Saturday, September 26, 2026
MiningNewsTerminal
Saturday, September 26, 2026 Admin

FNI.CN ·

Fathom Announces Q1/2022 Drill Results

Drill Results

Fathom Nickel Inc.

FATHOM DISCOVERS 300M CONDUCTIVE CORRIDOR - CONFIRMATION OF A SIGNIFICANT MAGMATIC

NICKEL SULPHIDE SYSTEM

Intersected 3.07% Nickel Equivalent

NOT FOR DISTRIBUTION TO UNITED STATES NEWSWIRE SERVICES OR FOR DISSEMINATION IN THE UNITED STATES.

ANY FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THIS RESTRICTION MAY CONSTITUTE A VIOLATION OF U.S. SECURITIES LAWS

Calgary, Alberta – April 28, 2022 – Fathom Nickel Inc. (the "Company" or "Fathom") (CSE:FNI) (FSE: 6Q5),

(OTCQB: FNICF) is pleased to announce the intersection of significant, near surface magmatic nickel

mineralization within a conductive corridor exceeding 300m in strike at its Albert Lake Property (“the Bay

Area Conductive Corridor”). The Bay Area Conductive Corridor (see Figure 1) and it’s associated magmatic

nickel mineralization provides evidence that the previously exploited, high-grade Ni -Cu-Co+PGE

Rottenstone deposit was a function of a very large magmatic nickel sulphide system . The Company is

confident that the historic Rottenstone deposit, in combination with the now defined Bay Area Conductive

Corridor demonstrates Fathom’s exploration activities are occurring in a new and developing magmatic

nickel camp located in a world class jurisdiction - Saskatchewan, Canada.

Highlights of Q1/2022 Drill Program

• Magmatic nickel mineralization occurs within the Bay Area Conductive Corridor, located 450m

west/northwest of the high-grade, historic Rottenstone deposit. The significance of this new

discovery is proof that the high-grade Rottenstone deposit originated from a larger source.

• The Bay Area Conductive Corridor exceeds 300m in strike and remains open in both directions.

• 13 drill holes were drilled within the corridor and each drill hole intersected nickel and up to 3.07%

NiEq1.

• Eight of the drillholes from the current program intersected significant nickel and nickel

equivalent values over drilled intervals up to 13.27m.

• Drill hole AL22052 displays the best results to date with 3.54m at 1.68% NiEq ( 1.09% Ni, 0.42%

Cu, 0.068% Co and 0.75g/t Pt, Pd & Au) within a 13.27m zone at 1.00% Ni Eq (0.62% Ni, 0.29% Cu,

0.039% Co and 0.62g/t Pt, Pd & Au).

• Three drill holes visually match the net -texture mineralization of the “Rottenstone style”

mineralogy. These results , plus other magmatic nickel textures recognized within the corridor

could potentially define the outer edges of Rottenstone-like deposits. (The original Rottenstone

mine was contained in a mineralized body measuring only 50 mx40mx10m, yet yielded some of

the highest grades of Ni-Cu + PGE ever mined in Canada).

• Drillholes AL22057 through AL22054A defines a zone of nickel mineralization approximately 185

meters in strike. This mineralization occurs at downhole depth s of 97.55 meters and 144.48

meters, respectively. Refer to Figure 1 and Table 2 for drillhole dips.

• Additionally, both near surface and deep er high-priority borehole electromagnetic ( “BHEM”)

targets within and outside the corridor need to be drill tested.

2

The Q1/2022 drill program, totaling 3,900m in 21 drillholes was completed on March 28, 2022. (See Figure

2, Table 2 for drillhole locations). The Company is now in receipt of all assay values.

Brad Van Den Bussche, Fathom CEO stated, “We are extremely pleased with the accomplishments of the

Fathom geological team resulting from the Q1/2022 exploration program. The definition of the 300m Bay

Area Conductive Corridor, along with the positive drill results demonstrate proof of concept that the

historic Rottenstone deposit did not occur in isolation. The systematic and disciplined exploration approach

the team has taken at Albert Lake has resulted in a new magmatic nickel discovery associated with a near

surface mineralized structure that is open along strike at both ends . We expect to expand and test the

corridor to the southwest during the summer exploration program.”

