Saturday, September 26, 2026
MiningNewsTerminal
Saturday, September 26, 2026 Admin

CYG.V ·

Doré Copper Announces Positive Preliminary Economic Assessment FOR Restarting Chibougamau Mining CAMP

Economic Studies Mine Development & Operations

PRESS RELEASE

DORÉ COPPER ANNOUNCES POSITIVE PRELIMINARY ECONOMIC ASSESSMENT

FOR RESTARTING CHIBOUGAMAU MINING CAMP

Toronto, Ontario – May 10, 2022 – Doré Copper Mining Corp. (the " Corporation" or " Doré Copper")

(TSXV: DCMC; OTCQ X: DRCMF; FRA: DCM) is pleased to report positive results from its Preliminary

Economic Assessment (“PEA“) for the restart of the Chibougamau mining camp. The PEA supports a hub-

and-spoke operation with the high-grade Corner Bay copper-gold deposit as its main underground mine

along with the Devlin copper deposit and the former Joe Mann gold mine providing feed to its Copper Rand

mill (collectively, the ”Project”) . The PEA demonstrates attractive project economics with optionality for

expansion into a significantly larger operation, re-establishing the Chibougamau mining camp as a long-life

copper and gold producer.

All values in this news release are reported in Canadian dollars (C$) unless otherwise noted.

Doré Copper will be hosting a webinar to review the PEA results on Tuesday, May 10 at 10:00AM EST:

https://us06web.zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_yaoTJLNPTcGccp-PlAceIA

PEA Highlights

• Attractive project economics:

o Base case metal prices of US$3.75/lb Cu and US$1,820/oz Au:

Pre-tax NPV8% of C$367 million and 30.7% IRR

After-tax NPV8% of C$193 million and 22.1% IRR

o Spot metal prices of US$4.20/lb Cu and US$1,854/oz Au:

Pre-tax NPV8% of C$555 million and 40.1% IRR

After-tax NPV8% of C$303 million and 29.4% IRR

• Mine life of 10.5 years: Metal production of 492 Mlbs Cu, 142,000 oz Au

• Average cash operating costs of US$1.35/lb CuEq and all-in sustaining costs of US$2.24/lb CuEq

• Light capital intensity: Initial capital of C$180.6 million (including C$24 million contingency), translating

to a Tier 1 Capital Intensity Index (initial capital / annual CuEq produced) of US$2.64/lb CuEq or

US$0.25/lb CuEq LOM

• Scalable operation: Mill has 25% excess grinding capacity (over the maximum annual throughput)

providing opportunities to add, discover, or acquire other properties in the Chibougamau mining camp

• Long life tailings storage option with minimal environmental impact: Implementation of dry stack

tailings and ore sorting technology provides for a maximum cap acity of 12 Mt on the existing Copper

Rand tailings management facility (“TMF”)

• Modernization of the mill and TMF: PEA study modernizes the existing Copper Rand mill and TMF

so that they are productive and cost efficient and minimizes impact on the environment

• Opportunities for mine life extension: Corner Bay and Joe Mann deposits remain open at depth with

strong potential to add additional resources and extend the mine life. Potential for additional mill feed

during mine life with the advancement of its exploration projects in Chibougamau mining ca mp.

Ernest Mast, President and CEO commented, “The completion of the PEA is a major accomplishment from

our team and gets us closer to our near-term objective of restarting the Chibougamau mining camp. This

achievement has come with the excellent exploration results from Corner Bay over the last few years where

we have been able to significantly grow the mineral resources. The PEA represents today’s status of the

projects but we envision scaled expansions and future growth at both Cor ner Bay and Joe Mann while

eventually sequencing in other deposits across our large land package in the Chibougamau mining camp.

With three projects in the PEA, the average annual production over the mine life is approximately 50 Mlbs

2

of copper equivalent , with a high of 90 Mlbs of copper equivalent . Our vision is to operate a viable

sustainable hub-and-spoke operation over multi-decades to become a significant copper producer in

Québec.”

