Saturday, September 26, 2026
MiningNewsTerminal
Saturday, September 26, 2026 Admin

AUXX.V ·

Goldshore intersects 79.0m of 1.28g/t Au at the Southwest Zone of the Moss Deposit: Extends mineralization from current resource model in the top 100 meters from surface

Drill Results

EE

Goldshore intersects 79.0m of 1.28g/t Au at the

Southwest Zone of the Moss Deposit:

Extends mineralization from current resource model in the

top 100 meters from surface

VANCOUVER, B.C., January 17, 2025: Goldshore Resources Inc. (TSXV: GSHR / OTCQB:

GSHRF / FWB: 8X00) (“Goldshore” or the “Company”), is pleased to announce the first assay

results from its 15,000 meter drill program at the Moss Gold Project in Northwest Ontario, Canada

(the “Moss Gold Project”). The primary goal of the winter drill program is to add ounces to the

current resource model by extending mineralization in the top 100 - 200 meters from surface

within the conceptual open pit, effectively converting waste rock to prospective mineable material

and potentially reducing the strip ratio of the deposit.

Michael Henrichsen, CEO of Goldshore commented, “We believe that the results from the first

three holes prove our thesis that mineralization can be expanded within the top 100 – 200 meters

from surface. We believe that these results have the potential to add to the ounce production

profile in the first several years of mine life enhancing the economic performance of the project

moving forward. Importantly, the PEA currently being completed by G Mining Services represents

a conservative case scenario as it will not include the results from the winter drill program.”

Highlights

• Results from the first hole (MMD-24-133), drilled to infill a gap in the resource model at

the eastern end of the Southwest Zone under Snodgrass Lake, has expanded the width

and increased the grade in a number of mineralized shears in the Southwest Zone

with a combined intercept of 79.0m of 1.28 g/t Au from 27.0m, including several

discrete higher-grade shear zones:

o 2.0m of 8.61 g/t Au from 27.0m and

o 32.3m of 1.73 g/t Au from 42.7m, including

 16.25m of 2.95 g/t Au from 47.3m

o 22.0m of 1.19 g/t Au from 84.0m, including

 10.0m of 2.13 g/t from 87.0m

• Hole MMD-24-134 was also drilled to infill a gap in the resource model at the eastern end

of the Southwest Zone under Snodgrass Lake. Mineralization was extended above the

known resource with intercepts of:

o 21.85m of 0.66 g/t Au from 4.5m, including

 7.75m of 1.36 g/t Au from 5.0m

o 12.0m of 0.90 g/t Au from 137.0m

2

• These results will allow for the modelling of mineralized shear zones to surface and into

volumes that are currently modelled as waste. The deeper intercepts also add approximately

75 meters to the overall width of the Southwest Zone mineralized shear corridor.

Technical Overview

Figure 1 shows the location of the drill holes being reported with respect to the planned winter

drill program , while Figure 2 illustrates a cross section through drill hole M MD-24-133 that

demonstrates significant mineralization outside of the current mineral resource. Tables 1 & 2

summarize significant intercepts and drill hole locations, respectively.

Figure 1: Illustrates the 2025 ongoing winter drill program targeting resource expansion within the conceptual open

pit outlined in grey. Drill holes being reported are highlighted in red.

3

Figure 2: Illustrates a cross -section through MMD-24-133 that demonstrates the presence of a wider series of shears

within the top 100 meters from surface. Collectively the shear zones intersected demonstrate greater width to

mineralized shear zones than represented in the current resource model as well as the extension of mineralized shears

from depth toward the surface. The cross-section also highlights the growth potential beneath the open pit that may

enable the open-pit resource to be as deep as the Main-QES pit.

Drilling at the Southwest Zone aims to add to the mineral resource by infilling gaps within the

current model created by sparse drilling. Drilling at shallow depths of 100 - 200 meters will allow

for mineralized shear zones to be extended to the surface. Drilling at depths of 200 to 400 meters

will allow the expansion of the open pit resource to a similar depth as the Main-QES pit that are

approximately 500 meters deep.

Two holes (MMD -24-133 and MMD -24-134) were drilled along the western edge of Snodgrass

Lake to further delineate the trend of the high-grade core shears and to test the up-dip potential

of lower grade marginal shear zones.

