Saturday, September 26, 2026
MiningNewsTerminal
Saturday, September 26, 2026 Admin

CRE.V ·

Critical Elements Lithium Announces New Positive Feasibility Study for the Rose Lithium Project Generating an After-Tax NPV8% of US$2.2B and an After-Tax IRR of 65.7%

Economic Studies

1

PRESS RELEASE

Critical Elements Lithium Announces New Positive Feasibility Study for

the Rose Lithium Project Generating an After-Tax NPV8%

of US$2.2B and an After-Tax IRR of 65.7%

August 29th, 2023 - MONTRÉAL, QUÉBEC – Critical Elements Lithium Corporation (TSX -V: CRE) (US

OTCQX: CRECF) (FSE: F12) (" Critical Elements " or the " Corporation") is pleased to announce the

results of a new Feasibility Study on the Rose Lithium -Tantalum project (“Rose” or the “Project”) in Eeyou

Istchee James Bay, Québec.

The management of Critical Elements , with its new highly qualified technical team led by Yves Perron as

Vice President of Engineering, Construction and Operations , brings a deep level of knowledge and

expertise to the engineering process (particularly in mining operations, process, environment, design,

estimation and project control). This new study replaces the Feasibility Study announced by the

Corporation on June 13, 2022 . Noteworthy changes include: (i) the increased indexation of industrial

construction prices, (ii) the addition of certain process equipment to increase operational reliability and (iii)

the addition of the scope change of the Project by incorporating the co nstruction of our own 500 -worker

camp 4 km from the mine site. The new camp has been added to reduce the execution risk and timeline as

this is vital to having the workers’ accommodation ready in time as we increase the speed of the construction

phase. The new 500-room camp includes both temporary and permanent sections (approximately 250

rooms for each section).

Jean-Sébastien Lavallée, Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation , said : “We are very pleased to

announce the results of the new Definitive Feasibility Study at Rose to provide the updated economics of

the Project. The study reaffirms the substantial value of Rose – amongst the backdrop of higher input costs

and the decision to build our own 500 -worker camp – to establish Critical Elements as a reliable, high -

quality supplier of lithium. Thank you to our engineers, management team and local stakeholders for their

diligent efforts and our shareholders for their continuous support.”

Highlights

• Expected 17-year mine life

• Average production Year 2-17: 157,706 tonnes of chemical grade 5.56% spodumene concentrate

• Average production Year 2-17: 46,059 tonnes of technical grade 6.16% spodumene concentrate

• Average production Year 2-17: 580 tonnes of tantalum concentrate

• Average operating costs : US$81,30 per tonne milled , US$587 per tonne of concentrate (all

concentrate production combined)

• Estimated initial capital cost: US$471 million (before working capital)

• Average gross margin: 78.8%

• After-tax NPV8% of US$2,195 million, after-tax IRR of 65.7%

• Anticipated construction time: 21 months to start of production

• Average price assumptions of US$4,699 per tonne technical grade lithium concentrate, US$2,162

per tonne chemical grade lithium concentrate and US$150 per kg tantalum pentoxide (Ta2O5)

The Rose Lithium-Tantalum Project is 100%-owned by Critical Elements. The Corporation’s market strategy

is to enter the lithium market with a low -risk approach. The completio n of the Feasibility Study on the

spodumene plant is the first step to entering the market and establish the Corporation as a reliable high -

quality lithium supplier. The low-risk approach is characterized by simple open-pit mining and conventional

lithium processing technologies.

2

Critical Elements has consistently sought to advance the wholly -owned Rose Lithium-Tantalum Project in

a low-risk manner. To this end, the Corporation has completed a new Feasibility Study with a conservative

spodumene concentrate price deck, as well as capital and operating cost estimates reflective of current

market conditions. The new Feasibility Study incorporates a standard truck and shovel open-pit mining

operation and conventional lithium processing technologies . The Project will produce technical grade

spodumene concentrate for the glass and ceramics industry and chemical grade spodumene concentrate

for conversion for use in batteries for e-mobility, as well as a tantalite concentrate.