It is now evident the Bay Area Conductive Corridor is structurally controlled and preliminary interpretation

and modelling suggest a fold nose or hinge zone. Continuous magmatic Ni-Cu-Co+PGE sulphide

mineralization occurring in both ultramafic rock and the associated country rock is emplaced in a south to

north, shallow plunging, keel-like structure that coincides with the interpreted fold nose or hinge zone.

At the south end of the corridor, r e-interpretation of historic BHEM surveys define zones of off-hole

conductivity within 50m of surface. This area has not been drill-tested, but remains a high priority for the

next phase of exploration and drilling.

The Bay Area Conductive Corridor’s electromagnetic (“EM”) response, structural control, and observed

mineralization textures in ultramafic and the associated country rock are consistent with a magmatic

nickel geological model. Furthermore, similar to the historic Rottenstone deposit, it is apparent, based

on results of AL22049, AL22051, AL22052, AL22053 and AL22057, that better mineralization occurs within

net-texture style mineralization and net-textured to semi-massive to massive sulphide mineralization. It

is this style of mineralization that yield s the most robust BHEM responses. Also of note are the

comparably robust yet deeper Bay Area off-hole BHEM responses (Figure 1) that the Company has yet to

drill test. Given the Q1/2022 Bay Area Conductive Corridor success, the Company is now in a much better

position to test these deep conductors with a greater degree of confidence.

Ian Fraser, VP Exploration stated, “ Defining this new corridor , that contains magmatic nickel

mineralization and textures at a location outside of the immediate vicinity of Rottenstone, is a fantastic

accomplishment. Our multi-disciplinary approach to exploration over the past year demonstrates that we

now have the tools and know-how to locate these features. The presence of potentially economic grades

of nickel and PGEs in the Bay Area Conductive Corridor proves that we are in a nickel camp and the

prospects for the discovery of additional “Rottenstones” has increased significantly. The combination of

coincident soil and biogeochemistry anomalies, stacked geophysical anomalies, well-planned drilling and

BHEM has led us to this discovery. There are multiple priority areas within 5km of the historic Rottenstone

deposit where we have the same coincident anomalies that can be pursued aggressively through the drill

bit, but in a much more efficient manner. This new discovery area is a very small fraction of our total land

package - I can’t think of a better place to be exploring for nickel in Canada than at Albert Lake ,

Saskatchewan.”

3

Figure – 1: The Bay Area Conductive Corridor

4

Table 1: Q-1 2022 Assay Summary

Drillhole From

(m)

To (m) Interval

(m)2

Ni

(%)

Cu

(%)

Co

(ppm)

Pd

(g/t)

Pt

(g/t)

Pd+Pt+Au

(g/t)

