Defense Metals - Robust Economics from Wicheeda Rare Earth Deposit PFS
Defense Metals - Robust Economics from Wicheeda Rare
Earth Deposit PFS
• The completion of the Pre-Feasibility Study establishes Defense Metals' Wicheeda Project as one of the most advanced undeveloped rare earth projects
in North America or Europe.
• The Wicheeda Project economics of pre-tax NPV at 8% of US$1.8 billion and IRR of 24.6% with after-tax payback of 3.7 years are robust.
• The breakeven price of NdPrO
1
for the project is US$67.60/kg (for IRR of zero). The operating cash breakeven price of NdPrO is US$37.42/kg.
• The Wicheeda Project will stand out in the Western rare earth industry as a result of the exceptional purity of its final product, which in turn will enable it
to secure a very high margin in the sector and ensure resilience, even in times of lower REE market prices.
VANCOUVER, BC
,
Feb. 18, 2025
/CNW/ - Defense Metals Corp. (
"Defense Metals"
or the
"Company"
; (TSXV: DEFN) (OTCQB:
DFMTF) (FSE:35D) is pleased to release the results of its independent Pre-Feasibility Study (PFS) concerning the on-going
development of its 100%-owned Wicheeda Rare Earth Element (REE) deposit located in
British Columbia
(BC),
Canada
.
All amounts herein are in
United States
dollars, unless otherwise stated.
Guy de Selliers
, Executive Chairman, stated:
"The positive results of our Pre-Feasibility Study confirm the strategic importance of the
Wicheeda Project at a time when
North America
and
Europe
are prioritizing economic resilience and supply chain security for critical
minerals.
"With NdPr being essential to electric vehicles, renewable energy, and advanced defense technologies, the Wicheeda Project
represents a unique opportunity to establish a reliable, Western-aligned supply of these vital materials, reducing reliance on foreign
sources and importantly helping to secure economic security.
"Our Wicheeda rare earth project is one of the most advanced in either
North America
or
Europe
that is not yet in production,
positioning it as a leading, near-term solution to meet the growing demands for Western-aligned supply chains.
"As we move forward, we remain committed to responsible development policies and practices, along with strong partnerships that
collectively will unlock the full economic and strategic value of this asset for all stakeholders and rightsholders."
Wicheeda Project PFS Highlights
Robust Economics
Pre-tax net present value (NPV) of
$1.8 billion
and after-tax NPV of
$1.0 billion
, at an 8% discount rate.
After-tax payback period of 3.7 years from the start of production.
Pre-tax internal rate of return (IRR) of 24.6%, and after-tax IRR of 18.9%.
Initial Capital Cost (CAPEX) of
$1.4 billion
.
Open-pit production of 15 years (excluding pre-production) feeding a 5,000 tonne per day (tpd) flotation concentrator.
Cash operating costs average
$37.42
/kg NdPrO (equivalent contained
1
) recovered.
Average operating margin of 71% (EBITDA / Revenue).
High-Grade REE Mineral Deposit Advantage
Defense Metals' Wicheeda REE deposit is located in a Tier 1 mining jurisdiction.
The Wicheeda Project has logistical and infrastructure advantages.
The project's reserves support a 15-year Life-of-Mine (LOM) with an average annual production of 31,900 tonnes (t) of Total Rare
Earth Oxide (TREO)
2
in concentrate, yielding approximately 5,200 t of TREO in a high-value mixed rare earth carbonate (MREC)
after the removal of cerium (Ce) and lanthanum (La).
Unique mineralogy of the Wicheeda REE deposit allows for the production of one of the highest-grade flotation REE mineral
concentrates in the world at exceptional recovery levels.
High-Grade Mineral Concentrate Advantage
LOM production of a high-grade flotation mineral concentrate, containing an average 50% TREO (dry basis) at 81% recovery over
the initial 8 years.
The mineral concentrate will be processed at Defense Metals' own hydrometallurgical and solvent extraction (SX) separation
process facilities.
High-Value Saleable Mixed Rare Earth Carbonate Product
All of the La and most of the Ce will be removed during the SX process, creating a value-added final MREC product.
The basket value of the MREC is derived from rare earth elements critical to high-growth permanent magnet applications;
neodymium and praseodymium (87.3 wt%), dysprosium, (0.6 wt%), and terbium (0.2 wt%) of contained TREO. Other minor REE
constituents are not considered in the basket value.
Defense Metals has taken a focused and conservative approach to all costs and inputs to deliver a realistic and compelling PFS that it
believes maximizes the scope and scale of its Wicheeda Project over the long term.
The PFS incorporates an initial proven and probable mineral reserve estimate that supports a 15-year, open-pit mining operation
(excluding pre-production) that will produce ore feed for a 5,000 tpd flotation plant. The flotation plant will produce a high-grade REE
mineral concentrate that will feed hydrometallurgical and SX process facilities to produce a value-added MREC product.
