Focus Graphite Reports a 26% Increase in Measured and Indicated Mineral Resources at its Lac Knife Flake Graphite Project, Québec
January 24th, 2017
For Immediate Release
FMS: TSX-VENTURE
Focus Graphite Reports a 26% Increase in Measured and Indicated
Mineral Resources at its Lac Knife Flake Graphite Project, Québec
OTTAWA – January 24th, 2017 -- Focus Graphite Inc. (FMS: TSX-V; OTCQX: FCSMF; FSE:
FKC) (“Focus” or the “C ompany”) is pleased to announce an updated Mineral Resource
Estimate for its 100%-owned Lac Knife flake graphite project, located 27 km south of
Fermont, in the Côte-Nord administrative region of northeastern Québec. The updated Mineral
Resource Estimate is based on 231 drill holes totalling 22,505 metres of historic and recent
drilling and has been prepared by AGP Mining Consultants Inc. in accordance with Canadian
Securities Administrators’ National Instrument 43 -101 “Standards of Disclosure for Mineral
Projects” (NI 43-101).
Highlights:
• Measured and Indicated Mineral Resources increased by 26% when reported at a
cut-off of 3.0% Graphitic carbon (Cg) to 12.1 million tonnes grading 14.64% Cg
(Table 1) compared to the previous estimate of 9.6 million tonnes grading 14.77%
Cg1 at the same cut-off (Table 2).
• Upgraded 2.5 million tonnes of Inferred resources to the Indicated category.
• Delineated an additional 2.3 million tonnes of Inferred resources that are located
within the southern extension of the Lac Knife deposit.
• The updated Mineral Resource Estimate increased the in-situ graphite content by
25% to 1.771 million tonnes in the Measured and Indicated category.
At the 3% Cg cut-off grade, Measured and Indicated Mineral Resources are now estimated at
12.1 million tonnes grading 14.64% Cg (Table 1). Additionally, there are 2.3 million tonnes of
Inferred resources at 16.20 % Cg (Tables 1 and 2).
Table 1. Lac Knife Mineral Resource Estimate @ 3.0 % Cg cut-off
Tonnage Cg In Situ Graphite
(t) (%) (t)
Measured 447,000 21.45 96,000
Indicated 11,654,000 14.38 1,675,000
Measured + Indicated 12,101,000 14.64 1,771,000
Inferred 2,299,000 16.20 372,000
• Mineral Resources are not Mineral Reserves and do not have demonstrated economic viability.
• There is no certainty that all or any part of the Mineral Resources will be converted into Mineral
Reserves.
• The rounding of tonnes as required by NI 43-101 reporting guidelines may result in apparent
differences between tonnes, grade and contained graphite.
1 Refer to Focus news release dated January 28th, 2014 available at www.focusgraphite.com and at www.sedar.com.
Focus Graphite President and CEO Gary Economo stated: “This second increase in Measured
and Indicated resources since 2014 continues to reflect the quality our Lac Knife flake graphite
deposit and is another positive step supporting the development of the Lac Knife project.”
The update to the Mineral Resource Estimate is based on the addition of the 2014 exploration
and definition drilling programs that added 65 new drill holes of which 41 targeted the Lac Knife
deposit’s southern extension. The additional 4,871 metres of drilling successfully achieved the
objectives of delineating the expansion of the mineralized zones to the south and to upgrade the
quality of existing Inferred resources to the Indicated category. This resource update is now
supported by a total of 231 drill holes totalling 22,505 metres of historic and recent drilling.
As shown in Table 2 below, the resource tonnage increased by 26% in the Measured and
Indicated category from 9.6 million tonnes grading 14.77% Cg in the Lac Knife project Feasibility
Study2 (“FEAS”) to 12.1 million tonnes grading 14.64% Cg in this new update. This translated to
an increase of 25% of in-situ graphite from 1.414 million tonnes to 1.771 million tonnes.