Hole MMD-24-133 intersected several closely spaced, high-grade shears hosting quartz -

carbonate veinlets with up to 2-3% pyrite±chalcopyrite within a strongly hematite-albite and silica-

sericite-pyrite altered granodiorite intrusion along the contact of a more competent porphyritic

diorite (Figure 3). Results were wider and higher grade than suggested in the resource model with

79.0m of 1.28 g/t Au from 27.0m, including 32.3m of 1.73 g/t Au and 22.0m of 1.19 g/t Au.

These results are top cut with a cap at 30 g/t Au, which only impacted a 1.2m veined shear

assaying 34.8 g/t Au. The hole then transitions into weaker shearing and mineraliz ation within

silica-sericite and epidote-chlorite altered diorite intrusions with lower grade intercepts, such as

12.0m of 0.57 g/t Au from 158.0m depth.

4

Figure 3: Illustrates drill core from hole MMD-24-133 that is characterized by a stacked sequence of high-grade shears

within an altered granodiorite returning 16.25m of 2.95 g/t Au from 47.3-66.55m.

Hole MMD-24-134 collared into the same mineralized and sheared altered granodiorite intrusion

yielding grade intercepts such as 21.85m of 0.66 g/t Au from 4.5m depth, including 7.75m of 1.36

g/t Au. The hole quickly transitions into the wide multi -stage silica-sericite and epidote-chlorite

altered diorite intrusion package, as seen in MMD-24-133, yielding broad lower grade intercepts

such as 32.15m of 0.36 g/t Au from 84.85m and 12.0m of 0.90 g/t Au from 137.0m.

Both deeper intercepts in MMD-24-133 and -134 represent new mineralized shears not previously

included in the current resource model that will potentially add to the overall width of the shear

corridor by approximately 75 meters.

Hole MMD -24-136 was drilled underneath Snodgrass Lake from a peninsula along the

southeastern shore to properly identify the south eastern limit of the Southwest Zone. The hole

encountered varying andesitic and dacitic volcanics before intersecting the diorite package at the

end of the hole. The diorite is weakly sheared with pervasive sericite-silica alteration similar to

that encountered towards the end of the previous two holes and is weakly mineralized yielding an

intercept of 8.8m of 0.39 g/t Au from 218.0m depth. The hole was terminated as the remaining

zone had been previously drilled from the southwestern side of the lake.

The ongoing drill program continues to infill wide-spaced drilling gaps within the Southwest Zone,

improving the understanding of the controls on mineralization with the aim of growing it into a

larger, more continuous mineralized domain, like that of the Main and QES zones. This includes

5

drilling at 200 to 400 meters depth to test mineralization that may extend the mineral resource

and enable the pit to extend to a similar depth as the Main-QES pit (~500 meters).

Winter temperatures have been sufficient to allow access to the muskeg-covered, northern portion

of the QES zone and the Company is also commencing ice making activities on Snodgrass Lake.

Both are high priorities for the current drill campaign, as they have not been drill-tested by

Goldshore and have limited historical exploration drilling completed. As a result, there are

significant volumes within the current conceptual open pit that are modelled as waste but have

the potential to contain shear -hosted gold mineralization, which in turn, has the potential to add

ounces to the current mineral resource estimate.

Table 1: Significant intercepts

HOLE ID FROM TO LENGTH

(m)

TRUE

WIDTH

(m)

CUT

GRADE

(g/t Au)

UNCUT

GRADE

(g/t Au)

MMD-24-133 27.00 29.00 2.00 1.2 8.61 8.61

42.70 75.00 32.30 18.6 1.73 1.91

incl 47.30 63.55 16.25 9.3 2.95 3.30

incl 47.30 48.50 1.20 0.7 30.0 34.8

84.00 106.00 22.00 12.7 1.19 1.19

incl 87.00 97.00 10.00 5.8 2.13 2.13

123.00 128.00 5.00 2.9 0.33 0.33

158.00 170.00 12.00 6.9 0.57 0.57

incl 159.00 161.75 2.75 1.6 1.06 1.06

MMD-24-134 4.50 26.35 21.85 15.5 0.66 0.66

incl 5.00 12.75 7.75 5.5 1.36 1.36

35.00 46.00 11.00 7.9 0.79 0.79

incl 39.00 42.00 3.00 2.2 2.03 2.03

63.00 66.95 3.95 2.9 0.75 0.75

84.85 127.00 42.15 31.3 0.36 0.36

137.00 149.00 12.00 9.1 0.90 0.90

159.00 165.80 6.80 5.2 0.30 0.30

MMD-24-136 218.00 226.80 8.80 7.0 0.39 0.39

Intersections calculated above a 0.3 g/t Au cut off with a top cut of 30 g/t Au and a maximum internal