Mark Tory
, President and CEO of Defense Metals, commented:
"We are thrilled to announce the successful completion of an
independent Pre-Feasibility Study for our Wicheeda Rare Earth Deposit, marking a major milestone in its development. The PFS,
conducted in collaboration with renowned global experts Hatch and SRK, demonstrates the strong potential of the Wicheeda Project
as a reliable and sustainable source of critical rare earth elements that are essential to advance energy technologies, manufacturing,
and defence applications.
"The high-grade mineral concentrate produced by the Wicheeda Project will undergo hydrometallurgical and solvent extraction
processing, and according to our flowsheet design will enable us to produce a high-value Mixed Rare Earth Carbonate product, due
to the substantial removal of lanthanum and cerium.
"With a pre-tax IRR of
24.6% and a pre-tax NPV of
US$1.8 billion
, our PFS confirms the robust economics this project has to offer.
These results position the Wicheeda Project as one of the most compelling rare earth projects in
North America
or
Europe
. Given the
increasing geopolitical tensions affecting rare earth supply chains, there is significant potential for rare earth prices to rise, further
enhancing Wicheeda's value and maximizing returns for our shareholders.
"Looking ahead, we will focus on optimizing the project's design to maximize operational efficiency and ultimately shareholder
returns. Additionally, we will engage with potential strategic partners to support the project's growth and development
.
"Now is the ideal time for a North American rare earth company to advance toward building a new mine and processing facilities. We
are moving forward with our regulatory engagement and continue to work closely with the project's Indigenous rightsholders to
expedite the approval process and bring this critical project to fruition."
___________________________
1
Neodymium-Praseodymium oxide (NdPrO) and Total rare earth oxide (TREO) equivalents are reported in this document by convention. In the final MREC product, the rare earths will be present as carbonates (RE
2
(CO
3
)
3
), and in the feed and
flotation concentrate they will be present in a variety of species. For reporting purposes, the rare earth content is converted to the oxide equivalent.
2
TREO accounts for all 15 rare earth oxides within the deposit; however, for financial modeling purposes only Nd, Pr, Tb and Dy are assigned economic value.
Wicheeda Project - Key Parameters
The project level financial analysis was performed on a
2025-dollar
basis without inflation.
Table 1 – Base Case Economics
Financial Metrics
Units
Base Case
Pre-tax NPV @ 8%
$M
1,803
After-tax NPV @ 8%
$M
992
Pre-tax IRR
%
24.6
After-tax IRR
%
18.9
Undiscounted After-tax Project Cashflow (LOM)
$M
2,672
After-tax payback period from start of production
Years
3.7
Costs and Profit
Initial capital expenditure
$M
1,440
Average annual operating cost
$M per annum
165
Average annual operating cost
$/kg NdPrO equivalent in MREC
37.42
MREC average price
$/kg NdPrO equivalent content in MREC
136.30
Life of mine gross revenue
$M
9,030
Operating (EBITDA) margin
%
71
Production Metrics
Mine life (excluding pre-production)
Years
15
Maximum mining production rate
Mtpa
8.7
Life of mine strip ratio
Waste: Ore
3.3:1
Life of mine TREO grade
% TREO in mill feed
2.4
Life of mine flotation concentrate
Thousand tonnes per annum (ktpa) dry
62.5
Concentrate grade
% TREO (dry)
50
Life of mine NdPrO contained in MREC
ktpa NdPrO equivalent
4.4
Life of mine NdPrO % of TREO in MREC
% NdPrO equivalent
87
The PFS was conducted by Hatch Ltd. (Hatch) and SRK Consulting (
Canada
) Inc. (SRK). The Hatch and SRK Qualified Person (QP)
authors confirm that the Wicheeda Project PFS disclosure meets the standards established by the Canadian Securities Administrators'
National Instrument 43-101
– Standard of Disclosure for Mineral Projects (
NI 43-101
).
The effective date of the PFS is
February 7, 2025
, and the Company expects to file a NI 43-101 technical report relating to the PFS on
SEDAR+ within 45 days of this news release.
Wicheeda Project Overview
Favourable Mineralogy Leading to Favourable Metallurgy
The Wicheeda REE deposit is characterized by three main REE-bearing lithologies: dolomite carbonatite (DC), which is the dominant
lithology, xenolithic carbonatite, and syenite. Limestone is the major waste rock lithology.
The predominant REE-bearing minerals are bastnäsite, monazite, synchysite and parisite. The coarse grain size of Wicheeda's REE
mineralization provides significant metallurgical advantages, allowing for enhanced mineral liberation and improved separation from
gangue minerals during comminution and increased flotation efficiency. These factors all support efficient and cost-effective REE
recovery and collectively lead to the production of a LOM high-grade REE concentrate (averaging 50% TREO) that contributes to the
Wicheeda Project's economic viability.