The mine will excavate a total of 26.3M tonnes ore grading an average of 0.87% Li2O and 138 ppm Ta2O5

after dilution. The mill will process 1.61M tonnes of ore per year to produce an annual average of 203,765

tonnes of technical and chemical grade spodumene concentrates and 580 tonnes of tantalite concentrates.

The ore is contained in several parallel and continuous shallow dipping pegmatite dykes outcropping on

surface. The ore zones are open at depth and a future underground operation is possible.

Over the life of mine, the open pit will excavate a total of 182.4M tonnes of waste rock and 10.9 M tonnes

of overburden. The average strip ratio is 7.3 tonnes of waste per tonne of ore.

Table 1 Rose Key FS Results

Item Units Value

Production

Project Life (from start of construction to closure) years 19

Mine Life years 17

Total Mill Feed tonnage M t 26.3

Average Mill Feed grade

Li2O % Li2O 0.87

Ta2O5 ppm Ta2O5 138

Lithium Concentrate Production

% of Production, Chemical Grade % 75

% of Production, Technical Grade % 25

Mill Recoveries

Li2O, Chemical Grade % 87.4

Li2O, Technical Grade % 84.8

Ta2O5 % 54.4

Concentrate grade

Li2O, Chemical Grade % 5.56

Li2O, Technical Grade % 6.16

Ta2O5 Grade % 20.00

Payable

5.56% Li2O Concentrate, Chemical Grade t 2,681,000

6.16% Li2O Concentrate, Technical Grade t 783,000

Ta2O5 Contained in Concentrate kg 1,971,000

Commodity Prices

5.5% Li2O Concentrate, Chemical Grade US$/tconc. 2,162

6% Li2O Concentrate, Technical Grade US$/tconc. 4,699

Ta2O5 Contained in Concentrate US$/kgcontained 150

Exchange rate 1.00 US$ : 1.30 CAN$

0.77 US$ : 1.00 CAN$

3

Item Units Value Value

Project Costs CA$ US$

Average Mining Cost $/t milled 35.13 27.05

Average Milling Cost $/t milled 27.00 20.79

Average General & Administrative Cost $/t milled 20.70 15.94

Average Concentrate Transport Costs $/t milled 22.76 17.52

Project Economics CA$ US$

Gross Revenue $M 12,692 9,772

Total Selling Cost Estimate $M 161 124

Total Operating Cost Estimate $M 2,776 2,137

Total Sustaining Capital Cost Estimate $M 310 239

Total Capital Cost Estimate $M 611 471

Duties and Taxes $M 3,688 2,840

Average Annual EBITDA $M 599 461

Average Gross Profit Margin % 78.8%

Pre-Tax Cash Flow $M 8,835 6,803

After-Tax Cash Flow $M 5,147 3,963

Effective Tax Rate % 41.7%

Discount Rate % 8.0%

Pre-Tax Net Present Value @ 8% $M 5,048 3,847

Pre-Tax Internal Rate of Return % 95.9%

Pre-Tax Payback Period years 1.3

After-Tax Net Present Value @ 8% $M 2,851 2,195

After-Tax Internal Rate of Return % 65.7%

After-Tax payback Period years 1.8

Property

The Rose property is located in northern Québec’s administrative region, on the territory of Eeyou Istchee

James Bay. It is located on Category III land, on the Traditional Lands of the Eastmain Community,

approximately 40 km north of the Cree village of Nemaska. The latter is located a pproximately 300 km

north-west of Chibougamau.

The Rose property is accessible by road via the Route du Nord, usable all year round from Chibougamau.

The mine site can also be reached by Matagami, via Route 109 and Route du Nord. Figure 1 displays the

regional location of the project. The project is lo cated 80 km south of Goldcorp’s Éléonore gold mine and

45 km north-west of Nemaska’s Whabouchi lithium project and 20 km south of Hydro Québec’s Eastmain -

1 hydroelectricity generating plant. The Nemiscau airport services the region’s air travel needs. The Rose

property site is located 50 km by road from the Nemiscau airport.