Table 2: Sensitivity to cut-off change and comparison to previous estimate (2014)
Updated
Mineral Resource Estimate
(3.0% Cg Cut-off base case)
2014
Mineral Resource Estimate
(3.0% Cg Cut-off base case)
Percent Change
Cut-off Tonnes CG (%) Cg Tonnes Tonnes CG (%) Cg Tonnes Tonnage Graphite
Measured
> 10.0 447,000 21.45 96,000 428,000 23.81 102,000 4% -6%
> 5.0 447,000 21.45 96,000 432,000 23.66 102,000 3% -6%
> 3.0 447,000 21.45 96,000 432,000 23.66 102,000 3% -6%
> 2.0 447,000 21.45 96,000 432,000 23.66 102,000 3% -6%
Indicated
> 10.0 9,832,000 15.56 1,530,000 7,466,000 15.77 1,177,000 32% 30%
> 5.0 11,571,000 14.45 1,672,000 9,065,000 14.44 1,309,000 28% 28%
> 3.0 11,654,000 14.38 1,675,000 9,144,000 14.35 1,312,000 27% 28%
> 2.0 11,656,000 14.38 1,675,000 9,146,000 14.35 1,312,000 27% 28%
Measured
+
Indicated
> 10.0 10,272,000 15.82 1,625,000 7,894,000 16.21 1,279,000 30% 27%
> 5.0 12,018,000 14.71 1,768,000 9,497,000 14.86 1,411,000 27% 25%
> 3.0 12,101,000 14.64 1,771,000 9,576,000 14.77 1,414,000 26% 25%
> 2.0 12,103,000 14.64 1,771,000 9,578,000 14.77 1,415,000 26% 25%
Inferred
> 10.0 2,093,000 17.02 356,000 2,196,000 15.81 347,000 -5% 3%
> 5.0 2,282,000 16.28 372,000 2,941,000 13.75 404,000 -22% -8%
> 3.0 2,299,000 16.20 372,000 3,102,000 13.25 411,000 -26% -9%
> 2.0 2,299,000 16.20 372,000 3,116,000 13.20 411,000 -26% -9%
• Mineral Resources are not Mineral Reserves and do not have demonstrated economic viability.
• There is no certainty that all or any part of the Mineral Resources will be converted into Mineral
Reserves.
• The rounding of tonnes as required by NI43 -101 reporting guidelines may result in apparent
differences between tonnes, grade and contained graphite.
2 Refer to Focus news release dated June 25th, 2014 available at www.focusgraphite.com and at www.sedar.com.
In the Inferred resource category, the tonnage decreased by 26% from 3.1 million tonnes in the
FEAS to 2.3 million tonnes in this resource update. The Inferred resource category average
grade increased from 13.25% Cg to 16.20% Cg. This resulted in a reduction of 9% of in-situ
graphite in this category from 411,000 tonnes down to 372,000 tonnes. These overall changes in
the resources resulted from converting most of the 2.5 million tonnes of Inferred resources in the
FEAS resource constraining shell to the M easured and Indicated categories, and also by
extending the deposit to the south adding an additional 2.3 million tonnes of Inferred resources
in the revised South Central Zone. (See Figure 1).
Figure 1. Isometric representation of the major mineralized z ones with resource constraining
shell
• The updated Mineral Resource Estimate is based on 231 core drill holes totalling 22,505 metres of
historic and recent drilling. This includes 149 surface drill holes totalling 12,041 metres completed
since 2010.
• Mineral Resources have been reported within a constraining pit shell at a cut -off grade of 3.0%
graphitic carbon (“Cg”).
This update is not deemed material by the Company. Details on the Mineral Resource
Estimation methodology are given in the notes below.
