Saturday, September 26, 2026
MiningNewsTerminal
Saturday, September 26, 2026 Admin

CTV.V ·

Flying Nickel Commences Drilling at its Minago Nickel Project in Thompson Manitoba, Canada

Exploration Programs

Flying Nickel Commences Drilling at its Minago Nickel

Project in Thompson Manitoba, Canada

Vancouver, British Columbia, March 7, 2022 – Flying Nickel Mining Corp. (“Flying Nickel”

or the “Company”) (TSXV:FLYN) is pleased to announce it has commenced a drilling program

at its 100% owned Minago nickel sulphide project (“Minago”) in the Thompson nickel belt in

Manitoba, Canada. A total of seven holes totaling 4,980 meters of exploration and infill drilling

are planned for the program.

This drilling program will test Minago’s North Limb deposit both at depth and to the north, which

were previously unexplored. Drill holes are also planned to test the south target from the Minago

main Nose deposit, which accounts for the majority of Minago’s current resource.

Dan Oosterman, CEO of Flying Nickel states : “Minago’s nickel grades compare very favorably

with other open pit optimized, greenfield nickel deposits in North America. Minago had sat

dormant for nearly 10 years under its previous operator , prior to Silver Elephant Mining Corp’s

purchase in February 2021. Our goal is to put Minago and Flying Nickel on the map of the nickel

and battery investment community.”

Rob Van Dru nen, COO of Flying Nickel states: “Our three-pronged development approach at

Minago is exploration, permitting, and an updated feasibility study. We believe Minago is well

positioned to complete both the permitting and feasibility study in 2022.”

About Minago:

Minago’s NI 43-101-compliant Mineral Resource Estimate (“MRE”) , which is comprised of the

Nose and North limb deposits, is effective as of July 2, 2021, and was filed by the Company on

March 2, 2022. The MRE is available under the Company’s profile at www.sedar.com. The

Minago resource is tabulated below:

Minago Deposit Mineral Resource - Effective July 2, 2021 Contained

Type Ni % Cut-off Category RoundedTonnes Ni % Ni Lbs

Open Pit 0.25

Measured 11,490,000 0.73 184,864,908

Indicated 12,450,000 0.69 189,334,620

Measured and Indicated 23,940,000 0.71 374,199,528

Inferred 2,070,000 0.57 26,004,996

Underground 0.5

Measured 610,000 0.81 10,889,964

Indicated 19,680,000 0.77 333,985,344

Measured and Indicated 20,290,000 0.77 344,875,308

Inferred 17,480,000 0.76 292,796,992

2

Minago Deposit Mineral Resource - Effective July 2, 2021 Contained

Type Ni % Cut-off Category RoundedTonnes Ni % Ni Lbs

Combined 0.25/0.50

Measured 12,100,000 0.74 197,346,160

Indicated 32,130,000 0.74 524,027,448

Measured and Indicated 44,230,000 0.74 721,373,608

Inferred 19,560,000 0.74 319,015,776

Mineral Resource Estimate Notes:

1. Mineral resources were prepared in accordance with the CIM Definition Standards for Mineral Resources and

Mineral Reserves (MRMR) (2014) and CIM MRMR Best Practice Guidelines (2019).

2. Open Pit mineral resources are defined within an optimized pit shell with average pit slope angles of 40⁰ and

overall 13.3:1 strip ratio (waste mineralized material). The 13.3:1 strip ratio is com prised of a 6.2:1 pre-strip

component and a 7.1:1 deposit component.

3. Pit optimization parameters include: metal pricing at US$7.80/lb Ni, mining at US$1.77/t, processing at

US$7.62/t processed, G&A at US$3.33/t processed, and an average sulphide Ni (NiS) r ecovery above the

cut-off grade of 78% (ranging from 40% to 90%), based on previous metallurgical test programs. An average

Ni recovery of 56% can be calculated using the average NiS recovery and the average ratio of NiS to Ni (72%)

reported above the cut-off grade. Concentrate by-product credits were applied at metal prices of US$3.25/lb

(Cu), US$2,000/oz Pd and US$ 1,000/oz Pt. A potential frac-sand overburden unit was assigned a value of

US $20/t, a recovery factor of 68.8 %, mining cost of US $1.77/t, and processing cost of US $6.55/t processed.

