Prophecy Reports 2.08 Million Tonnes of Indicated Resource Grading: 455 g/t Silver, 3.19% Zinc, 2.18% Lead (594 g/t Ag Eq.) for Pulacayo Project
Prophecy Reports 2.08 Million Tonnes of Indicated Resource
Grading: 455 g/t Silver, 3.19% Zinc, 2.18% Lead (594 g/t Ag Eq.)
for Pulacayo Project
Vancouver, British Columbia, November 22, 2017 – Prophecy Development Corp. (“Prophecy” or
the “Company”) (TSX:PCY, OTCQX:PRPCF, Frankfurt:1P2) has received an independent technical
report with an effective date of October 20 , 2017 titled “ Updated Mineral Resource Estimate and
Technical Report for the Pulacayo Project ” (the “Report”). The Report was prepared by Mercator
Geological Services Limited ( “Mercator”) on the Company’s Pulacayo project (the “Project”) and has
been filed under the Company’s profile on the System for Electronic Document Analysis and Retrieval
(“SEDAR”) at . www.sedar.com
The Project is located in Bolivia, 107 km northeast of Sumitomo Corporation’s San Cristobal silver mine,
185 km southwest of Coeur Mining, Inc.’s San Bartolome silver mine, and 139 km north of Pan American
Silver Corp.’s San Vicente silver mine.
The Report describes resources estimated following the guidelines of the CIM Definition Standards for
Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves.
Two mineral resource estimates were disclosed according to the requirements of National Instrument 43 -
101 – Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects (“NI 43-101”) – one for the Pulacayo deposit and the
second for the Paca deposit.
Pulacayo Deposit
Results of the mineral resource estimate prepared by Mercator for the Pulacayo deposit are presented
below in Table 1. The Report filed on SEDAR documents the resource estimate.
The Report outlined 2.08 million tonnes at a weighted average grade of Ag 455 g/t, Pb 2.18%, Zn 3.19%
(Ag Eq. 594 g/t) in the indicated category and 0.48 million tonne s at a weighted average grade of Ag 406
g/t, Pb 2.08%, Zn 3.93% (Ag Eq. 572 g/t) in the inferred category. The contained metal content estimated
by the Company, of the indicated category resources is 30.4 million ounces of silver, 100.0 million pounds
of lead, 146.3 million pounds of zinc. The contained metal content estimated by the Company, of the
inferred category resource is 6.3 million ounces of silver, 22.0 million pounds of lead, and 41.6 million
pounds of zinc (more resource details in the table below).
Table 1. Pulacayo Indicated and Inferred Mineral Resource Statement Details
Pulacayo Mineral Resource Statement – Effective October 20, 2017
Ag Eq. Cut-Off (g/t) Category Tonnes* Ag (g/t) Pb (%) Zn (%) Ag Eq. (g/t)
400 Indicated 2,080,000 455 2.18 3.19 594
Inferred 480,000 406 2.08 3.93 572
Notes:
(1) Mineral resources are estimated in conformance with the CIM Standards referenced in NI 43-101.
(2) Raw silver assays were capped at 1,700 g/t, raw lead assays were capped at 15% and raw zinc assays
were capped at 15%.
(3) Silver equivalent Ag Eq . (g/t) = Ag (g/t)*89.2% + (Pb% *(US$0.94/ lb. Pb /14.583 Troy oz./lb./US$16.50 per
Troy oz. Ag)*10,000*91.9%) + (Zn% *( US$1.00/lb. Zn/14.583 Troy oz./lb./US$16.50 per Troy oz.
Ag)*10,000*82.9%).
(4) Metal prices used in the silver equivalent calculation are US$16.50/Troy oz. Ag, US$0.94/lb Pb and
US$1.00/lb. Zn. Metal recoveries used in the silver equivalent equation reflect historic metallurgical results
disclosed by Apogee Silver Ltd. (Porter et al., 2013).
