Saturday, September 26, 2026
MiningNewsTerminal
Saturday, September 26, 2026 Admin

ELEF.TO ·

Silver Elephant Signs Definitive Agreement to Acquire Minago Nickel Project in Thompson Nickel Belt Manitoba, Canada

Mergers & Acquisitions Property Options & Staking

Silver Elephant Signs Definitive Agreement to Acquire Minago Nickel

Project in Thompson Nickel Belt Manitoba, Canada

Vancouver, British Columbia, January 22, 2021 – Silver Elephant Mining Corp. (“Silver Elephant” or “the

Company”) (TSX:ELEF, OTCQX:SILEF, Frankfurt:1P2N) is pleased to announce that it has entered into a

binding definitive Asset Purchase Agreement (the “APA”) with Victory Nickel Inc. (“Victory Nickel”) to acquire

the Minago Nickel Project located in Thompson nickel belt (“TNB”), Manitoba, Canada (the “Minago Project”).

Proposed Transaction Summary

Subject to the terms of the APA, Silver Elephant has agreed to acquire the Minago Project from Vic tory Nickel

for aggregate consideration of US$11,675,000, which consists of a US$6,675,000 (“Property Payment”) credit

against certain secured debt owed by Victory Nickel to Silver Elephant at closing and US$5,000,000 in Silver

Elephant common shares (“Consideration Shares”) to be issued over a one-year period.

Additionally, Silver Elephant will agree to issue to Victory Nickel C$2,000,000 in Silver Elephant common shares,

upon the price of nickel exceeding US$10 per pound for 30 consecutive business days , occurring before

December 31, 2023.

At closing, pursuant to the APA, Silver Elephant will also subscribe for 40,000,000 common shares of Victory

Nickel (each, a “VN Share”) at a price per VN Share of $0.025 for consideration of C$1,000,000.

Closing of c ontemplated transaction is expected by February 9, 2021, and subject to customary closing

conditions, including the final approval of the Toronto Stock Exchange and Canada Stock Exchange.

Dan Oosterman, the Company’s Vice President, Exploration and Canadian Operations states:

“The Minago acquisition immediately propels Silver Elephant to the forefront of the nickel sulphide mining space

to supply much needed Class 1 nickel for long- range, high-intensity, fast charging NMC 811 (80% nickel, 10%

manganese, 10% cobalt) cathode standard in lithium batteries to fuel mass electric vehicle (EV) adoption.

EV penetration is expected to reach 22 to 30% by 2030 according to a recent research report by Ken Hoffman

of Mckinsey & Company. Annual production of 30 million EV’s requires over 2 billion pounds of Class 1 nickel.

The 2019 global nickel production was approximately 5 billion pounds consisting of 2.5 billion pounds of Class 1

high-purity nickel from sulphide deposits, and 2.5 billion poun ds of Class 2 nickel from laterite deposits. Nickel

production from sulphide deposits has been in decline due to their rarity. Silver Elephant’s value proposition is

to fill the insatiable and eruptive Class 1 nickel demand from EV’s by expanding nickel sulphide resource at

Minago to district scale and eventually bringing the Minago project to production with industry partners.”

Minago Project Summary

The Minago Project spans over 197 km 2 and is in the province of Manitoba, Canada, situated approximately

480km north of Winnipeg and 225km southwest of Thompson.

The Minago Project resides in the southern part of the TNB. It is recognized as the fifth largest nickel -bearing

geological belt in the world with over 5 billion pounds of nickel production since 195 8. Notable nickel mines

include the T1, T3, and Birchtree mines all within a 225 km proximity to the Minago Project. Current annual

production by Vale S.A. in the TNB is approximately 33 million pounds.

The project site is close to existing infrastructure, including Manitoba Provincial Highway 6, a 230 kV high voltage

transmission line that runs directly beside Highway 6, both of which transect the property. The Property may be

served by the Hudson Bay Railway Company (HBR), with rail lines accessible from Ponton, Manitoba,

approximately 65 km north of the project.

Resource and Metallurgy

The Minago Project contains a sulphide nickel deposit known as the Nose deposit that was advanced to a

feasibility level stage as an open pit mine operation in 2009 by Victory Nickel with a former-NI43-101 compliant

resource calculation completed by Wardrop Engineering in 2009 as tabulated below:

Historic Resource Classification

(Wardrop, 2009)

Cutoff Tonnes (x 1,000) Ni (%) Mlbs Ni

Measured 0.25% 11,051 0.56 136.4

Indicated 0.25% 43,063 0.51 484.0

Inferred 0.25% 14,585 0.53 170.4

A qualified person as defined by NI 43- 101 has not done sufficient work to classify the historical estimate as

current mineral resources or mineral reserves. The Company is not treating the historical estimate as current

mineral resources or mineral reserves.

