Saturday, September 26, 2026
MiningNewsTerminal
Saturday, September 26, 2026 Admin

CPAU.V ·

Copaur Minerals Discovers New Gold Zone At Williams Project GIC Porphyry Target; Drilling Yields 2.2 G/T Gold Over 50 Metres, Including Last 10.5 Metres Averaging 4.2 G/T Au Ending In Mineralization

Drill Results

Copaur Minerals Discovers New Gold Zone At Williams Project GIC Porphyry

Target; Drilling Yields 2.2 G/T Gold Over 50 Metres, Including Last 10.5 Metres

Averaging 4.2 G/T Au Ending In Mineralization

Vancouver, British Columbia – August 16, 2022: Cop Aur Minerals Inc. (“CopAur” or the “Company”)

(TSX-V: CPAU) (OTCQB:COPAF) is pleased to announce the results of its recently completed four hole,

1,428 metre diamond drill campaign at its Williams Copper-Gold Project located in the Toodoggone region

of north-central British Columbia.

Drilling targeting untested soil geochemical anomalies at the GIC porphyry target has resulted in the

discovery of a new gold zone yielding 2.2 grams-per-tonne (g/t) gold (Au) and 0.13% copper (Cu) over 50

metres; including 4.2 g/t Au over 10.5 metres within drill hole WM22-02 (Table 1, and Figure 1 ). Both

the copper and gold mineralization appear to be improving at depth with the drill hole ending in strong

mineralization, demonstrating the significant potential to expand on this initial discovery.

The new gold discovery lies at the west end the of t he GIC porphyry target, a 4 km x 0.8 km east-west

trending copper-gold(±molybdenum) geochemical and IP/resistivity geophysical anomaly that has been

subject to only limited historical drilling (Figure 2).

Jeremy Yaseniuk, CEO, commented, “We are extremely excited with this new gold-copper discovery. Given

that this new discovery has only been tested by a single drill hole and ended in some of the strongest

mineralization, additional drill testing is warranted at depth and along strike to define th is emerging

mineralized zone.”

Table 1. Williams Copper-Gold Deposit 2022 Diamond Drill Intercepts

Hole ID From (m) To (m) Interval1

(m)

Au (g/t) Cu (%) Mo (g/t) Ag (g/t)

WM22-02

(000/-50)

157 250 95 0.16 0.023 - -

and 250 300 50 2.22 0.13 - 2.4

including 289.5 300 10.5 4.16 0.091 - -

WM22-01

(000/-50)

32 126 94 - 0.024 - 5.1

WM22-03

(000/-50)

12 115 103 0.13 0.025 - -

and 172 180 8 4.64 - - -

WM22-04

(090/-50)

135 152.8 17.8 0.17 - 288 -

and 167.8 185.5 17.7 - - 200 -

and 412 420 8 - - 266 -

1 True Width of the mineralized zone is not known

P a g e | 2

Figure 1. Williams GIC Porphyry Target WM22-02 Cross Section

Exploration drill hole WM22-02 testing a combined gold-copper soil geochemical and weak chargeability

anomaly intersected subtle quartz -carbonate-pyrite-magnetite mineralized and chlorite altered

intermediate volcanic rocks that returned assays of 2.22 g/t Au and 0.13% Cu over 50 metres, below a

broader zone of anomalous copper and gold values returning 0.16 g/t Au and 230 ppm Cu over 95 metres

(Image 1).

Drill hole WM22-01 targeting a copper-gold in soil geochemical target yielded anomalous copper values

from assaying 240 ppm Cu over 94 metres from surface within fine fracture -fill mineralized,

chlorite(±silica±epidote) altered intermediate volcanic rocks in contact with monazite intrusive at depth.

Similarly, drill hole WM22-03 also targeting a copper -gold in soil anomaly returned anomalous copper

values of 250 ppm Cu over 103 metres from surface within chlorite-silica altered intermediate volcanic

P a g e | 3

rocks; in addition, to a brecciated and silica -flooded magnetite veined zone downhole yielding 4.64 gt.t

Au over 8 metres (Image 1).