Mine Planning
Table 2 – PFS Mine Plan Summary
Mine Production Metrics
Unit
Pre-prod
Yrs 1-8
Yrs 9-15
LOM
Target Annual Throughput
Mt/a
-
1.8
1.8
1.8
Total Material Movement
Mt
11.2
65.2
33.3
109.7
Total Ore
Mt
0.1
14.6
10.8
25.5
Total Waste
Mt
11.0
50.0
21.6
84.2
Strip Ratio
waste: ore
77.0:1
3.5:1
2.1:1
3.3:1
Average Ore Grade
% TREO
2.32
2.80
1.92
2.43
Total Flotation Concentrate Produced
Mt dry
-
0.632
0.306
0.94
Design Flotation Concentrate Grade
% TREO
50
50
50
50
Average Flotation Plant Recovery
%
-
80.9
69.3
76.7
The Wicheeda Project will be developed as an open-pit mining operation. In the first eight years of ore production, near-surface, mostly
high-grade DC mineralization will be mined as indicated in the Figure 1 showing ore lithology over time. Mining rates will range from 4 to
9 million-tonnes per annum (Mtpa) over the 15-year mine life (excluding pre-production).
Figure 1 – Ore Processed per Year (CNW Group/Defense Metals Corp.)
Mined ore will be crushed at a facility near the pit and transported via conveyor to sustain a 1.8 Mtpa mill feed to the on-site flotation
plant. Waste rock will be placed in a waste rock storage facility (WRSF) adjacent to the pit.
The flotation plant will produce a high-grade rare earth mineral concentrate averaging 50% TREO. The flotation plant flowsheet
includes crushing, semi-autogenous and ball mill grinding, rougher and scavenger flotation and three stages of cleaner flotation at
elevated temperatures to produce a final flotation concentrate.
The Wicheeda Project envisages dewatering tailings using filter press technology and storing the filtered material in a filtered tailings
storage facility (FTSF) located west of Wichcika Creek. It will store both flotation tailings and hydrometallurgical residue, with a liner
system and water management pond to manage environmental impact.
The high-grade, filtered mineral concentrate will be transported off-site, approximately 45 kilometers (km) by truck, to
Bear Lake
for
hydrometallurgical and SX processing to produce a high-quality MREC product.
Hydrometallurgy with Lanthanum and Cerium Removal by Solvent Extraction
During hydrometallurgical processing, the flotation mineral concentrate will first undergo acid baking with concentrated sulphuric acid
(1.1 t/t concentrate) at about 300˚C, converting the rare earths into water-soluble sulphates, which readily dissolve during a subsequent
water leach process. The resulting leachate will then be purified before being sent to the SX unit for the removal of La and Ce to allow
production of MREC with enhanced economic value.
The SX operations will employ a single, standard solvent extraction circuit using an acidic extractant in a kerosene-based diluent: to
separate La and Ce from the other REEs.
The low-value La and Ce will largely be eliminated and separately precipitated and disposed of in a waste storage facility provided for
the hydrometallurgical process (with potential to be recovered should a market develop for these elements). The more valuable REEs
will be retained, including the magnet-metal REEs: praseodymium (Pr), neodymium (Nd), terbium (Tb) and dysprosium (Dy).
Table 3 – Hydrometallurgical Plant Metrics
Item
Unit
Yrs 1-8
Yrs 9-15
LOM
Flotation concentrate feed
ktpa
80.4
44.7
63.7
MREC production (TREO equivalent)
ktpa
6.3
3.8
5.2
NdPrO (equivalent)
ktpa
5.4
3.2
4.4
Heavy REO (equivalent)
3
ktpa
0.8
0.5
0.7
Hydrometallurgical Plant Recovery
% NdPrO
93.4
93.4
93.4
After the La and Ce are removed, the remaining REEs are precipitated as a MREC.
The advantage of the SX process is that a higher-quality, higher-value MREC product is produced, containing 87% NdPr oxide and 11%
heavy rare earth oxides including valuable Dy and Tb. Elimination of the La and Ce reduces the mass of MREC to be produced by a
factor of six without any loss of the valuable NdPr. This not only allows for transportation and separation cost savings but also creates
a more desirable product for downstream end users and REE separators.
_____________________________
3
For the purposes of this document, Heavy REO refers to the oxides of samarium (Sm), europium (Eu), gadolinium (Gd), terbium (Tb), dysprosium (Dy), holmium (Ho), erbium (Er), thulium (Tm), ytterbium (Yb), lutetium (Lu), and yttrium (Y). Only
Tb and Dy contributions were considered in the product value calculations.