The historic resource estimate database includes 68,092 metres of diamond drilling endowed with zones of wide

(i.e. 100 meters+) and continuous mineralization within the Nose deposit. The table below showcases

considerable widths through the mineralized zone:

Hole No From (m) To (m) Int (m) Ni%

V-10-11 161.5 353.2 191.7 0.51

V-10-16 176.0 320.3 144.3 0.85

V-08-06 537.7 676.7 139.0 0.73

V-08-06 132.2 265.3 133.1 0.62

V-10-15 109.5 228.0 118.5 0.82

V-08-04B 361.7 471.0 109.2 0.76

N-05-01 143.7 251.0 107.3 0.80

MXB-71-94 177.4 282.2 104.9 0.73

V-10-26 269.2 358.8 89.5 0.86

NM-06-02 293.3 364.2 70.9 1.21

N-05-01 325.3 391.2 65.9 1.08

V-10-18 351.0 409.1 58.1 1.67

B-12A-89 322.2 372.5 50.3 1.23

V-08-01 452.2 490.6 38.4 1.51

Reported widths are core-interval widths and not true widths. True widths have not been determined.

The 2009 feasibility study incorporated metallurgical test work conducted by SGS Lakefield in 2008 which is yet

to be verified by the Company. This test wor k was conducted on a composite of 5 metallurgical drillholes that

were designed to have the best representation of the Nose deposits mineralization profile in terms of style and

grade. The results of this work indicates that a nickel concentrate containing 22.27% Ni and with an equivalent

sulphidic nickel recovery of 77.2%.

Mineralogical work on the nature of the Nose deposit’s nickel sulphides reveals a prevalence of violarite (FeNi2S4)

and secondary millerite (NiS ). These types of nickel sulphides result in high nickel tenor, which is the

concentration of nickel in sulphides, contributing to the high metallurgical recoveries and concentrate grade at

the Minago Project.

Exploration Potential

The Minago Project is i n the same key geological formation of the Opswagan Group in which the Thompson

nickel deposits occur. The orebodies in the Thompson Nickel Belt occur in what is geologically known as the

Pipe Formation, specifically within the member known as the P2 schis t. Thompson- style mineralization is

believed to form as primary nickel sulphide deposits that have undergone remobilization into low-stress structural

traps such as fold noses and along fold limbs in pressure shadows and dilatant zones as a result of regional

metamorphism.

This has led to several producing mines along the same fold- structure within kilometers of each other —in

Thompson this is known as the Thompson Dome, where the Thompson, Birchtree and Pipe mines have

collectively produced 150Mt grading 2.32% nickel since 1958.

The Nose deposit at Minago has all the same structural, geological and mineralogical characteristics as the

Thompson Dome. Extended mineralization has been defined by drilling along a fold structure within a kilometer

north of the Nose deposit known as the North Limb.

The North Limb has received over 6,000 meters of diamond drilling with intercepts of nickel mineralization akin

to the grades and widths at the Nose deposit. Some highlights from the drilling completed in 2010 and 2011

along the North Limb are tabulated below:

DDH No From (m) To (m) Int (m) Ni (%)

V‐10‐02 142 202.4 60.4 0.45

incl… 184.8 201.0 16.3 0.8

V‐10‐03 199.7 228.1 28.4 0.42

V‐10‐03 291.0 301.9 10.9 0.7

V‐10‐04 203.0 255.0 52.0 0.63

incl… 206.0 236.5 30.5 1.01

V‐10‐04 263.0 292.0 29.0 0.56

incl… 270.0 281.0 11.0 1.08

V‐10‐05 280.9 298.5 17.7 0.73

incl… 282.0 298.5 9.5 1.07

V‐10‐13 180.8 314.6 133.9 0.5

incl… 259.1 312.0 52.8 0.61

V-10-21 173.0 225.2 52.2 0.57

V-10-21 259.6 277.8 18.3 0.54

V-11-07 333.0 347.4 14.4 0.44

V-11-08 301.6 327.8 26.3 0.51

V-11-08 339.1 359.4 20.3 0.91

V-11-09 266.0 361.5 95.5 0.72

V-11-10 260.0 380.5 120.5 0.52

incl… 292.5 324.0 31.5 0.75

V‐11‐11 217.9 235.0 17.1 0.58

V‐11‐11 255.0 304.0 49.0 0.56

incl… 259.0 295.0 36.0 0.64

V‐11‐13 194.2 255.2 61.0 0.46

incl… 208.0 237.0 29.0 0.6

V‐11‐14 302.4 338.7 36.3 0.68

Reported widths are core-interval widths and not true widths. True widths have not been determined.

Based on these historic results Victory Nickel engaged AGP Consultants to evaluate the potential of the North

Limb and established that a resource target estimate of between 21 million and 34 million tonnes grading 0.49%

to 0.59% based on a 0.30% total nickel cut-off that is separate from the Nose deposit. This target estimate has

not been verified by the Company.

In addition to the North Limb, drillings completed immediately to the west of Nose (“ Nose West Extension”),

10km to the south of Nose (“ South Tar get”), and 3km to the northwest of North Limb (“ O Limb ”) had all

encountered nickel mineralization with highlights below. All those represent priority targets upon which the

Company expects to evaluate further.

