Saturday, September 26, 2026
MiningNewsTerminal
Saturday, September 26, 2026 Admin

BYN.V ·

Banyan Files Technical Report for Aurmac Property, 903,945 Gold Ounce Initial Mineral Resource Estimate, Yukon, Canada

Resource Estimates Technical Reports (NI 43-101)

Banyan Files Technical Report for Aurmac Property, 903,945 Gold

Ounce Initial Mineral Resource Estimate, Yukon, Canada

July 7, 2020 TSX-V: BYN

VANCOUVER, July 7, 2020, Banyan Gold Corp. (the "Company" or "Banyan") (TSX-V: BYN) is

pleased to announce filing the Technical Report to support the Initial Mineral Resource Estimate

in accordance with the Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum (“CIM”) Definition

Standards incorporated by refer ence in National Instrument 43 -101 (“NI 43-101”) for the Aurex

and McQuesten properties (together, the “AurMac Property”) 1. The AurMac Property is located

in the Mayo Mining district, approximately 40 kilometres northeast from the village of Mayo, Yukon

and 356 kilometres north of Whitehorse, Yukon. The Technical Report was prepared by Marc

Jutras, P.Eng., M.A.Sc., Principal, Ginto Consulting Inc.

“This initial resource has given us a new benchmark valuation and confidence in our geological

model to strengthen our targeting and continue to grow this Mineral Resource” stated Tara

Christie, President and CEO. "Our 2020 exploration work will meaningfully advance the AurMac

project and will be in the spotlight with both our neighbours Victoria Gold (40km away) and Alexco

Resource Corporation mines (10km away) now in production.”

As announced on May 25, 2020, the Initial AurMac Mineral Resource Estimate comprises a total

Inferred Mineral Resource of 903,945 ounces of gold contained in two pit -constrained near/on-

surface deposits, Airstrip and Powerline.

The Mineral Resource is summarized below:

Table 1: Pit-Constrained Inferred Mineral Resources at a 0.2 g/t Au Cut -Off – AurMac

Property

Deposit Classification Tonnage

Tonnes

Average Au

Grade

g/t

Au Content

oz.

Airstrip Inferred 45,997,911 0.524 774,926

Powerline Inferred 6,578,609 0.610 129,019

Total Combined Inferred 52,576,520 0.535 903,945

1 Formerly referred to as the Aurex-McQuesten property in previous Company disclosure.

Notes to Table 1:

1. The effective date for the Mineral Resource is May 25, 2020.

2. Mineral Resources which are not Mineral Reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability.

The estimate of Mineral Resources may be materially affected by environmental, permitting, legal,

title, taxation, sociopolitical, marketing, changes in global gold markets or other relevant issues.

3. The CIM definitions were followed for classification of Mineral Resources. The quantity and grade

of reported inferred Mineral Resources in this estimation are uncertain in nature and there has been

insufficient exploration to define these inferred Mineral Resources as an indicated Mineral

Resource and it is uncertain if further exploration will result in upgrading them to an indicated or

measured Mineral Resource category.

4. Mineral Resources are reported at a cut-off grade of 0.2 g/t Au, using a US$/CAN$ exchange rate

of 0.75 and constrained within a n open pit shell optimized with the Lerchs -Grossman algorithm to

constrain the Mineral Resources with the following estimated parameters: gold price of

US$1,500/ounce, US$1.50/t mining cost, US$2.00/t processing cost, U S$2.50/t G+A, 80% heap

leach recoveries, and 45° pit slope2

Detailed images of the Mineral Resource model, including an interactive 3D model and additional

information can be found at: https://www.banyangold.com/projects/aurex-mcquesten/

About the AurMac Property

The AurMac Property is held by the Company under earn -in option agreements (the “Option

Agreements”) with StrataGold Corporation, a 100% owned subsidiary of Victoria Gold Corp. (TSX:

VGCX) (“Victoria Gold”) and Alexco Resource Corporation (TSX: AXR) (“Alexco”). The Company

has the right to earn up to a 100% interest in the AurMac Property, subject to royalties, pursuant

to the terms and conditions of the Option Agreements.3

The Airstrip and Powerline deposits contained within the AurMac Property are both on and near-

surface deposits and potentially open pit mineable, with expected low strip ratios. The AurMac

Property is located just 40 km from Victoria Gold’s open pit, heap leach mine and 10 km from

Alexco’s m ill facility at the High -Grade silver deposits of the Keno Hills District. The AurMac

Property lies on existing transportation infrastructure (Main Yukon Government Highway System)

and the all-season road to Victoria Gold’s Eagle Mine. The Airstrip and Pow erline deposits are

within 1 km of each other and both within 50m of year -round access roads, have 3 -phase

powerlines and benefit from cellular communications.

