Frontier Lithium PEA Demonstrates Attractive 27% IRR Pre-Tax for Lithium Chemical Production in North America's Great Lakes Region
Frontier Lithium PEA Demonstrates Attractive
27% IRR Pre-Tax for Lithium Chemical
Production in North America's Great Lakes
Region
SUDBURY, ON
,
Feb. 16, 2021
/CNW/ - Frontier Lithium Inc. (TSXV: FL) (OTCQB: LITOF) (FSE:
HL2) ("Frontier" or "the Company") is pleased to release the strong results of a Preliminary
Economic Assessment ("PEA") for a proposed mine-to-lithium hydroxide chemical/hydromet plant
facility ("Integrated Project") in the Great Lakes Region of North America. The fully Integrated
Project PEA assumes a hydromet plant that would convert spodumene concentrate feedstock
sourced from open-pit mining and a milling facility at the Company's PAK Lithium Project, located
north of
Red Lake
, Ontario.
Frontier Lithium PEA Demonstrates Attractive 27% IRR Pre-Tax for Lithium Chemical Production in
North America's Great Lakes Region (CNW Group/Frontier Lithium Inc.)
Highlights ($USD unless otherwise stated):
Life of Project Revenue of
$8.52 billion
over 26-year total project life;
Total initial capital expenditure estimate of
$685 million
with a contingency of 22.5% included.
Sustaining Capital of
$117 million
;
Pre-tax Net Present Value at an 8% base case discount rate ("NPV
8
") of
$1
.62 billion and
Internal Rate of Return ("IRR") of 27%;
Post-tax net "undiscounted" Cash Flow (before initial capital expenditures) of
$3.75 billion
;
Post-tax NPV
8
of
$974.6 million
and IRR of 21%;
Annual Average EBITDA (steady-state) of
$225 million
.
Chemical plant producing 23,174 tonnes of battery-quality Lithium Hydroxide Monohydrate
(LiOH-H
2
O) per year with an average selling price of
$13,500
per tonne. A total of 556,200
tonnes of LiOH has been contemplated being produced from open pit mining only at the PAK
and Spark deposits; underground constrained mineral resources available at the PAK deposit
for future consideration.
PAK and Spark deposits are open in all directions and could provide potential resource
expansion for a newly commenced Preliminary Feasibility Study ("PFS");
All-in operating cash costs of $4,083 per tonne of LiOH; and
After-Tax Pay Back of Capital Expenditures is 4.5 years after the start of commercial
operations.
"The fully Integrated Project PEA demonstrates the economic and strategic benefits of developing
lithium chemical production of lithium hydroxide in the Great Lakes Region of
North America
, with
skilled labour, exceptional infrastructure, low carbon sources of energy, prime intermodal
transportation access and low operating costs." stated
Trevor Walker
, President & CEO of Frontier
Lithium. "With PEA completion, Frontier will advance the Integrated Project to a PFS level and
continue to advance the high-grade PAK Lithium Project resource toward the goal of production of
premium lithium chemicals. Underpinning the PFS will be the current drilling at the PAK Lithium
Project and ongoing operations of the Company's mini-pilot plant testing our proprietary Lithium
Hydroxide production process. As western automotive companies rapidly electrify their product
lineups, we expect very strong demand for locally sourced premium lithium chemicals supply, and the
Great Lakes region is the prime location as it is the largest auto manufacturing hub on the continent."