(5) Metal grades were interpolated within wire -framed, three -dimensional silver domain solids using Geovia -
Surpac Ver. 6.6.1 software and inverse distance squared interpolation methods. Block size is 10m(X) by 10m(Z)
by 2m(Y). Historic mine void space was removed from the model prior to reporting of resources.
(6) Block density factors reflect three-dimensional modeling of drill core density determinations.
(7) Mineral resources are considered to have reasonable expectation for economic development using
underground mining methods based on the deposit history, resource amount and metal grades, current metal
pricing and comparison to broadly comparable deposits elsewhere.
(8) Rounding of figures may result in apparent differences between tonnes, grade and contained ounces.
(9) Mineral resources that are not mineral reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability.
(10) * Tonnes are rounded to nearest 10,000.
The contained metals estimated by the Company based on in the October 20, 2017 resource estimate by
Mercator are presented in Table 2.
Table 2: Contained Metals Based on October 20, 2017 Pulacayo Deposit** Mineral Resource Estimate
Metal Indicated Resource Inferred Resource
Silver 30.4 million oz. 6.3 million oz.
Lead 100.0 million lbs. 22.0 million lbs.
Zinc 146.3 million lbs. 41.6 million lbs.
**Based on the resource estimate Ag Eq. cut -off value of 400 g/ t and 100% recovery ; figures are rounded to the
nearest 100,000th increment
Between 2006 and 2012, a total of 69,739 metres of diamond drilling (226 surface and 42 underground
drill holes) was conducted at Pulacayo, results of which support the mineral resource estimate repo rted in
this news release. The Pulacayo site is currently permitted for production at a milling rate of 560 tonnes
per day and no known legal, political, environmental, or other risks that would materially affect potential
future development have been ide ntified by Prophecy at the effective date of the current ( October 20 ,
2017) mineral resource estimate.
Approximately 85% of the resource tonnage identified at the 400 g/t Ag Eq. cut -off value occurs within
150 meters vertical distance from the main San Le on tunnel, which may facilitate future mineral extraction.
Historic Pulacayo production was predominantly from the Tajo vein system which extends over a strike
length of more than 2.5 km and to a depth of at least 1,000 meters. Prior resource drilling only covered
approximately 20% of the Tajo vein system strike length. With new drilling, Prophecy feels that there is
potential to discover additional resources along the Tajo structure.
The Company’s research has shown that relatively few silver underground deposits have been defined at
resource cut-off values of 400 g/t Ag Eq. or more.
Paca Deposit
The Paca deposit is located in Bolivia approximately 7 km north of the Pulacayo deposit.
Results of the mineral resource estimate prepared by Mercator for the Paca deposit are presented below
in Table 3. The Report described previously and filed on SEDAR documents the resource estimate.
The Report outlined 2.54 million tonnes at a weighted a verage grade of Ag 256 g/t, Pb 1.03%, Zn 1.10%
(Ag Eq. 342 g/t) in the inferred category. T he contained metal content estimated by the Company, of the
inferred category resources is 20.9 million ounces of silver, 57.7 million pounds of lead, 61.6 million
pounds of zinc. (more resource details in the table below).
Table 3. Paca Inferred Mineral Resource Statement Details
Paca Mineral Resource Statement – Effective October 20, 2017
Ag Eq. Cut-Off (g/t) Category Tonnes* Ag (g/t) Pb (%) Zn (%) Ag Eq. (g/t)
200 Inferred 2,540,000 256 1.03 1.10 342
Notes:
(1) Mineral resources are estimated in conformance with the CIM Standards referenced in NI 43-101.
(2) Raw silver assays were capped at 1,050 g/t, raw lead assays were capped at 5% and raw zinc assays were
capped at 5%.
(3) Silver equivalent Ag Eq. (g/t) = Ag (g/t) + (Pb% *(US$0.94/ lb. Pb /14.583 Troy oz./lb./US$16.50 per Troy oz.
Ag)*10,000) + (Zn% *(US$1.00/lb. Zn/14.583 Troy oz./lb./US$16.50 per Troy oz. Ag)*10,000). 100 % metal
recoveries are assumed based on lack of comprehensive metallurgical results.