“Our next steps include commencing a feasibility study and submitting permit application with the provincial

government. We look forward to working with Ouje-Bougoumou Cree Nation and the towns of

Chibougamau and Chapais with the support of the government to advance the restart of the Chibougamau

mining camp.”

PEA Study Approach

The PEA envisions a hub-and-spoke model operation starting first with the underground development of

the Devlin deposit via a ramp and secondly with the underground development of the Corner Bay deposit

(main asset) via a ramp. Once the Devlin deposit is mined out (approximately 4 years), production at the

Joe Mann mine would start and be funded out of cash flow from operations. Joe Mann benefits from an

existing headframe and shaft, including all surface infrastructures.

A fixed crushing circuit and ore sorter plant (XRT) would be installed at Corner Bay and would reject the

low-grade and dilution material from the Devlin and Corner Bay mines. The high-grade material would be

transported by trucks to the refurbished and optimized Copper Rand mill. The filtered tailings would be

transported to a dry stack tailings facility, which uses part of the footprint at the existing TMF.

The copper and gold concentrate produced would be transported to the port of Québec City for onward

shipping to international smelters, or to a local smelter. Ocean Partners Ltd. has the off -take agreement

(treatment and refining charges terms are within standard market rates).

Table 1: PEA Summary of Key Metrics

Description Unit Base Case1

24-month Trailing Avg

Spot Prices

May 9, 2022

Metal Prices/FX

Copper (Cu) US$/lb 3.75 4.20

Gold (Au) US$/oz 1,820 1,854

Currency Exchange Rate USD/CAD 1.28 1.30

Production Data

Resource Tonnes T 9,150,710 9,150,710

Copper Equiv. Grade % 2.98 2.98

Daily Mill Throughput Tpd 1,350 1,350

Annual Processing Rate Ktpa 490 490

Mine Life Years 10.5 10.5

Avg Annual Production

(in concentrate) Mlbs CuEq 53 53

Operating Costs (LOM avg)

Total Operating Costs2 C$/t mined 106 106

C$/t milled 186 186

All-in Sustaining Costs3,4 US$/lb CuEq 2.24 2.24

Capital Costs5

Initial Capital C$M 180.6 180.6

LOM Sustaining Capex C$M 402.4 402.4

Financial Analysis (unlevered)

Pre-Tax NPV 8% C$M 367 555

Pre-Tax IRR % 30.7 40.1

After-Tax NPV 8% C$M 193 303

After-Tax IRR % 22.1 29.4

Payback Period (Production Start) years 5.5 4.2

1. Base case metal prices based on 24-month trailing average from March 31, 2022.

2. Total operating costs include mining, processing, tailings, surface infrastructures, transport, and G&A costs. See

Table 3.

3

3. AISC includes cash operating costs, sustaining capital expenses to support the on-going operations, concentrate

transport and treatment charges, royalties and closure and rehabilitation costs divided by copper equivalent

pounds produced. See Table 3.

4. AISC is a non-IFRS financial performance measures with no standardized definition under IFRS. Refer to note at

end of this news release.

5. See Table 2.

Capital Cost

The PEA for the Project outlines an initial (pre-production) capital cost estimate of C$180.6 million and

sustaining capital costs over the life of mine (“LOM”) of C$402.4 million, which includes the capital to restart

Joe Mann and overall closure costs of C$53.6 million. Initial underground capital costs include the

rehabilitation of the portals at Corner Bay and Devlin, facilities for water capture and treatment at both

locations, construction of a powerline (16 km, 34 kV powerline to Corner Bay, and 3.25 km, 34 kV powerline

to Devlin), a crushing circuit and ore sorter at Corner Bay, improvements to existing roads and 4 km of new

roads connecting Corner Bay and Devlin, a new feed material reception and mill feed conveyor, ball milling

and gravity circuit, rehabilitated flotation and concentrate filtration circuit and new tailings filtration circuit at

the mill, and preparation of an area on the existing TMF for the placement of filtered tailings and a water

treatment facility.