Proximity to Existing Infrastructure
The Wicheeda REE deposit is approximately 80 km northeast of the nearby city of
Prince George, British Columbia
. The deposit
location provides excellent access to infrastructure, as the site is accessible via an all-weather gravel road that connects to British
Columbia Highway 97. Proximity to major B.C. Hydro hydroelectric power lines, a natural gas pipeline, and the Canadian National
Railway line further enhance the project's logistical advantages.
Prince George
(agglomerated population ~ 95,000) serves as a regional hub, supporting oil and gas, forestry, hydropower and mining
industries and offers a skilled workforce and essential services. Daily commercial air service is available between
Prince George
and
major Canadian international airports. Moreover, the port of
Prince Rupert
, the closest major North American port to
Asia
is located
about 500 km to the west and accessible by rail and road.
Power
The Wicheeda Project's power supply is expected to come from a new high-voltage transmission line (1L 365) located west of the
project site which connects to the B.C. Hydro 500 kV line. Cost estimates used in the PFS are based on industry benchmarks.
Transportation
Upgrading the existing forestry road from
Bear Lake
will facilitate access to the project site.
The Canadian National Railway (CNR) will be important in the supply of Wicheeda Project process plant reagents and consumables.
The CNR handles over 50% of all Canadian chemicals production and is the only rail carrier servicing three major petrochemical centers
in
North America
: the Alberta Heartland, the U.S. Gulf Coast and southwestern
Ontario
. The CNR line that passes through
Bear Lake
is
high-capacity rail line that also services the port facilities at
Prince Rupert, BC
.
Project Infrastructure
The mining project area exhibits a topography and geography ideally suited for development. The varied terrain provides opportunities
to minimize earthwork requirements and facilitates the development of a water management plan which maintains natural drainage
patterns.
Water Supply
All excess water at the mine site will be directed to the contact water pond at the processing plant for process water recirculation or
treatment and discharge.
Table 4 – Wicheeda Project Capital Expenditure Estimates
Category
Capital Costs ($M)
Initial
Sustaining
Closure
Post Closure
Total
Mining
99.2
57.9
-
-
157.2
Flotation Plant and Infrastructure
450.9
-
-
-
450.9
Hydrometallurgical and SX Plants
614.5
-
-
-
614.5
Mine Tailings
19.8
45.7
-
-
66.5
Hydrometallurgical Waste
10.7
14.0
-
-
24.7
Contact Water Pond
11.8
-
-
11.8
Mine Site Water Management
1.6
-
-
-
1.6
Mine Site Water Treatment
10.0
-
-
-
10.0
Hydrometallurgical Water Treatment
6.6
-
-
-
6.6
Closure
-
-
57.4
325.1
382.5
Contingency
214.8
15.3
7.2
40.6
277.9
Total
1,439.8
133.0
64.5
365.8
2,003.0
Cost estimates do not consider cost escalation resulting from the imposition of new tariffs, counter-tariffs, import and/or export duties
or other similar charges applicable to raw, semi-finished or finished materials and/or other products.
Table 5 – Wicheeda Project Operating Costs Estimates
Category
LOM ($M)
LOM avg ($M/y)
LOM ($/kg NdPrO
equivalent in MREC)
Mining
537
35.8
8.09
Flotation Plant
724
48.3
10.91
Hydrometallurgical Facility
995
66.3
15.02
Concentrator & Hydrometallurgical Facility General & Administration
88
5.8
1.32
Mine Site Tailings
94
6.3
1.42
Hydrometallurgical Waste
20
1.4
0.31
Contact Water Pond
2
0.2
0.04
Mine Site Water Treatment
11
0.7
0.16
Hydrometallurgical Water Treatment
8
0.5
0.12
Total
2,479
165.3
37.42
Rare Earth Markets and Price Forecast
The Rare Earth Market
According to Adamas Intelligence Inc. (Adamas), global Neodymium-Iron-Boron (NdFeB) magnet consumption grew by 13% in 2023,
and projects demand will rise by 12% in 2024 to 231,371 t. This growth has been largely driven by passenger and commercial electric
vehicles (EV) traction motors, wind power generators and consumer electronics.
Adamas reports that the magnet industry, which relies on Nd, Pr, and, for high-end applications, Dy and Tb, is the largest consumer of
rare earths by volume, accounting for 49% of global demand in 2023. However, in value terms, rare earth permanent magnets have
long been the dominant market. In 2023, magnet applications represented over 95% of the total rare earth market value.
Looking ahead, Adamas projects that global demand for NdFeB magnets will increase at a compound annual growth rate of 8.7% to
reach 606,792 t by 2035 and 881,396 t in 2040. The expected greatest demands driving growth come from robotics, advanced air
mobility, commercial EV traction motors and passenger EV traction motors, reinforcing their critical role in advanced technologies and
the energy transition.