Notes on Mineral Resource Estimation Methodology
• Mineral resources are estimated in conformance with the CIM Mineral Resource
definitions referred to in NI 43-101 “Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects”. Pierre
Desautels, P.Geo., Principal Resource Geologist of AGP Mining Consultant s Inc. and
Qualified Person under NI 43-101 who is an independent of the Company, has prepared
and authorized the release of the mineral resource estimates presented herein. Willie
Hamilton, Eng., Senior Mining Engineer of AGP Mining Consultants Inc. and Qualified
Person under NI 43-101, has reviewed the technical content of the Press Release. This
mineral resource estimate is an update of the January 28th, 2014 estimate conducted by
AGP Mining Consultants that supported the Lac Knife FEAS effective June 25, 2014
authored by Met-Chem.
• The updated mineral resource is based on 231 core drill holes totalling 22,505 metres of
historic and recent drilling. This includes 149 surface drill holes totalling 12,041 metres
completed since 2010.
• All drill holes are diamond drill core and were sampled and assayed over their entire
length in the mineralized section of the core of mostly 1.31 metre sample intervals. A
QA/QC program was introduced during the 2010 drill program and expanded during the
2012, 2013 and 2014 programs to include the insertion of standards, duplicates, and
blanks and check assays at a secondary laboratory.
• Specific gravities were determined by IOS Services Géoscientifiques (“IOS”) of
Saguenay, Québec. A total of 5,183 determinations exist in the database that were
collected by IOS since the 2010 drill program. Due to the strong correlation between the
sulphur and bulk density, the model was interpolated with the same parameters used for
the sulphur model. The density in the mineralized zone ranges from 2.60 to 3.08 g/cm3.
• A detailed review of the geological logs and grade distribution led to the development of
three-dimensional (3D) domain model based lithology and grade boundaries. The
“wireframing” or outlining of mineralization resulted in three major mineralized zones with
eight minor accessory zones. The grade is typically above 3% Cg within the wireframes
but was allowed to be as low as 1% in the occasional lower grade zones internal to the
high grade material and also on the edge of the wireframe. These domains were utilized
to perform variography studies and to develop grade interpolation constraints.
• For the treatment of outliers, each statistical domain was evaluated separately and no
top cut was necessary. However, a search restriction of 30 x 30 x 30 metr es was
imposed on threshold values of 38% Cg in order to restrict the influence of the highest
values during the interpolation.
• The composite intervals selected were 3.0 metres nominal length. Shorter composites
that were generated at the intersection with wireframes were distributed over the lengths
of the other composites within the same domain.
• A 3D geological block model was generated using GEMS© s oftware. The block model
matrix size is 6 x 6 x 5 metres. Ordinary kriging was used for all domains with inverse
distance and nearest neighbour check models. The interpolation was carried out in
multiple passes with increasing search ellipsoid dimensions. Classification for all models
was based primarily on the pass number , distance to the closest composite and the
krige variance. The Measured classification was only retained in the area in proximity to
the bulk sample pits. No adjustment to the classifica tion was made for blocks
interpolated primarily with historical holes since these were found to be adequate for
resource modelling.
• The reported mineral resources are considered to have reasonable prospects of
economic extraction. AGP created a pit shell using the Lerchs-Grossman pit optimization
algorithm and costs, sales price and pit and plant operating parameters that were
derived from the Lac Knife FEAS (June 25th, 2016) as well as from typical regional costs;
- Selling Price – 2,000 $/t (FOB Sept-Iles);
- Mill Recovery – 91%;
- Concentrate Grade – 97.8%;
- Pit Slope – 40 and 48 degrees;
- Overburden Mining Cost – 4.00 $/t mined;
- Rock Mining Cost – 5.50 $/t mined;
- Processing Cost – 42.50 $/t milled;
- Transportation Cost – 25.00 $/t of concentrate;
- General Administration Cost – 2.50 $/t milled.
• The resulting pit shell encompasses most of the estimated Measured, Indicated and
Inferred Resources. The rounding of tonnes as required by NI 43-101 reporting
guidelines may result in apparent differences between tonnes, grade and contained
graphite.
