Saturday, September 26, 2026
MiningNewsTerminal
Saturday, September 26, 2026 Admin

FVI.TO ·

Fortuna Advances Diamba Sud Gold Project in Senegal with Updated Mineral Resources; PEA Completion Targeted for Q4 2025

Corporate Updates

NEWS RELEASE

Fortuna Advances Diamba Sud Gold Project in Senegal with Updated

Mineral Resources; PEA Completion Targeted for Q4 2025

Vancouver, August 5, 2025: Fortuna Mining Corp. (NYSE: FSM | TSX: FVI) is pleased to

report an updated Mineral Resource estimate as of July 7, 2025, for the Diamba Sud Gold Project

located in Senegal. All dollar amounts in this news release are expressed in US dollars.

Highlights of the Inpit Mineral Resource Update

• Indicated Mineral Resource of 724,000 gold ounces, representing a 53 percent increase since

year-end 2024

• Inferred Mineral Resource of 285,000 gold ounces, reflecting a 93 percent increase since year-

end 2024

• Initial Inferred Mineral Resource estimates for the Southern Arc and Moungoundi deposits,

containing 194,000 ounces and 31,000 ounces of gold, respectively

• Preliminary Economic Analysis (PEA) underway, with completion targeted for the fourth

quarter of 2025

• Exploration drilling at Southern Arc continues focusing on:

o Infilling drilling to upgrade Inferred Resources

o Expansion drilling where mineralization remains open at shallow depths to the south

and east of the defined deposit limits

Diamba Sud Gold Project, Senegal

Fortuna estimates that the Diamba Sud Gold Project comprises an Indicated Mineral Resource of

14.2 Mt at an average gold grade of 1. 59 g/t, containing 724,000 ounces of gold, and an Inferred

Mineral Resource of 6.2 Mt at an average gold grade of 1.44 g/t containing 285,000 ounces of gold.

The updated Mineral Resource estimate is based on new drilling completed between July 2024 to July

2025, comprising 243 holes totaling 31,652 meters. The data collected improved the geological

interpretation and resource modelling for Area A, Area D, Karakara, Western Splay, and Kassassoko.

It also contributed to the expansion of Diamba Sud´s pipeline of emerging deposits, with the first-time

resource estimates for Southern Arc and Moungoundi. Expansion drilling at these deposits, along with

the drilling of new targets, is planned for the fourth quarter of 2025.

Changes from the previous estimate are due to the following:

• Infill drilling at Area A , Area D , Karakara, Western Splay, and Kassassoko improv ed the

geological interpretation and supported the conversion of Inferred Resources to Indicated

Resources

• Exploration drilling at Southern Arc and Moungoundi resulted in the first-time estimation of

Inferred Mineral Resources

-2-

• An increase in the long-term gold price assumption, now at $2,600/oz, along with refinements

to projected mining and processing costs, contributed to updated pit shell optimization and

cut-off grade determination

Diamba Sud Gold Project Mineral Resources by deposit

Mineral Resources – Indicated Contained Metal

Classification Deposit Tonnes

(000)

Au

(g/t)

Au

(koz)

Indicated

Area A 3,891 1.47 184

Area D 4,877 1.75 274

Karakara 2,476 1.79 143

Western Splay 1,615 1.65 86

Kassassoko 1,294 0.90 38

Total Indicated 14,153 1.59 724

Mineral Resources – Inferred Contained Metal

Classification Deposit Tonnes

(000)

Au

(g/t)

Au

(koz)

Inferred

Area A 61 1.02 2

Area D 600 1.10 21

Karakara 510 1.61 26

Western Splay 101 2.11 7

Kassassoko 123 0.85 3

Southern Arc 3,854 1.57 194

Moungoundi 922 1.06 31

Total Inferred 6,171 1.44 285

Notes:

1. Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources are as defined by the 2014 CIM Definition Standards for Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves

2. Mineral Resources are exclusive of Mineral Reserves.

3. Mineral Resources that are not Mineral Reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability.

4. Factors that could materially affect the reported Mineral Resources include changes in metal price and exchange rate assumptions; changes in local interpretations

of mineralization; changes to assumed metallurgical recoveries, mining dilution and recovery; and assumptions as to the continued ability to access the site, extend

and/or retain mineral and surface rights, titles and permits, maintain environmental and other regulatory permits, and maintain the social license to operate.