Table 2: Capex Estimates

Cost Element Initial Capital (C$M)1 Sustaining Capital (C$M)1,3

Mine Costs

Corner Bay 14.8 247.3

Devlin 7.0 0.4

Joe Mann2 0.0 51.9

Processing (including Ore Sorting) 54.2 1.1

Infrastructure 34.5 15.5

Tailings 13.8 16.7

EPCM and Indirect Costs4 22.8 5.5

Owner’s Costs4 9.9 3.1

Subtotal Capex $157.1 $341.6

Contingency5 23.6 7.2

Reclamation and Closure 0.0 53.6

Total Capex $180.6 $402.4

1. All values stated are undiscounted. No inflation or depreciation of costs were applied.

2. Contingency, owner’s costs, EPCM and indirect costs on Joe Mann’s initial capital also included in the

sustaining capital.

3. Sustaining capital does not include salvage values, estimated at C$17 M for all sites.

4. Includes owner’s costs of 8%, construction indirects of 10%, and EPCM of 12% for mill and tailings and 4% for

mining of direct costs.

5. Includes contingency of 15% for all initial capital, owner’s costs, construction indirects, and EPCM.

Operating Costs

Operating costs estimates were developed using first principles methodology, vendor quotes received from

Q4 2021 to Q1 2022, and productivities being derived from benchmarking and industry best practices. Over

the LOM, the average operating cost for the Project is estimated at C$106/t mined and C$186/t milled.

The average cash operating costs over the LOM is US$1.35/lb CuEq and the average AISC is US$2.24 /lb

CuEq.

4

Table 3: Operating Cost Summary

Average LOM

Mining C$61/t mined / C$108/t milled

Processing (including Ore Sorting) C$32/t milled

Tailings1 C$7/t milled

Infrastructure and Transport

G&A

C$28/t milled

C$12/t milled

Total operating costs C$186/t milled

Cash operating costs 2,4,5 US$1.35 /lb CuEq

All-in sustaining costs 3,4,5 US$2.24 /lb CuEq

1. Tailings filtration costs are in processing costs.

2. Cash operating cost includes mining, processing, tailings, surface infrastructures, transport, and G&A to the point

of production of the concentrate at the Copper Rand site divided by copper equivalent pounds produced . It

excludes off -site concentrate costs, sustaining capital expenses, closure/rehabilitation and roy alties. CuEq

calculation assumes metal base case prices.

3. AISC includes cash operating costs, sustaining capital expenses to support the on-going operations, concentrate

transport and treatment charges, royalties and closure and rehabilitation costs divided copper equivalent pounds

produced.

4. Copper equivalent (CuEq) costs uses only payable gold in concentrate and is applied as a credit against costs.

5. Cash operating cost and AISC are non-IFRS financial performance measures with no standardized definition

under IFRS. Refer to note at end of this news release.

6. Numbers may not add up due to rounding.

Economic Analysis and Sensitivities

The PEA indicates that the potential economic returns from the Project justify its further evaluation by

advancing to a feasibility study.

Table 4: Summary of Economic Analysis1,2

Base Case

Metal Price Assumptions (US$) $3.75/lb Cu, $1,820/oz Au

Exchange Rate (USD/CAD) 1.28

Pre-tax After-tax

NPV (8% discount) C$366 M C$193 M

IRR 30.7% 22.1%

Payback Period 4.2 yrs 5.5 yrs

EBITDA C$1,313 M C$1,313 M

LOM Undiscounted Net Cash Flow C$747 M C$455 M

1. The analysis assumes that the Project is 100% equity financed (unlevered).

2. Appropriate deductions are applied to the concentrate produced, including treatment, refining, transport and

insurance costs.

The Project generates cumulative cash flow of C$455 million on an after-tax basis and C$747 million pre-

tax at a base case of $3. 75/lb Cu based on a n average mill throughput of 1,350 tpd over 10.5 years. The

2% net smelter return ( “NSR”) royalty over the Joe Mann mine, and the 15% net operating profits interest

(NPI) royalty and the 2% NSR on the gross value of the mineral products exceeding US$60 million over

Devlin have been applied to the cash flow model for a total of C$13.3 million undiscounted.

