Saturday, September 26, 2026
MiningNewsTerminal
Saturday, September 26, 2026 Admin

BIG.V ·

Hercules Silver Drills 38 Meters of 487 g/t Silver Equivalent in Maiden Drill Program Strong grade over multiple significant intervals, including drill hole HER-22-01, the first hole of the program, which intercepted 38 meters of 353 g/t Ag, 0.64% Pb, 2.28% Zn and

Drill Results

Hercules Silver Drills 38 Meters of 487 g/t

Silver Equivalent in Maiden Drill Program

Strong grade over multiple significant intervals, including drill hole HER-22-01, the first

hole of the program, which intercepted 38 meters of 353 g/t Ag, 0.64% Pb, 2.28% Zn and

0.16% Cu (487 g/t AgEq), beginning at a shallow depth of 26 m depth in first drill hole,

HER-22-01.

HER-22-01 included a higher-grade intercept of 4.57 m grading 791 g/t Ag, 1.25% Pb,

4.06% Zn and 0.18% Cu (1,021 g/t AgEq) starting at 29 m.

HER-22-07 intersected 44.2 m grading 224 g/t Ag, 0.32% Pb, 0.38% Zn and 0.09% Cu (258

g/t AgEq) starting at 1.5 m.

Drilling grades significantly exceed grades sampled at surface, supporting the concept of

potential supergene enrichment of mineralization below surface.

Confirmed the presence of a high-grade shoot (the P-19 Shoot) at the east end of the

Frogpond Zone; open at depth to the east.

Confirmed the presence of shallow, high-grade mineralization at Frogpond and Hercules

Adit Zones, with additional follow-up planned for Phase II.

Utilized small, low-cost scout drill for preliminary Phase I drilling with multiple holes

bottoming in mineralization.

Gained in-depth geological information to guide an expanded 3,000-meter Phase II core

drilling program, scheduled for spring 2023.

Toronto, Ontario--(Newsfile Corp. - February 28, 2023) -

Hercules Silver Corp.

(TSXV: BIG) (OTCQB:

BADEF) (FSE: 8Q7)

("

Hercules Silver

" or the "

Company

") is pleased to announce Phase I drill

results from its Hercules Silver Property located in western Idaho ("

Hercules

"

or the "

Property

"). The

Company's maiden drill program was designed to test and validate significant silver reported in

historical drilling at the Property's Frogpond and Hercules Adit Zones, as well as copper, lead and zinc,

which were historically only selectively assayed for.

Subsurface drilling grades significantly exceed the grades sampled at surface within both zones,

supporting the concept of potential supergene enrichment below surface. The Phase I program utilized a

small, low-cost scout drill to gain important geological and analytical information, which will further guide

an expanded Phase II 3,000-meter core drilling program.

The preliminary drilling results are in line with historically reported grades and widths and provide the

Company with confidence in the large-scale exploration potential at Hercules moving forward.

Table 1: Phase I Drill Intercepts Calculated at 35 g/T AgEq Cutoff Grade

1

Hole ID

From (m)

To (m)

Interval (m)

Ag (g/t)

Cu (%)

Pb (%)

Zn (%)

AgEq

[2]

(g/t)

AgEq

2

x

Meters (g/t x

m)

HER-22-01

25.91

64.01 (EOH)

38.10

353

0.16

0.64

2.28

487

18,562

Including

28.96

33.53

4.57

791

0.18

1.25

4.06

1,021

4,669

HER-22-02

48.77

56.39

7.60

52

0.03

0.08

0.45

75

575

HER-22-03

4.57

21.34

16.76

54

0.03

0.08

0.17

65

1,097

HER-22-04

6.10

12.19

6.10

40

0.01

0.17

0.18

51

309

HER-22-05

30.48

131.06

100.58

58

0.02

0.41

0.78

105

10,554

Including

103.63

112.78

9.14

134

0.04

1.78

1.04

234

2,142

Including

118.87

123.44

4.57

345

0.06

0.61

0.81

404

1,849

HER-22-06

24.38

59.44

35.05

38

0.01

0.49

0.80

87

3,055

Including

39.62

47.24

7.62

93

0.03

1.69

0.75

176

1,338

AND

76.20

92.96 (EOH)

16.76

16

0.01

0.16

0.57

47

781

HER-22-07

1.52

45.72

44.20

224

0.09

0.32

0.38

258

11,417

Including

6.10

25.91

19.81

398

0.07

0.44

0.16

426

8,432

HER-22-08

3.05

60.96 (EOH)

57.91

124

0.05

0.18

0.51

157

9,083

Including

39.62

60.96 (EOH)

21.34

252.3

0.08

0.31

0.51

293

6,253

Including

42.67

53.34

10.67

384.2

0.14

0.44

0.62

440

4,694

HER-22-09

24.38

60.96 (EOH)

36.58

292.4

0.13

0.53

1.37

382

13,977

Including

35.05

45.72

10.67

750.6

0.33

1.10

2.36

921

9,830

Management Commentary

Chris Paul, CEO and Director of the Company, noted: "