5. Mineral Resources are reported as of July 7, 2025.

6. Mineral Resources for Diamba Sud are reported pit constrained on a 100% ownership basis at selective mining unit block sizes and at an incremental gold cutoff

grade for oxide/transitional material of 0. 31 g/t Au, with fresh material reported based on a cutoff of 0.3 5 g/t Au for Area A, 0.42 g/t Au for Area D, 0.35 g/t Au for

Karakara, 0.41 g/t Au for Western Splay, 0.35 g/t Au for Kassassoko, 0.37 g/t Au for Southern Arc, and 0.39 g/t Au for Moungoundi in accordance with the varying

ore differential parameters and varying metallurgical recoveries for oxide, transitional and fresh rock within pit shell optimizations, assuming a long-term gold metal

price of $2,600/oz and metallurgical recoveries based on metallurgical testwork.

7. Eric Chapman, P. Geo. (EGBC #36328), is the Qualified Person responsible for Mineral Resources, being an employee of Fortuna Mining Corp.

8. Totals may not add due to rounding

The Mineral Resource is comprised of seven deposits: Area A, Area D, Karakara, Western Splay ,

Kassassoko, Southern Arc, and Moungoundi. It incorporates data from a total of 1,178 diamond and

reverse circulation (RC) drill holes , totaling 154,814 meters, completed at these deposits since 2019

(see Figure 1).

-3-

Figure 1: Location of Deposits Included in the Mineral Resource Estimate

-4-

All RC drilling at Diamba Sud was conducted using a 5.25-inch face sampling pneumatic hammer, with

samples collected into 60 -liter plastic bags. To maintain sample integrity, sufficient air pressure was

used to keep samples dry and prevent groundwater inflow . If water ingress exceeded air pressure

capacity, RC drilling was halted, and drilling converted to diamond core tails. Samples were collected

at 1 -meter intervals from an onboard cyclone and split on site to produce two 1.5-kilogram sub-

samples. The first sample was submitted for laboratory analysis, while the second was retained at the

core yard as a field duplicate.

The majority of d iamond drill holes at Diamba Sud were drilled with either HQ or NQ sized diamond

drill bits. Core was logged and marked for sampling using standard lengths of one meter or to

geological boundaries as appropriate. Samples were cut into equal halves using a diamond saw. One

half of the core was retained in the original core box and stored in a secure facility at the project site’s

core yard. The other half was sampled, catalogued, and placed into sealed bags which were securely

stored on site until shipment.

All RC and diamond core samples from Diamba Sud were shipped to ALS Global’s laboratory in

Kedougou, Senegal, for preparation and then sent, via commercial courier , to ALS’s facility in

Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso, for final analysis. Routine gold analysis was performed using a 50-gram

charge with fire assay and atomic absorption finish. Quality control procedures included the systematic

insertion of blanks, duplicates, and certified reference standards into the sample stream. Additionally,

ALS implemented its own quality control protocols.

The Mineral Resource estimate for Diamba Sud was prepared using data with an effective cut-off date

of July 7, 2025. Three-dimensional wireframes were constructed for the host lithologies, including the

weathering profile, as well as for mineralized zones. The mineralized envelopes were defined using

nominal cut-off grades of approximately 0.1 g/t and 0.3 g/t Au, respectively.

Wireframes for each mineralized envelope were used to select and flag drillhole samples. Samples

were preferentially sampled at 1-meter intervals, regardless of drilling technique based on the deposit

characteristics, and therefore composited to this length. Composites for each mineralized domain were

evaluated both indivi dually and collectively using histograms, log -probability plots, and box -and-

whisker plots.

Input composite data for each domain were assessed for outliers , and grade capping was applied on

a semi-quantitative basis . This process was guided by statistical tools, including histograms, log -

probability plots, and mean -variance plot s. Grade caps were generally applied at or above the

98th percentile.

Where sufficient data existed, experimental semi -variograms were generated for each domain and

modelled accordingly. These were typically characterized by a moderate to high nugget effect and two

nested spherical structures.

A block model was built for each of the Diamba Sud deposits. Models were aligned with the national

UTM coordinate system used for the input data and were designed with block dimensions reflecting

the likely selective mining unit.

Mineralized wireframes were treated as hard boundaries during grade interpolation , meaning only

assay data within each domain was used to interpolate grades within that domain. Grade interpolation

was performed using either inverse distance weighting or ordinary kriging, depending on the quality

and robustness of the modeled variograms. The Qualified Person considers the interpolation methods

appropriate for the style of mineralization at Diamba Sud.

-5-

All estimates were carried out on a parent block basis. Estimation search parameters were informed

by Kriging Neighborhood Analysis (KNA) , utilizing a s ingle-block KNA approach within well -drilled

areas. An oriented ellipsoid search was applied to select composites for interpolation, with orientations

derived from variogram models. Gold grade estimation was completed using a thr ee-pass search

strategy within each mineralized domain, based on the respective variogram ranges.

