Discovery Silver Reports Preliminary Economic Assessment on Cordero with After-Tax NPV of US$1.2 B, IRR of 38% and Payback of 2.0 Years
Discovery Silver Reports Preliminary Economic Assessment on Cordero
with After-Tax NPV of US$1.2 B, IRR of 38% and Payback of 2.0 Years
November 30, 2021, Toronto, Ontario - Discovery Silver Corp. (TSX-V: DSV, OTCQX: DSVSF)
(“Discovery” or the “Company”) is pleased to announce results f rom its Preliminary Economic
Assessment (“PEA” or “the Study”) on its 100%-owned Cordero silver project (“Cordero” or “the Project”)
located in Chihuahua State, Mexico.
Study highlights include (all figures are in USD unless otherwise noted):
Excellent project economics: Base Case after-tax NPV5% of $1.2 B (C$1.5 B) and IRR of 38% (Ag
- $22.00/oz, Au - $1,600/oz, Pb - $1.00/lb and Zn - $1.20/lb).
Exceptional silver price leverage: Upside Case after-tax NPV5% of $1.9 B (C$2.4 B) and IRR of
55% (Ag - $27.50/oz, Au - $1,880/oz, Pb - $1.10/lb and Zn - $1. 45/lb based on one-year trailing 90th
percentile prices).
Large-scale, high-margin, long mine life asset: 16-year mine life with average annual production
of 26 Moz AgEq at an AISC of $12.35/oz AgEq.
Low capital intensity: initial development capex of $368 M; attractive NPV-to-capex ratio of 3.2x.
Rapid payback: post-tax payback of 2.0 years for Base Case and 1.4 years for Upside Case.
Technically robust study: 99% of tonnes processed in the PEA mine plan are in the Measur ed &
Indicated category; process design and metallurgical recovery e stimates are based on the
Company’s comprehensive 2021 metallurgical testwork program.
Silver-dominant revenues: silver represents +60% of the net smelter return in the first five years of
the mine life and +50% of the net smelter return over the life of mine, in-line with the senior/mid-tier
silver producer group.
Taj Singh, President and CEO, states: “With annual AgEq production averaging more than 26 Moz over
a +15-year mine life we believe this PEA clearly positions Cordero as a Tier 1 silver asset. This impressive
scale of production is achieved through modest development capex of $368 M and returns excellent
margins with AISC averaging less than $12.50/AgEq oz over the life of the mine. These costs highlight
the benefits of existing local infrastructure, excellent metallurgy, and a straight-forward open pit mine with
excellent grades and a low strip ratio.
“Importantly, the outstanding metrics demonstrated in the PEA are supported by a mine plan with more
than 99% of tonnes in the Measured and Indicated category, and a simple and conventional process
design based on our detailed metallurgical testwork program completed earlier this year. This provides
us with a huge head start as we look ahead to the delivery of a Prefeasibility Study on Cordero in 2022.”
NEWS RELEASE
PEA SUMMARY:
Study support:
The Study is based on the updated Mineral Resource Estimate (“ Resource”) press released on
October 20, 2021 (see Appendices for Resource details), and the Company’s comprehensive
metallurgical testwork program described in our press release dated September 7, 2021.
The PEA project team was led by Ausenco Engineering Canada Inc . (“Ausenco”), an industry leader
in cost-effective design and construction. Ausenco was supporte d by AGP Mining Consultants Inc.
(“AGP”) and Knight Piésold and Co. (USA) (“Knight Piésold”).
