Blue Sky Uranium Announces a Positive Preliminary Economic Assessment for the Ivana Uranium-Vanadium Deposit, Amarillo Grande Project, Argentina
Blue Sky Uranium Announces a Positive Preliminary Economic
Assessment for the Ivana Uranium-Vanadium Deposit, Amarillo Grande
Project, Argentina
TSX Venture Exchange: BSK
Frankfurt Stock Exchange: MAL2
OTCQB Venture Market (OTC): BKUCF
VANCOUVER
,
Feb. 27, 2019
/CNW/ -
Blue Sky Uranium Corp. (TSX-V: BSK, FSE: MAL2; OTC: BKUCF),
("
Blue Sky
" or the "
Company
") is pleased to
announce the results of the first Preliminary Economic Assessment ("
PEA
") for the Ivana Uranium-Vanadium deposit at the Company's 100% owned Amarillo
Grande Project in
Rio Negro Province
, Argentina. The PEA demonstrates robust economics for a surficial mining operation of the Ivana deposit, with 13 years of
uranium and vanadium production.
PEA Highlights
(All figures in US dollars)
After-tax NPV8%:
$135.2 million
After-tax IRR: 29.3%
After-tax Payback period: 2.4 years
Pre-production Capital Cost:
$128.05 million
, includes
$28.28 million
contingency
Life of mine ("LOM") Sustaining Capital Cost:
$35.46 million
, includes
$7.21 million
contingency
Average LOM Total Cash Cost net of credits:
$16.24
/lb U
3
O
8
Average LOM All-In Sustaining Costs ("AISC") net of credits:
$18.27
/lb U
3
O
8
PEA Key Assumptions & Inputs
Uranium price:
$50
/lb U
3
O
8
Vanadium Price
$15
/lb V
2
O
5
Years of Construction: 2
Years of Production: 13
Strip Ratio: 1.1:1 (waste/ore)
Dilution: 3%
Peak Mining rate (waste + mill feed): 13,500 tonnes per day ("tpd")
Processing throughput: 6,400 tpd
Process Plant Recoveries, Uranium: 84.6%
Process Plant Recoveries, Vanadium: 52.5%
Average Annual Production (LOM): 1.35 Mlbs/y U
3
O
8
LOM uranium production: 17.5 Mlbs U
3
O
8
"
This PEA demonstrates that the Ivana deposit is a leading new low-cost uranium-vanadium development project,
" stated
Nikolaos Cacos
, Blue Sky President &
CEO. "
With the expansion upside at Ivana and the discovery potential for new uranium and vanadium resources throughout the district-scale property, we
expect Amarillo Grande to continue to improve its value proposition."
Additional exploration work and detailed engineering studies are expected to expand and upgrade mineral resources, and further optimize and enhance the
economics of the Ivana uranium-vanadium deposit.
PEA Summary
The PEA parameters are summarized in Table 1.
The PEA is preliminary in nature and is based solely on Inferred Mineral Resources that are considered too speculative geologically to have economic
considerations applied to them that would enable them to be categorized as Mineral Reserves. Mineral Resources that are not Mineral Reserves do not have
demonstrated economic viability and there is no certainty that the PEA will be realized.
Table 1. PEA Summary Parameters
Input
Unit
Physical Parameters
Total tonnes feed prep processed (LOM)
Mt
27.7
Head Grade (U
3
O
8
)
%
0.034%
Head Grade (V
2
O
5
)
%
0.019%
Average Annual throughput
tpa
2,170,000
Recovery - Uranium (net)
%
84.6%
Recovery - Vanadium (net)
%
52.5%
Mine Life (Production)
years
13
Total Uranium (U
3
O
8
) produced
Mlbs
17.5
Total Vanadium (V
2
O
5
) produced
Mlbs
6.0
Average Annual U
3
O
8
production
Mlbs/yr
1.35
Operating Cost Parameters
Mining Cost (LOM avg)
$/t feed
4.62
Processing Cost (LOM avg)
$/t feed
6.50
Waste & Water Management
$/t feed
0.08
G&A Cost (LOM avg)
$/t feed
1.80
Total Operating Cost
$/t feed
13.00
Pre-Production Capital Costs
Mine
$M
16.49
Process Plant
$M
75.52
Waste & Water Management
$M
4.61
Other Infrastructure
$M
3.15
Contingency (avg)
$M
28.28
Total Pre-Production Capital
$M
128.05
Sustaining Capital (LOM)
$M
35.46
Total Capital (LOM)
$M
163.52
Cost Summary
LOM U
3
O
8
cost (net of V
2
O
5
credits)
$/lb
16.24
LOM U
3
O
8
cost (net of V
2
O
5
credits) with AISC
$/lb
18.27
Mineral Resource Estimate
An updated Mineral Resource Estimate, effective
September 28
th
, 2018, was used for the PEA. Supporting information will be included in the NI 43-101 Technical
Report to be published within 45 days of this press release. The updated resource estimate includes data from an additional 61 reverse circulation ("RC") drill
holes (1,043 metres) completed in September of 2018, as well as a more extensive density study that indicated a density of 2.1 gr/cm
3
should be applied. Those
changes resulted in a 17% increase in total tonnes, as well as a 19% increase in contained U
3
0
8
and a 13% increase in contained V
2
0
5
, at similar grades.
