Saturday, September 26, 2026
MiningNewsTerminal
Saturday, September 26, 2026 Admin

FPX.V ·

FPX Nickel Scoping Study Outlines Development of World’s Largest Integrated Nickel Sulphate Operation for EV Battery Supply Chain at Baptiste Project in British Columbia

Economic Studies Metallurgy & Processing

Suite 320 – 1155 West Pender Street

Vancouver, BC Canada V6E 2P4

Tel: 604.681.8600

e-mail: [email protected]

FPX Nickel Scoping Study Outlines Development of World’s

Largest Integrated Nickel Sulphate Operation for EV Battery

Supply Chain at Baptiste Project in British Columbia

Vancouver, September 7, 2022 – FPX Nickel Corp. (TSX-V: FPX, OTCQB: FPOCF ) (“FPX” or the

“Company”) is pleased to announce the results of an internal engineering scoping study (“the Study”)

evaluating the production of nickel sulphate for the electric vehicle (“ EV”) battery supply chain from the

high-grade awaruite nickel concentrate to be produced by the Company’s Baptiste Nickel Project

(“Baptiste” or “the Project”) in central British Columbia. The Study highlights FPX’s potential to develop

the world’s largest integrated nickel sulphate production facility, linking the Company directly into the EV

battery supply chain via the production of low -cost, low-carbon nickel sulphate over Baptiste’s projected

35-year mine life.

Highlights

• Development of an integrated nickel operation at Baptiste producing approximately 43,500 tonnes

of nickel contained in nickel sulphate per annum, enough to fulfill approximately 17% of the

projected North American EV battery demand for nickel in 2030 (according to Goldman Sachs1)

• Study outlines conventional hydrometallurgical flowsheet for production of high -purity nickel

sulphate directly from Baptiste’s high grade awaruite nickel concentrate (60-65% nickel), without

the intermediate smelting typically required for sulphide concentrates or the extensive, aggressive

pressure oxidation conditions required for laterite ores and sulphide concentrates

• Anticipated capital costs for nickel sulphate production expected to be competitive with large-scale

refinery operation recently developed by Terrafame (Finland)

• Nickel sulphate production at Baptiste is expected to be more environmentall y sustainable than

traditional production methods for nickel sulphate, with reduced carbon intensity, fewer supply

chain participants, and synergies with an integrated site

“This scoping study demonstrates that Baptiste could become a globally significant producer of low -cost,

low-carbon nickel for electric vehicles for decades to come,” commented Martin Turenne, FPX’s President

and CEO. “Baptiste’s awaruite nickel mineraliza tion has clear technical advantages over sulphide and

laterite ores for producing nickel sulphate , offering a lower-cost, lower-carbon path from mine-to-market

in the EV battery supply chain . Given its extremely high nickel content (over 60% nickel) and low levels

of impurities, our high-grade nickel concentrate has distinct advantages over low -grade nickel sulphide

concentrates (under 20% nickel), and is already comparable to intermediate nickel sulphate feedstocks like

mixed hydroxide precipitate (“MHP”), mixed sulphide precipitate (“MSP”), or nickel matte.

“We look forward to continued engagement with downstream participants in the EV battery supply chain,

including chemical companies, battery makers and automotive OEMs, and expect to incorporate the results

of this internal scoping study into the next stage of formal project study for Baptiste, with a new National

Instrument 43-101 technical report anticipated in the first half of 2023.”

Awaruite – An Advantageous Nickel Feedstock

Nickel mineralization at Baptiste is primarily present in awaruite (Ni3Fe), a nickel-iron alloy composed of

75% nickel and 25% iron. In comparison to typical nickel sulphide concentrates, the Baptiste awaruite

nickel concentrate is notable for its extremely high nickel content and low level of sulphur and associated

impurities, as shown in Table 1.

Table 1 – Select Elemental and Mineral Content for Baptiste Nickel Concentrate and Typical

Nickel Sulphide Concentrates

Elements and Minerals Baptiste Awaruite

Nickel Concentrate

Nickel Sulphide

Concentrates

Nickel (Ni) 60-65% 8-21%

Iron (Fe) 30-32% 25-41%

Sulphur (S) 0.6% 14-31%

Cobalt (Co) 1% 0-1.2%

Copper (Cu) 0.5% 0-5.0%

Magnesium Oxide (MgO) 1% 4-10%

As described in the Company’s January 7, 2020 news release, successful pressure leach test work on

Baptiste’s awaruite nickel concentrate was undertaken by Sherritt Technologies (“Sherritt”). These tests

demonstrated awaruite has favourable leaching characteristics, with up to 99% nickel extraction under

moderate conditions and short treatment times. In addition, these tests demonstrated that the expected

pregnant leach solution will contain low levels of impurities , allowing the utilization of conventional

downstream unit operations for the production of nickel sulphate.

