Cartier announces updated PEA for the Cadillac Project: After-tax NPV5% of C$1.0 billion and after-tax IRR of 26.6% at US$3,600/oz gold price Average annual production of 100 koz of gold over a 16.2-year mine life – After-tax NPV5% of C$1,565 M
Cartier announces updated PEA for the Cadillac Project: After-tax NPV5%
of C$1.0 billion and after-tax IRR of 26.6% at US$3,600/oz gold price
Average annual production of 100 koz of gold over a 16.2-year mine life – After-tax NPV5% of C$1,565 M
and after-tax IRR of 37.3% at spot gold of US$4,300/oz - NPV5% to initial capital ratio of 3.6x.
Highlights
Robust Economics
• After-tax NPV5% of C$1,001 M and after-tax IRR of 26.6% at a base case gold price of US$3,600/oz and
an exchange rate of 1.38 C$/US$.
• At a spot gold price of US$4,300/oz, after -tax NPV5% increases to C$1,565 M and after -tax IRR
increases to 37.3%.
• After-tax payback of 4.3 years and NPV5% to initial capital ratio of 3.6x.
• Life-of-mine after-tax free cash flow of C$2,772 M over a 16.2-year mine life.
• Initial CAPEX of C$275.8 M and AISC of US$2,137/oz.
Production and Operating Profile
• Average annual gold production of 100koz over the life of mine.
• Total recovered gold production of 1,610koz.
• Metallurgical recovery of 9 5%, supported by the 2026 metallurgical testwork program and a
conventional flowsheet with crushing, grinding, gravity concentration and cyanide leaching.
• Processing scenario: 3,000 tpd toll milling (year 1), 3,000 tpd on-site processing (years 2-4), 4,300 tpd
on-site processing following expansion (year 5+).
• Mining scenario considers solely underground method of l ongitudinal longhole stoping with ramp
extraction utilizing a peak mining rate of 4,300 tpd.
VAL-D'OR, Quebec, September 17, 2026 — Cartier Resources Inc. (″Cartier″ or the ″Company″) (TSXV:
ECR; FSE: 6CA; OTCQB: ECRFF) is pleased to announce the results of the updated Preliminary Economic
Assessment (″PEA″) on its 100% -owned Cadillac Project, located in Val -d'Or (Abitibi, Quebec, Canada). The
updated PEA was prepared in accordance with National Instrument 43 -101 – Standards of Disclosure for
Mineral Projects (″NI 43 -101″) by Evomine Consulting Inc., and replaces the PEA published on April 13, 2023,
on what was then named the Chimo Mine Project. It incorporates the updated mineral resource estimate
announced on December 18, 2025, the metallurgical results announced on May 14, 2026, and a materially
different gold price environment.
Philippe Cloutier, President and CEO of Cartier, stated: “The positive results of the study demonstrate the
project's economic viability at the PEA level while highlighting several opportunities for further optimization.
Importantly, the project has been designed as a fully underground mining operation, minimizi ng its surface
footprint and supporting a responsible development approach. With low initial CAPEX requirements, we now
have additional strategic solutions that offer flexibility to advance development. We remain confident in the
project's strong potential and our ability to create additional value for stakeholders,”
Ronan Déroff, Vice President Exploration of Cartier, added: “The current PEA is only the beginning. With
~35,000 metres of drilling completed in 2025–2026 yet to be incorporated, and compelling new gold discoveries
emerging at the Contact and Hope Sectors, we believe Cadillac offers substantial resource -growth potential
and significant exploration upside along the 15 -km Cadillac Fault — all of which remains outside the current
economic model.”
Financial analysis
The economic analysis was performed using a 5% discount rate, a base case gold price of US$3,600/oz and an
exchange rate of 1.38 C$/US$. On a pre -tax basis, the project generates an NPV5% of C$1,679 M, an IRR of
35.5% and a payback period of 3.0 years. On an after-tax basis, the project generates an NPV5% of C$1,001 M,
an IRR of 26.6% and a payback period of 4.3 years. A summary of project economics is presented in Table 1.