The estimate of mineral resources may be materially affected by environmental, permitting, legal, title, taxation, sociopolitical, marketing, or other relevant issues.
The quantity and grade of reported Inferred resources are uncertain in nature and there has been insufficient exploration to classify these inferred resources as
Indicated or Measured, and it is uncertain if further exploration will result in upgrading them to an Indicated or Measured category.
Table 2. Estimate of Inferred Mineral Resource reported at 100 ppm Uranium Cut-off
Zone
Tonnes (t)
Average Grade
Contained Metal
U (ppm)
U
3
0
8
(%)
V (ppm)
V
2
O
5
(%)
U
3
0
8
(lb)
V
2
O
5
(lb)
Upper
3,200,000
133
0.016
123
0.022
1,100,000
1,500,000
Lower
24,800,000
335
0.040
105
0.018
21,600,000
10,000,000
Total
28,000,000
311
0.037
107
0.019
22,700,000
11,500,000
Notes to Table 1:
1.
Mineral Resources are not Mineral Reserves and do not have demonstrated economic viability.
2.
It is reasonably expected that the majority of Inferred Mineral Resources could be upgraded to Indicated Mineral Resources with continued exploration.
3.
The Mineral Resources in this estimate were not constrained within a conceptual pit shell owing to the shallow nature of the deposit (<25 m).
4.
The 100 ppm uranium reporting cutoff grade is based on operative costs of $12/t, a price of $50/lb U
3
O
8
, and a process recovery of 90%. A density of 2.1gr/cm
3
was applied.
5.
The resource was estimated within distinct zones of elevated uranium concentration occurring within the host sediments. Vanadium is associated with uranium and is estimated within the same zones. There is no indication that Vanadium occurs outside of the elevated uranium zones
in the Ivana deposit area in sufficient concentrations to justify developing estimation domains focused on Vanadium.
Mine Plan
The Ivana operation will consist of surface mining operation delivering mill feed to a nearby processing plant or stockpiles. The annual mining rate will be
approximately 4.7 Mtpa (13,000 tpd) consisting of waste material and mill feed. The average strip ratio is approximately 1.1:1.
Table 3 presents the potentially excavated tonnages. Mill feed may be delivered directly to the process plant or placed into stockpiles for blending purposes.
Table 3. Potentially Extractable Portion of the Mineral Resource
kt
U
3
O
8
(%)
V
2
O
5
(%)
Waste stripped
30,100.4
-
-
Strip Ratio
1.1:1
Mill Feed (diluted)
27,690*
0.034%
0.019%
*Assumes 3% dilution and ore loss
Note: cut-off grade of 60 ppm U used to define potentially extractable portion of mineral resource
The surface mine will be relatively shallow, with a maximum depth of 30 metres. The length of the mine will be approximately 3000 metres with widths ranging
from 100 to 400 metres.
Mining will be done with a fleet of two (5 cubic metre) excavators, a front-end loader and six 31-tonne articulated trucks along with a fleet of support equipment.
The materials mined are unconsolidated gravels and sands and are free digging, therefore drill and blast operations will not be required.
Waste materials will be placed out of pit for the first few years. Waste will then be placed either into external dumps or used as in-pit backfill.