The favourable leaching characteristics of Baptiste’s awaruite nickel concentrate , relative to a nickel

sulphide concentrate, arises from the absence of sulphur in the awaruite mineral. While leaching of nickel

sulphide concentrates is industrially proven, as demonstrated by Vale’s Long Harbour refinery, they require

more aggressive leaching conditions owing to the inherently refractory nature of sulphide minerals. Further

to the simpler processing route , the significantly higher nickel grade of awaruite translates to a reduced

plant size for a given nickel output.

Engineering Study Evaluating Nickel Sulphate Production

Strategy and Basis

Upstream of EV battery manufacturers are chemical plants producing P -CAM (precursor cathode active

material) and CAM (cathode active material) for in clusion into the battery cathode cells. These chemical

plants require nickel feedstock to produce P -CAM and CAM , with a preference for nickel sulphate

specifically.

FPX engaged Ausenco Engineering Canada Ltd. (“Ausenco”) to complete an independent scoping study

evaluating upgrading the high-grade Baptiste awaruite nickel concentrate to nickel sulphate. The Study

evaluated options for producing nickel sulphate in either crystal form (Option 1) or solution form (Option

2), including an assessment of the various technical, economic and strategic considerations of each

alternative. Figure 1 below provides a conceptual product flow diagram for each Option’s integration into

the EV battery supply chain.

Figure 1 – Product Flow for Integration of FPX Nickel Concentrate in EV Battery Supply Chain

Option 1 entails the production of nickel sulphate crystals at a hydrometallurgical refinery to be located

either at the Baptiste site or a separate off-site location. The primary advantage of producing nickel sulphate

in crystal form (versus Option 2’s solution form) is the greater flexibility for servicing multiple downstream

users, which is a tangible consideration considering the significant potential annual production volume from

Baptiste (nominally 43,500 tonnes per year of nickel contained in approx imately 200,000 tonnes per year

of nickel sulphate crystal grading 22% nickel).

Option 2 is based on the transport of Baptiste concentrate to a refinery co-located with P-CAM and CAM

manufacturing facilities (and potentially downstream battery cell manufacturing and battery pack assembly

facilities). In this scenario, the refinery would produce a nickel sulphate solution, which would then be

directly fed to an adjacent chemical plant producing P-CAM and CAM. The primary advantage of Option

2 is the potential synergies of co-locating refining, P-CAM, and CAM facilities in a common location.

In addition to the production of nickel sulphate, the Study also evaluated the capture of cobalt units into a

cobalt intermediate product, representing a new by-product opportunity for the Project.

Processing Concept

The Study envisioned a processing concept with a conventional flowsheet , including unit operations of

leaching, purification, solvent extraction, and crystallization. The process envisioned in the Study is also

broadly comparable with the recently constructed Terrafame nickel refinery, which treats a mixed sulphide

precipitate (“MSP”) product, with nickel intermediates such as MSP having broadly comparable processing

requirements to Baptiste’s awaruite nickel concentrate, as presented in Table 2.

Table 2 – Comparison of Baptiste’s Awaruite Nickel Concentrate and Typical MSP Feedstock

Baptiste Awaruite

Nickel Concentrate

Typical MSP

Feedstock

Composition

Nickel (Ni)

Iron (Fe)

Sulphur (S)

Cobalt (Co)

Copper (Cu)

Magnesium Oxide (MgO)

60-65%

30-32%

0.6%

1.0%

0.5%

1%

55%

0.1-0.2%

33%

1-5%

<0.1%

<0.01%

Pressure Leaching Requirements:

Pressure (kpag)

Temperature (°C)

Residence Time (hours)

750

150

1.5

1,200-1,500

160-180

2.5

Pregnant Leach Solution:

Nickel (g/L)

Iron (g/L)

Free Sulphuric Acid (g/L)

60-70

2.0

10-25

80

0.5

20-30

Selection of the process design, equipment sizing and reagent quantities in the Study was based on a review

of previous testwork , internal databases, and benchmark ing against similarly -sized nickel sulphate

operations, including Terrafame’s refinery in Finland and BHP’s Kwinana refinery in Australia. The FPX

Study developed overall flowsheets, mass and energy balance s, key mechanical equipment list s, general

arrangement layouts, capital cost estimates, and operating cost estimates.

Figure 2 presents a comparison of the Study’s processing concept to the comparable Terrafame processing

concept, with key differences highlighted.

Figure 2 – Process Concepts – Baptiste and Terrafame Nickel Refineries

Key Results

Based on the Study’s process design, the production of nickel sulphate from Baptiste ’s awaruite nickel

concentrate is expected to achieve stage nickel recoveries of approximately 97%, resulting in the annual

production of approximately 43,500 tonnes of nickel in nickel sulphate in the form of either crystals (Option

1) or solution (Option 2). At this scale, Baptiste would significantly exceed the scale of the world’s current

largest nickel sulphate producers.