2 The gold price and cost assumptions are consistent with current pricing assumptions and costs, and in

particular are consistent with those employed for recent technical reports for similar pit-constrained Yukon

gold projects.

3 Refer to Press Releases of the Company dated December 13, 2019, July 9, 2019 and May 25, 2017 for

further details regarding the Aurex Option Agreement and McQuesten Option Agreement.

Airstrip Deposit

The Airstrip deposit is delineated by 102 drill holes. Topographic control was from a detailed

LiDAR survey dataset.

There are several geologic controls on gold mineralization as per the current geologic

understanding of the Airstrip deposit. The Airstrip lithological model is made of seven units mainly

oriented east-west, with six of the units dipping at approximately 40°. The bulk of the Inferred

Mineral Resources are hosted within the calcareous package, a roughly 90-metre-thick zone that

strike east west and dips approximately 35° to the south.

The most common sampling length of the Airstrip deposit is 1.5m, with approximately 40% of the

sample data; and composites were constructed at this interval. Capping of high -grade outliers

was based on lithological domains and varied from 0.4 g/t Au to 9.0 g/t Au.

The estimation of gold grades into a block model was carried out with the Ordinary Kriging (OK)

technique on capped composites and the resultant block model contains a block size of 5m

(easting) x 5m (northing) x 5m (elevation). Density was calculated fro m a total of 418

measurements from the drill core. The average density per lithology type was assigned to the

corresponding blocks.

At a 0.20 g/t Au cut-off, the pit-constrained, inferred Mineral Resources are of 46.0 million tonnes

at an average gold gra de of 0.5 24 g/t for a total of 7 74,926 ounces of gold . Cut -off grade

sensitivities for the Airstrip deposit are presented in Table 2.

Table 2: Pit-Constrained Inferred Mineral Resources – Airstrip Deposit

Au Cut-Off

g/t

Tonnage

Tonnes

Average Au Grade

g/t

Au Content

oz.

0.10 61,300,337 0.430 847,466

0.15 53,264,976 0.476 815,154

0.20 45,997,911 0.524 774,926

0.25 38,397,872 0.583 719,725

0.30 31,869,662 0.647 662,938

0.35 26,516,484 0.712 606,998

0.40 21,676,296 0.787 548,467

0.45 18,151,272 0.857 500,125

0.50 15,513,348 0.923 460,361

Notes to Table 2:

1. The effective date for the Mineral Resource is May 25, 2020.

2. Mineral Resources which are not Mineral Reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability.

The estimate of Mineral Resources may be materially affected by environmental, permitting, legal,

title, taxation, sociopolitical, marketing, changes in global gold markets or other relevant issues.

3. The CIM definitions were followed for the classification of inferred Mineral Resources. The quantity

and grade of reported inferred Mineral Resources in this estimation are uncertain in nature and

there has been insufficient exploration to define these inferred Mineral Resources as an indicated

Mineral Resource and it is uncert ain if further exploration will result in upgrading them to an

indicated or measured Mineral Resource category.

4. Mineral Resources are reported at a cut-off grade of 0.2 g/t Au, using a US$/CAN$ exchange rate

of 0.75 and constrained within an open pit shell optimized with the Lerchs-Grossman algorithm to

constrain the Mineral Resources with the following estimated parameters: gold price of

US$1,500/ounce, US$1.50/t mining cost, US$2.00/t processing cost, U S$2.50/t G+A, 80% heap

leach recoveries, and 45° pit slope

Powerline Deposit

The drill data for the Powerline deposit is comprised of 15 drill holes. The most common sampling

length of the Powerline deposit is 1.5m, with approximately 35% of the sample data. 1.5m was

selected as the composite length and is based on the most common sampling length as well as

on the envisioned block height of 5m. Capping of high -grade outliers was based on grade

distribution domains and ranged from 4.0 g/t Au to 6.0 g/t Au.

The estimation of gold grades into a block model was carried out with the inverse distance

squared (ID2) technique on capped composites with the resultant block model containing a block

size of 5m (easting) x 5m (northing) x 5m (elevation).

At a 0.20 g/t Au cut-off, the pit-constrained, inferred Mineral Resources are of 6.6 million tonnes

at an average gold grade of 0. 61 g/t for a total of 129,019 ounces of gold . Cut-off grade

sensitivities for the Powerline deposit are presented in Table 3.

Table 3. Pit-Constrained Inferred Mineral Resources – Powerline Deposit

Au Cut-Off

g/t

Tonnage

tonnes

Average Au Grade

g/t

Au Content

oz.