Processing & Recovery
Mined mill feed may be delivered directly to the processing plant, or stockpiled. Stockpiles provide a surge capacity between the mining and processing, and
enable blending, to manage the head grade of the process plant feed. Mill feed will then be processed in two stages. The overall process plant recovery is 85%
for uranium (derived from 89% leach feed preparation recovery and 95% subsequent alkaline leach circuit recovery); and 53% for vanadium (derived from 89%
leach feed preparation recovery and 60% subsequent alkaline leach circuit recovery). Recoveries were determined through the mineralogical, metallurgical and
process engineering test work program completed by The Saskatchewan Research Council (SRC), as detailed in the Blue Sky press release dated
February 7
th
,
2019.
Feed material will first be processed through the leach feed preparation plant, a semi-mobile screening and scrubbing facility located at the proposed mining site.
The leach feed preparation plant will liberate fine material (<100 um) from the larger particles (>100 um) and scrub away and recover fine uranium and vanadium
mineral particles coating the large particles, into a leach feed slurry. The rejected coarse fraction (approx. 75% of the mill feed mass from which most of the
original uranium and vanadium has been stripped) will be dewatered, stockpiled, and backhauled by the mine fleet to the dump sites or backfilled into the mine
excavation.
In the second process stage the slurry containing the fine fraction of the mineralized material will be pumped to the leach plant. An alkaline leach circuit (sodium
carbonate and bicarbonate) will be used to dissolve uranium and vanadium from the leach feed minerals. No oxidant is required. Subsequently, uranium and
vanadium will be separated by selective chemical precipitation, with uranium solids then calcined to U
3
O
8
or UO
3
and vanadium solids calcined to V
2
0
5
.
Tailings slurry from the alkaline leach circuit (approx. 25% of the mill feed mass and from which the majority of uranium and vanadium has been stripped) will
initially be pumped to a surface tailings management facility (TMF) where it will settle and release water. This released water will be reclaimed and pumped to the
water treatment circuit in the process plant where it will be further treated, resulting in solids that are pumped back to the TMF with the alkaline leach tailings.
The final pH adjusted water will be returned to the process water tank for reuse. In later years, the fine tailings will be pumped into containment cells in mined out
sections of the pit, for co-disposal with mine waste rock and coarse rejects. Long term storage of all waste material from mining operations will comply with all
local and international regulations and requirements.
Infrastructure
The Ivana operation will take advantage of local infrastructure whenever possible. Employees will reside in local communities, most likely the town of Valcheta,
approximately 25 km from the mine site. Grid power will be accessible to the project via the construction of a 30 km powerline. For the PEA it is assumed that
process water will be supplied from on-site pumping wells. Ground water at the mine site is classified as non-potable for humans and animals but suitable for
processing use. Future studies will further assess the local water resources.
Other site infrastructure will include maintenance shops, administration offices, a mine dry, diesel fuel storage, and warehouses.
Capital and Operating Costs
The life-of-mine capital and operating costs are summarized in Tables 4 and 5. The costs assume a fully owner-operated project. The closure and reclamation
cost are estimated at
$22.6 million
and includes costs for site remediation and final backfilling of the remaining mine excavation.
Table 4. Capital Cost Summary
Area
Units
Pre-
production
Sustaining
(LOM)
Total
LOM
Mine
$M
16.5
9.4
25.9
Process Plant
$M
75.5
9.7
85.2
Waste & Water Management
$M
4.6
8.1
12.7
Other Infrastructure
$M
3.2
1.1
4.3
Contingency (avg.)
$M
28.3
7.2
35.5
Total Capital
$M
128.1
35.5
163.5
Note: cost accuracy is commensurate with a PEA level study, with +/- 30% accuracy.
Table 5. Operating Cost Summary
Area
Unit Cost
($/t)
Total LOM
($M)
Mining Cost, incl stockpiling &
coarse reject backhauling
$/t
mined
2.26
128.0
Mining Cost, incl stockpile & rejects
$/t feed
4.62
128.0
Processing Cost
$/t feed
6.50
180.0
Waste and Water Management
0.08
2.3
G&A
$/t feed
1.80
49.9
Total Operating Cost
$/t feed
13.00
360.1
Project Economics and Sensitivities
The economic results of the PEA are summarized in Table 6 on both a before-tax and after-tax basis. For the PEA Base Case a long-term uranium price of
$50
/lb U
3
O
8
and a vanadium price of
$15
/lb V
2
O
5
were used. Sensitivity to various uranium prices are shown in Table 6 while the vanadium price is kept fixed.
