Eskay Mining Corp. Announces 2018 Plans: Ni-Cu-Co Potential Along Red Lightning Trend toward Garibaldi’s E&L Occurrence; Potential for Brucejack-Style Precious Metals Mineralization on North Mitchell Block
1
82 Richmond Street East
Toronto, ON M5C 1P1
T: 416 907 4020
W: eskaymining.com
NEWS RELEASE
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: JANUARY 19, 2018
Eskay Mining Corp. Announces 2018 Plans: Ni-Cu-Co Potential Along Red
Lightning Trend toward Garibaldi’s E&L Occurrence; Potential for
Brucejack-Style Precious Metals Mineralization on North Mitchell Block
Toronto, January 19, 2018 – Eskay Mining Corp. (“Eskay” or the “Company”) (TSX-
V:ESK) (OTC-PK: ESKYF) (Frankfurt: KN7; WKN: A0YDPM) is pleased to announce
its plans for 2018 fieldwork, largely based on:
1) an update by nickel expert Peter Lightfoot on its Red Lightning zone, along with a
subsequent re-evaluation of previously-collected stream sediment geochemical data
from the immediate vicinity;
2) the identification through recent mapping of a Brucejack-style conceptual exploration
target on its North Mitchell block; and
3) the initiation of an exploration-focused review of historical data from Eskay Mining’s
entire land package outside of the SIB property. Reference is made to the Company’s
website at www.eskaymining.com for more maps and information on the Company’s
130,000 acre landholdings in the Golden Triangle of B.C.
Red Lightning Review
Immediately after the field season, highly-regarded geologist and magmatic Ni-Cu
sulphide system expert Dr. Peter Lightfoot was contracted by the Company to carry out
a review of previous work on Eskay Mining’s Red Lightning zone magmatic Ni-Cu-Co
occurrence (Figure 1). Dr. Lightfoot, who was recently involved closely in Garibaldi
Resources’ recognition and exploration of the potential at the nearby E&L Ni-Cu-PGE-
Au-Ag massive sulphide occurrence (20 km northwest), has confirmed that the
mineralization at Red Lightning is indeed that of a magmatic nickel-copper sulphide
system. And while the grades intersected to date are sub-economic (20.4 m at 0.79%
Cu, 0.42% Ni and 0.08% Co, including 10 m at 1.03% Cu, 0.55% Ni and 0.10% Co
[estimated true thicknesses of 10.8 m and 5.3 m, respectively]), the Ni-Cu system
remains prospective.
The prospectivity evident at Red Lightning and nearby is also evident from a review of
previous work in the belt by the Company. This work, which included stream sediment
2
82 Richmond Street East
Toronto, ON M5C 1P1
T: 416 907 4020
W: eskaymining.com
sampling and airborne geophysics, strongly suggests that Red Lightning should be
viewed as just one small part of what is likely a much larger, 15 km long, relatively
underexplored belt that likely includes other mafic-ultramafic bodies. The belt is outlined
by anomalous Ni-Cu stream sediment geochemistry and airborne magnetic highs that
may well run from the Red Lightning zone along a northwest trend toward Garibaldi’s
Ni-Cu prospects and the E&L Zone (Figures 2 and 3). It is clear from the figures and this
data that the Red Lightning-E&L trend warrants follow-up exploration work focusing on
Ni-Cu-PGE mineralization.
Brucejack-Style Conceptual Target on the North Mitchell Block
The Company’s North Mitchell Block consists of six tenures comprising 1446 hectares
that lies in “Elephant Country,” less than 2 km east-southeast of Seabridge Gold’s
porphyry Au-Cu deposit, Iron Cap, and a similar distance across the Mitchell glacier
from Pretium’s Snowfield gold deposit (Figure 4). Recent mapping of the property has
confirmed that the same stratigraphic units which host many of the occurrences on
Pretium’s Brucejack property track across and are preserved at North Mitchell. This is
significant because many of the occurrences at Brucejack, which are aligned along a
NNE trend that runs from south of the Valley of the Kings (Brucejack deposit) north at
least as far as the Snowfield deposit, occur at, or near, a similar stratigraphic level within
the Early Jurassic section. Along that trend, intrusive and host stratified rocks below that
stratigraphic level are commonly much more altered than the rocks above. This is
particularly so near discordant structures (faults) which cut the host rocks and appear to
have acted as controls for mineralization and alteration along the trend, but commonly
at high angles to it. As has been shown at Brucejack, these faults also appear to have
acted as basin-bounding extensional structures during deposition of the Early Jurassic
volcanic and associated clastic rocks. In the Sulphurets Camp, these discordant
structures may also have been reactivated and locally inverted much later, during
contractional deformation associated with development of Skeena fold belt in mid-
Cretaceous time. Examples of such inverted structures in the Camp probably include
the Sulphurets and Mitchell thrust faults, as well as folds at various scales, including the
Valley of Kings syncline along the Brucejack trend, and folds and faults running sub-
parallel to the trends of the Sulphurets and Mitchell thrusts.