The Rose property comprises 473 claims spread over a 24,654-ha area. Geologically, the Rose property is

located at the north-east end of the Archean Lake Superior Province of the Canadian Shield.

4

Figure 1 Rose Property Location

Reserve Estimate

A Mineral Reserve Estimate for 17 mineralized zones was prepared during this study. The estimation

assumed the production of a chemical grade spodumene concentrate with a price of US$20 per kg Li 2O

and a tantalite concentrate with a price of US$130 per Kg of Ta2O5. The recoveries were fixed at 85% and

64% for lithium and tantalum, respectively. The grade -recovery curve used for resource estimate, which

became available after the mineral reserves were evaluated, was verified and found to have little influence

on the reserve estimate. The production of a higher value technical grade spodumene concentrate was not

assumed in the reserve estimate.

Based on compilation status, metal price parameters, and metallurgical recovery inputs, the effective date

of the estimate is August 1st, 2023.

The estimate was prepared in accordance with CIM’s standards and guidelines for reporting mineral

resources and reserves.

Table 2 displays the results of the Mineral Reserve Estimate for the Rose Project at the CA$44.80 NSR per

tonne cut-off for the open-pit scenario.

Table 2 Mineral Reserve Estimate

Tonnage NSR Li2O_eq Li2O Li2O Ta2O5 Ta2O5

Category (Mt) (CA$) (%) (%) (000 t) (ppm) (000 t)

Probable 26.3 165 0.92 0.87 193,8 138 2,3

Total 26.3 165 0.92 0.87 193,8 138 2,3

5

• The Independent and Qualified Person for the Mineral Reserve Estimate, as defined by National

Instrument 43-101 – Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Project (“NI 43-101”), is Simon Boudreau,

P.Eng, of InnovExplo Inc. The effective date of the estimate is August 1st, 2023.

• The model includes 17 mineralized zones.

• Calculations used metric units (metres, tonnes and ppm).

• The number of metric tons was rounded to the nearest thousand. Any discrepancies in the totals

are due to rounding effects. Rounding followed the recommendations in NI43‑101.

• InnovExplo is not aware of any known environmental, permitting, legal, title-related, taxation, socio-

political, marketing or other relevant issue that could materially affect the Mineral Reserve Estimate.

Resource Estimate

The current Mineral Resource Estimate (“MRE”) is primarily based on changes made to the net smelter

return (“NSR”) parameters, supported by new assumptions concerning metal prices and the creation of

potentially mineable shape to constrain the MRE for the potential underground extraction scenario. No

changes to the interpretation and interpolation parameters were deemed necessary. The mineral resource

model for the current MRE is based largely upon the model generated for the 2011 PEA.

The effective date of the estimate is August 1st, 2023, based on compilation status, metal price parameters,

metallurgical recovery inputs and creation of the constraining volume.

Given the density of the processed data, the search ellipse criteria, the drill hole density and the specific

interpolation parameters, the Qualified Persons is of the opinion that the current MRE can be classified as

Indicated and Inferred resources. The estimate was prepared in accordance with CIM’s standards and

guidelines for reporting mineral resources and reserves.

Table 3 displays the results of the MRE for the Rose Project using CA$31.40 NSR/t cut-off for the open-pit

potential extraction scenario and CA$121.12 NSR cut-off for the underground potential extraction scenario.

Table 3 Mineral Resource Estimate

Category Tonnage NSR Li2O_Eq Li2O Ta2O5

(CA$) (%) (%) (ppm)

Indicated

Pit 29,922,000 185 1.03 0.93 145

Underground 624,000 177 0.96 0.91 82

Total Indicated 30,561,000 185 1.03 0.93 118

Inferred

Pit 1,787,000 149 0.86 0.77 138

Underground 597,000 150 0.87 0.80 101

Total Inferred 2,384,000 149 0.86 0.78 129

• The Independent and Qualified Person for the Mineral Resource Estimate, as defined by NI 43-101,

is Carl Pelletier, P.Geo., of InnovExplo Inc. The effective date of the estimate is August 1st, 2023.