• Mineral resources that are not mineral reserves do not have demonstrated economic
viability. The estimate of mineral resources may be materially affected by environmental,
permitting, legal, title, taxation, sociopolitical, marketing, or other relevant issues.
• The quantity and grade of reported Inferred mineral resources in this estimation are
uncertain in nature and there has been insufficie nt exploration to define these Inferred
mineral resources as Indicated or Measured mineral resources and it is uncertain if
further exploration will result in upgrading them to Indicated or Measured mineral
resources.
Lac Knife Project
The Lac Knife project comprises 57 map -designated claims covering 2,986.31 ha located in
Esmanville Township (NTS map sheet 23B/11), 27 km south-southwest of the iron-mining town
of Fermont, in the Côte-Nord administrative region of Québec. Focus acquired a 100% interest
in the project in October 2010. A map showing the location of the Lac Knife project is available
on the company’s website at www.focusgraphite.com.
The mineralization at Lac Knife is hosted in biotite-quartz-feldspar paragneiss and schist of the
Nault Formation, in association with iron formations of the Wabush Formation. These are
equivalent to the lower Proterozoic Labrador Trough rocks affected by the late Proteroz oic
Grenvillian orogeny. High grade metamorphism and folding associated with the Grenvillian
orogeny has resulted in the formation of important concentrations of graphite dominated b y
value-enhanced large flakes.
Sampling, Assaying and QA/QC
The entire drill cores were logged at th e Lac Knife camp and shipped to IOS’ facilities in
Saguenay, Québec for sample preparation. Two slabs of about 1/4 of the 4-inch diameter PQ
core were sawed parallel on each side of the central axis of the core. One of the slab s was
earmarked for geochemical analysis while the other slab was kept as a witness sample. Center
parts of the core are kept for possible subsequent uses. The samples are mostly 1.5 m etres in
length with variances from 0.5 m to 1.8 m. Slab samples were dr ied before processing for
density measurement, crushing and grinding at the IOS sample preparation laboratory.
Once prepared, the samples were sent to the Consortium de Recherche Appliquée en
Traitement et Transformation des Substances Minérales (“COREM” ), an ISO/IEC 17025:2005
certified facility located in Québec-City, for graphitic carbon (Cg) analysis using LECO high
frequency combustion method with infrared measurement (internal analytical code LSA -M-B10
for graphitic carbon; ISO 9686:2004). For the m easurement of graphitic carbon, the sample is
pre-treated with nitric acid, placed in a LECO capsule and introduced in the furnace (1,380ºC) in
an oxygen atmosphere. Carbon is oxidized to CO2. After the removal of moisture, gas (CO2) is
measured by an infrared detector and a computerized system calculates the concentration of
graphitic carbon (% Cg). Total sulphur was also analyzed by LECO (code LSA-M-B41). For
sulphur determinations, the sample is placed in a LECO capsule and introduced in the furnace
(1,380ºC) until sulphur is oxidized to SO2. After the removal of moisture, gas (SO2) is measured
by an infrared detector and a computerized system calculates the concentration of total sulphur
(% S).
Under the QA/QC program, about 10% of the samples were analyzed by COREM for total (code
LSA-M-B45), organic (code LSA-M-B58), inorganic (code LSA-M-B11) and graphitic (code LSA-
M-B10) carbon as well as for total sulphur. Duplicates of these samples were also sent to
ACTLABS Laboratories in Ancaster, Ontari o (ISO/IEC 17025:2005 with CAN -P-1579) for
graphitic carbon (code 5D – C Graphitic) and total sulphur (code 4F – S Combustion infrared
detection) determinations and for 35 multi -element analysis using ICP methods (code 1E2 –
Aqua Regia). IOS introduced standards, duplicates (sawing, crushing or grinding duplicates) and
blank samples into each batch of core samples as part of the QA/QC program.