Rare Earth Prices
Rare earth prices have been highly volatile in recent years, driven by growing demand for energy and mobility technologies, the COVID
pandemic, as well as geopolitical factors.
Adamas has developed a Base Case pricing scenario that accounts for supply-demand modeling and expects that the future of rare
earths demand (at least in the case of, Nd, Pr, Dy and Tb) will be more robust, more resilient and less sensitive to price than demand
of the past and present, which is still largely driven by consumer and legacy automotive applications.
Adamas believes that from 2032 through 2040 Defense Metals could expect to receive a price for its MREC equal to 95% of the rare
earth oxide value it contains (value based on
China
domestic prices, excluding VAT).
Adamas expects the price of NdPr oxide to increase from an average of
$63
/kg this year to
$70
-110/kg in the late-2020s. In a rational
market, it would expect these price increases to induce investment in new production capacity. However, owing to the long lead times
to develop new rare earth supplies and the lack of advanced, financially committed projects in the pipeline today, Adamas sees
potential for pervasive deficits to push prices above required inducement levels (estimated at
$100
-150/kg in the long term).
Given the high amounts of NdPr in the final MREC after removing Ce and La, the average MREC price per kg for the Wicheeda Project
is
$70.4
/kg of MREC, which is the equivalent of
$116.5
/kg of contained TREO and the equivalent of
$136.3
/kg of contained NdPrO.
Financial Analysis
The expected project cashflows were modelled using a simple discounted cash-flow model. A discount rate of 8% was used. The
model uses nominal cashflows and costs and is configured for annual periods. An exchange rate of
1.40 CAD
/USD was used for
reporting any CAD values used in the PFS. A constant price of
$133
/kg NdPrO was applied and is based on the Adamas long term
forecast.
Table 6 – Cash Flow Summary
Item
Undiscounted LOM ($M)
Undiscounted Unit Average
($/kg NdPrO equivalent in MREC)
Discounted LOM ($M)
Gross Revenue
9,030
136.33
4,536
Operating Costs
(2,479)
(37.42)
(1,208)
Product Transportation
(26)
(0.39)
(13)
Royalties
(90)
(1.36)
(45)
EBITDA
6,435
97.15
3,269
Changes in Net Working Capital
-
-
(80)
Initial Capital Cost
(1,440)
(21.74)
(1,275)
Sustaining Capital Cost
(133)
(2.01)
(70)
Closure and Reclamation Bond Cost
(430)
(6.50)
(41)
Royalty buy-out
(1)
(0.01)
(1)
Pre-Tax Cash Flow
4,431
66.90
1,803
BC Mineral Tax
(604)
(9.12)
(269)
Corporate Tax
(1,155)
(17.44)
(542)
After-Tax Cash Flow
2,672
40.33
992
The PFS estimates total LOM taxes paid of
$1.8 billion
including
$604 million
to the Province of
British Columbia
and
$1.2 billion
to the
Government of
Canada
, implying an estimated tax rate on taxable income of approximately 40%.
Sensitivity Analysis
NPV @ different discount rates
Table 7: NPV sensitivity to discount rate
Discount rate (%)
5 %
8% (base)
10 %
15 %
Pre-tax NPV ($M)
2,582
1,803
1,403
694
After-tax NPV ($M)
1,514
992
722
242
NPV and IRR sensitivity to the itemized factors are illustrated in the graphs which follow:
MREC price (substantially NdPr)
CAPEX
OPEX
Figure 2 – NPV Sensitivity (CNW Group/Defense Metals Corp.)
Figure 3 – IRR Sensitivity (CNW Group/Defense Metals Corp.)
Defense Metals evaluated pricing reports from Adamas and Argus Media (Argus). The Company believes it was more appropriate to
use Adamas for comparability with peers who have used the same pricing methodology. This includes MP Materials Corp. which
reference the Adamas pricing in their
February 22, 2024
, EDGAR filing in relation to technical report for their Mountain Pass mine.
Argus had two scenarios, the incentive price scenario was 6.8% higher than Adamas base case pricing and the conservative case was
18.3% lower than the Adamas base case pricing.
Environmental, Social, and Regulatory Engagement
Defense Metals is committed to maintaining high environmental, social, and governance (ESG) standards while responsibly progressing
the development of the Wicheeda Project. The regulatory jurisdiction has embedded standards relating to the environmental
assessment and permitting processes that align with ESG principles, including the consideration of climate change in project planning
and impact assessment, biodiversity assessments, social impact evaluation and stakeholder engagement and rightsholder consultation.
Many critical baseline studies have been initiated to ensure a background understanding of environmental, social and cultural values.
Additional environmental, social and cultural studies will be completed to provide project design refinements and advance environmental
assessment and permitting processes.