Fixed bulk density values were assigned by lithology and weathering profile , based on more than

25,000 water immersion measurements of drill core collected across the Diamba Sud property.

Initial validation of the block models included checks for unestimated mineralized blocks, incorrect or

missing density assignments, and verification that no mineralized blocks or blocks with density values

were present above the topographic surface. Visual validation included comparing the estimated block

model grades to the composite grades for a series of cross sections sliced through each of the

deposits.

Following the initial validation checks, swath plots were generated along the three principal axes to

assess the representativeness of the estimated grade profiles relative to the input composite grades.

These plots were prepared on a per -domain basis for each mineralized solid and demonstrate a

satisfactory correlation between the estimated grades and the underlying composite data, supporting

the reliability of the grade interpolation.

Mineral Resource classification considered several aspects affecting confidence in the estimation

including geological continuity; data density and orientation; data accuracy and precision; and grade

continuity. Indicated Mineral Resources have relied on a drilling grid of approximately 25 meters, with

Inferred Mineral Resources based on an approximate 50-meter grid.

Mineral Resources are reported on a 100 percent ownership basis, using block sizes consistent with

the anticipated selective mining unit . Resources are constrained by optimized pit shells and reported

at incremental gold cut -off grades that reflect varying metallurgical recoveries and projected mining ,

processing, and general costs. A long-term gold price of $2,6 00 per ounce was assumed for pit

optimization and economic evaluation.

-6-

Qualified Person

Eric Chapman, Senior Vice President, Technical Services, is a Professional Geoscientist of the

Association of Professional Engineers and Geoscientists of the Province of British Columbia

(Registration Number 36328) and a Qualified Person as defined by Nati onal Instrument 43 -101-

Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects. Mr. Chapman has reviewed and approved the scientific

and technical information contained in this news release and has verified the underlying data.

About Fortuna Mining Corp.

Fortuna Mining Corp. is a Canadian precious metals mining company with three operating mines and

a portfolio of exploration projects in Argentina, Côte d’Ivoire, Mexico, and Peru, as well as the Diamba

Sud Gold Project in Senegal. Sustainability is at the core of our operations and stakeholder

relationships. We produce gold and silver while creating long -term shared value through efficient

production, environmental stewardship, and social responsibility. For more information, please visit

our website at www.fortunamining.com

ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD

Jorge A. Ganoza

President, CEO, and Director

Fortuna Mining Corp.

Investor Relations:

Carlos Baca | [email protected] | fortunamining.com | X | LinkedIn | YouTube

-7-

Forward looking Statements

This news release contains forward -looking statements which constitute “forward -looking information” within the

meaning of applicable Canadian securities legislation and “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the

“safe harbor” provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (collectively, “Forward -looking

Statements”). All statements included herein, other than statements of historical fact, are Forward -looking

Statements and are subject to a variety of known and unknown risks and uncertainties which could cause actual

events or results to differ materially from those reflected in the Forward-looking Statements. The Forward-looking

Statements in this news release may include, without limitation, the Mineral Resource estimates at Diamba Sud;

the Company’s proposed exploration plans at Diamba Sud; statements that a preliminary economic a nalysis is

expected to be completed in the fourth quarter of 2025; statements about the Company’s business strategies,

plans and outlook; the Company’s plans for its mines and mineral properties; changes in general economic

conditions and financial markets; the impact of inflationary pressures on the Company’s business and operations;

the future results of exploration activities; expectations w ith respect to metal grade estimates and the impact of

any variations relative to metals grades experienced; assumed and future metal prices ; the merit of the

Company’s mines and mineral properties; and the future financial or operating performance of the Company.

Often, but not always, these Forward -looking Statements can be identified by the use of words such as

“estimated”, “potential”, “open”, “future”, “assumed”, “projected”, “proposed”, “used”, “detailed”, “has been”, “gain”,

“planned”, “reflecting” , “will”, “anticipated”, “estimated” “containing”, “remaining”, “to be”, or statements that

events, “could” or “should” occur or be achieved and similar expressions, including negative variations.