Table 1: Summary of project economics
Description Unit Value
Exchange rate CA$/US$ 1.38
Gold price US$/oz 3,600
Mineralized material mined kt 23,145
Mineralized material grade g/t 2.28
Mineralized material ounces koz 1,698
Recovery % 95%
Recovered gold oz 1,610
Mine life years 16.2
Discount rate % 5.0%
Operating costs
Mining operating cost CA$/t proc. 95.1
Processing operating cost CA$/t proc. 29.8
Waste and water management operating cost CA$/t proc. 1.5
General and administration operating cost CA$/t proc. 10.1
Total operating costs CA$/t proc. 136.4
AISC
Total operating costs US$/oz 1,450
Selling costs US$/oz 5
Royalty costs US$/oz 47
Cash costs US$/oz 1,502
Sustaining capital costs US$/oz 635
All-In Sustaining Costs US$/oz 2,137
Capital costs
Initial capital costs CA$M 275.8
Growth capital costs CA$M 277.1
Sustaining capital costs CA$M 1,062.0
Closure capital costs CA$M 40.0
Economics
Pre-tax Net Present Value CA$M 1,679.4
Pre-tax Internal Rate of Return % 35.5%
Pre-tax Payback Period years 3.0
After-tax Net Present Value CA$M 1,001.2
After-tax Internal Rate of Return % 26.6%
After-tax Payback Period years 4.3
Table 2, Table 3, and Table 3 highlight the after-tax impact of performing a sensitivity analysis on gold price,
capital costs and operating costs.
Table 2: Gold price sensitivity
Gold Price (US$/Oz) NPV (M CA$) IRR (%) Payback Period
3,000 497.2 16.4% 6.2
3,600 (base case) 1,001.2 26.6% 4.3
4,200 1,485.8 35.9% 2.8
4,800 1,961.7 44.9% 2.2
5,400 2,429.8 53.5% 1.9
6,000 2,896.0 62.0% 1.7
Table 3: Capital cost sensitivity
Capital costs NPV (M CA$) IRR (%)
Payback Period
-20% 1,165 35.1% 2.8
-10% 1,083 30.5% 3.4
Base Case 1,001 26.6% 4.3
+10% 918 23.4% 4.7
+20% 833 20.5% 5.1
Table 4: Operating cost sensitivity
Operating costs NPV (M CA$) IRR (%)
Payback Period
-20% 1,230 31.1% 3.4
-10% 1,116 28.9% 3.7
Base Case 1,001 26.6% 4.3
+10% 883 24.3% 4.5
+20% 762 21.8% 4.8
Capital and operating cost estimates
Initial capital is estimated at C$ 275.8 M, growth capital costs are estimated at C$277.1 M and sustaining
capital at C$ 1,102.0 M, as detailed in Table 5. Total operating costs over the life-of-mine is estimated at
C$3,148.2 M representing C$136.4/tonne processed , as detailed in Table 6.
Table 5: Capital cost summary
Cost Area
Initial Capital Costs
(M CA$)
Growth Capital
Costs (M CA$)
Sustaining Capital
Costs (M CA$)
Total Capital Costs
(M CA$)
Infrastructure 40.9 - 52.5 93.4
Electrical and communication 27.9 - 8.1 36.0
Waste and water management 9.2 - 58.7 68.0
Mine - underground 91.3 - 720.2 811.5
Process plant 9.0 230.2 - 239.2
Indirect costs 29.8 9.0 84.0 122.7
Contingency 37.9 37.8 138.5 214.2
Capitalized revenue -30.2 - - -30.2
Capitalized operating costs 60.0 - - 60.0
Closure - - 40.0 40.0
Total 275.8 277.1 1,102.0 1,654.9
Table 6: Operating cost summary
Cost Area Total (M CA$)
Unit cost (CA$/tonne
processed)
Unit cost (US$/oz
payable)
Underground mining 2,193.7 95.1 1,010.3
Mineralized material transportation 15.1 0.7 6.9
Processing 672.3 29.1 309.6
Waste and water management 34.6 1.5 15.9
General and administrative 232.5 10.1 107.1
Total 3,148.2 136.4 1,449.9
Mine design and production schedule
The PEA presents an underground mining operation that uses conventional longitudinal longhole stoping at a
peak mining rate of 4,300 tpd over a 16.2-year mine life. A total of 23.1 Mt of mineralized material at an average
grade of 2.3 g/t representing 1,698 koz of gold will be extracted. The mineralized material will be loaded by load-
haul-dump (LHD) machine s and hauled to the surface by trucks via ramps. For backfilling, a combination of
pastefill, cemented rockfill and dry rockfill will be used. The mine will be split into five separate areas with each
area having their dedicated mining infrastructure as illustrated in Figure 1.
Figure 1: Mine design
Metallurgy and processing
To complete the process plant design and determine metallurgical performance, a series of tests w ere
performed on six variability samples: two from each of the three main zones, Chimo, East Chimo, and West
Nordeau. The samples were selected from exploration drill core and are considered representative of the
mineral resources. The test program included m ineralogy, geochemistry, grindability, gold recovery, and
tailings detoxification. The results indicate that, based on the average resource grade, a gold recovery of 95%
could be achieved at a grind size P80 of 50 µm. The tests also established the require d grinding energy, gold
recovery equipment criteria, and reagent dosage design criteria.