(4) Metal prices used in the silver equivalent calculation are US$16.50/Troy oz. Ag, US$0.94/lb Pb and
US$1.00/lb Zn and reflect those used for the Pulacayo deposit mineral resource estimate reported above.
(5) Metal grades were interpolated within wire -framed, three-dimensional solids using Geovia -Surpac Ver. 6.7
software and inverse distance squared interpolation methods. Block size is 5m (X) by 5m (Z) by 2.5m (Y). Historic
mine void space was removed from the model prior to reporting resources.
(6) A block density factor of 2.26g/cm³ was used and reflects the average of 799 density measurements.
(7) Mineral resources are considered to have reasonable expectation for economic development using
combined underground and open pit methods based on the deposit history, resource amount and metal grades,
current metal pricing and comparison to broadly comparable deposits elsewhere.
(8) Mineral resources that are not mineral reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability.
(9) *Tonnes are rounded to nearest 10,000.
The contained metals estimated by the Company based on the October 20, 2017 resource estimate by
Mercator are presented in Table 4.
Table 4. Contained Metals Based On October 20, 2017 Paca Deposit** Mineral Resource Estimate
Metal Inferred
Resource
Silver 20.9 million oz.
Lead 57.7 million lbs.
Zinc 61.6 million lbs.
**Based on the resource estimate Ag Eq. cut-off value of 200 g/t and 100% recovery; figures are rounded
to the nearest 100,000th increment
The resource estimate is based on results of 97 diamond drill holes and 1 reverse circulation drill hole
totaling 18,160 meters completed between 2002 and 2007.
The geology of the Paca deposit inclu des a core zone of feeder -style mineralization associated
predominantly with brecciated andesite, plus additional zones of shallowly dipping mantos -style
mineralization that are hosted by the surrounding volcano -sedimentary sequence. The Paca deposit
remains open at depth and along strike.
The Paca mineralization starts from surface and the deposit may be amenable to open-pit mining and this
will be evaluated further in the future.
The Company’s research has shown that relatively few silver open pit deposits have been defined at
resource cut-off values of 200 g/t Ag Eq. or more.
Project update
The Company’s Bolivian subsidiary, ASC Bolivia LDC Sucursal Bolivia, has invested approximately
US$28 million at Pulacayo and already acquired necessary environmental and social licenses to mine at
Pulacayo. The Company is working with the Bolivian mining ministry and Corporacion Minera De Bolivia
(COMIBOL) to obtain authorization which will allow Prophecy to mine at Pulacayo while transitioning from
the current joint venture contract to a mining production contract.
Qualified Persons
The technical contents of this news release have been prepared under the supervision of Christopher M.
Kravits, CPG, LPG, General Mining Manager of Prophecy. Mr. Kravits is a Qualified Person as defined in
NI 43-101. Mr. Kravits is a consultant to the Company and is not independent of the Company since most
of his income is derived from the Company.
Peter Webster, P. Geo., of Mercator Geological Services Limited is one of the Qualified Person s within
the meaning of NI 43 -101 responsible for preparation of S ections 3.0 to 8.0 , 14.0 to 23.0 and 26 of the
Report. He also reviewed all R eport sections, contributed to the Report Summary and Report Sections
24.0 and 25.0, and responsible for the mineral resource estimate addressed in this news release. Michael
P. Cullen, P. Geo., also of Mercator Geological Services Limited is the other Qualified Person within the
meaning of NI 43-101 responsible for preparation of Sections 1.0 and 2.0, 9.0 through 13.0 of the Report.
He also reviewed all Report sections and contributed to the Report Summary.
About Prophecy
Prophecy Development Corp. is a Canadian public company listed on the Toronto Stock Exchange that is
engaged in worldwide mineral and energy exploration and development. Further informat ion on
Prophecy can be found at . www.prophecydev.com
About Mercator
Mercator Geological Services Limited is a Canadian consulting firm founded in 1997 that offers a broad
range of professional project management services including technical reporting to standards referenced
in NI 43-101, exploration program management, and professional staffing for both small and large mineral
exploration projects. Mercator has completed mineral exploration and resource estimation programs both
domestically and internationally and prepared on beh alf of Prophecy, the current mineral resource
estimates for the Pulacayo deposit and the Paca deposit.