Uranium provides approximately 90% of the project's revenue stream.
Table 6. Economics and Sensitivity
Units
Uranium Price Sensitivity
Price - U
3
O
8
$/lb
40
50
60
Price - V
2
O
5
$/lb
15
15
15
Pre-Tax
NPV (0%)
$M
233.6
405.3
577.0
NPV (8%)
$M
111.8
214.6
317.5
IRR
%
24.9%
36.1%
45.9%
After-Tax
NPV (0%)
$M
155.8
266.7
377.6
NPV (8%)
$M
67.8
135.2
202.3
IRR
%
20.0
29.3
37.3
Payback
years
3.0
2.4
1.9
Opportunities
Infill drilling at the Ivana deposit is expected to upgrade the mineral resource from the Inferred category.
There is also potential to expand resources at Ivana, particularly to the west, where recent pit sampling returned significant intervals with high grades of uranium
and vanadium (see Blue Sky news release dated
November 15
, 2018). Furthermore, there is excellent exploration potential in the area to the north of the Ivana
deposit, and elsewhere on the Amarillo Grande Project concessions.
Additional improvements to the project economics are expected as more detailed engineering studies are undertaken and optimization studies are completed.
Future work on Ivana will include additional infill and step-out drilling to upgrade and expand mineral resources, as well as advanced engineering studies that will
include a complete and comprehensive environmental base line study, additional metallurgical and process design test work, mine design optimization, detailed
permitting assessment, among other items.
A
bout the Amarillo Grande Project
The Company's 100% owned Amarillo Grande Uranium-Vanadium Project in
Rio Negro Province
,
Argentina
is a new uranium district controlled by Blue Sky. The
Project includes several major target areas over a regional trend, with uranium and vanadium mineralization in loosely consolidated sandstones and
conglomerates, at or near surface. The area is flat-lying, semi-arid and accessible year-round, with nearby rail, power and port access.
The Ivana deposit is located in the southernmost of three target areas that comprise the Amarillo Grande Uranium-Vanadium project. Mineralization was first
identified at Ivana after field follow-up of a 2010 regional high-resolution airborne radiometric and magnetic survey.
The Ivana deposit displays characteristics of both surficial-type and sandstone-type uranium-vanadium deposits. In plan view, the Ivana uranium-vanadium
mineralization has a broad C-shaped pattern with some isolated outlying areas of peripheral mineralization. The uranium mineralization at Ivana is comprised of
secondary uranium minerals which include carnotite, a coffinite-like mineral that has been called β-coffinite (beta-coffinite), as well as lesser tyuyamunite, leibigite,
and an unidentified uranium-bearing mineral species.
Mineralization occurs within
25 m
of surface in two stacked zones. The upper zone is comprised of predominantly carnotite mineralization, and the lower zone
contains a mixture of mainly carnotite and β-coffinite mineralization. The two zones occur together through most of the deposit but there are localized areas where
only one zone is present. The upper zone averages
2.7 m
in thickness, with a maximum of
10 m
, while the lower zone has a maximum of
20 m
and has an
average thickness of
6 m
.
The Amarillo Grande project is believed to have district-scale potential for discovery of similar styles of mineralization.
QA/QC
The resource estimation was based on 488 RC drill holes, representing 7,622 metres of drilling with one metre samples. The drilling was completed in three
phases starting in
January 2017
and finishing in
August 2018
. Only 2 holes were inclined; the remainder were vertical. Bedding and mineralized horizons are
approximately horizontal so vertical samples are believed to represent true thickness.