Further, t he proposed design is expected to yield cobalt recoveries from flotation concentrate of

approximately 95%, resulting in the annual production of approximately 650 tonnes of cobalt in either an

MSP or MHP product grading 40-50% Co. At this scale, Baptiste would become one of Canada’s five

largest cobalt operations, alongside nickel-cobalt mines operated by Glencore and Vale in central and

eastern Canada.

Based on preliminary estimates developed for the Study, it is expected that the capital costs of nickel

sulphate production at Baptiste will be competitive with the comparable Terrafame refinery in Finland,

which was commissioned in 2021 (see Table 3). Similarly, the Study’s operating cost estimate in well

aligned with other industry benchmarks.

Table 3 – Key Parameters for Recent and Planned Nickel Sulphate Refinery Operations

Baptiste Terrafame

Basis Independent scoping

study

Constructed

Location Canada Finland

Feedstock Awaruite concentrate

60-65% Ni

MSP

55% Ni

Production (tpa nickel contained in

nickel sulphate)

43,500 37,4002

Capital Cost (USD, millions) Internal Estimates $3333

Capital Intensity (USD / tpa nickel) Internal Estimates $8,900

Operating Cost (USD / lb nickel) Internal Estimates Not published

The production of (a) nickel sulphate and (b) cobalt MHP (or MSP) products are expected to generate high-

value alternatives for the utilization of Baptiste concentrate in the global EV battery supply chain. With

easy access to well established domestic and international shipping routes, the Baptiste products can be

readily integrated into the rapidly expanding EV production chain both within North America and abroad.

Comparison of Nickel Sulphate Feedstocks – Awaruite vs. Sulphides and Laterites

Typically, nickel sulphate is produced from intermediate or refined nickel products that have been subject

to multiple complex metallurgical processes. These intermediate nickel products are typically either

produced from sulphide or laterite nickel ores. The treatment process for Baptiste’s awaruite nickel

concentrate presents a simplified and lower risk route to producing large quantities of nickel sulphate.

Awaruite vs. Sulphide Ores

As compared to nickel sulphide concentrates, results from FPX’s testwork and the Study suggest Baptiste’s

awaruite nickel concentrate has significant technical advantages, as follows:

• Reduced Processing Requirements – the lack of sulphur and associated impurities eliminates the

need for intermediate smelting prior to downstream hydrometallurgical processing into nickel

sulphate (see Figure 3)

• Reduced Process Complexity – the efficient dissolution of Baptiste’s awaruite nickel concentrate

eliminates the need for intermediate smelting and/or complex leaching processes, such as ultra-fine

grinding, chlorine pre-leaching, chloride addition, or ammonia leaching

• Reduced Carbon Intensity – the extremely high nickel content of Baptiste nickel concentrate (60-

65% nickel) reduces the volume of concentrate for shipment by up to 85% in comparison with

nickel sulphide concentrates, which typically grade 10 -15% nickel , and the elimination of a

secondary refining stage (e.g., smelting) further reduces the carbon emissions associated with

transportation to multiple refining locations

Figure 3 – Simplified Processing Route for Nickel Sulphate Production

Awaruite vs. Laterite Ores

As compared to nickel laterite ores, results from FPX’s testwork and the Study suggest Baptiste’s awaruite

nickel concentrate has significant technical advantages, as follows:

• Process Complexity – the leaching characteristics of awaruite require significantly lower pressure

and temperature than high-pressure acid-leach (“HPAL”) processes (See Figures 4 and 5)

• Process Footprint – the extremely high nickel content of Baptiste concentrate (60-65%+ nickel)

tangibly reduces the volume of material subjected to pressure oxidation and leaching, significantly

reducing the footprint and cost of the hydrometallurgical facility

• Reduced Carbon Intensity – tangibly reduced process requirements for Baptiste concentrate fed

by British Columbia’s hydroelectric-based grid with demonstratively lower carbon intensity

Figure 4 – Operating Pressures for Autoclaves in the Nickel and Gold Industries

Figure 5 – Operating Temperatures for Autoclaves in the Nickel and Gold Industries

Based on FPX’s testwork and Study results, a refinery upgrading Baptiste’s awaruite nickel concentrate

would generate a low-carbon, low-cost, high-volume and high-purity nickel sulphate product for the EV

battery supply chain, with a favourable competitive position driven by:

• Single integrated facility to convert concentrate directly to nickel sulphate

• Low cost of feedstock for a refinery integrated with the Baptiste mine-and-mill operation, versus

higher-cost refined nickel feedstocks like nickel matte, MSP, MHP, powder, and briquettes

• High refinery recovery rates for both nickel and cobalt

0

1,000

2,000

3,000

4,000

5,000

FPX's

Awaruite

Conc.

MSP

(Terrafame)

Gold

POX

Laterite

HPAL

Autoclave Pressures (kPag)

100

150

200

250

300

FPX's

Awaruite

Conc.

MSP

(Terrafame)

Gold

POX

Laterite

HPAL

Autoclave Temperatures (°C)