The processing strategy considers toll milling to an off-site process plant for the pre-production period and the
first year of production at a rate of 3,000 tpd . An on-site, 3,000 tpd process plant will become available to
process material as of the second year of production and until the fourth year of production when it will be
expanded to 4,300 tpd for the remainder of the life-of-mine. Figure 2 below shows the process flowsheet and
identifies the additional equipment required for the expansion in red.
Figure 2: Process flowchart
All Phase 1 equipment will be designed to handle the life -of-mine throughput, while the added equipment will
provide the additional grinding power and cyanidation residence time required to complete gold dissolution.
Based on this flowsheet and feed throughput, the capital and operating costs of the gold extraction process
plant were estimated to support the economic analysis. The plant was designed to achieve the projected 95%
gold recovery in both phases.
Supporting infrastructure
Infrastructure requirements to support the project ha ve been evaluated and the overall site layout has been
developed to optimize operational efficiency, safety, and environmental management, while accounting for
topography and minimizing the surface impact in the Project area. The required infrastructure for the project
includes the following:
• Underground mine portals, lateral development and vertical development
• Waste rock and overburden management facilities
• Tailing management facility
• ROM stockpiles
• Water management infrastructure
• Electrical powerlines and substations
• Mine offices, dry and maintenance facility
• Other supporting infrastructure
Figure 3 and Figure 4 illustrate the surface infrastructure general arrangement and the infrastructure on the
main industrial pad for the project.
Figure 3: Surface infrastructure general arrangement
Figure 4: Main industrial pad infrastructure
Environmental, permitting and social considerations
The development of the Cadillac project continues under an approach focused on sustainable development,
respect for stakeholders, and environmental protection. In 2026, Stantec completed a literature review of the
project’s physical, biological, and social components in order to document and characterize the potential
environmental issues associated with its footprint. The results of this review contributed to the selection and
location of the infrastructure presented in the updated PEA , and will also be used to plan the next steps,
including field inventories. In addition, an environmental geochemical characterization of the waste rock, ore,
and tailings generated during processing was initiated in August 2026. This study is essential t o the
development of the Cadillac project, as it will help optimize the management of these materials and mining
water management in order to limit impacts on the receiving environment. It will be conducted in accordance
with the guidelines of Directive 019 and the Guide de caractérisation des résidus miniers et du minerai
(GCRMM) issued by the Ministère de l’Environnement, de la Lutte contre les changements climatiques, de la
Faune et des Parcs (MELCCFP).
Mineral Resource Estimate
The updated PEA is based on the mineral resource estimate announced on December 18, 2025, and detailed
in the technical report filed on January 27, 2026 which is summarized in Table 7.
Table 7: Mineral Resource Estimate
All sectors /
Category
Open Pit Resources Underground Resources
Total
Cut-off Grade = 0.30g/t Au Cut-off Grade = 1.00g/t Au
Tonnes (t) Grade
(Au g/t) Gold (oz) Tonnes (t) Grade
(Au g/t) Gold (oz) Tonnes (t) Grade
(Au g/t) Gold (oz)
Measured 1,770,000 2.16 123,300 4,210,000 2.80 379,300 5,988,000 2.61 502,600
Indicated 1,730,000 1.52 84,500 2,240,000 2.51 180,600 3,965,000 2.08 265,200
Measured &
Indicated 3,500,000 1.84 207,800 6,450,000 2.70 559,900 9,953,000 2.40 767,800
Inferred 4,740,000 1.13 172,600 30,450,000 2.29 2,244,200 35,185,000 2.14 2,416,900
1. The independent qualified persons for the MRE, as defined by National Instrument (“NI”) 43-101 guidelines, is Pierre Luc Richard,
P.Geo., of PLR Resources Inc., with contributions from Stephen Coates, P.Eng., of Evomine Consulting for cut -off grade
estimation and open pit and underground stope optimization solids.
2. These Mineral Resources are not mineral reserves as they have no demonstrated economic viability. No economic evaluation
of these Mineral Resource has been produced. The quantity and grade of reported Inferred Resources in this MRE are uncertain
in nature and there has been insufficient drilling to define these Inferred Resources as Indicated. However, it is reasonably
expected that the majority of Inferred Mineral Resources could be upgraded to Indicated category with continued drilling.
3. The Qualified Persons are not aware of any known environmental, permitting, legal, title -related, taxation, socio -political,
marketing or other relevant issues that could materially affect the Mineral Resource Estimate.
4. Calculations used metric units (metres, tonnes). Metal contents in the above table are presented in gram per tonne and troy
ounces. Metric tonnages and ounces were rounded, and any discrepancies in total amounts are due to rounding errors.
5. CIM definitions and guidelines for Mineral Resource Estimates have been followed.
Notes Accompanying the Mineral Resource Estimate
• Resources are presented as undiluted and in situ for the open -pit scenario within 5m x 5m x 5m blocks
and include internal dilution for the underground scenario and are considered to have reasonable