(All Tables are in $USD unless otherwise stated)
Table
1
: Summary of PAK Project PEA Economics
Project Economics
Pre-Tax
NPV
8
$1.62 Billion ("B")
IRR
27%
Cumulative Cash Flow
$5.26 B
Annual Average EBITDA (steady-state)
$225 Million ("M")
Post-Tax
NPV
8
$974.6 M
IRR
21%
Cumulative Cash Flow
$3.51 B
Table
2
: Summary of PAK Project PEA Economic Assumptions
Economic Assumptions and Parameters
Exchange Rate ($USD/$CAD)
$0.78
Discount Rate (base case)
8%
Technical Grade Concentrate (7.2% Li2O)
$1,600/tonne
Chemical Grade Concentrate (6.0% Li2O)
$750/tonne
Lithium Hydroxide Monohydrate_Battery Grade
$13,500/tonne
Table
3
: Summary of PAK Project PEA Production Profile
Production Profile
Total Project Life (LOM)
26 Years
Mine and Concentrator
Total Tonnes Milled
22,914,500
Diluted Head Grade
1.46% Li
2
O
Average Stripping Ratio (W:O)
3.6
Daily mill commercial throughput
2,900 t/d
Average Lithium Recovery (mill)
83.9%
Total CG Production (6.0% Li
2
O)
4,076,600 tonnes
Total TG Production (7.2% Li
2
O)
525,700 tonnes
Hydromet Plant
Yearly chemical plant throughput
160,000 tonnes
Lithium Recovery
85%
Total battery grade Lithium Hydroxide (LiOH)
556,200 tonnes
Table
4
: Summary of PAK Project PEA Operating Costs
Operating Costs
$/t
processed
Mine and Concentrator
Direct Open Pit Mining Cost
3.48
Direct Processing Cost
17.82
Avg. Spodumene Conc. Production Cost (EXW hydromet plant)
313
Hydromet Plant
Average Processing Cost
1,785
Lithium Recovery
85%
Total Lithium Hydroxide Production Cash Cost (EXW plant)
4,083
Table
5
: Summary of PAK Project PEA Capital
Capital Requirements
$ Million
EPCM
41.3
Contingency
111.4
Mine and Mill
Site Preparation/Infrastructure
41.4
Mill Processing and Storage
100.3
Power Distribution
6.2
Open Pit Equipment
16.6
Water treatment and waste management
4.2
Chemical Plant
Civil/Structural
103.9
Hydromet Processing
168.8
Utilities/Aux. & Services
90.9
Total Pre-Production Capital Cost
684.9
Total Sustaining Capital Cost
117.1
Cautionary Statements
The fully Integrated Project PEA referred to in this announcement has been undertaken to determine
the potential viability of the integrated project comprising a mine/concentrator and chemical plant in
northern
Ontario
and to reach a decision to proceed with more definitive studies. This PEA is
preliminary in nature, includes inferred mineral resources that are considered too geologically
speculative to have the economic considerations applied to them that would enable them to be
categorized as mineral reserves. There is no certainty the PAK Lithium Project outlined by the PEA
will be realized. The Company has concluded it has a reasonable basis for providing the forward-
looking statements included in this announcement and believes that it has a reasonable basis to
expect it will be able to fund the development of the Integrated Project. Given the uncertainties
involved, investors should not make any investment decisions based solely on the results of the PEA.
Mining and Milling
A preliminary integrated site plan including mining operations, waste disposal, and concentrator was
considered and developed for the purpose of the PEA. The PEA study outlines two open pits at the
mine, one at the PAK deposit and one at the Spark deposit. The PAK deposit contains a pit
constrained mineral resource in the measured and indicated categories of 5.4 million tonnes
averaging 1.99% Li
2
O and a pit constrained inferred mineral resource of 0.60 million tonnes
averaging 1.97% Li
2
O that hosts a rare technical/ceramic grade spodumene with low inherent iron
(below 0.1% Fe
2
O
3
). The Spark deposit is located only 2km northwest of the PAK deposit and
contains a pit constrained mineral resource estimate of 3.3 million tonnes averaging 1.59% Li
2
O in
the indicated category and a pit constrained mineral resource of 15.7 million tonnes averaging 1.31%
Li
2
O in the inferred category. Under the PEA, the open pits targeted production results in an
anticipated stripping ratio of 3.6 to 1. The open pits will be mined using a standard fleet of off-road
mining trucks and hydraulic excavators at a rate of approximately 2,900 tonnes of ore per day. The
concentrator will process all of the ore generated from mining operations. Frontier Lithium has filed
with appropriate authorities for a mining lease which comprises the mining and surface rights
necessary to mine the PAK and Spark deposits and encompass the appropriate area for a mining
operation as outlined in the PEA. Frontier Lithium does not have the necessary permits in place at
the time of this release to build the project as described in the PEA.
Chemical/Hydromet Plant
The hydromet plant PEA considers a lithium processing plant to be located on a Great Lakes port
and includes spodumene concentrate receiving and storage facilities, reagent receiving and storage
facilities, process facilities and site infrastructure. For the purpose of the PEA the chemical plant
flowsheet incorporates as far as practical 'conventional' or proven-in-operation, equipment, and
process stages, in order to minimize process, technology and equipment risk. The hydromet plant is
designed to produce 23,174 tonnes per year of battery grade lithium hydroxide monohydrate
(approx. 20,400 t/year of lithium carbonate equivalent "LCE").
Mineral Resource Estimate
A summary of the Mineral Resource Estimate for Spark is set out in Table 6. The Mineral Resource
Estimate for PAK is summarized in Tables 7 and 8.