Nose West Extension highlights:

DDH No. From (m) To (m) Int (m) Ni %

V-11-21 99.2 103.3 4.1 0.77

V-11-21 116.1 122.5 6.5 0.39

V-11-23 111.5 122.0 10.5 0.65

V-11-23 142.9 152.0 9.2 1.17

V-11-23 157.5 165.0 7.5 0.55

V-11-23 173.0 205.5 32.5 0.73

incl… 176.1 187.5 11.4 1.11

V-11-24 196.3 199.8 3.5 0.45

V-11-24 230.0 233.9 3.9 0.64

Reported widths are core- interval widths and not true widths. True widths have not been determined. South

Target highlights:

DDH No Int (m)* Ni%

A60 12.2 0.49

A60 23.2 0.47

A60 36.6 0.6

A37 36.6 0.51

A23 9.1 0.45

A34 16.2 0.71

A36 12.2 0.46

A36 24.4 0.38

*Taken from filed assessment maps reporting only width/grade. ‘From’ and ‘To’ meterage not available for these

holes. Reported widths are core-interval widths and not true widths. True widths have not been determined.

“O” Limb highlights:

DDH No From (m) To (m) Int (m) Ni (% )

MN96-141 97.9 118.0 20.1 0.61

MN96-142 122.9 128.0 5.2 1.44

MXB-71-86 188.7 192.9 4.3 1.2

MXB-71-86 188.7 201.0 12.3 0.86

Reported widths are core-interval widths and not true widths. True widths have not been determined.

Further Transaction Details

The US$6,675,000 Property Payment will be made at closing in the form of a credit in the favour of Victory Nickel

of US$6,675,000 against an aggregate of approximately US$11,880,000 owed by Victory Nickel pursuant to a

Secured Debt Facility (“SDF”)

The current SDF creditor and Silver Elephant have entered into arm -length definitive Debt Purchase and

Assignment Agreement (“DPAA”), whereby the SDF creditor will sell and assign the SDF to Silver Elephant for

US$6,675,000 payable by Silver Elephant to the SDF creditor at closing of such transaction.

Under the APA, Silver Elephant will further credit the remaining balance under the SDF to Victory Nickel’s benefit,

upon the completion of an independent economic study proving positive net present value being prepared in

respect of the Minago Project in the future after closing. Silver Elephant will also grant Victory Nickel a right of

first refusal till December 31, 2023 to exploit the sandstone (non- nickel bearing sulphides) resources for frac

sand extraction at the Minago Project. The Consideration Shares will be issued in three tranches as follows:

US$2,000,000 worth of Consideration Shares at Closing; a further US$2,000,000 worth of Consideration Shares

on or before August 31, 2021, and a further US$1,000,000 worth of Consideration Shares on or before December

31, 2021, at such timings as may be determined at the sole option of Silver Elephant, all in accordance with the

APA.

Concluding Remarks

John Lee, CFA, the Company’s chairman states: “Danniel Oosterm an, Silver Elephant’s VP Exploration and

Canadian Operations, started his career at Falconbridge and INCO, and helped drill the T3 deposit in Thompson

not far from Minago. Silver Elephant has high hopes and aspirations for significant Minago resource expansion

and Dan is ideally suited to unveil this great project and explore Minago to its full potential.”

Visit www.silverelef.com for Minago project maps.

Qualified Person

The technical contents of this news release have been prepared under the supervision of Danniel Oosterman,

VP Exploration. Mr. Oosterman is not independent of the Company in that he is employed by it. Mr. Oosterman

is a qualified person (“QP”) as defined by the guidelines in NI 43-101.

About Silver Elephant

Silver Elephant Mining Corp. is a premier mining and exploration company of energy metals.

Further information on Silver Elephant can be found at www.silverelef.com.

SILVER ELEPHANT MINING CORP.

ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD

“John Lee”

Executive Chairman

For more information about Silver Elephant, please contact Investor Relations:

+1.604.569.3661 ext. 101

[email protected] www.silverelef.com

Neither the Toronto Stock Exchange nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in the policies of the

Toronto Stock Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release.

Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

Certain statements contained in this news release, including statements which may contain words such as “expects”,

“anticipates”, “intends”, “plans”, “believes”, “estimates”, or similar expressions, and statements related to matters which are

not historical facts, are forward-looking information within the meaning of applicable securities laws. Such forward-looking

statements, which reflect management’s expectations regarding Silver Elephant’s future growth, results of operations,

performance, business prospects and opportunities, are based on certain factors and assumptions, including, but not limited

to, the ability of the Company to complete the transactions contemplated by the APA, the ability of the Company to explore

the Minago Project, the ability of the Company to capitalize on the Minago Project, global commodities prices and volatility,

the ability of the Company to access financing on terms acceptable to the Company, the ability of the Company and Victory

Nickel to obtain the approval of the Toront o Stock Exchange and the Canadian Securities Exchange respectively, future

exploration and drilling results at the Minago Project and elsewhere, political risks, risks associated with the ongoing COVID-

19 pandemic, general economic, social and securities risks, and any other risks noted in the Company’s public disclosure

record, and involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties which may cause the actual results, performance, or

achievements to be materially different from future results, performance, or achievements expressed or implied by such

forward-looking statements.