The lengths and grades we are seeing near

surface at Hercules are remarkable. Broad intervals of intensely altered and mineralized Hercules

Rhyolite indicate the presence of a significant silver system, with surface data suggesting we have

intersected the top of a large, concentrically zoned porphyry copper-epithermal system. The Phase I

results so far are in line with historical drilling and indicate the potential to incorporate large volumes

of previous drilling data into future resource calculations. Validating such data, which has a

substantial replacement cost, could potentially add significant value to the project. The preliminary

results so far suggest good continuity within mineralized zones which remain open along strike and at

depth. We look forward to initiating our maiden core drilling program later this spring, to further

delineate these zones and test our conceptual model of a zoned porphyry copper-epithermal system

at Hercules."

Figure 1: Phase I Drill Plan and Surface Geology

To view an enhanced version of Figure 1, please visit:

https://images.newsfilecorp.com/files/9425/156441_942c8af1840109fc_002full.jpg

P-19 Shoot

Drill Hole HER-22-01 intersected 38 meters grading 353 g/t Ag, 0.64% Pb, 2.28% Zn and 0.16% Cu

(487 g/t AgEq), beginning at 27 meters depth. The hole was stopped short of its target depth ("TD") due

to the limited depth capacity of the scout drill utilized. The hole ended in Hercules Rhyolite and confirms

the presence of a high-grade shoot, now termed the P-19 Shoot after the historical Anglo-Bomarc hole

that discovered it. Data suggests the potential for the P-19 Shoot to extend at depth to the east, where it

appears to have also been intersected near the bottom of historical hole 83-5.

Figure 2: Section A-A' - P-19 Shoot Looking North

To view an enhanced version of Figure 2, please visit:

https://images.newsfilecorp.com/files/9425/156441_942c8af1840109fc_003full.jpg

Figure 3: P-19 Shoot Drillholes- Plan View

To view an enhanced version of Figure 3, please visit:

https://images.newsfilecorp.com/files/9425/156441_942c8af1840109fc_004full.jpg

Figure 4: Section B-B' - Hercules Adit Zone Looking Southeast

To view an enhanced version of Figure 4, please visit:

https://images.newsfilecorp.com/files/9425/156441_942c8af1840109fc_005full.jpg

Figure 5: Section C-C' - HER-22-03/04 - Low-Grade Halo Confirmation Holes

To view an enhanced version of Figure 5, please visit:

https://images.newsfilecorp.com/files/9425/156441_942c8af1840109fc_006full.jpg

Shallow Drilling Depths

Five of the nine holes drilled in Phase I were stopped short of their TD due to the shallow depth capacity

of the drill (Table 2). Four of these holes partially tested their targets, while HER-22-06 was stopped

short of reaching its target zone.

Table 2: Drill Holes Not Completed Due to Limited Depth Capability

Hole ID

Comments

HER-22-01

Drilling Ended in Mineralization

HER-22-02

Hole Not Completed. Testing Extension of P-19 Shoot

HER-22-06

Did Not Reach Target

HER-22-08

Drilling Ended in Mineralization

HER-22-09

Drilling Ended in Mineralization

Table 3: Drill Holes Successfully Completed

Hole ID

Comments

HER-22-03

Low Grade Confirmation Hole Close to Main Road

HER-22-04

Testing Extension of Low-Grade Confirmation Hole HER-22-03

HER-22-05

Confirming Hercules Adit Mineralization

HER-22-07

Confirming Hercules Adit Mineralization

Table 4: 2022 Drill Hole Locations

Hole ID

Easting

Northing

Depth (m)

Azimuth

Dip

Hole type

HER-22-01

511318

4956605

64

0

90

RC

HER-22-02

511317

4956609

71.62

314

75

RC

HER-22-03

511208

4956531

30.48

0

90

RC

HER-22-04

511208

4956531

25.91

225

60

RC

HER-22-05

511160

4957067

146.30

204

59

RC

HER-22-06

511160

4957070

92.96

59

72

RC

HER-22-07

511070

4956969

54.86

133

45

RC

HER-22-08

511070

4956969

60.96

73

43

RC

HER-22-09

511321

4956607

60.96

96

55

RC

4-Acid ICP Geochemistry

Samples were assayed using a 4-acid inductively coupled plasma ("

4-acid ICP

") analytical method,

providing a near complete digest of the sample, with accurate results for 48 elements. Results have

suggested a potential zone of potassic flooding within the Hercules Rhyolite, which correlates with

elevated silver-lead-zinc grades. Potassic alteration is not readily visible within the weathered felsic host

rock at surface and the Company has initiated further investigation by submitting a selection of samples

for petrographic analysis, to determine their mineralogy. The objective of the petrographic work is to

better understand hydrothermal alteration on the Property, further refine the deposit model, and provide

more robust vectors to potentially higher-grade portions of the system.