NiEq1

AL22057 97.55 103.60 6.05 0.58 0.19 355 0.43 0.05 0.49 0.90

including 97.55 101.75 4.20 0.73 0.22 439 0.51 0.05 0.58 1.11

including 99.40 101.75 2.35 1.003 0.31 600 0.48 0.02 0.52 1.45

including 100.07 101.00 0.93 1.093 0.33 614 0.44 0.01 0.48 1.54

AL22056 No significant results, south side Bid Island

AL22055 No significant results, Bay Area Conductive Corridor

AL22054 Hole Abandoned

AL22054A 144.48 149.28 4.80 0.20 0.08 113 0.11 0.09 0.22 0.32

AL22053 98.85 108.03 9.18 0.37 0.27 234 0.20 0.09 0.27 0.62

including 98.85 99.19 0.34 1.17 0.46 708 0.80 0.21 1.05 1.85

including 104.60 104.93 0.33 0.19 1.47 136 0.08 0.01 0.10 0.86

AL22052 95.86 109.13 13.27 0.62 0.29 391 0.39 0.21 0.62 1.00

including 97.60 105.74 8.14 0.87 0.41 536 0.54 0.29 0.85 1.40

including 97.60 98.22 0.62 0.58 0.43 364 0.48 2.78 3.29 1.40

including 99.03 102.57 3.54 1.093 0.42 675 0.69 0.04 0.75 1.68

including 105.40 105.74 0.34 1.04 0.53 659 0.67 0.02 0.71 1.66

AL22051 105.40 111.18 5.78 0.36 0.09 200 0.25 0.02 0.28 0.54

including 108.20 111.18 2.98 0.55 0.11 300 0.37 0.03 0.41 0.80

including 108.79 109.07 0.28 2.13 0.22 1110 1.72 0.01 1.74 3.07

AL22050 No significant results, the Panhandle prospect area

AL22049 103.68 111.72 8.04 0.32 0.23 189 0.18 0.08 0.27 0.54

including 103.68 105.90 2.20 0.62 0.72 356 0.38 0.11 0.51 1.15

including 105.55 105.9 0.35 1.343 0.79 745 0.80 0.10 0.93 2.14

AL22048 No significant results, the Dime prospect area

AL22047 No significant results, the Dime prospect area

AL22046 Hole Abandoned

AL22046A No significant results, the Slug prospect area

AL22045 102.94 106.32 3.38 0.29 0.16 152 0.17 0.02 0.20 0.46

AL22044 136.00 137.45 1.45 0.33 0.17 169 0.17 0.01 0.19 0.50

AL22043 118.42 120.25 1.83 0.19 0.14 117 0.11 0.01 0.13 0.32

AL22042 144.70 147.15 2.45 0.34 0.23 176 0.19 0.01 0.21 0.55

AL22041 Hole Abandoned

AL22040 118.37 127.85 9.48 0.28 0.20 151 0.16 0.03 0.21 0.46

including 120.20 123.54 3.34 0.45 0.32 232 0.27 0.06 0.34 0.74

AL22039 No significant results, Bay Area Conductive Corridor

1Where used in this news release NiEq% = Ni%+ Cu% x $4.50/$11.00 + Co% x $30.00/$11.00 + Pt

[g/t]/31.103 x $1,050/$ 11.00/22.04 + Pd [g/t]/31.103 x $2400/$11.00/22.04 + Au [g/t]/31.103 x

$1,900/$11.00/22.04

2Note; interval (m) are downhole intervals and not true thickness.

3Net-texture sulphide intersections.

5

Figure 2: Q-1 2022 Drillhole Location Map

.

6

Figure 3 (left): Net-texture Ultramafic -Hosted Magmatic Nickel Sulphide Mineralization Drillhole

AL22052; @ 99.03m

Figure 4 (right): Net -texture Ultramafic -hosted Magmatic Nickel Sulphide Mineralization Drillhole