The MRE follow 2014 CIM Definition Standards and the 2019 CIM MRMR Best Practice Guidelines.

• These Mineral Resources are not Mineral Reserves as they do not have demonstrated economic

viability.

• The model includes 24 mineralized zones.

• The reasonable prospect for eventual economic extraction is met by having constraining volumes

applied to any blocks (potential open -pit or underground extraction scenario) using Whittle and the

Deswik Stope Opti mizer (DSO) and by the application of cut -off grades. The mineral resource is

reported at a cut -off of CA$31.40 NSR for the open -pit potential; and of US$121.12 NSR for the

underground potential based on market conditions (metal price, exchange rate and production cost).

• A range of densities was used on a per-zone basis based on statistical analysis of all available data.

• A minimum true thickness of 2.0 m was applied, using the grade of the adjacent material when

assayed or a value of zero when not assayed.

6

• High grade capping was done on raw assay data based on the statistical analyses of individual

mineralized zones.

• Compositing was done on drill hole intercepts falling within mineralized zones (composite lengths

vary from 1.5 m to 3 m to distribute the tails adequately).

• Resources were evaluated from drill holes using a 2-pass OK interpolation method in a block model

(block size = 5 m x 5 m x 5 m).

• The inferred category is only defined within the areas where blocks were interpolated during pass 1

or pass 2 where continuity is sufficient to avoid isolated blocks being interpolated by only one drill

hole. The indicated category is only defined by blocks interpolated by a minimum of two drill holes

in areas where the maximum distance to the closest drill hole composite is less than 40 m for blocks

interpolated in pass 1.

• Results are presented in-situ. The number of metric tons was rounded to the nearest thousand. Any

discrepancies in the totals are due to rounding effects. Rounding followed the recommendations in

NI 43-101.

• The qualified persons are not aware of any known environmental, permitting, legal, title -related,

taxation, socio-political or marketing issues, or any other relevant issue, that could materially affect

the potential development of mineral resources other than those discussed in the MRE.

Feasibility Study

The parameters used for the Feasibility Study are the following:

• Open pit mining rate of 1,610,000 tpy of ore

• Spodumene process plant with a 4,600 tpd capacity

Mining Operation

The mineralization is hosted within outcropping pegmatite dykes subparallel to surface. The ore body is

relatively flat, close to surface and comprised of north oriented stacked lenses. Mineralization recognized

to date on the Rose property includes rare elements of Lithium-Cesium-Tantalum or LCT-type pegmatites

and molybdenum occurrences.

A conventional truck and shovel open -pit approach was considered to mine the Rose Lithium -Tantalum

Project’s Probable Mineral Reserves. The dimensions of the engineered pit design are approximately 1,620

m long x 900 m wide x 220 m deep.

The life of mine plan (LOM) proposes to mine 26.3 Mt of ore, 182.4 Mt of waste, and 10.9 Mt of overburden

for a total of 219.6 Mt of material. The average stripping ratio is 7.3 tonnes of waste per tonne of ore. The

nominal production rate is estimated at 4,600 tonnes per day and 350 operating days per year.

The mining operation production rate is set to approximately 15 Mt of material per year. An open pit mining

schedule was planned and resulted in a mine life of 17 years.

Contract mining will be used for the removal of the overburden while Critical Elements will undertake the

mining of all hard rock material with its own equipment fleet and operators.

The main production fleet will consist of one (1) backhoe excavator, one (1) electric front shovel, one (1)

wheel loader, eight (8) haul trucks (65t each), seven (7) haul trucks (135t each), two (2) rotary drills, one

(1) DTH drill, two (2) bulldozers, one (1) wheel dozer, two (2) graders, one (1) auxiliary excavator, one (1)

auxiliary wheel loader, and two (2) water trucks.