Drill hole WM22-04 tested a combined copper-gold-molybdenum soil anomaly intersected an alternating

sequence of massive and clastic intermediate volcanic rocks hosting multiple zones of fracture controlled

molybdenite mineralization that retuned values including returned 0.17 g/t Au and 288 ppm Mo over

17.8 metres; 200 ppm Mo over 17.7 metres; and 266 ppm Mo over 8 metres.

The 2022 Williams Project drill campaign was designed to test a range of surface geochemical and

geophysical targets within the GIC porphyry target (Figure 2). The discovery of a new gold zone wi th the

drill hole WM22-02 is interpreted to represent distal gold -copper mineralization proximal to a potential

blind porphyry intrusion at depth. A vector to depth and eastward toward an intrusive source is suggested

based on an increase in silicification and potassic alteration of host volcanic rocks, presence of porphyritic

intrusive rocks, and associated molybdenum mineralization within WM22-04 and surface soils. Additional

drilling at the Williams GIC target will be designed to expand laterally and to depth the compelling gold

values intersected in WM22-02, which terminated in mineralization.

Figure 2. Williams GIC Porphyry Target

P a g e | 4

Image 1: WM22-02 (left) clotty pyrite mineralized, chlorite-silica-potassium feldspar-magnetite

altered volcanic (this sample 5.8 g/t Au and 787 ppm Cu); WM22-03 (right) brecciated and

silica-flooded magnetite veined zone (this sample 9.9 g/t Au)

Methodology and QA/QC

The analytical work reported on herein was performed by ALS Global (“ALS”), Vancouver Canada. ALS is

an ISO -IEC 17025:2017 and ISO 9001:2015 accredited geoanalytical laboratory and is independent of

Copaur Minerals Inc. and the QP. Drill core samples were subject to crushing at a minimum of 70% passing

2 mm, followed by pulverizing of a 250-gram split to 85% passing 75 microns. Gold determination was via

standard atomic absorption spectroscopy (“AAS”) finish 30-gram fire-assay (“FA”) analysis, in addition to

four-acid digestion 33 element ICP-AES geochemistry. Overlimit values for copper (>1%) and silver (>100

g/t) were analyzed via four-acid digestion ICP-AES or AAS.

Copaur Minerals Inc. follows industry standard procedures for the work carried out on the Williams

Copper-Gold Project, with a quality assurance/quality control (QA/QC) program. Blank, duplicate, and

standard samples were inserted into the sample sequence sent to the laboratory for analysis. Copaur

Minerals Inc. detected no significant QA/QC issues during review of the data. Copaur Minerals Inc. is not

aware of any drilling, sampling, recovery, or other factors that could materially affect the accuracy or

reliability of the data referred to herein.

Qualified Person

The scientific and technical information contained in this news release has been reviewed and approved

by Kristopher J. Raffle, P.Geo. (BC) Principal and Consultant of APEX Geoscience Ltd. of Edmonton, AB,

and a “Qualified Person” as defined in National Instrument 43 -101 – Standards of Disclosure for Mineral

Projects. Mr. Raffle has verified the data disclosed which includes a review of the sampling, analytical and

test data underlying the information and opinions contained herein.

For more information, please contact:

CopAur Minerals Inc.

Jeremy Yaseniuk, Chief Executive Officer & Director

Tel: +1 (604) 773-1467

P a g e | 5

Email: [email protected]

Neither the TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in the

policies of the TSX Venture Ex change) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this news

release.

Forward Looking Information

This news release includes certain statements that constitute “forward -looking information or

statements” within the meaning of applicable secu rities law, including without limitation, conducting

exploration work on its projects, receipt of assays, other statements relating to the technical, financial

and business prospects of the Company and its properties, and other matters.