Table
6
: Spark Mineral Resource Calculation (Updated 2021)
Cut-Off
Resource
Classification
Tonnes (t)
Li
2
O (%)
Ta
2
O
5
(ppm)
Contained
Li
2
O (t)
0.60%
Li
2
O
Indicated
3,261,000
1.59
123
52,000
Inferred
15,718,000
1.31
108
206,000
T
able
7
: PAK Open Pit Mineral Resource Calculation (Updated 2021)
Cut-
off
Resource
Category
Commodity
Geologic Zone
Tonnes (t)
Li
2
O
(%)
Ta
2
O
5
(ppm)
Contained Li
2
O
(t)
0.6% Li
2
O
Measured
Lithium
UIZ
(1)
325,200
3.43
59
11,154
Lithium
LIZ
(2)
1,019,400
1.73
105
17,636
Lithium
Total Lithium Zone
1,344,600
2.14
94
28,790
Lithium / Tantalum
Bulk Pegmatite
1,344,600
2.14
94
28,790
0.6% Li
2
O
Indicated
Lithium
UIZ
255,400
2.91
75
7,432
Lithium
LIZ
3,819,900
1.88
99
71,814
Lithium
Total Lithium Zone
4,075,300
1.94
97
79,246
Tantalum
CIZ
(3)
544,100
1.11
113
n/a
Lithium / Tantalum
Bulk Pegmatite
4,619,400
1.72
99
79,246
0.6% Li
2
O
Measured + Indicated
Lithium
UIZ
580,600
3.20
65
18,587
Lithium
LIZ
4,839,300
1.85
100
89,450
Lithium
Total Lithium Zone
5,419,900
1.99
96
108,036
Tantalum
(CIZ)
544,100
1.11
113
n/a
Lithium / Tantalum
Bulk Pegmatite
5,964,000
1.81
98
108,036
0.6% Li
2
O
Inferred
Lithium
(UIZ)
74,200
2.77
96
2,055
Lithium
(LIZ)
528,900
1.86
79
9,838
Lithium
Total Lithium Zone
603,100
1.97
81
11,893
Tantalum
(CIZ)
77,400
1.21
153
n/a
Lithium / Tantalum
Bulk Pegmatite
680,500
1.75
89
11,893
Table
8
: PAK Underground Mineral Resource Calculation (Updated 2021)
Cut-
off
Resource
Category
Commodity
Geologic Zone
Tonnes (t)
Li
2
O
(%)
Ta
2
O
5
(ppm)
Contained Li
2
O
(t)
0.8% Li
2
O
Measured
Lithium
UIZ
0
-
-
0
Lithium
LIZ
0
-
-
0
Lithium
Total Lithium Zone
0
-
-
0
Lithium / Tantalum / Rubidium
Bulk Pegmatite
0
-
-
0
0.8% Li
2
O
Indicated
Lithium
UIZ
0
-
-
0
Lithium
LIZ
1,261,700
2.15
91
27,127
Lithium
Total Lithium Zone
1,261,700
2.15
91
27,127
Tantalum / Rubidium
CIZ
3,830
1.16
14
n/a
Lithium / Tantalum / Rubidium
Bulk Pegmatite
1,265,530
2.14
91
27,127
0.8% Li
2
O
Measured + Indicated
Lithium
UIZ
0
-
-
0
Lithium
LIZ
1,261,700
2.15
91
27,127
Lithium
Total Lithium Zone
1,261,700
2.15
91
27,127
Tantalum / Rubidium
CIZ
3,830
1.16
143
n/a
Lithium / Tantalum / Rubidium
Bulk Pegmatite
1,265,530
2.14
91
27,127
0.8% Li
2
O
Inferred
Lithium
UIZ
27,450
4.35
31
1,194
Lithium
LIZ
2,043,400
2.35
73
48,020
Lithium
Total Lithium Zone
2,070,850
2.38
72
49,214
Tantalum /Rubidium
CIZ
6,900
2.03
146
n/a
Lithium / Tantalum / Rubidium
Bulk Pegmatite
2,077,750
2.37
73
49,214
(1)
Upper Intermediate Zone
(2)
Lower Intermediate Zone
(3)
Central Intermediate Zone
Mineral Resource Estimate Notes
1.
Mineral Resources were prepared in accordance with NI 43-101 and CIM Definition Standards (2014). Minerals Resources that are not Mineral Reserves do not have
demonstrated economic viability. This estimate of Minerals Resources may be materially affected by environmental, permitting, legal, title, taxation, sociopolitical,
marketing and other issues.