Forward-looking Statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause

the actual results, performance, or achievements of the Company to be materially different from any results,

performance or achievements expressed o r implied by the Forward-looking Statements. Such uncertainties and

factors include, among others, operational risks associated with mining and mineral processing; uncertainty

relating to Mineral Resource and Mineral Reserve estimates; uncertainty relating to capital and operating costs,

production schedules and economic returns; risks relating to the Company’s ability to replace its Mineral

Reserves; risks related to the conversion of Mineral Resources to Mineral Reserves; risks associated with mineral

exploration and project development; uncertainty relating to the repatriation of funds as a result of currency

controls; environmental matters including obtaining or renewing environmental permits and potential liability

claims; uncertainty relating to nature and climate conditions; laws and regulations regarding the protection of the

environment (including greenhouse gas emission reduction and other decarbonization requirements and the

uncertainty surrounding the interpretation of omnibus Bill C -59 and the related amendments to the C ompetition

Act (Canada); risks associated with political instability and changes to the regulations governing the Company’s

business operations; changes in national and local government legislation, taxation, controls, regulations and

political or economic developments in countries in which the Company does or may carry on business; risks

associated with war, hostilities or other conflicts, such as the Ukrainian – Russian, and Israeli – Hamas conflicts,

and the impacts they may have on global economic activity; risks relating to the termination of the Company’s

mining concessions in certain circumstances; developing and maintaining relationships with local communities

and stakeholders; risks associated with losing control of public perception as a result of social media and other

web-based applications; potential opposition to the Company’s exploration, development and operational

activities; risks related to the Company’s ability to obtain adequate financing for planned exploration and

development activities; property title matters; risks related to the ability to retain or extend title to the Company’s

mineral properties; risks relating to the integration of businesses and assets acquired by the Company;

impairments; risks associated with climate change legislation; reliance on key personnel; adequacy of insurance

coverage; operational safety and security risks; legal proceedings and potential legal proceedings; uncertainties

relating to general economic conditions; risks relating to a global pandemic, which could impact the Company’s

business, operations, financial condition and share price; competition; fluctuations in metal prices; risks

associated with entering into commodity forward and option contracts for base metals production ; fluctuations in

currency exchange rates and interest rates; tax audits and reassessments; risks related to hedging; uncertainty

relating to concentrate treatment charges and transportation costs; sufficiency of monies allotted by the Company

for land reclamation; risks associated with dependence upon information technology systems, which are subject

-8-

to disruption, damage, failure and risks with implementation and integration; labor relations issues; as well as

those factors discussed under “Risk Factors” in the Company's Annual Information Form for the fiscal year ended

December 31, 2024. Although the Company has attempted to identify important factors that could cause actual

actions, events, or results to differ materially from those described in Forward -looking Statements, there may be

other factors that cause actions, events or results to differ from those anticipated, estimated or intended.

Forward-looking Statements contained herein are based on the assumptions, beliefs, expectations and opinions

of management, including, but not limited to, the accuracy of the Company’s current Mineral Resource and Mineral

Reserve estimates; that the Company’s activities will be conducted in accordance with the Company’s public

statements and stated goals; that there will be no material adverse change affecting the Company, its properties

or its production estimates (which as sume accuracy of projected ore gr ade, mining rates, recovery timing, and

recovery rate estimates and may be impacted by unscheduled maintenance, labor and contractor availability and

other operating or technical difficulties); the duration and effect of global and local inflation; the dur ation and

impacts of geo-political uncertainties on the Company’s production, workforce, business, operations and financial

condition; the expected trends in mineral prices, inflation and currency exchange rates; that all required approvals

and permits will be obtained for the Company’s business and operations on acceptable terms; that there will be

no significant disruptions affecting the Company's operations and such other assumptions as set out herein.

Forward-looking Statements are made as of the date hereof and the Company disclaims any obligation to update

any Forward-looking Statements, whether as a result of new information, future events, or results or otherwise,

except as required by law. There can be no assurance that these Forward -looking Statements will prove to be

accurate, as actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements.

Accordingly, investors should not place undue reliance on Forward-looking Statements.

Cautionary Note to United States Investors Concerning Estimates of Reserves and Resources

All reserve and resource estimates included in this news release have been prepared in accordance with National

Instrument 43-101 Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects ("NI 43-101") and the Canadian Institute of Mining,

Metallurgy, and Petroleum Definition Standards on Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves. NI 43-101 is a rule

developed by the Canadian Securities Administrators that establishes standards for public disclosure by a

Canadian company of scientific and technical information concerning m ineral projects. All Mineral Reserve and

Mineral Resource estimates contained in the technical disclosure have been prepared in accordance with NI 43-

101 and the Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum Definition Standards on Mineral Resources

and Reserves. Canadian standards, including NI 43-101, differ significantly from the requirements of the Securities

and Exchange Commission, and mineral reserve and resource information included in this news release may not

be comparable to similar information disclosed by U.S. companies.