Forward-looking st atements address future events and conditions and are necessarily based upon a

number of estimates and assumptions. These statements relate to analyses and other information that

are based on forecasts of future results, estimates of amounts not yet determ inable and assumptions of

management. Any statements that express or involve discussions with respect to predictions,

expectations, beliefs, plans, projections, objectives, assumptions or future events or performance (often,

but not always, using words or phrases such as “expects” or “does not expect”, “is expected”,

“anticipates” or “does not anticipate”, “plans”, “estimates” or “intends”, or stating that certain actions,

events or results “may”, “could”, “would”, “might” or “will” be taken, occur or be achieved), and variations

of such words, and similar expressions are not statements of historical fact and may be forward -looking

statements. Forward-looking statement are necessarily based upon a number of factors that, if untrue,

could cause the actual results, performances or achievements of the Company to be materially different

from future results, performances or achievements express or implied by such statements. Such

statements and information are based on numerous assumptions regarding present and fu ture business

strategies and the environment in which the Company will operate in the future, including the price of

metals, anticipated costs and the ability to achieve goals, that general business and economic conditions

will not change in a material adverse manner, that financing will be available if and when needed and on

reasonable terms, and that third party contractors, equipment and supplies and governmental and other

approvals required to conduct the Company’s planned exploration activities will be available on

reasonable terms and in a timely manner. While such estimates and assumptions are considered

reasonable by the management of the Company, they are inherently subject to significant business,

economic, competitive and regulatory uncertainties and risks.

Forward-looking statements are subject to a variety of risks and uncertainties, which could cause actual

events, level of activity, performance or results to differ materially from those reflected in the forward -

looking statements, including, w ithout limitation: (i) risks related to gold and other commodity price

fluctuations; (ii) risks and uncertainties relating to the interpretation of exploration results; (iii) risks

related to the inherent uncertainty of exploration and cost estimates and t he potential for unexpected

costs and expenses; (iv) that resource exploration and development is a speculative business; (v) that the

Company may lose or abandon its property interests or may fail to receive necessary licences and permits;

(vi) that environmental laws and regulations may become more onerous; (vii) that the Company may not

be able to raise additional funds when necessary; (viii) the possibility that future exploration, development

or mining results will not be consistent with the Company’ s expectations; (ix) exploration and

development risks, including risks related to accidents, equipment breakdowns, labour disputes or other

unanticipated difficulties with or interruptions in exploration and development; (x) competition; (xi) the

P a g e | 6

potential for delays in exploration or development activities or the completion of geologic reports or

studies; (xii) the uncertainty of profitability based upon the Company’s history of losses; (xiii) risks related

to environmental regulation and liability; (xiv) risks associated with failure to maintain community

acceptance, agreements and permissions (generally referred to as “social licence”); (xv) risks relating to

obtaining and maintaining all necessary government permits, approvals and authorizations relating to the

continued exploration and development of the Company’s projects; (xvi) risks related to the outcome of

legal actions; (xvii) political and regulatory risks associated with mining and exploration; (xix) risks related

to current global financial con ditions; and (xx) other risks and uncertainties related to the Company’s

prospects, properties and business strategy. These risks, as well as others, could cause actual results and

events to vary significantly.

Factors that could cause actual results to d iffer materially from those in forward looking statements

include, but are not limited to, continued availability of capital and financing and general economic,

market or business conditions, the loss of key directors, employees, advisors or consultants, a dverse

weather conditions, increase in costs, equipment failures, government regulations and policies, litigation,

exchange rate fluctuations, the impact of Covid-19 or other viruses and diseases on the Company’s ability

to operate, decrease in the price o f gold and other metals, failure of counterparties to perform their

contractual obligations and fees charged by service providers. Investors are cautioned that forward -

looking statements are not guarantees of future performance or events and, accordingly a re cautioned

not to put undue reliance on forward -looking statements due to the inherent uncertainty of such

statements. The forward-looking statements included in this news release are made as of the date hereof

and the Company disclaims any intention or obligation to update or revise any forward -looking

statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as expressly

required by applicable securities legislation.