Project Economics:
Sensitivity of the Project’s expected after-tax NPV, IRR and pa yback at different commodity price
assumptions is outlined in the table below:
Units Base Case Upside Case Base Case
+15%
Base Case
‐15%
After‐Tax NPV (5% discount rate) (US$ M) $1,160 $1,889 $1,692 $622
Internal Rate of Return (%) 38.2% 54.6% 49.9% 25.2%
Payback (yrs) 2.0 1.4 1.6 3.5
Base Case price assumptions: Ag = $22.00/oz, Au = $1,600/oz, Pb = $1.00/lb, Zn = $1.20/lb
Upside Case price assumptions: Ag = $27.50/oz, Au = $1,880/oz, Pb = $1.10/lb, Zn = $1.45/lb based on one‐year trailing
90th percentile prices
After-Tax Free Cash Flow:
A chart summarizing the expected annual and cumulative after-ta x free cash flow (“FCF”) over the life-
of-mine (“LOM”) is provided below:
($500)
‐‐
$500
$1,000
$1,500
$2,000
$2,500
($200)
($100)
‐‐
$100
$200
$300
$400
Y‐2 Y‐1 Y1 Y2 Y3 Y4 Y5 Y6 Y7 Y8 Y9 Y10 Y11 Y12 Y13 Y14 Y15 Y16
Cumulative FCF (US$M)
Free Cash Flow (US$M)
Annual FCF Cumulative FCF
Payback
Threshold
Production & Costs:
Annual production over the LOM is expected to average 26 Moz Ag Eq with production averaging over
33 Moz AgEq when fully ramped up (Years 5 – 12); this positions Cordero as one of the largest silver
mines globally.
Units Year 1 – 4 Year 5 ‐ 12 Year 13 ‐16 LOM
AgEq Produced ‐ Average (Moz) 29 33 9 26
AgEq Payable ‐ Average (Moz) 26 29 8 23
AgEq Produced ‐ Total (Moz) 117 265 37 426
AgEq Payable ‐ Total (Moz) 104 230 32 372
All‐In Sustaining Cost (AISC) (US$/AgEq oz) $11.64 $11.77 $18.88 $12.35
Note – LOM production/payable totals include production from Year -1. AgEq Produced is metal recovered in doré/concentrate. AgEq Payable
is metal payable from doré/concentrate and incorporates metal payment terms outlined in the Concentrate Terms section below. See Technical
Disclosure section for AgEq and AISC calculation methodology.
LOM Production & AISC:
Note – Au/Pb/Zn production is shown on an AgEq basis based on: Ag = $22/oz, Au = $1,600/oz, Pb = $1.00/lb and Zn = $1.20/lb
$0.00
$5.00
$10.00
$15.00
$20.00
$25.00
0
10
20
30
40
50
Y1 Y2 Y3 Y4 Y5 Y6 Y7 Y8 Y9 Y10 Y11 Y12 Y13 Y14 Y15 Y16
AISC ($/oz AgEq)
AgEq Produced (Moz)
Ag Au Pb Zn AISC
OPERATIONS:
Mining:
The mine plan incorporates accelerated stripping as well as sto ckpiling of low-grade material in order to
optimize the grade profile over the LOM.
The mine plan was completed by AGP and is based on a detailed mine design that incorporates
mining dilution, safety berms and haul roads.
Mining rates over the life of the mine are relatively steady a t 60 to 70 Mtpa.
The ultimate pit contains 719 Mt in total consisting of 228 Mt of mill feed and 491 Mt of waste for an
average strip ratio of 2.2:1. The strip ratio is relatively even over the LOM.
Pit slope designs were based on an assessment by Knight Piésol d that was supported by two
geotechnical coreholes in the North Corridor and logging of cor e from two exploration coreholes in
the South Corridor.
Processing:
Processing was broken into two phases to optimize the capital efficiency of the project.
Phase 1 throughput (Year -1 to Year 4)
Oxides: mined during the preproduction period and are crushed through the Phase 1 crushing
plant and stacked on the heap leach from Year -1 to Year 3 at a throughput rate of 5 Mtpa. After
Year 3 the Phase 1 crushing plant is dedicated to processing higher-value sulphide material with
remaining oxide material processed as uncrushed ‘run-of-mine’ ( “ROM”) material via heap
leaching.
Sulphides: crushing, grinding and flotation circuit is constru cted in Year -1 and processing occurs
at a nameplate rate of 7.2 Mtpa from Year 1 to Year 4. During t his period the mine plan focuses
on high-grade material from the Pozo de Plata zone.