Qualified Persons
Pierre Desautels, P.Geo. Principal Resource Geologist of AGP Mining Consultants Inc. Qualified
Person under NI 43-101 who is independent of the Company, has prepared and authorized the
release of the mineral resource estimates presented herein. Willie Hamilton, Eng., Senior Mining
Engineer of AGP Mining Consultants Inc. and Qualified Person under NI 43-101 guidelines has
reviewed the technical content of the News Release.
Mr. Marc-André Bernier, M.Sc, P.Geo (Québec and Ontario), a Director of the Company and a
Qualified Person under National Instrument 43 -101 – Standards of Disclosure for Mineral
Projects, has reviewed and approved the technical content of this news release.
About Focus Graphite
Focus Graphite Inc. is an advanced exploration and mining company with an objective of
producing graphite concentrate at its wholly-owned Lac Knife flake graphite deposit located 27
km south of Fermont, Québec. In a second stage, to meet Quebec stakeholder interests of
transformation within the province and to add shareholder value, Focus is evaluating the
feasibility of producing value added graphite products including battery-grade spherical graphite.
The Lac Knife project hosts a Measured and Indicated Mineral Resource* of 12.1 million tonnes
grading 14.64% Cg (447,000 tonnes Measured @ 21.45% Cg and 11,654,000 tonnes Indicated
@ 14.38% Cg) as natural flake graphite with an additional Inferred Mineral Resource* of 2.3
million tonnes grading 16.20% Cg. Focus' goal is to assume an industry leadership position by
becoming a low-cost producer of technology-grade graphite concentrate.
The Feasibility Study filed with SEDAR (www.sedar.com) on August 8, 2014 for the Lac Knife
Project indicates the project is economically viable and has the potential to become a low cost
graphite concentrate producer based on 7.86 milli on tonnes of Proven and Probable Mineral
Reserves** grading 15.13% Cg included in the Mineral Resource (429,000 tonnes Proven @
23.61% Cg and 7,428,000 tonnes Probable @ 14.64% Cg).
On May 27, 2014, the Company announced the potential for high value added sales in the Li-ion
battery sector following battery coin cell tests performed on Spherical Graphite ("SPG")
produced from the Lac Knife graphite concentrate. Testing measured the performance metric s
and confirmed Focus' capability to tailor lithium ion battery-anode-grade graphite and value
added products to meet the most stringent customer specifications.
On February 26, 2015, the Company announced the results from independent laboratory testing
that indicated Coated Spherical Graphite (“CSPG”) produced from Lac Knife concentrate
outperformed synthetic graphite anodes for use in lithium-ion batteries.
On November 25, 2015, the Company announced results from independent laboratory testing
that reported “zero loss” in long-term battery anode cycle testing of high purity CSPG produced
from Lac Knife concentrate.
On March 31, 2016, the Company announced the introduction of a high conductivity graphite
cathode material produced from expanded Lac Knife graphite and exhibiting twice the
conductivity of cathodes versus standard grades of synthetic and natural flake graphite used in
commercially available lithium-ion batteries.
On August 8, 2016, the Company announced it has successfully purified fine flake graphite -
sourced at its wholly owned Lac Knife, Québec deposit - from 95% to 99.99% purity using a
proprietary energy efficient purification process. Attaining a 99.99% purity level from fine
graphite flake is significant. Focus now has the technology to economically purify low value fine
flake graphite or, “fines” to a high value material needed for the production of lithium -ion
batteries.
On August 17, 2016, the Company reported that the maiden core drilling program conducted at
its wholly-owned Lac Tétépisca graphite project in 2014 intersected significant subsurface
graphitic mineralisation along the trend of the Manicouagan-Ouest Graphitic Corridor including in
hole LT-14-04 which intersected 103.9 m (true thickness) grading 10.25% Cg.
On August 24, 2016, the Company released channel sampling results from its wholly-owned Lac
Tétépisca Nord graphite project. An 86.8 m long trench crosscut 67.2 m grading 6.75% Cg.