The Rose project pit was designed with a 10 m single benching arrangement. A 57° inter-ramp angle and

an overall pit slope angle of 55° were utilized for the ultimate pit design. A berm width of 7.0 m corresponding

to the recommended overall slope angle was used. The pit slopes in overburden have a face ratio of 2.5:1

with a 10 m berm width.

The main in-pit haulage ramp is designed at 30.9 m wide to allow a double -lane traffic, except for the last

benches at the pit bottom that are designed at 20.4 m wide for single lane traffic. A 2 m drainage ditch is

included to allow for water drainage and pipe installation. The maximum gradient of the inner curvature of

all ramp segments is 10%.

7

Figure 2 Rose Pit Plan View

Figure 3 Rose Pit Side View Looking West

Mineral Processing

A standard froth flotation process will be utilized to produce technical grade and chemical grade lithium

concentrates and a tantalum concentrate. The mineral process plant will consist of crushing, beneficiation,

and dewatering areas. The technical grade lithium concentrate will grade 6.16% Li2O while the chemical

grade lithium concentrate will grade 5.56% Li2O. The tantalum concentrate will grade 20% Ta 2O5.

The beneficiation process includes crushing, grinding, magnetic separation and flotation. The crushing

circuit will consist of a jaw crusher and two (secondary and tertiary) cone crushers, and screens. The

crushed ore will have a P80 of 13 mm and will be s tockpiled in a 24-hour live capacity dome. The grinding

circuit will consist of a ball mill operating in a closed circuit with a set of cyclones. The tantalum will first be

recovered at a grade of 2.0% Ta 2O5 by high intensity magnetic separation then upgraded further to 20.0%

Ta2O5 by gravity separation. Tantalum concentrate will be thickened, filtered, dried to 1% moisture, and

bagged for shipment. The lithium flotation circuit will include removal of slimes (particles less than 20 um)

8

after magnetic separ ation followed by mica flotation, scrubbing, and spodumene flotation to the required

grades. The spodumene concentrate will then be thickened, pressure filtered with a 5% moisture content,

and stored in a dome with a capacity of 24 hours and then be transp orted by trucks and trains to the port.

The flotation tailings will be thickened, vacuum filtered to 15% moisture or less, and trucked to the waste

rock / tailings piles where it will be dry stacked.

The spodumene plant will operate 24 hours per day, 7 days per week, and 52 weeks per year. The process

plant was designed with an operating availability of 90%. The crushing circuit was designed using an

operating availability of 50%. The plant has a capacity of 1,610,000 tonnes per year or 4,900 dry tonnes

per day including availability.

The process plant flowsheet developed by Bumigeme Inc. is presented in Figure 4.

Figure 4 Rose Process Flowsheet

Metallurgy

Bench scale metallurgical testing was performed at ACME Metallurgical Limited in Vancouver in 2011. The

results from these tests were used for the PEA study. Three composites : the Rose (main structure), the

Rose Sud-Est (Southeast structure) , and Tantalum (secondary structure with higher tantalum and lower

lithium content) were subjected to various metallurgical tests.

SGS Canada Inc. in Lakefield conducted tests from 2013 to 2015 to improve lithium and tantalum

recoveries. In 2015 SGS Canada Inc. developed a conceptual flowsheet based on a series of bench scal e

tests on various samples from the Rose deposit. The proposed flowsheet consists of conventional three -

stage crushing and single stage grinding followed by magnetic separation for the recovery of tantalum, mica

flotation, and spodumene flotation. This flowsheet was the basis of the process plant design.

SGS Canada also conducted a pilot plant program in early 2017 on two samples from the Rose project

(Rose and Rose South). The main objective of the pilot plant program was to generate spodumene

concentrate for testing in a lithium carbonate pilot plant which was conducted by Outotec in Germany and

Finland. Secondary objectives were to prove metallurgical performance on a continuous pilot scale and to