2.
Open Pit Mineral Resources are reported at a cut-off of 0.60% Li
2
O. Underground Mineral Resources are reported at a cut-off of 0.80% Li
2
O.
3.
Appropriate mining costs, processing costs, metals recoveries and inter ramp pit slope angles were used to generate pit shells.
4.
Appropriate mining costs, processing costs, metals recoveries and mining shapes were used to generate underground mineral resources
5.
Rounding may result in apparent summation differences between tonnes, grades and contained metals content
6.
Tonnage and grades measurements are in metric units
7.
Contributing assay composites at Spark were capped at 3.55% Li
2
O. At PAK, composite assays were capped at 4.40 % Li
2
O in the CIZ, 4.18% Li
2
O in the LIZ and 4.95%
Li
2
O in the UIZ.
8.
A specific gravity of 2.718 was applied to the pegmatite at Spark based on 241 measurements. The specific gravity at PAK vary from 2.66 to 2.86 depending on the
pegmatite domain.
9.
Modeling at Spark was performed using GEOVIA Surpac 2019 software with grades estimated using ordinary kriging (OK) interpolation methodology. Samples were
composited at 1.0 meter down hole. Block grades were estimated on a multi pass basis with a minimum and maximum number of composites required for each estimation
pass. Block size is 2 metre * by 2 metre (y) by 2 metre (z).
10.
Modeling at PAK was performed using GEOVIA Surpac 2019 software with grades estimated using ordinary kriging (OK) interpolation methodology. Samples were
composited at 1.0 meter down hole. Block grades were estimated on a multi pass basis with a minimum and maximum number of composites required for each estimation
pass. Block size is 2.5 metre * by 2.5 metre (y) by 2.5 metre (z).
Quality Assurance and Quality Control
Under Frontier's QA/QC procedures, all drilling was completed by Chenier Drilling Ltd. of Val Caron,
ON using thin-walled BTW drill rods (4.2 cm core diameter) and a Reflex ACT III oriented core
system. Using the Reflex system, the drill core was oriented and marked as it was retrieved at the
drill. The core was boxed and delivered to the Frontier core shack where it was examined,
geologically logged and marked for sampling. The core was photographed prior to sampling. Using
a rock saw, the marked sample intervals were halved with one halve bagged for analysis. Sample
blanks along with lithium, rubidium and cesium certified reference material was routinely inserted into
the sample stream in accordance with industry recommended practices. Field duplicate samples
were also taken in accordance with industry recommended practices. The samples were placed in
poly sample bags and transported to Red Lake by Frontier employees and then shipped to AGAT
Laboratories Ltd. (AGAT) in Mississauga, ON for quantitative multi-element analysis. AGAT is an
ISO accredited laboratory. All petrographic sample preparation and electron microprobe (EMP)
analysis was completed at the Queen's Facility for Isotope Research (QFIR) at Queen's University
in Kingston, Ontario under the direct supervision of Dr. Steve Beyer. The core is stored on site at the
Pakeagama Lake exploration camp.
Qualified Persons
The Mineral Resources for PAK Lithium Project disclosed in this news release have been estimated
by Mr.
Todd McCracken
, P. Geo., an employee of
BBA Engineering Ltd.
and independent of
Frontier. By virtue of his education and relevant experience, Mr. McCracken is "Qualified Person" for
the purpose of National Instrument 43-101. The mineral resource has been classified in accordance
with CIM Definition Standards for mineral resources and mineral reserves, (
November 2014
). Mr.
McCracken, P. Geo., has read and approved the contents of this press release as it pertains to the
disclosed Mineral Resource estimate and financial model. The National Instrument 43-101 PEA
report will be filed on SEDAR (
www.sedar.com
) within 45 days.
BBA Engineering Ltd. is a Canadian consulting engineering firm specialized in power, mining and
metals, biofuels, oil and gas.
Johnny Canosa P.Eng
., Sr. Mining Engineer for JAC Mining Consultants is an independent Qualified
Person as defined by NI 43-101 and has reviewed and approved the contents of this news release.
Mr. Canosa is responsible for open pit mine planning, scheduling operating and capital costs related
to mining and surface infrastructure.
Kurt Boyko
, P.Eng., Consulting Specialist - Mechanical for Nordmin Engineering Ltd., is an
independent Qualified Person as defined by NI 43-101 and has reviewed and approved the contents
of this news release. Mr. Boyko is responsible for process plant design, chemical plant design and
operating and capital cost estimates related to the processing facilities.
