Future Fuels Unlocks Historic Geophysical Survey Data ; Marketing Update
FUTURE FUELS UNLOCKS HISTORIC GEOPHYSICAL SURVEY DATA ; MARKETING
UPDATE
Vancouver, B.C., October 6, 2025 – Future Fuels Inc. (TSXV: FTUR) (FSE: S0J) (OTC.QB: FTURF) (“Future Fuels” or
the “ Company”) is pleased to announce that it has acquired high resolution geophysical data that covers the
Mountain Lake System at its wholly owned Hornby Basin Project (the “ Hornby Project” or the “Project”), located
approximately 95 kilometres southwest of Kugluktuk, Nunavut Territory.
Future Fuels CEO, Rob Leckie commented “One of our primary objectives for the Mountain Lake project has been
the consolidation and digitization of historic data generated during prior exploration campaigns. Over the past
decades, various operators spent substantial time, effort and money generat ing data that was never properly
consolidated. Our ongoing efforts to secure and process this data represents a significant step forward for our
exploration program. We will be immediately re-processing and integrating it into Vrify's DORA AI platform, giving
us high-resolution geophysical coverage directly over the Mountain Lake system for the first time. Our hope is that
this will allow for the identification of geophysical signatures associated with known mineralization and the
application of those patterns across our broader district -scale land position. This is why digitization, advanced AI,
and machine learning tools are a core part of our exploration strategy; Future Fuels can now systematically evaluate
Mountain Lake and the Hornby Basin in a manner that was previously impossible . We believe this dataset will
unlock new high-priority drill targets across the property.”
About The Historical Geophysical Survey
The Airborne Mega Transient Electromagnetic (MEGATEM) survey was conducted by Pitchstone Exploration and
Triex Minerals two decades ago but was never submitted to the Nunavut Geoscience Database. As a result, this
data was inaccessible to Future Fuels until now.
In May 2005, Fugro Airborne Surveys flew 684 line kms of MEGATEM electromagnetics and magnetics at 150m line
spacings. This is the highest resolution airborne survey ever to be completed at the Hornby Project. The
Electromagnetic system was a MEGATEM 20 channel multicoil system flown at a height of 120m above the ground.
MEGATEM are airborne transient (or time domain) towed -bird EM systems incorporating a high -speed digital
receiver which records the secondary field response with a high degree of accuracy. The response is generated by
eddy currents in conductors. The resul ting EM response can be interpreted to identify the probable origin of the
source conductors. There are various types of conductors, but graphitic horizons in the bedrock are the primary
target. These graphitic zones are often associated with unconformity style uranium deposits. The Company had
Fugro's interpretation of the data, as this was documented as an appendix to the 2006 assessment report (085069)
but lacked the digital version which prevented integration with the ongoing re -interpretation work and use within
the Vrify DORA AI analysis and platform.
The key highlights from the 2005 report completed by Fugro were:
• The magnetic field products showed several strong magnetic bodies with numerous weak short
wavelength bodies filling around the dominant features. This abundance of strong gradients seen in the
first derivative product indicated the area had undergone strong structural deformation and faulting. This
is an important component required for unconformity style deposits hosted at the contact between the
overlying sediments and basement.
• The EM products identified five significant conductors in the survey area which showed evidence of
structural control from the magnetic data. These conductors were recommended for follow up.
• The airborne magnetic and EM survey highlight ed several interesting observations. The magnetic survey
shows a sharp NE-SW boundary between rocks with a strong magnetic signature (on NW side) and rocks
of variable weak to moderate magnetic signature (SE side). This boundary correlates well with the main
trace of the NE trending, vertical dipping Helmut Fault and associated splays. On the SW side of the Helmut
Fault, where the magnetic signature is variably weak to moderate, most of the changes in magnetic
variability correspond to mapped and interpreted faults. It is likely that the magnetic signature picked up
on the survey represents basement rock (i.e. below the Dismal Lake sandstone stratigraphy). As very few
holes went deep enough to intersect the basement rock, it is not clear whether the different magnetic
intensity is a function of the block faulted nature of the same basement rock, or different rock units that
make up the basement.
• The Mountain Lake System occurs within a NE -SW trending zone of moderate magnetic intensity
signature, separated from a narrow zone of weak magnetic intensity to the NW. This change in magnetic
intensity from weak to moderate is coincident with the trace of the NE trending vertic al Imperial Fault. It
is suspected that the proximity to these major faults has a direct impact on the control of the uranium
mineralization. The magnetic survey seems to be very good at showing the traces of the various faults and
highlighting the underlying basement magnetic signature of the Mountain Lake System itself.