4. Open Pit mineral resources are reported at a cut-off grade of 0.18 % NiS within the optimized pit shell. The

0.18 % NiS cut-off grade approximates a 0.25 % Ni grade when applying the average ratio of NiS to total Ni

for the mineral resource. The cut -off grade reflects total operating costs used in pit optimization to define

reasonable prospects for eventual economic extraction by open pit mining methods.

5. Underground mineral resources are reported at a cut-off grade of 0.36 % NiS. The 0.36 % NiS cut-off grade

approximates a 0.50 % Ni grade when applying the average ratio of NiS to total Ni for the mineral resource.

The cut-off grade reflects total operating costs of US$41.72/t processed to define reasonable prospect s for

eventual economic extraction by underground mining methods.

6. Ni % deposit grade was estimated using Ordinary Kriging methods applied to 2 m downhole assay composites.

No grade capping was applied. NiS % block values were calculated from Ni % block values using a regression

curve based on Ni and NiS drilling database assay values. Model block size is 6 m (x) by 6 m (y) by 6 m (z).

7. Bulk density was applied on a lithological model basis and reflects averaging of bulk density determinations

for each lithology.

8. Mineral resources may be materially affected by environmental, permitting, legal, title, taxation, sociopolitical,

marketing, or other relevant issues.

9. Mineral resources are not mineral reserves and do not have demonstrated economic viability.

10. Mineral resource tonnages are rounded to the nearest 10,000.

The MRE was prepared by Mercator Geological Services Limited. AGP Mining Consultants

provided pit optimization and associated services. Robert Smith, P.Geo provided site visit and

professional support. All authors are independent of Flying Nickel as defined in NI 43-101. The

MRE was prepared in accordance with the CIM Definition Standards for Mineral Resources and

Mineral Reserves (2014).

The Minago project encompasses a 197 km 2 prospective land package and hosts one of the

largest greenfield open pit nickel sulphide deposits in Canada. Minago is located in the southern

extent of Manitoba’s Thompson Nickel B elt, North America’s second most prolific nickel mining

camp, having produced over 5 billion pounds of nickel since 1959. Manitoba Provincial Highway

6 and a high- voltage (230 kV) hydro-electric power transmission line both transect the Minago

project area, making Minago potentially one of the lowest carbon- intensity nickel projects in the

world.

3

Qualified Person

The technical contents of this news release have been prepared under the supervision of Danniel

Oosterman, CEO. Mr. Oosterman is not independent of the Company in that he is employed by

it. Mr. Oosterman is a qualified person as defined in NI 43-101.

About Flying Nickel

Flying Nickel Mining Corp. is a premier nickel sulphide mining and exploration company , which

was spun out from Silver Elephant Mining Corp in January 2022. The company is advancing its

100% owned Minago nickel project in the Thompson nickel belt in Manitoba, Canada.

Further information on the Company can be found at www.flynickel.com.

FLYING NICKEL MINING CORP.

ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD

“Danniel Oosterman”

Chief Executive Officer

For more information about the Company, please contact:

Email: [email protected]

Neither the TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined

in the policies of the TSX Venture Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy

of this release.

Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

Certain statements contained in this news release, including statements which may contain words

such as “expects”, “anticipates”, “intends”, “plans”, “believes”, “estimates”, or similar expressions,

and statements related to matters which are not historical facts, are forward- looking information

within the meaning of applicable securities laws. Such forward-looking statements, which reflect

management’s expectations regarding Flying Nickel’s future growth, results of op erations,

performance, business prospects and opportunities, are based on certain factors and

assumptions and involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties which may cause the actual

results, performance, or achievements to be materially different from future results, performance,

or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements.

These factors should be considered carefully, and readers should not place undue reliance on

the Flying Nickel’s forward -looking statements. Flying Nickel believes that the expectations

reflected in the forward- looking statements contained in this news release and the documents

incorporated by reference herein are reasonable, but no assurance can be given that these

expectations will prove to be correct. In addition, although Flying Nickel has attempted to identify

important factors that could cause actual actions, events or results to differ materially from those

described in forward looking statements, there may be other factors that cause actions, events or

results not to be as anticipated, estimated or intended. Flying Nickel undertakes no obligation to

release publicly any future revisions to forward- looking statements to reflect events or

circumstances after the date of this news or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events,

except as expressly required by law.