Defense Metals and the McLeod Lake Indian Band (MLIB) have signed a Co-Design Agreement, formalizing their partnership to
integrate MLIB's perspectives into all project phases, from technical and engineering considerations to social and environmental
planning. Defense Metals is committed to ongoing collaboration with rightsholders and stakeholders, prioritizing their interests and
working towards consensus.
The Wicheeda Project is vital to
British Columbia's
transition to clean energy. Defense Metals maintains close communication with the
BC Critical Minerals Office, a government body that fosters the province's critical mineral sector. Through this relationship, Defense
Metals is provided with dedicated regulatory process assistance and possible funding support.
Mineral Reserves and Resources Estimates
Mineral Reserves
The mineral reserve estimate for the Wicheeda Rare Earth Element Deposit has been prepared for Defense Metals as part of the 2025
Pre-Feasibility Study (PFS). This mineral reserve estimate has been prepared in accordance with the Canadian Institute of Mining,
Metallurgy and Petroleum (CIM) Definition Standards on Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves adopted by CIM Council in
May
2014
.
The mineral reserves respective of the open pit are based on Measured and Indicated mineral resources that have been identified as
being economically extractable and which incorporate mining losses and mining waste dilution. The mineral reserves include 25.5 million
tonnes (Mt) of mineable ore from one open pit at an average grade of 2.43% TREO. The mineral reserve includes variable mining
dilution, and it is calculated after 1% ore loss.
A summary of the surface mineable mineral reserves by rock type and reserve classification is shown in Table 8.
Table 8 – Summary of the Mineral Reserves (as of February 7, 2025)
Mineral Reserve
Rock Type
Tonnes
TREO
Pr
6
O
11
Nd
2
O
3
Tb
4
O
7
Dy
2
O
3
kt
%
ppm
ppm
ppm
ppm
Proven
Dolomite Carbonatite
5,377
2.97
1,152
3,135
12
35
Limestone
11
2.01
858
2,359
12
40
Syenite
42
1.45
582
1,681
11
39
Xenolithic Carbonatite
258
1.74
700
2,060
11
37
Total
5,688
2.90
1,127
3,074
12
35
Probable
Dolomite Carbonatite
12,178
2.86
1,122
3,071
12
34
Limestone
139
1.39
563
1,600
10
38
Syenite
639
1.25
503
1,483
8
26
Xenolithic Carbonatite
6,820
1.42
585
1,717
9
30
Total
19,775
2.30
913
2,543
10
32
Total
Dolomite Carbonatite
17,554
2.89
1,131
3,091
12
34
Limestone
150
1.44
585
1,655
10
38
Syenite
681
1.26
508
1,495
8
27
Xenolithic Carbonatite
7,078
1.44
589
1,730
9
30
Total
25,462
2.43
961
2,661
11
33
Mineral Reserves Notes:
• The effective date of the Wicheeda Rare Earth Element Deposit Mineral Reserve is February 7, 2025.
• Dollar values herein stated are United States Dollars (US$)
• Mineral Reserves are reported assuming the prices provided from Adamas listed below:
• NdPr Oxide 132.70 $/kg REO
• Tb
4
O
7
1362.83 $/kg REO
• Dy
2
O
3
442.48 $/kg REO
• Mineral Reserves are defined within the final pit design guided by pit shells derived from the optimization software, GEOVIA Whittle™
•
Cut-off grade is based on the value factors generated in each block. The revenue and related costs vary based on the composition of different elements
in each block
. Value of a block is the revenue generated in that block minus the related processing and G&A operating costs.
• The base mining costs are assumed to be $5.00/t. The mining costs vary based by the bench and depth of the pit. The average mining costs for the life
of mine is calculated to be $5.26/t mined.
• Processing costs consist of flotation plant cost at the mine site and a hydrometallurgical/solvent extraction (hydrometallurgical) plant that is off the mine
property. The operating cost of the flotation plant is $27.60/t milled and the hydrometallurgical plant operating cost is $1,164.4/t of concentrate treated.
• General and administration costs of the mine site is $3.67/t for ore milled.
• Tailings management and storage cost is $6.55/t of ore.
• Off-site cost (transportation) is $87.76/t of precipitate products produced.
• Processing recovery is calculated using the following formula:
• Flotation recovery for TREO = -11.183*TREO^2 + 67.831*TREO - 20.42194%. For ore above 3% TREO, the flotation recovery is set to 82.4%. For grade
less than 0.32% TREO, the flotation recovery is set to 0.0%.
• Flotation recovery for TREO then is multiplied by 0.995, 0.996, 0.734, 0.636 for Pr, Nd, Tb, Dy respectively to calculate the respective flotation recovery
for each element.
• Hydrometallurgical recovery for Pr, Nd, Tb, Dy are 0.932, 0.935, 0.802, 0.734 respectively.