• The airborne EM survey shows that the faults believed to be important controls in mineralization are
subtle conductors. Based on the airborne geophysical work, the faults themselves may represent a
mineralized uranium target.
Historical Data Product and Next Steps
The data is currently being re -processed and will be incorporated into the learning data sets for the DORA AI
platform with Vrify. It is anticipated that this additional data layer will enable the DORA algorithm to generate
valuable insights that can help guide future exploration and target generation.
Figure 1: Mountain Lake airborne MEGATEM Survey , 2nd Order Moment: Magenta-Blue represents high -low conductivity
(After Armitage, 2006)
References
Armitage, A. E. (200 6). 2005 Airborne Geophysical surveys, on the mountain lake property, Prepared for Triex Minerals Corporation, Nunavut
assessment report 085069
Marketing Update
Further to the Company’s March 11, 2025 and September 5, 2025 news releases, the Company also wishes to
announce that it has increased the maximum budget of its renewed September 5, 2025 engagement with MCS
Market Communication Service GmbH (“MCS”) for the continued provision of a range of on-line marketing services,
including campaign creation and production of marketing materials, as well as research and analytics, by up to an
additional 155,000 euros. The services are expected to run until November 6, 2025, or until budget exhaustion. No
securities have been provided to MCS or its principals as compensation.
National Instrument 43-101 Disclosure
Nicholas Rodway, P. Geo, (NAPEG Licence # L5576) is a consultant of the Company and is a qualified person as
defined by National Instrument 43-101 - Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Properties. Mr. Rodway has reviewed
and approved the technical content in this release.
About Future Fuels Inc.
Future Fuels’ principal asset is the Hornby Project, covering the entire 3,407 km² Hornby Basin in north -western
Nunavut, a geologically promising area with over 40 underexplored uranium showings, including the historic
Mountain Lake System. Additionally, Future Fuels holds the Covette Project in Quebec’s James Bay region,
comprising 65 mineral claims over 3,370 hectares.
On behalf of the Board of Directors
FUTURE FUELS INC.
Rob Leckie, CEO and Director
604-681-1568
X: @FutureFuelsInc
www.futurefuelsinc.com
Forward Looking Statements
Neither the TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Service Provider (as that term is defined in the policies of the
TSX Venture Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release.
This news release contains forward-looking statements and other statements that are not historical facts. Forward-
looking statements are often identified by terms such as "will", "may", "should", "anticipate", "expects" and similar
expressions. All stateme nts other than statements of historical fact included in this news release are forward -
looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. There can be no assurance that such statements will prove
to be accurate and actual results and future events co uld differ materially from those anticipated in such
statements. Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from the Company's expectations
include but are not limited to market conditions and the risks detailed from time to tim e in the filings made by the
Company with securities regulators , available under its profile at www.sedarplus.ca . The reader is cautioned that
assumptions used in the preparation of any forward -looking information may prove to be incorrect. Events or
circumstances may cause actual results to differ materially from those predicted, as a result of numerous known
and unknown risks, uncertainties, and other factors, many of which are beyond the control of the Company. The
reader is cautioned not to place u ndue reliance on any forward -looking information, including, but not limited to,
statements regarding the Hornby Project, the prospects of the mineral claims forming the Hornby Project, which
are not at an advanced stage of development, the Company's antic ipated business and operational activities, and
the Company's plans with respect to the exploration or advancement of the Hornby Project. Factors that could cause
actual results to vary from forward -looking statements or may affect the operations, performance, development
and results of the Company's business include, among other things, the Company's ability to generate sufficient
cash flow to meet its current and future obligations; that mineral exploration is inherently uncertain and may be
unsuccessful in achieving the desired results; that mineral exploration plans may change and be re -defined based
on a number of factors, many of which are outside of the Company's control; the Company's ability to access sources
of debt and equity capital; competitive factors, pricing pressures and supply and demand in the Company's industry;
and general economic and business. Such information, although considered reasonable by management at the time
of preparation, may prove to be incorrect and actual results may differ materially from those anticipated. Forward-
looking statements contained in this news release are expressly qualified by this cautionary statement. The forward-
looking statements contained in this news release are made as of the date of this news release and the Company
will update or revise publicly any of the included forward -looking statements as expressly required by applicable
law.