0.10 7,281,920 0.565 132,277

0.15 6,930,115 0.588 131,011

0.20 6,578,609 0.610 129,019

0.25 6,084,687 0.641 125,397

0.30 5,457,139 0.683 119,833

0.35 4,939,191 0.720 114,335

0.40 4,420,295 0.761 108,150

0.45 4,083,388 0.789 103,583

0.50 3,654,322 0.826 97,046

Notes to Table 3:

1. The effective date for the Mineral Resource is May 25, 2020.

2. Mineral Resources which are not Mineral Reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability.

The estimate of Mineral Resources may be materially affected by environmental, permitting, legal,

title, taxation, sociopolitical, marketing, changes in global gold markets or other relevant issues.

3. The CIM definitions were followed for the classification of inferred Mineral Resources. The quantity

and grade of reported inferred Mineral Resources in this estimation are uncertain in nature and

there has been insufficient exploration to define these inferred Mineral Resources as an indicated

Mineral Resource and it is uncertain if further exploration will result in upgrading them to an

indicated or measured Mineral Resource category.

4. Mineral Resources are reported at a cut-off grade of 0.2 g/t Au, using a US$/CAN$ exchange rate

of 0.75 and constrained within a n open pit shell optimized with the Lerchs -Grossman algorithm to

constrain the Mineral Resources with the following estimated parameters: gold price of

US$1,500/ounce, US$1.50/t mining cost, US$2.00/t processing cost, U S$2.50/t G+A, 80% heap

leach recoveries, and 45° pit slope

Quality Assurance, Quality Control Measures and Data Verification

The reported work was completed using industry standard procedures, including a quality

assurance/quality control (“QA/QC”) program consisting of the insertion of certified standards and

blanks into the sample stream and utilizing certified independent ana lytical laboratories for all

assays. Additionally, historic QA/QC data and methodology on the AurMac Property were

reviewed and will be summarized in the NI 43 -101 Technical Report . The qualified persons

detected no significant QA/QC issues during review of the data.

A robust system of standards, ¼ core duplicates and analytical blanks, was implemented in all

Banyan drilling programs and was monitored as chemical assay data became available. All

control samples were within accuracy and precision threshold s required to meet data quality

standards. These control samples amounted to approximately 10% of the all samples submitted

to analytical laboratories. A verification program of historic core was carried out by re -sampling

the entire length of two holes, M Q-00-004 and MQ -03-009. The percent relative difference

between the re-assays and the original assays ranged from -1.5% to +2.5%.

All geological data in the resource estimate was verified by Ginto Consulting Inc. (“Ginto”) as

being accurate to the extent possible and to the extent possible all geological information was

reviewed and confirmed. Ginto made site visits to the AurMac property in 2018 and 2019 and

observed Banyan’s drilling and sampling techniques, as well as viewed AurMac drillcore. Ginto

confirms that the assay sampling and QA/QC sampling of core by Banyan provides adequate and

good verification of the data and believes the work to have been done within the guidelines of NI

43-101. Additional discussion on the AurMac Mineral Resource Model Da ta Verification is

included in the NI 43-101 Technical Report to be filed on SEDAR today.

Qualified Persons

The Initial Mineral Resource Estimate for the AurMac Property was prepared by Marc Jutras,

P.Eng., M.A.Sc., Principal, Ginto Consulting Inc., an independent Qualified Person in accordance

with the requirements of NI 43-101, who has reviewed and approved the contents of this release.

Paul D. Gray, P.Geo., Vice President of Exploration for the Company, is a “qualified person” as

defined under NI 43-101 and has reviewed and approved the content of this news release.

Analytical Method

All drill core and RC splits collected from the 2017 to 2019 Aurex -McQuesten programs were

analyzed at Bureau Veritas Minerals of Vancouver, B.C. utilizing the aqua regia digestion ICP -

MS 36-element AQ200 analytical package with FA450 50 -gram Fire Assay wi th AAS finish for

gold on all samples. All core samples were split on -site at Banyan’s core processing facilities in

Elsa, Yukon. Once split, half samples were placed back in the core boxes with the other half of

split samples sealed in poly bags with one part of a three-part sample tag inserted within. All RC

samples were split in the field with a 3-tier riffle splitter with 87.5% of the sample being stored in

a reject poly bag and 12.5% of the sample in a submittal poly bag. Once split, both poly bags

were sealed with one part of a three-part sample tag inserted within. Samples were delivered by

Banyan personnel or a dedicated expediter to Bureau Veritas, an independent Whitehorse

preparatory laboratory where samples are prepared and then shipped to Burea u Veritas’s

Analytical laboratory in Vancouver, B.C. for pulverization and final chemical analysis. A more

robust description of historic analytical procedures is included in the AurMac NI 43-101 report to

be filed on SEDAR today.

