year life of mine (“LOM”) with an average annual gold production of 116,000 ounces

• Low-cost profile: Average AISC1 of $1,056/oz over the first 4 years and $1,332/oz over LOM

• Final investment decision expected after receipt of the mining permit; first gold targeted by

Q2 2028

CAPEX and Funding

• Total initial capital of $397.5 million

• Funding secured by the Company´s strong cash flow generation and liquidity of over

$800 million2

Early Works

• The Company continues advancing camp construction, office facilities and new site access

road

• A letter of intent (“LOI”) has been executed with African Power Services (“APS”) as the

power station engineering, procurement, and construction (“EPC”) contractor to secure the

heavy-fuel oil (“HFO”) and light-fuel oil (“LFO”) generators.

• Front-end engineering design (“FEED”) is being completed to support early procurement of

critical-path equipment, including the SAG mill, to reduce project schedule risk

Notes:

1. This is a non-IFRS financial measure. The definition and purpose of this non -IFRS financial measure is included under the heading “Cautionary

Note on Non-IFRS Measures” in this news release

2. Liquidity position as at March 31, 2026

-2-

Diamba Sud Feasibility Study Overview

The Feasibility Study was prepared by Fortuna and supported by a team of independent industry

experts, including Lycopodium, Knight Piesold, Kenmore Mine Consulting, SOJUFISC, Infinity

Corporate Finance, Piteau Associates, Entech, and Earth Systems.

The Diamba Sud Gold Project is located in the Kédougou Region of southeastern Senegal,

approximately 665 kilometers southeast of Dakar, 83 kilometers northeast of Kédougou, and

50 kilometers north of the Senegal -Guinea border. The Project comprises the contiguous DS1 and

DS2 permit blocks, situated approximately 7 kilometers west of the Falémé River near the Senegal -

Mali border.

Diamba Sud is operated by Boya S.A., a wholly owned indirect subsidiary of Fortuna. Boya holds full

and unrestricted surface rights over the land covered by the exploration permit, subject to applicable

mining regulations. Upon the granting of an exploitat ion permit, the State of Senegal will assume a

10% free-carried ownership interest in the Project.

Table 1 summarizes the key assumptions, operational parameters, economic results, and AISC values

from the FS.

Table 1: Feasibility Study Summary

Metrics Units Results

Gold price $/oz 3,500

Life of mine year 9.4

Total ore mined1 Mt 20.5

Contained gold in ore mined1 koz 1,151

Strip ratio w:o 6.3:1

Throughput (oxide) Mtpa 2.5

Throughput (fresh) Mtpa 2.0

Head grade g/t Au 1.75

Recovery % 91%

Gold production

Total production over LOM koz 1,053

Average annual production, LOM koz 116

Average annual production, first 4 years koz 158

Per unit costs over LOM

Total mining costs $/t, mined $4.8

Processing $/t, processed $16.1

G&A $/t, processed $8.6

Cash costs 2

Average operating cash costs2, LOM $/oz $1,146

Average operating cash costs2, first 4 years $/oz $856

AISC2

Average AISC2, LOM $/oz $1,332

Average AISC2, first 4 years $/oz $1,056

Capital costs

Initial capital expenditure $ M $398

Sustaining capital, operations + Infrastructure (includes closure costs) $ M $79

NPV5%, pre-tax (100% project basis) $ M $1,379

Pre-tax IRR % 70%

NPV5%, after-tax (100% project basis) $ M $1,009

After-tax IRR % 60%

Payback period years 1

Annual EBITDA 2

Average EBITDA2 over LOM $ M $258

Average EBITDA2 over first 4 years $ M $398

-3-

Notes:

1. The pit optimization shells used for the Mineral Reserves were generated using a gold price of $2,900/oz.

2. This is a non-IFRS financial measure. The definition and purpose of this non -IFRS financial measure is included under the heading “Cautionary

Note on Non-IFRS Measures” in this news release. Non-IFRS financial measures have no standardized meaning under the International Financial

Reporting Standards (IFRS) and therefore, may not be comparable to similar measures presented by other issuers.

3. Average operating cash costs and average AISC represent costs for projected production for the LOM at the time of gold sales.

4. The FS is presented on a 100% project basis. However, upon the granting of the exploitation permit, the State of Senegal will be entitled to a 10%

free-carried interest in the Project, with the right for the State to acquire an additional contributory interest of up to 25%.

5. The economic analysis was carried out using a discounted cash flow approach on a pre-tax and after-tax basis, based on a gold price of $3,500/oz.

6. The IRR on total investment that is presented in the economic analysis was calculated assuming a 100% ownership in Diamba Sud.

7. The NPV was calculated from the after-tax cash flow generated by the Project, based on a discounted rate of 5%.

8. The FS assumes that the percentage of certain royalties and taxes payable to the State, the percentage of the investment tax credit available to

Boya S.A. and the percentage payable to the social development fund will be in accordance with the provisions of the Mining Convention between

Boya S.A. and the State of Senegal dated April 8, 2015. There can be no assurance that such provisions will not be renegotiated by the State as

part of the exploitation permit approval process.