Steve Wilson
, P.Eng., Process Engineer – Wil-Solve Consulting Services, is an independent
Qualified Person as defined by NI 43-101 and has reviewed and approved the contents of this news
release. Mr. Wilson is responsible for mineral processing and metallurgical testing.
Review of Technical Information
Garth Drever
, P. Geo, Vice President Exploration for
Frontier Lithium Inc.
is a Qualified Person as
defined by NI 43-101 and has reviewed and approved the contents of this news release. Mr. Drever
has been involved with all aspects of the PAK Lithium project since 2013.
About Frontier Lithium Inc.
Frontier Lithium (
TSX.V: FL
) (
OTCQB: LITOF
) (
FSE: HL2
) is a
Sudbury Ontario
based, publicly
listed, junior mining company with the largest land position in an emerging premium lithium mineral
district located in the Great Lakes region of northern
Ontario
. The company maintains 100% interest
in the PAK Lithium Project which contains one of
North America's
highest-grade, large tonnage hard-
rock lithium resources in the form of a rare low-iron spodumene. The Project has significant upside
exploration potential. Frontier is a pre-production business that is targeting the manufacturing of
battery quality lithium hydroxide in the Great Lakes Region to support electric vehicle and battery
supply chains in
North America
. Frontier maintains a tight share structure with management
ownership approximately 30% of the Company.
About the PAK Lithium Project
The PAK Lithium Project encompasses 26,774 hectares at the south end of
Ontario's
Electric
Avenue, the largest land package hosting lithium bearing pegmatites in
Ontario
. The Project covers
65 km of the Avenue length and remains largely unexplored; however, since 2013 the company has
delineated two premium spodumene bearing lithium deposits located 2.3 km from each other at the
southwestern end of the project. Recently, Frontier confirmed the presence of spodumene with the
Bolt pegmatite, between PAK and Spark deposits and the Pennock Lake pegmatite occurrence a
further 30 km along the Project. Frontier's premier Great Lakes location is advantaged by favorable
geology, proven metallurgy with access to intermodal hubs, infrastructure, power, and mining along
with downstream lithium processing expertise and auto OEM's.
The PAK deposit hosts a rare "technical grade" spodumene maintaining low inherent iron levels
(below 0.1% Fe
2
O
3
) and contains a pit constrained mineral resource in the measured and indicated
categories of 5.4 million tonnes averaging 1.99% Li
2
O and a pit constrained inferred
mineral resource of 0.60 million tonnes averaging 1.97% Li
2
O. The PAK deposit also contains an
underground constrained mineral resource in the measured and indicated categories of 1.3 million
tonnes averaging 2.15% Li
2
O and an underground constrained mineral resource in the inferred
category of 2.1 million tonnes averaging 2.38% Li
2
O. The Spark deposit is located only 2km
northwest of the PAK deposit and contains a pit constrained mineral resource estimate of 3.3 million
tonnes averaging 1.59% Li
2
O in the indicated category and a pit constrained mineral resource of
15.7 million tonnes averaging 1.31% Li
2
O in the inferred category., as per the initial results
supporting an upcoming NI 43-101 Technical Report, "2020 Preliminary Economic Assessment, Fully
Integrated PAK Lithium Project" by BBA Engineering Ltd.
Forward-looking Statements
Neither the TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in
the policies of the TSX Venture Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of
this release. This release includes certain statements that may be deemed "forward-looking
statements". All statements in this release, other than statements of historical facts, that address
future production, reserve potential, exploration drilling, exploitation activities and events or
developments that the Company expects are forward-looking statements. Although the Company
believes the expectations expressed in such forward-looking statements are based on reasonable
assumptions, such statements are not guarantees of future performance and actual results or
developments may differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements. Factors that could
cause actual results to differ materially from those in forward looking statements include market
prices, exploitation and exploration successes, continued availability of capital and financing, and
general economic, market or business conditions. Investors are cautioned that any such statements
are not guarantees of future performance and those actual results or developments may differ
materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements. For more information on the
Company, Investors should review the Company's registered filings what are available at
https://www.sedar.com
SOURCE
Frontier Lithium Inc.
View original content to download multimedia:
http://www.newswire.ca/en/releases/archive/February2021/16/c4690.html
%SEDAR: 00008434E
For further information:
Bora Ugurgel, Manager, Investor Relations, 2736 Belisle Drive, Val Caron,
ON. P3N 1B3 CANADA, T. +001 705.897.7622, F. +001 705.897.7618
CO: Frontier Lithium Inc.
CNW 16:30e 16-FEB-21