On November 21, 2016, the Company and Joint-Venture partner SOQUEM Inc. reported high
hydrometallurgical recoveries of rare earth elements (REE) from the Kwyjibo REE project. The
extraction rate from rare earth concentrate is approximately 90% for all REE within the
Magnetitite Mineralization Type (MM1). The relatively simple metallurgical flowsheet is a
distinctive feature of the Kwyjibo project among peer rare earth elements projects.
On January 20, 2017, the Company released the results of its 2016 infill and extension drilling
program at its wholly-owned Lac Tétépisca graphite project including in Hole LT-16-32 which
intersected 102.1 m (true thickness) grading 10.7% Cg.
Focus Graphite is a technology-oriented graphite mining development company with a vision for
building long-term, sustainable shareholder value. Focus also holds a significant equity position
in graphene applications developer Grafoid Inc.
* Mineral Resources are not Mineral Reserves and do not have demonstrated economic viability.
** The Measured and Indicated Mineral Resources are inclusive of those Mineral Resources
modified to produce Mineral Reserves. The reference point for the Mineral Reserve Estimate is
the mill feed.
For more information about Focus Graphite, please visit www.focusgraphite.com.
Forward Looking Statement
This News Release contains "forward -looking information" within the meaning of Canadian
securities legislation. All information contained herein that is not clearly historical in nature may
constitute forward-looking information. Generally, such forward-looking information can be
identified by the use of forward -looking terminology such as "plans", "expects" or "does not
expect", "is expected", "budget", "scheduled", "estimates", "forecasts", "intends", "anticipates" or
"does not anticipate", or "believes", or variations of such words and phrases or state that certain
actions, events or results "may", "could", "would", "might" or "will be taken", "occur" or "be
achieved". Forward-looking information is subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties
and other factors that may cause the actual results, level of activity, performance or
achievements of the Company to be materially different from those expressed or implied by such
forward-looking information, including but not limited to: (i) volatile stock price; (ii) the general
global markets and economic conditions; (iii) the possibility of write-downs and impairments; (iv)
the risk associated with exploration, development and operations of mineral deposits; (v) the risk
associated with establishing title to mineral properties and assets; (vi) the risks associated with
entering into joint ventures; (vii) fluctuations in commodity prices; (viii) the risks associated with
uninsurable risks arising during the course of exploration, de velopment and production; (ix)
competition faced by the Company in securing experienced personnel and financing; (x) access
to adequate infrastructure to support mining, processing, development and exploration activities;
(xi) the risks associated with changes in the mining regulatory regime governing the Company;
(xii) the risks associated with the various environmental regulations the Company is subject to;
(xiii) risks related to regulatory and permitting delays; (xiv) risks related to potential conflict s of
interest; (xv) the reliance on key personnel; (xvi) liquidity risks; and (xvii) the risk of potential
dilution through the issue of common shares. Forward-looking information is based on
assumptions management believes to be reasonable at the time suc h statements are made,
including but not limited to, continued exploration activities, no material adverse change in metal
prices, exploration and development plans proceeding in accordance with plans and such plans
achieving their stated expected outcomes, receipt of required regulatory approvals, and such
other assumptions and factors as set out herein. Although the Company has attempted to
identify important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those contained
in the forward-looking information, there may be other factors that cause results not to be as
anticipated, estimated or intended. There can be no assurance that such forward -looking
information will prove to be accurate, as actual results and future events could differ materially
from those anticipated in such forward-looking information. Such forward-looking information has
been provided for the purpose of assisting investors in understanding the Company's business,
operations and exploration plans and may not be approp riate for other purposes. Accordingly,
readers should not place undue reliance on forward -looking information. Forward-looking
information is made as of the date of this News Release, and the Company does not undertake
to update such forward-looking information except in accordance with applicable securities laws.