The drilling program was carried out using a Roc L8 and FlexiROC D65 drill rigs from Atlas Copco, ore-control track-mounted rigs adapted to RC with double and
triple cyclone, respectively, to reduce the dust loss during sampling and automatic sampling. Samples were sent to Bureau Veritas Minerals of Mendoza,
Argentina
for preparation by drying, crushing to 80% passing 10 mesh and then pulverizing a 250g split to 95% passing 150 mesh. Pulps were sent to Bureau
Veritas Commodities Canada Ltd. for analysis of 45 elements by means of Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry (ICP-MS) following a four-acid
digestion (MA-200). Samples over 4,000ppm uranium are re-assayed, after phosphoric acid leach, by Inductively Coupled Plasma Electron Spectrometry (ICP-
ES). After approximately every 10th sample a blank, duplicate, or standard sample was inserted into the sample sequence for quality assurance/quality control
(QA/QC) purposes. The results of the QA/QC samples were reviewed by the Qualified Person. QA/QC sample performance confirmed sampling and assaying
were of excellent quality allowing assay data to be used to estimate Inferred Resources.
Qualified Persons and NI 43-101 Disclosure
The results of the Company's drilling program were reviewed, verified (including sampling, analytical and test data) and compiled by the Company's geological
staff under the supervision of David Terry, Ph.D., P.Geo. Dr. Terry is a Director of the Company and a Qualified Person ("QP") as defined in National Instrument
43-101.
A National Instrument 43-101 ("NI 43-101") Technical Report supporting the Mineral Resource Estimate and the Preliminary Economic Assessment will be filed on
SEDAR within 45 days of this news release.
The Mineral Resource Estimate and associated information in this news release were prepared under the direction of Bruce Davis Ph.D., F.AusIMM, of BD
Resource Consulting Inc. and
Susan Lomas
, P.Geo., of Lions Gate Geological Consulting Inc. Both Dr. Davis and Ms. Lomas are independent Qualified Persons
(QP's) as defined in NI 43-101.
The PEA and associated information in this news release were prepared under the direction of consultant
Ken Kuchling
, P.Eng., a mining engineer specializing in
economic reviews and an independent Qualified Person as defined in NI 43-101.
Additional contributing Qualified Persons for the PEA are:
Jon Thorson
, Ph.D., CPG. (geological interpretation)
Chuck Edwards
, P.Eng. FCIM (metallurgy & processing)
Ken Embree
, P.Eng., of Knight Piésold Ltd (waste & water management)
All the QP's have reviewed and approved the content of this news release.
About Blue Sky Uranium Corp.
Blue Sky Uranium Corp. is a leader in uranium discovery in
Argentina
. The Company's objective is to deliver exceptional returns to shareholders by rapidly
advancing a portfolio of surficial uranium deposits into low-cost producers. Blue Sky holds the exclusive right to over 434,000 hectares (equiv. to 1,072,437 acres)
of property in two provinces in
Argentina
. The Company's flagship Amarillo Grande Project was an in-house discovery of a new district that has the potential to be
both a leading domestic supplier of uranium to the growing Argentine market and a new international market supplier. The Company is a member of the Grosso
Group, a resource management group that has pioneered exploration in
Argentina
since 1993.
For additional details on the project and properties, please see the Company's website:
www.blueskyuranium.com
ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD
"Nikolaos Cacos"
______________________________________
Nikolaos Cacos
, President, CEO and Director
Neither TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in policies of the TSX Venture Exchange) accepts responsibility for
the adequacy or accuracy of this release.
This news release may contain forward-looking statements including but not limited to comments regarding the timing and content of upcoming work programs,
geological interpretations, receipt of property titles, potential mineral recovery processes, etc. Forward-looking statements address future events and conditions
and therefore involve inherent risks and uncertainties. Actual results may differ materially from those currently anticipated in such statements. Readers are
encouraged to refer to the Company's public disclosure documents for a more detailed discussion of factors that may impact expected future results. The
Company undertakes no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements. We advise U.S. investors that the SEC's mining guidelines
strictly prohibit information of this type in documents filed with the SEC. U.S. investors are cautioned that mineral deposits on adjacent properties are not
indicative of mineral deposits on our properties.
View original content:
http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/blue-sky-uranium-announces-a-positive-preliminary-economic-assessment-for-the-ivana-uranium-vanadium-deposit-amarillo-grande-project-argentina-300802839.html
SOURCE
Blue Sky Uranium Corp.
View original content:
http://www.newswire.ca/en/releases/archive/February2019/27/c0150.html
%SEDAR: 00023601E
For further information:
Corporate Communications, Tel: 1-604-687-1828, Toll-Free: 1-800-901-0058, Email: [email protected]
CO: Blue Sky Uranium Corp.
CNW 09:30e 27-FEB-19