Risk Factors

Banyan is unaware of any legal, political, environmental or other risks that could materially affect

the potential development of the Mineral Resource estimates described in this news release.

COVID-19 Update

Banyan has taken proactive measures to protect the health and safety of our employees and

communities from COVID 19 and exploration activities in 2020 will have additional safety

measures in place, following and exceeding all the recommendations made by the Yukon’s Chief

Medical Officer.

There have been 11 COVID-19 cases confirmed in Yukon to date, with all patients having fully

recovered. No cases have required hospitalization.

About Banyan

Banyan is focused on gold exploration projects that have the geological potential, size of land

package and proximity to infrastructure that is advantageous for a mineral project to have potential

to become a mine. Our Yukon based projects both fit this model and our objective is to gain

shareholder value by advancing projects in our pipeline.

The Hyland Gold Project, located 70km NE of Watson Lake, Yukon, along the southeast end of

the Tintina Gold Belt is a sediment hosted, structurally controlled, intrusion related gold deposit,

with a large land package (over 125 sq. km), with the Mineral Re source contained in the Main

Zone area (900x600m) daylighting at surface and numerous other known surface gold targets.

The Main Zone oxide zone is amenable to heap leach open pit mining, with column leach

recoveries of 86%. The project has an existing gravel access road.

The 9,230 ha AurMac Property lies in close proximity to both Victoria Gold's Eagle Project and

Alexco 's Keno Hill Silver District and is highly prospective for structurally controlled, intrusion

related gold-silver mineralization in relation to the Tombstone intrusive suite. The property hosts

numerous known gold targets and Banyan has developed a mineralization model at the

McQuesten “Airstrip” and “Powerline” Gold deposits, located adjacent to the main Yukon highway

and just off the main access road to the Victoria Gold open-pit, heap leach Eagle Gold mine. The

AurMac Property benefits from a 3 -phase powerline, existing Yukon Energy Corp. switching

power station and cell phone coverage. Banyan has optioned the properties from Victoria Gold

and Alexco respectively with a right to earn up to a 100% subject to royalties.

Banyan trades on the TSX -Venture Exchange under the symbol “BYN”. For more information,

please visit the corporate website at www.BanyanGold.com or contact the Company.

ON BEHALF OF BANYAN GOLD CORPORATION

(signed) "Tara Christie"

Tara Christie

President & CEO

For more information, please contact:

Tara Christie David Rutt

Tel: (888) 629-0444 Tel: (888) 629-0444

Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected]

CAUTIONARY STATEMENT: Neither the TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is

defined in policies of the TSX Venture Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release.

No stock exchange, securities commission or other regulatory authority has approved or disapproved the information

contained herein. This news release contains forward-looking information, which is not comprised of historical facts.

Forward-looking information involves risks, uncertainties and other factors that could cause actual events, results,

performance, prospects and opportunities to differ materially from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking

information. Forward looking information in this news release includes, but is not limited to, Banyan’s objectives, goals

or future plans, statements regarding exploration expectations, exploration or development plans and mineral resource

estimates. Factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from such forward-looking information include, but

are not limited to, uncertainties inherent in resource estimates , capital and operating costs varying significantly from

estimates, the preliminary nature of metal lurgical test results, delays in obtaining or failures to obtain required

governmental, environmental or other project approvals, political risks, uncertainties relating to the availability and costs

of financing needed in the future, changes in equity mar kets, inflation, changes in exchange rates, fluctuations in

commodity prices, delays in the development of projects and the other risks involved in the mineral exploration and

development industry, enhanced risks inherent to conducting business in any jurisdiction, and those risks set out in

Banyan’s public documents filed on SEDAR. Although Banyan believes that the assumptions and factors used in

preparing the forward-looking information in this news release are reasonable, undue reliance should not be placed on

such information, which only applies as of the date of this news release, and no assurance can be given that such

events will occur in the disclosed time frames or at all. Banyan disclaims any intention or obligation to update or revise

any forward-looking information, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, other than as

required by law.

Statements in this news release regarding Banyan which are not historical facts are “forward -looking statements” that

involve risks and uncertainties. Such information can generally be identified by the use of forwarding -looking wording

such as “may”, “will”, “expect”, “estimate”, “anticipate”, “intend”, “believe” and “continue” or the negative thereof or

similar variations.