Phase 2 throughput (Year 5+)
Sulphides: two identical crushing, grinding and flotation circ uits from Y5 onwards with total
throughput of 14.4 Mtpa
Annual Throughput (Mt/a)
PHASE 1 PHASE 2
Year ‐1 Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5+
Oxides / Heap Leach (Crushed) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 ‐ ‐
Sulphides / Milling ‐ 5.8 7.2 7.2 10.8 14.4
Total Tonnes 5.0 10.8 12.2 12.2 10.8 14.4
Process design
Oxides: three-stage crushing (targeted crush size of 8 mm), ag glomeration, heap leaching and
refining in Year -1 to Year 3 and ROM dump leaching and refining in Year 4 to Year 6 to produce
Ag-Au doré bars
Sulphides: three-stage crushing, grinding (targeted grind size of 200 micron) and flotation to
produce Pb and Zn concentrates
Head grades:
The mine plan focuses on feeding higher grades to the mill earlier in the mine life:
Year 1 – 4: processing of higher-grade oxide material from the South Corridor and sulphide material
predominantly from the Pozo de Plata zone
Year 5 – 12: processing of higher-grade sulphides from the NE Extension and the South Corridor
Year 13 – 16: processing of lower-grade material stockpiled during Year 1 to Year 12
HEAD GRADES UNIT PHASE 1 PHASE 2 LOM Year 1 – 4 Year 5 – 12 Year 13 – 16
Oxides
Tonnes processed (Mt) 25 4 ‐ 29
Ag (g/t) 37 29 ‐ 36
Au (g/t) 0.08 0.05 ‐ 0.08
AgEq (g/t) 43 33 ‐ 42
Sulphides
Tonnes processed (Mt) 31 115 52 199
Ag (g/t) 57 32 13 31
Au (g/t) 0.26 0.07 0.04 0.09
Pb (%) 0.80 0.50 0.17 0.46
Zn (%) 0.80 0.92 0.34 0.75
AgEq (g/t) 118 88 34 80
Note – Phase 1 and LOM Oxide tonnes/grades include tonnes processed on the heap leach in Year -1
Recoveries:
Oxides: recoveries were based on coarse bottle roll tests and preliminary results from column leach
tests completed in 2021. Recoveries average 56% for Ag and 63% for Au for crushed feed and 36%
for Ag and 35% for Au for uncrushed ROM feed.
Sulphides: recoveries were based on the 2021 metallurgical test program which included lock-cycle
tests and examined metal recoveries to the silver-lead concentrate and the silver-zinc concentrate at
varying head grades for each of the major geological rock types at Cordero. Metal recoveries to the
two concentrates are summarized below:
SULPHIDE RECOVERIES (weighted average) PHASE 1 PHASE 2 LOM Year 1 – 4 Year 5 – 12 Year 13 – 16
Ag 92% 83% 67% 84%
Au 19% 19% 19% 19%
Pb 90% 86% 69% 86%
Zn 85% 86% 74% 85%
Tailings Management Facility (TMF):
The TMF design was completed by Knight Piésold and is based on a conventional thickened tailings
dam facility of downstream construction type.
The TMF is located directly west of the open pit. The design i ncorporates five dam lifts over the LOM.
Total capacity of the TMF is 179M m 3 (252 Mt); this is significantly greater than the estimated volume
requirement of 142M m3 based on the PEA mine plan.
An evaluation of using a dry-stacked tailings facility will be completed as part of pre-feasibility work.
CONCENTRATE TERMS:
Metal Payable:
Cordero is expected to produce clean, highly saleable concentr ates with minimal penalty elements
as established in the 2021 metallurgical test program.
Industry standard payables and deductions were applied to the Pb and Zn concentrates as per the
table below. A metallurgical balance summary is included in the Appendices.
Approximately 85% of the Ag reports to the Pb concentrate wher e higher payabilities are received.