AL22057; @ 100.49m

Figure 5: Massive Magmatic Sulphide Mineralization Drillhole AL22051; @108.79m

Table 2: Q-1 2022 Drillhole Location Table

Hole ID Easting Northing Elevation Azimuth Inclination Final Depth (m) Status

AL22039 510490.1 6244860.7 451.7355 123.7 -70 201.45 Completed

AL22040 510438.3 6244811.4 450.3609 123.4 -70 200 Completed

AL22041 510438.5 6244811.6 450.3609 128 -60 100.7 Abandoned

AL22042 510474.8 6244885.4 451.1 120 -68 212 Completed

AL22043 510460.5 6244785 451.3 105.7 -75 193.86 Completed

AL22044 510460.7 6244871.6 451.1483 122.7 -75 305 Completed

AL22045 510433.4 6244777.9 451.2263 124.8 -75 191 Completed

AL22046 509262.6 6241787.5 450.8936 127 -65 60.6 Abandoned

AL22046A 509262.4 6241787.7 450.8936 128.7 -75 308 Completed

AL22047 507861.3 6241219 460.3564 165.3 -45 224 Completed

AL22048 507684.7 6241136 473.3714 150.9 -48 239.24 Completed

AL22049 510452.3 6244751.9 451.0681 105.8 -80 165 Completed

AL22050 510655.2 6245072.1 454.3834 144.8 -50 211 Completed

AL22051 510444 6244753.9 451.7789 107.3 -80 173 Completed

AL22052 510445 6244744.2 450.8261 107.5 -80 173 Completed

7

AL22053 510444.3 6244743.9 450.8261 108 -84 122 Completed

AL22054 510492.7 6244898.3 451.0963 120 -78 24 Abandoned

AL22054A 510492.4 6244898 451.0963 120 -78 212 Completed

AL22055 510395.5 6244724.7 451.289 102 -65 188 Completed

AL22056 510144.5 6244461.3 451.1372 144.3 -54.1 260 Completed

AL22057 510421.6 6244694.6 451.86624 53 -72 137 Completed

Quality Assurance / Quality Control (QA/QC) Disclosure Statement

Fathom implements an industry -standard QA/QC for all field and diamond drill programs. Fathom,

through the services of TerraLogic Exploration Inc., inserts QA/QC samples in its diamond drill programs

at a rate of one sample per approximately every 12 -13 samples collected. Standards sourced from CDN

Resource Laboratories and CCRMP were inserted into the sample stream at a rate of 1 in 30 samples.

Additionally, lab duplicates (coarse rejects) were inserted and positioned in the sample sequence at a rate

of 1 in 30 samples and positioned in the sample sequence alternating with standards to result in a QA/QC

insertion rate of no less than 1 in 15 samples. Blanks were inserted at the start of every sample batch and

additionally after samples of anticipated high-grade or high sulphide content.

Assaying is performed at ALS Canada Ltd. ALS is an accredited laboratory; (SCC – CAN-P-1579 and CAN-P-

4E ISO/IEC 17 025) and is independent of Fathom. All drill core samples are analyzed using a 4 -Acid

digestion followed by 33 element ICP-AES analyses (Code ME-ICP61). Over limit Ni, Cu results are further

analyzed by 4 -Acid ore grade elements ICP -AES process (Code ME- OG62). Analyses for Au, Pd and Pt

utilized the ore grade Pt, Pd and Au by ICP-AES (Code PGM-ICP27).

Qualified Person and Data Verification

Ian Fraser, PGeo., VP Exploration and a Director of the Company and the "qualified person" as such term

is defined by National Instrument 43 -101, has verified the data disclosed in this news release, and has

otherwise reviewed and approved the technical information in this news release on behalf of the

Company.

About Fathom Nickel Inc.

Fathom is a resource exploration and development company that is targeting high-grade nickel sulphide

discoveries for use in the rapidly growing global electric vehicle market.

The Company is accelerating exploration on its flagship Albert Lake Project, host to the historic

Rottenstone mine, which is recognized as one of the highest -grade (Nickel, Copper , Platinum group

metals) deposits of its type ever mined in Canada. The Albert Lake Project consists of over 90,000 ha of

mineral claims located in the Trans -Hudson Corridor of Saskatchewan, which is home to numerous

world-class mining camps.

8

ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD

“Brad Van Den Bussche”

President and CEO, Director

For Further Information Please Contact:

Brad Van Den Bussche, President and CEO

or

Manish Grigo, Director of Corporate Development

+1-416-569-3292

Email: [email protected]

Forward Looking Statements:

This news release contains "forward -looking statements" that are based on expectations, estimates, projections and

interpretations as at the date of this news release. Forward -looking statements are frequently characterized by words such as

"plan", "expect", "project", "seek", "intend", "believe", "anticipate", "estimate", "suggest", "indicate" and other similar words or

statements that certain events or conditions "may" or "will" occur, and include, without limitation, statements regarding the

enhancement of the Company’s geologic model and extending the areas of known mineralization and the Company’s work

towards defining a resource base. Such forward looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other

factors which may cause the actual results, performance or achievements of the Company to be materially different from any

future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward- looking statements. Such risks and other

factors may include, but are not limited to, the results of exploration activities; the ability of the Company to complete fu rther

exploration activities; timing and availability of external financing on acceptable terms. The Company does not undertake to

update any forward-looking information except in accordance with applicable securities laws.