Sampling Methodology

Midnight Sun Drilling Inc. of Whitehorse, YT, Canada, was contracted to carry out the drilling using a

Multi-Power Products Ltd. track-mounted "Grasshopper" reverse-circulation ("

RC

") drill with 3.5 inch

outside diameter drill rods. Drilling was performed in 5-foot intervals, with sample material collected in

clean 5-gallon pails. To reduce sample size, a dry splitter was used to homogenously split the material

into 87% reject and 13% sample. The sample portion was directed into cloth sample bags, while the

reject material was discarded. Received sample weights from laboratory certificates varied but

averaged 3.5 kg.

During duplicate sample runs, reject material was funneled into a clean pail and run through the splitter a

second time, collecting 13% of the reject material as a duplicate sample.

Hercules Silver Corp. personnel supervised the sampling process, including closing, sealing and tagging

of the bags. Following collection, the samples were placed into rice sacks and sealed with tamper proof

security tags. A signed and sealed sample submittal form was placed into the first bag of the shipment.

The samples were transported to Hercules Silver Corp.'s office location in Kelowna, BC, in the

possession of Hercules Silver Corp. personnel. From there, the samples were shipped on pallets by

commercial freight to MSA Labs in Langley, British Columbia for analysis.

The samples were received

by the lab in two batches on November 8, 2022 and December 8, 2022.

Sample Analysis and QAQC

All drill chip samples were prepped and analyzed at MSA Labs in Langley, British Columbia, an ISO

17025 and ISO 9001 certified laboratory. Samples were dried and crushed to 2mm, from which a 250g

sub-sample split was then pulverized to 85% passing a 75 micron sieve. Following preparation, assays

were determined by the IMS-230 method. A 0.25g aliquot of the prepared pulp was digested in a 4-acid

solution consisting of hydrochloric, nitric, perchloric and hydrofluoric acids. 4-acid is a near total digest

and only the most highly resistant minerals are not dissolved. The resulting solution was analyzed via

ICP-MS and ICP-ES for 48 elements and was corrected for inter-element spectral interferences.

Lower

detection limits for this procedure are 0.01 ppm for silver, 0.5 ppm for lead, 2 ppm for zinc, and 0.2 ppm

for copper. Mercury is not reported due to volatilization in reaction with hydrofluoric acid and gold is not

reported due to the small, 0.25g aliquot size being insufficient to overcome the nugget effect. Select

samples were analyzed for gold by a 50g fire assay method, with no significant results returned.

Samples with initial results beyond the upper detection limit of the IMS-230 method were analyzed by

procedures ICF-6Ag, ICF-6Pb and ICF-6Zn.

The thresholds were 100 ppm for silver, and >1% for lead

and zinc.

Preliminary silver assays that returned values >1000 ppm were determined by fire assay with a

50g charge for the final result.

MSA Labs employs internal quality control standards, duplicates and blank samples at set frequencies.

Blind certified reference materials (CRMs) purchased from CDN Resource Laboratories of Langley,

B.C., and duplicate samples were inserted by the Company at a frequency of 2 - 3% of drill samples,

totaling 29 analyses. CRM results for copper, silver, lead and zinc were generally within the "between

lab" ± 2SD inner control limits around the recommended value.

Exceptions included one failure each for

silver and copper, and two low failures for lead.

No results exceeded a ±3SD outer control limit.

Ten barren rock blanks were inserted blind in the sample batches.

These yielded four 10x lower

detection limit (LDL) failures for silver, nine for lead, five for zinc and two for copper.

All of the silver

failures included failures for lead and zinc, and two of them included failures for copper.

In each case,

these blanks followed well-mineralized intervals which indicates that low-level contamination of all of the

samples occurred during the preparation stage. The Company is performing further follow-up on the

failures and will likely specify improved laboratory protocols in future drilling and sampling programs to

ensure thorough cleaning of lab equipment between samples.

Given the relatively low thresholds of the

exceedances relative to any conceivable potential mining grade cutoff, the impact of the apparent

contamination issue is not material to the overall Phase I drilling grades at the cutoff(s) reported.

Eight duplicate samples were collected following the procedure outlined in the Methodology section

above. Despite the presence of high-grade in one sample, precision statistics are acceptable.

Eliminating one very low-grade sample, the RMS CV for the silver field duplicates is 33% with means of

44 g/T and 66 g/T for the originals and duplicates, respectively. Lead shows very similar behavior with

much of the overall variance contributed by the same higher-grade pair that affects silver precision.

On

the other hand, zinc and copper field duplicates with one very low-grade pair removed show remarkably

low RMS CVs of 3% and 15%, respectively.

This suggests that much of the variance in the single silver

and lead pair is inherent in the sampling methods used in the field.

Scatterplots for silver, lead, zinc and

copper show reasonable clustering about linear trend lines with no evidence of sample mix-ups;

correlation coefficients for originals and duplicates for each metal are 0.89 or higher. Silver, lead and

copper duplicate pairs each show one failure exceeding 50% variance. Despite the limited size of the