The PEA economic analysis is significantly influenced by copper prices. At spot metal prices of US$4.20/lb

Cu and US$1,854/oz Au, the Project generates an after -tax Net Present Value (“NPV”) using an 8%

discount rate of $303 million and an after-tax IRR of 29.4% with a payback period of 4.2 years from the

commencement of production. Outlined below in Table 5 is a detailed sensitivity analysis across various

commodity prices.

5

Table 5: Sensitivity Analysis

Copper Prices (US$/lb)

3.40

Base Case

3.75

4.10

Spot

4.20

Gold Prices (US$/oz) 1,650 1,820 1,820 1,854

Pre-tax NPV (8% discount) (C$M) 228 367 494 555

After-tax NPV (8% discount) (C$M) 107 193 269 303

Pre-tax IRR (%) 23.2 30.7 37.2 40.1

After-tax IRR (%) 16.1 22.1 27.2 29.4

Opportunities

• Add Corner Bay’s silver and molybdenum content (currently excluded for mineral resources)

• Potential to extend mine life by expanding mineral resources at both Corner Bay and Joe Mann once

operation starts

• Surplus grinding capacity at the Copper Rand mill

• Underpins potential for low-cost organic production growth (other nearby assets, including Cedar Bay

and Copper Rand) to be evaluated during LOM)

• Potential to increase Corner Bay and Devlin concentrate grades which would decrease treatment

charges and shipping costs

• Potential labour cost savings by self-performance for various mill rehabilitation activities

• Potential to install a 25 kV line from the Québec grid to Corner Bay (PEA design has a 34 kV line)

• Potential for a carbon neutral operation with PEA design to utilize power from the Qu ébec grid,

minimizing trucked material with ore sorting technology and implement ing trolley-assist hauling

technology at the Corner Bay mine site. In the feasibility study, the Corporation will attempt to be carbon

neutral by the end of Devlin’s mine life (approximately 4 years).

Mineral Resources

The basis for the PEA uses an updated mineral resource estimate for the Corner Bay deposit (effective

date March 30, 2022) and previously published MRE for Devlin and Joe Mann , respectively October and

July 2021 , restated with an updated effective date of March 30, 2022. The PEA reports on mineral

resources, not mineral reserves.

Table 6: Mineral Resource Estimates

Deposit Category Tonnage Grade Contained

000 tonnes % Cu g/t Au M lbs Cu 000 oz Au

Corner Bay Indicated 2,675 2.66 0.26 157 22

Inferred 5,829 3.44 0.27 442 51

Devlin Measured 121 2.74 0.29 7.3 1

Indicated 654 2.06 0.19 29.7 4

Measured &

Indicated

775 2.17 0.20 37.0 5

Inferred 484 1.79 0.17 19.2 3

Joe Mann Inferred 608 0.24 6.78 3.3 133

Total Measured &

Indicated

3,450 2.55 0.25 194.0 27

Total Inferred 6,921 3.04 0.83 464.5 187

Notes:

1. CIM (2014) definitions were followed for Mineral Resources.

2. The effective date of the Mineral Resources is March 30, 2022.

3. Mineral Resources are estimated using an exchange rate of US$0.75/C$1.00.

4. Mineral Resources at Joe Mann are estimated using a long-term gold price of US$1,800/oz Au, and a metallurgical

gold recovery of 83%. Mineral Resources at Corner Bay and Devlin are estimated using a long -term copper price

of US$3.75/lb, and a metallurgical copper recovery of 95%.

6

5. Mineral Resources are estimated at a cut-off grade of 2.60 g/t Au at Joe Mann, 1.3% Cu at Corner Bay and 1.2%

Cu at Devlin.