Ag Au Pb Zn
Pb Concentrate
Average concentrate grade LOM 2,900 g/t 1.6 g/t 52% ‐
Payable metal 95% 95% 95% ‐
Minimum deduction 50 g/t 1 g/t 3 units ‐
Zn Concentrate
Average concentrate grade LOM 300 g/t 0.5 g/t ‐ 51%
Payable metal 70% 70% ‐ 85%
Deduction 3 oz/t 1 g/t ‐ ‐
Treatment/Refining Charges:
Treatment and refining charges were based on a review of spot and recent benchmark pricing and
are summarized as follows:
PARAMETER UNITS PEA COST SPOT 2021
BENCHMARK
TREATMENT/REFINING CHARGES
Treatment charge – Pb con $/dmt $100 ~$60 $140
Treatment charge – Zn con $/dmt $200 ~$80 $160
Ag refining charge – Pb con $/oz $1.00 ~$0.75 $1.50
Concentrate Transportation:
Transportation costs assume trucking of the concentrate via co ntainers to the international port at
Guaymas, Sonora, and then shipping via ocean freight to Asia.
Estimated transportation costs (trucking, port handling and oc ean freight) are $128/wmt for Pb
concentrate and $116/wmt for Zn concentrate.
CAPITAL EXPENDITURES:
Initial Capital (for parallel processing of crushed oxides and sulphides)
Year -2: construction of on-site infrastructure, power line and the hea p leach circuit with capacity of
5 Mtpa to process oxide/transition material (includes a three-stage oxide crushing circuit, heap leach
pad/ponds and Merrill Crowe plant).
Year -1: first sulphide circuit with a capacity of 7.2 Mtpa (includes s ulphide crushing circuit, ball mill
and flotation plant) and construction of the TMF including the initial dam lift.
Expansion Capital (to expand plant to 14.4 Mtpa sulphides only)
Year 3: addition of second sulphide circuit to expand processing rate to 14.4 Mtpa by the addition of
a ball mill and flotation circuit creating two parallel sulphid e circuits. The crushing circuit previously
used for oxides will be dedicated to sulphides from Year 4 onwards and will not require repurposing.
Year 8: expand flotation circuit with additional flotation cells, cycl ones, filters and thickeners to
accommodate the higher zinc grades from Year 9 to Year 11.
Sustaining Capital
TMF: the tailings dam will be completed in five lifts over the LOM a t a total capital cost of $110 M
($15 M initial capex plus $95 M of sustaining capex).
Other: additional sustaining capex totals $113 M over the LOM and inc ludes sustaining capital for
the process plant and mobile equipment and replacements/refurbishments of infrastructure assets.
DESCRIPTION (all in US$ millions) INITIAL CAPITAL EXPANSION
CAPITAL SUSTAINING
LOM CAPEX
TOTAL
LOM CAPEX Year ‐2 Year ‐1 Year 3 Year 8
CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
Mining $26 $1 $7 $33
Infrastructure $34 $9 $10 $16 $69
Heap Leach + Oxide Plant $71 $1 $4 $76
Sulphide Processing Plant $95 $51 $23 $30 $199
Tailings Facility (TMF) $15 $95 $110
Indirects $22 $30 $17 $6 $4 $78
Owners Costs $6 $6
Closure (net of Salvage Value) $22 $22
Contingency $28 $30 $16 $6 $29 $110
Capital Expenditures ‐ Subtotals $187 $181 $94 $35 $208 $704 $368
PRE‐SULPHIDE OPERATIONS
Revenue $121
Mining Costs ($110)
Process + G&A Costs ($27)
Operating Cash Flow for Year ‐1 ($16)
NET FUNDING REQUIREMENT $384
OPERATING COST ASSUMPTIONS:
Mining:
Mining is assumed to be completed by contract mining; estimate d mining costs were based on
contractor quotes for Cordero received by AGP
Processing and G&A Costs:
Processing costs for the heap leach and mill/flotation, and G& A costs were developed by Ausenco
from first principles.
Sulphide processing costs benefit from a conventional flotatio n process design and low power costs.
The targeted coarse grind size of 200 micron alleviates the need for a SAG mill.
G&A costs estimates are based on a small camp and administrati on office at site. The majority of the
work force will be Mexican nationals commuting daily from the l ocal town of Parral. Parral is 25 km
south of Cordero and has a population of approximately 100,000. It is the regional government centre
in the southern part of Chihuahua State and has a well-establis hed service industry that supports
numerous local mining operations.