PROPHECY DEVELOPMENT CORP.
ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD
“JOHN LEE”
Executive Chairman
For more information about Prophecy, please contact Investor Relations:
+1.888.513.6286
www.prophecydev.com
Neither the Toronto Stock Exchange nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in the
policies of the Toronto Stock Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this
release.
Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
Certain statements contained in this news release, including statements which may contain words such
as “expects”, “anticipates”, “intends”, “plans”, “believes”, “estimates”, or similar expressions, and
statements related to matters which are not historica l facts, are forward -looking information within the
meaning of applicable securities laws. Such forward -looking statements, which reflect management’s
expectations regarding Prophecy’s future growth, results of operations, performance, business prospects
and opportunities, are based on certain factors and assumptions and involve known and unknown risks
and uncertainties which may cause the actual results, performance, or achievements to be materially
different from future results, performance, or achievemen ts expressed or implied by such forward -looking
statements. These estimates and assumptions are inherently subject to significant business, economic,
competitive and other uncertainties and contingencies, many of which, with respect to future events, are
subject to change and could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied in
any forward -looking statements made by Prophecy. In making forward -looking statements as may be
included in this news release, Prophecy has made several assumptions that it believes are appropriate,
including, but not limited to assumptions that: there being no significant disruptions affecting operations,
such as due to labour disruptions ; currency exchange rates being approximately consistent with curre nt
levels; certain price assumptions for coal, prices for and availability of fuel, parts and equipment and other
key supplies remain consistent with current levels ; production forecasts meeting expectations ; the
accuracy of Prophecy’s current mineral reso urce estimates ; labour and materials costs increasing on a
basis consistent with Prophecy’s current expectations ; and that any additional required financing will be
available on reasonable terms. Prophecy cannot assure you that any of these assumptions wil l prove to
be correct.
Numerous factors could cause Prophecy’s actual results to differ materially from those expressed or
implied in the forward -looking statements, including the following risks and uncertainties, which are
discussed in greater detail under the heading “Risk Fa ctors” in Prophecy’s most recent Management
Discussion and Analysis and Annual Information Form as filed on SEDAR and posted on Prophecy’s
website: Prophecy’s history of net losses and lack of foreseeable cash flow ; exploration, development and
production risks, including risks related to the development of Prophecy’s mineral properties ; Prophecy
not having a history of profitable mineral production ; the uncertainty of mineral resource and mineral
reserve estimates ; the capital and operating costs required to bring Prophecy’s projects into production
and the resulting economic returns from its projects ; foreign operations and political conditions, including
the legal and political risks of operating in Bolivia, which is a developing jurisdiction ; amendments to local
Bolivian laws which may have an adverse impact on the Company’s operations ; title to Prophecy’s
mineral properties ; environmental risks ; the competitive nature of the mining business ; lack of
infrastructure; Prophecy’s reliance on key personnel ; uninsured risks ; commodity price fluctuations ;
reliance on contractors ; Prophecy’s need for substantial additional funding and the risk of not securing
such funding on reasonable terms or at all ; foreign exchange risks ; anti-corruption legislation ; recent
global financial conditions; the payment of dividends; and conflicts of interest.
These factors should be considered carefully, and readers should not place undue reliance on Prophecy’s
forward-looking statements. Prophecy believes that the expectations r eflected in the forward -looking
statements contained in this news release and the documents incorporated by reference herein are
reasonable, but no assurance can be given that these expectations will prove to be correct. In addition,
although Prophecy has attempted to identify important factors that could cause actual actions, events or
results to differ materially from those described in forward -looking statements, there may be other factors
that cause actions, events or results not to be as anticipated, e stimated or intended. Prophecy undertakes
no obligation to release publicly any future revisions to forward -looking statements to reflect events or
circumstances after the date of this news or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events, except as
expressly required by law.