6. A minimum mining width of 1.2 m was used at Joe Mann and a small number of lower grade blocks have been

included for continuity. A minimum mining width of 2.0 m was used at Corner Bay, and a minimum height of 1.8 m

was applied at Devlin.

7. Bulk density ranges by deposit and vein from 2.84 t/m3 to 3.1 t/m3.

8. Mineral Resources that are not Mineral Reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability.

9. Numbers may not add up due to rounding.

Mining

Projected mined tonnes from the Project (Corner Bay, Devlin and Joe Mann) are expected to total 9.15 Mt,

ramping up to a maximum capacity of 3,000 tpd over a mine life of 10.5 years.

Figure 1: Annual Mining Rates (tpd)

Corner Bay Mine

Underground mining at Corner Bay would use the existing single portal and two kilometers of development

to three levels down to 115 meters. The development would extend the decline ramps to a depth of 1,326

meters. Most of the material would be mined by longhole open stopi ng with pillars then backfilled and

AVOCA, a longitudinal longhole retreat mining method. A fleet of nine battery electric haul trucks with trolley

assist and six loaders w ould be required at maximum capacity. Trade off studies were completed to

evaluate between a shaft, 42 tonne battery electric trucks with BaaS (Battery as a Service) technology and

50 tonne diesel trucks and it was concluded that the use of 42 tonne battery el ectric trucks w as the best

economic option. In addition, the electric truck technology will provide benefits related to less ventilation

requirements, better air quality and lower diesel consumption.

The mined material would be transported to surface and crushed at site with an integrated XRT (X-ray

transmission) ore sorting circuit. Test work on material selected from the development mineralized material

stockpiled at surface, which was extracted during the preparation of the 2008 bulk sample , indicated that

the average grade of the mineralized material is upgraded 1.54 times and 47% of the crushed mined

material would be rejected. The high-grade material pre-concentrate would be transported by trucks to the

Copper Rand mill located approximately 47 km from the mine site.

Total projected mined tonnes from Corner Bay are expected to be 7.60 Mt ramping up to a maximum

capacity of 2,600 tpd over a mine life of 10.5 years.

7

Devlin Mine

Access to the shallow Devlin deposit would require the enlargement of the existing decline ramp (305

meters) and existing drifts (364 meters). Underground mining would use a combination of room and pillar

and drift and fill mining methods. Devlin will produce 951 ,000 tonnes of material over a mine life of four

years and reach a maximum mining rate of 760 tpd. Mining and surface activities at Devlin will be done by

a contractor.

The mined tonnes would be trucked 15.6 km to the Corner Bay site for crushing and sorting in combination

with the Corner Bay mined tonnes. With the mineralized material having a thickness of 1 to 2 meters and

the wall rock being essentially barren, ore sorting technology is expected to work well. Preliminary test work

on core from drilling simulating a 2.3 meter mining height resulted in upgrading the grade by 65% and

rejecting 40% of the material.

Joe Mann Mine

As the Devlin mine become depleted, the Joe Mann mine would be restarted. Once the mine would be

dewatered, the Corporation would start an underground exploration program with the objective of

augmenting the mineral resources to increase the mine life beyond the PEA study.

Longhole mining method was chosen for Joe Mann with the mined material to be brought to surface using

the existing shaft and hoist. The mined material would be transported by trucks to the Corner Bay site (total

of 43.5 km) for crushing and then transported by trucks to the Copper Rand mill for processing.

In the PEA, the Joe Mann mine has a mine life of four years with maximum production of 590 tpd. It is

anticipated that additional mineral resource can be defined to increase mine life.

Metallurgy and Processing

The PEA relies on the metallurgical results of the operational data from the processing of a Corner Bay bulk

sample in 2008 at the Copper Rand mill, historical flotation tests done on Corner Bay mineralized material,

recent material sorting test results completed by Corem on Corner Bay and Devlin mineralized material,

recent flotation tests on Devlin completed by SGS Canada Inc., and historical operational data from Joe

Mann when it was treated in the Copper Rand mill . The expected metal recoveries for the three proposed

mines are shown in Table 7.