• A 95% payability has been applied to the final hydrometallurgical product.
• Mining dilution varies based on the mining zone. The average mining dilution is calculated to be 2.9%, for the ore delivered to the mill. Tonnages reported
as ore includes dilution.
• A 1% ore loss has been applied to the total reserve in each bench.
• Figures are rounded to the appropriate level of precision for the reporting of mineral reserves. Due to rounding, some columns or rows may not sum as shown.
• The overall strip ratio (Waste:Ore - the amount of waste mined for each tonne of ore) is 3.34.
• The mineral reserve is stated as diluted dry metric tonnes.
• The mine plan underpinning the mineral reserves has been prepared by SRK Consulting (Canada) Inc.
• The TREO grade encompasses 15 rare earth elements present in the deposit
• The estimate of Mineral Reserves may be materially affected by environmental, permitting, legal, title, taxation, sociopolitical, marketing, or other relevant issues.
The Qualified Person, Dr.
Anoush Ebrahimi
, does not know of any legal, political, environmental, or other risks that could materially
affect the potential development of the mineral reserves. Dr. Ebrahimi personally inspected the Wicheeda Project on
October 26, 2021
.
Mineral Resources
The Mineral Resource estimate for the Wicheeda Rare Earth Element Deposit has been prepared for Defense Metals
as part of the 2025 Pre-Feasibility Study (PFS). This Mineral Resource estimate has been prepared in accordance with the CIM
Definition Standards adopted
May 2014
.
The Mineral Resources stated below are constrained within an optimized pit shell to satisfy Reasonable Prospects of Eventual
Economic Extraction (RPEEE) requirements. The Mineral Resources include 29.2 Mt of Measured + Indicated resource at an average
grade of 2.27% TREO and 5.5 Mt of Inferred resource at an average grade of 1.42% TREO. No mining dilution has been incorporated
into the Mineral Resources stated below. The Mineral Resources are stated inclusive of Mineral Reserves.
A summary of the surface mineable Mineral Resources by rock type and Resource classification is shown in Table 9.
Table 9 – Summary of the Mineral Resources (as of February 7, 2025)
Mineral Resource
Rock Type
Tonnes
TREO
Pr
6
O
11
Nd
2
O
3
Tb
4
O
7
Dy
2
O
3
kt
%
ppm
ppm
ppm
ppm
Measured
Dolomite Carbonatite
5,350
2.99
1161
3158
12
35
Limestone
10
1.99
851
2347
13
42
Syenite
50
1.41
561
1635
11
40
Xenolithic Carbonatite
300
1.64
662
1952
11
36
Total
5,720
2.90
1128
3079
12
35
Indicated
Dolomite Carbonatite
12,020
2.90
1139
3117
12
34
Limestone
160
1.41
573
1639
11
43
Syenite
1,280
1.08
445
1340
8
29
Xenolithic Carbonatite
9,980
1.32
549
1623
9
30
Total
23,430
2.12
846
2374
10
32
Measured + Indicated
Dolomite Carbonatite
17,370
2.93
1146
3129
12
34
Limestone
170
1.46
593
1688
11
43
Syenite
1,330
1.09
450
1352
8
29
Xenolithic Carbonatite
10,270
1.33
552
1633
9
30
Total
29,150
2.27
901
2512
11
33
Inferred
Dolomite Carbonatite
570
2.67
1072
2883
12
37
Limestone
210
1.51
603
1650
9
33
Syenite
1,480
0.92
408
1251
9
33
Xenolithic Carbonatite
3,240
1.43
589
1717
9
32
Total
5,500
1.42
590
1709
9
33
Mineral Resources Notes:
• CIM (2014) definitions were followed for Mineral Resources.
• The Qualified Person for the MRE is Doug Reid, P.Eng., EGBC (23347), an SRK employee.
• The effective date of the Mineral Resource is February 7, 2025
• Dollar values herein stated are United States Dollars (US$)
• Mineral Resources are reported assuming the prices listed below (a 15% uplift was applied to the Reserve prices):
• NdPr Oxide 132.70 $/kg REO
• Tb
4
O
7
1567.26 $/kg REO
• Dy
2
O
3
508.85 $/kg REO
• Mineral Resources are defined within a pit shell derived from the optimization software, GEOVIA Whittle™
•
Cut-off grade is based on the value factors generated in each block. The revenue and related costs vary based on the composition of different
elements in each block
. Value of a block is the revenue generated in that block minus the related processing and G&A operating costs.
• The base mining costs are assumed to be $4.50/t. The mining costs vary based by the bench and depth of the pit. The average mining costs for
the life of mine is calculated to be $4.74/t mined.