Figure 1 illustrates the Diamba Sud FS LOM production and cost profile and highlights average

production of 158,000 ounces per year over the initial four years at an AISC of $1,056/oz.

Figure 1: Diamba Sud FS LOM Production and Cost Profile

-4-

Key Improvements from the 2025 PEA

The 2026 Diamba Sud FS supersedes the Preliminary Economic Assessment ( “PEA”) dated October

15, 2025, and reflects a more advanced, higher -confidence project with stronger production, a longer

mine life, improved technical definition, and reduced execution risk. Key optimizations to the Project

include:

• Higher production profile: Average annual gold production increases from 106,000 ounces per year

in the PEA to 116,000 ounces per year in the FS, including average production of 158,000 ounces per

year over the first four years compared with 147 ,000 ounces per year over the first three years in the

PEA.

• Longer mine life: Project life increases from 8.1 years in the PEA to 9.4 years in the FS, supporting

an extended production and cash-flow profile.

• Reserve conversion and Resource growth: Material growth in the Indicated Mineral Resource

category supports conversion to Probable Mineral Reserves, establishing a stronger foundation for the

FS mine plan.

• Improved grade profile: Average feed grade increases from 1.63 g/t Au in the PEA to 1.75 g/t Au in

the FS.

• Improved metallurgical performance: Metallurgical recoveries increased from 90% in the PEA to

91% in the FS.

• Higher-confidence cost and execution basis: The FS advances the Project to a level of accuracy

considered consistent with an Association for the Advancement of Cost Engineering ( “AACE”) Class

3 estimate, typically corresponding to an accuracy range of approximately -10% to +15%.

• Reduced execution risk: Further advancement of early works to enable a rapid construction ramp -

up following FID, to secure long-lead equipment, and to protect the project’s critical-path.

Exploration Upside: Resource Growth and Continued Expansion Potential

The initial Mineral Reserve estimate for Diamba Sud (see Table 2 below) represents a major milestone

and provides the foundation for a long-life, low-cost open pit operation with strong production and cash

flow potential . The Probable Mineral Reserves total 20.5 million tonnes averaging 1.75 g/t Au,

containing 1.15 million ounces of gold. Importantly, Diamba Sud remains open for further growth. The

FS mine plan is based on the current Mineral Reserve, while additional opportunities remain to convert

Mineral Resources into Mineral Reserves and to expand the resource base through continued drilling.

This provides Fortuna with a clear pathway to potentially extend mine life, enhance future production,

and increase the overall value of the Project.

The Mineral Reserve estimate is supported by FS-level technical work , including metallurgical,

geotechnical, hydrogeological, environmental, mine planning, processing, infrastructure, and cost

studies. Mineral Reserves are reported at the point of delivery to the process plant using the 2014 CIM

Definition Standards, on a 100 % basis, and are classified as Probable Mineral Reserves . Mineral

Reserves are estimated and reported as at April 10, 2026, and are summarized in Table 2. Mineral

Resources, reported exclusive of Mineral Reserves, are summarized in Table 3.

-5-

Table 2: Mineral Reserve Estimate

Classification Deposit Tonnes (kt) Au (g/t) Au (koz)

Probable Mineral Reserves Area A 4,136 1.59 211

Area D 5,103 1.70 279

Karakara 2,859 1.87 172

Kassasoko 1,164 0.96 36

Moungoundi 1,069 1.10 38

Southern Arc 4,464 2.31 332

Western Splay 1,706 1.51 83

Total 20,500 1.75 1,151

Table 3: Mineral Resource Estimate, exclusive of Mineral Reserves

Classification Deposit Tonnes (kt) Au (g/t) Au (koz)

Indicated Mineral Resources Area A 288 0.50 5

Area D 436 0.53 8

Karakara 221 0.61 4

Kassasoko 206 0.49 3

Moungoundi 279 0.75 7

Southern Arc 1,701 1.62 89

Western Splay 233 0.74 6

Total 3,364 1.12 121

Inferred Area A 152 1.45 7

Area D 264 0.95 8

Karakara 26 1.47 1

Kassasoko 138 0.86 4

Moungoundi 107 1.09 4

Southern Arc 734 1.42 33

Western Splay 211 1.64 11

Total 1,632 1.30 68

Notes:

1. Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources are as defined by the 2014 CIM Definition Standards for Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves.

2. Mineral Resources are exclusive of Mineral Reserves.

3. Mineral Resources that are not Mineral Reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability .

4. Factors that could materially affect the reported Mineral Resources or Mineral Reserves include; changes in metal price and e xchange rate

assumptions; changes in local interpretations of mineralization; changes to assumed metallurgical recoveries, mining d ilution and recovery; and

assumptions as to the continued ability to access the site, retain mineral and surface rights titles, maintain environmental and other regulatory

permits, and maintain the social license to operate . Boya SA has applied for an exploitation permit for the Project, and if not granted, it will have

a material impact on the potential development of the Project.