Table 7: LOM Recovery Rates

Project Cu Recovery % Au Recovery, % Cu Grade in Concentrate, %

Corner Bay 93.2 78.0 24.7

Devlin 95.5 72.5 20.5

Joe Mann 93.9 83.6 15.9

The PEA proposes to refurbish the Copper Rand mill, which closed in 2008 after approximately 50 years

of operation. The mill was constructed in 1959 and expanded twice in the early 1980s and again in 2001.

Historically, the mill operated with a mixture of local ores at an instantaneous rate of 2,700 tpd.

The existing crushing and conveying circuit at the Copper Rand mill will not be used or upgraded since it is

more efficient to install a new crushing circuit and ore sorting plant at Corner Bay . The sorted pre-

concentrate will be trucked to the Copper Rand site and stockpiled by the mill building where it will be

reclaimed in a hopper and fed via a single conveyor to a new 1 ,500 kW ball mill (4.0 meters diameter by

7.15 meters long) to be located in the 1984 expansion area of the existing mill. This new ball mill will replace

the existing 1950’s rod mill and four ball mills in the circuit. Th is will result in significantly less project

execution risk and a mill that will require less manpower and be superior in terms of energy efficiency,

process control and safety. The ball mill discharge will be pumped to a new hydro-cyclone in closed circuit.

The hydro-cyclone underflow will flow to a screen and the un dersize will feed two gravity concentrators.

The hydro-cyclone overflow, at an 80% passing size of 100 µm, will flow by gravity to the existing flotation

area where sequential rougher and scavenger flotation will recover the copper . The rougher concentrate

treated by regrinding and cleaner flotation will produce a copper concentrate with an average grade of

8

23.7% Cu over LOM. The gravity gold bearing concentrate will be blended into the copper concentrate. The

concentrate is considered very clean as it does not contain any elevated deleterious elements. The moisture

content of the concentrate will be reduced to approximately 8% before being transported to the port of

Québec City for onward shipping to international smelters, or to a local smelter.

Figure 2: Annual Copper Equivalent (CuEq) Production (in-concentrate) Schedule

Infrastructure and TMF

The Project benefits greatly from substantial infrastructure in place, including the mill facility, all weather

access roads, 25 kV powerline and a 10.5 MW substation sufficient for the mill power requirements, TMF,

office building, core shack and water supply.

A 16 km forestry road from Québec Highway 167 will be upgraded and constructed to access the Corner

Bay mine site, decreasing the distance between Corner Bay and Copper Rand mill by over 9 km one way .

The Devlin mine site will be accessed via a 3.25 km upgraded road branching off from the Corner Bay road.

Both mine site s are designed to be compact with required infrastructure near the portal. A substation

connected to the Québec grid and a 34 kV powerline will supply power to the Corner Bay and Devlin mines.

The Joe Mann mine will utilize the existing logging roads and powerline to site.

The TMF is located 1.5 km by road from the Copper Rand mill within the existing Copper Rand TMF . The

tailings will be thickened and pumped to a newly constructed filtration plant at the mill site. The filtered

tailings will then be trucked 1.5 km, placed and compacted to the targeted density. The dry stack tailings

facility (filtered tailings) will be built within the footprint of the existing Copper Rand TMF. A liner will be used

to separate the filtered tailings from the in-situ tailings. The run-off water from the filtered tailings facility will

be treated in a water treatment plant and discharged into the existing Copper Rand TMF polishing pond.

Water will flow by gravity from the polishing pond into Lac Doré as it presently occurs. The proposed TMF

has capacity to be expanded to approximately 12 Mt of tailings, representing an increase of 7.5 Mt from the

current design of 4.5 Mt.

Workforce

The Project plans to source most of its workforce locally. The peak workforce during operations is estimated

at approximately 320 persons.

-

20

40

60

80

100

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11

CuEq Lbs (in Millions)

Year

Mill Recovered CuEq Lbs

Corner Bay Devlin Joe Mann