• Processing costs consist of flotation plant cost at the mine site and a hydrometallurgical/solvent extraction (hydrometallurgical) plant that is off the
mine property. The operating cost of the flotation plant is $27.60/t milled and the hydrometallurgical plant operating cost is $1,164.4/t of concentrate
treated.
• General and administration costs of the mine site is $3.67/t for ore milled.
• Tailings management and storage cost is $6.55/t of ore.
• Off-site cost (transportation) is $87.76/t of precipitate products produced.
• Processing recovery is calculated using the following formula:
• Flotation recovery for TREO = -11.183*TREO^2 + 67.831*TREO - 20.421940%. For ore above 3% TREO the flotation recovery is set to 82.4%.
For grade less than 0.32% TREO the flotation recovery is set to 0.0%.
• Flotation recovery for TREO then is multiplied by 0.995, 0.996, 0.734, 0.636 for Pr, Nd, Tb, Dy respectively to calculate the respective flotation
recovery for each element.
• Hydrometallurgical recovery for Pr, Nd, Tb, Dy are 0.932, 0.935, 0.802, 0.734 respectively
• A 95% payability has been applied to the final hydrometallurgical product.
• Bulk density is assigned by lithology.
• No mining dilution has been applied.
• Mineral Resources are reported inclusive of those Mineral Resources converted to Mineral Reserves.
• Mineral Resources that are not Mineral Reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability.
• Figures are rounded to the appropriate level of precision for the reporting of mineral Resources. Due to rounding, some columns or rows may not sum
as shown.
• The TREO grade encompasses 15 rare earth elements present in the deposit
• The estimate of Mineral Resources may be materially affected by environmental, permitting, legal, title, taxation, sociopolitical, marketing, or other
relevant issues.
The Qualified Person,
Douglas Reid
, does not know of any legal, political, environmental, or other risks that could materially affect the
potential development of the mineral Resources. Mr. Reid personally inspected the Wicheeda Project on
October 31
and
November 1,
2024
.
Pre
-
Feasibility Study Review Webinar
Defense Metals will be hosting a webinar to discuss the results of the Wicheeda Project PFS during which members of the Defense
Metals' leadership team will be on the call. Participants will be able to submit questions or e-mail them in advance to
.
Date:
February 19, 2025
Time:
1:00 p.m. ET
/
10:00 a.m. PT
Link:
https://us02web.zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_BLHdzFqsSyufX1r2jYrFhQ
Qualified Persons – PFS Contributors
The Wicheeda Project PFS was conducted by independent representatives of Hatch and SRK (the PFS Contributors), each of whom is
a Qualified Person (QP) as defined by the Canadian Securities Administrators'
National Instrument 43-101 -
Standards of Disclosure
for Mineral Projects.
The PFS contributors prepared or supervised the preparation of information that forms the basis of the PFS disclosure in this news
release.
Each of the QPs is independent of Defense Metals and has reviewed and confirmed that this news release fairly and accurately
reflects, in the form and context in which it appears, the information contained in the respective sections of the Wicheeda Project PFS
report for which they are responsible. The affiliation and areas of responsibility for each QP involved in preparing the PFS are provided
as follows:
Hatch QPs:
Metallurgical review, process design and operating cost estimates:
Jeff Adams
for Hydrometallurgical
Joe Paventi for mine site flotation plant
Process plant and associated infrastructure cost estimates – Gerry Schwab
Financial analysis and market study –
Stefan Hlouschko
SRK QPs:
Mineral resources estimate –
Doug Reid
Mineral reserves, mine design and scheduling –
Anoush Ebrahimi
Mine costing –
Bob McCarthy
Tailings storage facilities – Ignacio Garcia
J.R. Goode, P.Eng., a consultant to the Company and a QP as defined in NI 43-101, reviewed and approved the metallurgical and
process design information in this news release.
About Defense Metals Corp. and its Wicheeda REE Deposit
Defense Metals Corp. is focused on the development of its 100% owned, 11,800-hectare (~29,158-acre) Wicheeda REE deposit that
is located on the traditional territory of the McLeod Lake Indian Band in
British Columbia, Canada
.
The Wicheeda Project, approximately 80 kilometres (~50 miles) northeast of the city of
Prince George
, is readily accessible by a
paved highway and all-weather gravel roads and is close to infrastructure, including hydro power transmission lines and gas pipelines.
The nearby Canadian National Railway and major highways allow easy access to the port facilities at
Prince Rupert
, the closest major
North American port to
Asia
.
For further information, please visit
www.defensemetals.com
or contact:
Alex Heath
Senior Vice President, Corporate Development & Interim CFO
Tel: +1 604-354-2491
Email:
Neither the TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in the policies of the TSX Venture
Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this news release.
Cautionary Statement Regarding "Forward-Looking" Information
This news release contains "forward looking statements" or "forward-looking information" (collectively, "Forward-Looking Statements")