5. Mineral Resources and Reserves for the Diamba Sud are estimated and reported as at April 10, 2026. The State of Senegal will assume a 10%

free-carried ownership interest in the Project when an exploitation permit is granted and may elect to purchase up to an additional 25% contributory

interest in Boya SA at a “fair price” as determined through an independent valuation.

6. Mineral Reserves for the Diamba Sud Project are reported at the point of delivery to the process plant on a 100% ownership basis and have been

estimated using incremental gold cutoff grades for open -pit oxide and transitional material as follows: 0.38 g/t Au for Area A, Moungoundi, and

Western Splay; 0.37 g/t Au for Kassasoko and Southern Arc; 0.36 g/t Au for Karakara; and 0.35 g/t Au for Area D. For fresh material, the applied

cut-off grades are 0.40 g/t Au for Karakara and Kassasoko, 0.42 g/t Au for Area A, 0.43 g/t Au for Southern Arc, 0.45 g/t Au for Moungoundi, 0.46

g/t Au for Area D, and 0.49 g/t Au for the West ern Splay deposit. The cutoff grades were derived using a gold price assumption of $2,900/oz,

metallurgical recovery rates ranging from 72% to 97% depending on grade and material type by deposit, and surface mining cost s of $5.77/t for

Area A, $5.26/t for Area D, $5.28/t for Karakara, $6.27/t for Western Splay, $6.09/t for Kassasoko, $6.18/t for Moungoundi, and $6.27/t for Southern

Arc. Average processing and general and administrative (G&A) costs are estimated at $24.92/t milled for oxide and transitiona l material and

$30.23/t for fresh material. Refining and selling costs are estimated at $5.50/oz of gold, with an applicable royalty rate of 3.5%. Pit slope angles

of 32° for weathered material and 46° for fresh rock have been applied in the pit optimization. Metallurgical recoveries have been estimated using

grade–recovery relationship models developed for oxide and transitional material across all deposits, with deposit-specific recovery models applied

to fresh rock across the seven deposits.

7. Mineral Resources are reported insitu and constrained within pit shells using selective mining unit block sizes and at an inc remental gold cutoff

grade for oxide/transitional material of 0.26 g/t Au, with fresh material reported based on a cutoff of 0.29 g /t Au for Area A, 0.37 g/t Au for Area D,

0.31 g/t Au for Karakara, 0.33 g/t Au for Western Splay, 0.28 g/t Au for Kassassoko, 0.31 g/t Au for Southern Arc, and 0.33 g/t Au for Moungoundi.

Mineral Resource estimates are based on the same parameters used fo r Mineral Reserve estimates except gold price , where $3,300/oz was

applied.

-6-

8. Eric Chapman is the Qualified Person responsible for Mineral Resources, and is a full-time employee of Fortuna, Raul Espinoza is the Qualified

Person responsible for Mineral Reserves, and is a full -time employee of Fortuna.

9. Totals may not add due to rounding procedures.

Since 2023, Fortuna has invested meaningfully in mineral exploration at Diamba Sud, with the growth

reflected in the maiden Mineral Reserve estimate summarized in Table 2. This work has increased

both the scale and confidence of the resource base and supports the feas ibility study mine plan. The

Project retains further upside, particularly at Southern Arc, where recent drilling indicates the potential

to extend mineralization.

Ongoing drilling is expected to test open extensions, improve geological confidence in areas currently

classified as Inferred Resources, and identify additional mineralization beyond the current feasibility

study mine plan. This work provides a clear pathway to further expand and upgrade the resource base,

with the potential to support future mine life extensions and additional value creation.

Mining and Processing

The FS outlines a conventional open pit gold mining operation feeding a central processing facility

over a 9.4-year project lif e. The mine plan incorporates the Area A, Area D, Karakara, Kassassoko,

Moungoudi, Southern Arc, and Western Splay deposits, with mining sequenced to support a consistent

production profile over the LOM. The proposed general arrangement of the site infrastructure is shown

in Figure 2.

The pit optimization shells used to constrain the Mineral Reserve were generated using a gold price

of $2,900/oz and a revenue factor of 1.0. Optimization parameters included government royalties,

refining, mining, processing, and general and administrative costs to support realistic pit designs and

economic assumptions.

Based on the Mineral Reserve estimate, the mine plan includes the mining of 20.5 million tonnes of

ore at an average gold grade of 1.75 g/t, containing 1.15 million ounces of gold. A total of 130 million

tonnes of waste will be mined, resulting in a LOM strip ratio of 6.3:1.

Mining will use conventional open pit methods, including drilling and blasting for both oxide and fresh

ore, followed by truck-and-shovel mining operations. Ore from the open pits will be processed through

a conventional CIL plant designed to produce gold doré, incorporating crushing, milling, gravity

recovery, CIL processing, carbon elution, and gold recovery.

The process plant is designed to treat the ore at an average annual processing rate of approximately

2.26 million tonnes, as shown in Figure 3, producing 1.05 million ounces of gold at a LOM metallurgical

recovery of 91%.

-7-

Figure 2: Diamba Sud Mine General Site Infrastructure General Arrangement

-8-

Figure 3: Diamba Sud FS LOM processing schedule