On the North Mitchell Block (Figures 1 and 4) direct evidence for the presence of a
mineralizing system is restricted to locally pervasive quartz-sericite-pyrite (qsp)
alteration at lower stratigraphic levels and locally associated veining that to date has
only returned anomalous gold grades. Our mapping, however, has revealed good
evidence on the property for the existence of a possible inverted Early Jurassic
structure, and this structure is coincident with the most intense alteration. The structure
is manifest as a (faulted) mid-Cretaceous fold with a northeasterly trending axial plane
3
82 Richmond Street East
Toronto, ON M5C 1P1
T: 416 907 4020
W: eskaymining.com
across which a gently to moderately northerly-dipping sequence of relatively thin but
distinctive volcanic strata on the northwest correlates well with similar but steeply
southeastly-dipping to slightly overturned strata on the east that appear to be part of a
much thicker sequence than their correlatives to the west. The change in stratigraphic
thickness of coeval strata across this strongly southeast-vergent structure may therefore
mark the presence of an inverted syn-depositional Early Jurassic structure. Given its
association with common qsp alteration of lower Hazelton Group rocks, and given its
general spatial association with both the Brucejack trend and with the northeast trend
marked by the Au-rich Cu porphyries at Kerr, Sulphurets, Mitchell, and Iron Cap on
Seabridge’s property (a trend which includes the emerging Au and Au-Cu systems still
farther northeast on Tudor Gold’s Treaty Creek property), this conceptual but blind
target at North Mitchell is truly compelling.
The Company is considering a number of approaches to help refine targets for drilling at
North Mitchell, including a Magnetotelluric Survey and further geologic mapping.
Exploration-Focused Review of Historical Data
In late 2017 The Company also initiated a detailed review of all historical data collected
from its extensive land package, which includes occurrences such as Red Lightning.
This review, which differs from previous compilations in its more detailed scope, is
intended to help focus field-based follow-up that will generate specific drill targets. That
fieldwork will build on fieldwork undertaken in 2016 (See October 17, 2016 news
release) and will likely consist of geological mapping, prospecting, geochemical
sampling and local ground geophysical surveying, with drilling to follow, either later on in
the 2018 field season, or in 2019. The compilation is being undertaken by geologists
Andrew Mitchell, Neil Prowse, and Arron Albano, under the supervision of Charlie Greig
of C.J. Greig & Associates Ltd., all of whom are familiar with the area and who were
closely involved in the 2017 SIB property exploration program that was funded by SSR
Mining Inc.
Charles J. Greig, P . Geo., a member of the Company’s Advisory Team, is a Qualified
Person under the definition of National Instrument 43-101. Mr. Greig has reviewed and
approved the technical information in this press release.
For further information regarding the SIB property, see the Company’s Press Releases
of October 17, 2016, August 8, 2016, May 9, 2016 and January 23, 2013.
4
82 Richmond Street East
Toronto, ON M5C 1P1
T: 416 907 4020
W: eskaymining.com
About Eskay Mining Corp:
Eskay Mining Corp (TSX-V:ESK) is a TSX Venture Exchange listed company,
headquartered in Toronto, Ontario. Eskay is an exploration company focused on the
exploration and development of precious and base metals in British Columbia in a
highly prolific, poly metallic area known as the Eskay Rift Belt located in the “Golden
Triangle”, 70km northwest of Stewart, BC. The Company currently holds mineral
tenures in this area comprised of 177 claims (130,000 acres).
All material information on the Company may be found on its website at
www.eskaymining.com and on SEDAR at www.sedar.com.
For further information, please contact:
Mac Balkam T: 416 907 4020
President & Chief Executive Officer E: [email protected]
Neither the TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that
term is defined in the policies of the TSX Venture Exchange) accepts
responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release.
Forward-Looking Statements: This Press Release contains forward-looking
statements that involve risks and uncertainties, which may cause actual results to differ
materially from the statements made. When used in this document, the words “may”,
“would”, “could”, “will”, “intend”, “plan”, “anticipate”, “believe”, “estimate”, “expect” and
similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Such
statements reflect our current views with respect to future events and are subject to
risks and uncertainties. Many factors could cause our actual results to differ materially
from the statements made, including those factors discussed in filings made by us with
the Canadian securities regulatory authorities. Should one or more of these risks and
uncertainties, such as actual results of current exploration programs, the general risks
associated with the mining industry, the price of gold and other metals, currency and
interest rate fluctuations, increased competition and general economic and market
factors, occur or should assumptions underlying the forward looking statements prove
incorrect, actual results may vary materially from those described herein as intended,
planned, anticipated, or expected. We do not intend and do not assume any obligation
to update these forward-looking statements, except as required by law. Shareholders
are cautioned not to put undue reliance on such forward-looking statements.
5
82 Richmond Street East
Toronto, ON M5C 1P1
T: 416 907 4020
W: eskaymining.com
Figure 1: Eskay Mining Corp’ s Property Overview and Deposit Setting
6
82 Richmond Street East
Toronto, ON M5C 1P1
T: 416 907 4020
W: eskaymining.com
Figure 2: Ni silt anomaly trending from Red Lightning to Garibaldi Resources Ni-Cu-Co-PGE-Au-Ag Discovery
7
82 Richmond Street East
Toronto, ON M5C 1P1
T: 416 907 4020
W: eskaymining.com
Figure 3: Copper silt anomaly trending from Red Lightning to Garibaldi Resources Ni-Cu-Co-PGE-Au-Ag
8
82 Richmond Street East
Toronto, ON M5C 1P1
T: 416 907 4020
W: eskaymining.com
Figure 4: North Mitchell Block Mineralization and Structural Trend