waste interval of 5 metres and minimum mineralized width of 2m. Shaded intervals are intersections

calculated above a 1.0 g/t Au cut off. Intervals in bold are those with a grade thickness factor exceeding

20 gram x metres / tonne gold. True widths are approximate and assume a subvertical body.

6

Table 2: Drill Collars

HOLE EAST NORTH RL AZIMUTH DIP EOH

MMD-24-133 668,515 5,378,324 428 90 -45 225

MMD-24-134 668,522 5,378,305 428 105 -45 225

MMD-24-136 668,645 5,378,012 430 350 -45 228

Analytical and QA/QC Procedures

All samples were sent to ALS Geochemistry in Thunder Bay for preparation and analysis was

performed in the ALS Vancouver analytical facility. ALS is accredited by the Standards Council of

Canada (SCC) for the Accreditation of Mineral Analysis Testing Labor atories and CAN -P-4E

ISO/IEC 17025. Samples were analysed for gold via fire assay with an AA finish (“Au-AA23”) and

48 pathfinder elements via ICP-MS after four-acid digestion (“ME-MS61”). Samples that assayed

over 10 ppm Au were re-run via fire assay with a gravimetric finish (“Au-GRA21”).

In addition to ALS quality assurance / quality control (“QA/QC”) protocols, Goldshore has

implemented a quality control program for all samples collected through the drilling program. The

quality control program was designed by a qualified and independent third party, w ith a focus on

the quality of analytical results for gold. Analytical results are received, imported to our secure on-

line database and evaluated to meet our established guidelines to ensure that all sample batches

pass industry best practice for analytica l quality control. Certified reference materials are

considered acceptable if values returned are within three standard deviations of the certified value

reported by the manufacture of the material. In addition to the certified reference material, certified

blank material is included in the sample stream to monitor contamination during sample

preparation. Blank material results are assessed based on the returned gold result being less

than ten times the quoted lower detection limit of the analytical method. The results of the on-

going analytical quality control program are evaluated and reported to Goldshore by Orix

Geoscience Inc.

Qualified Person

Peter Flindell, PGeo, MAusIMM, MAIG, Vice-President, Exploration, of the Company, and a

qualified person under National Instrument 43-101 – Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects,

has approved the scientific and technical information contained in this news release.

Mr. Flindell has verified the data disclosed. To verify the information related to the winter drill

program at the Moss Gold Project, Mr. Flindell has visited the property several times; discussed

and reviewed logging, sampling, bulk density, core cutting and sample shipping processes with

responsible site staff; discussed and reviewed assay and QA/QC results with responsible

personnel; and reviewed supporting documentation, including drill hole location and orientation

and significant assay interval calculations. He has also overseen the Company’s health and safety

policies in the field to ensure full compliance, and consulted with the Project’s host indigenous

communities on the planning and implementation of the drill program, particularly with respect to

its impact on the environment and the Company’s remediation protocols.

Marketing Communications Engagements

The Company also announces that it has engaged the following service providers (the

“Contractors”) to advise and coordinate market communications and investor relations on behalf

of the Company. The Company is at arms -length from each of the Contractors and does not

propose to issue any securities to any of the Contractors in consideration of services to be

7

provided to the Company. Each Contractor has agreed to comply with all applicable securities

laws and the policies of the TSX Venture Exchange.

The Company has engaged Cambridge House International. (“Cambridge House”) to provide a

3 interview studio series for a term ending March 31, 2025. Cambridge House will receive a total

fee of US $34,500 in consideration, of which US$19,500 was paid on entry of the engagement

and US$5,000 will be paid with the completion of each video interview. Cambridge House is based

in Squamish, British Columbia and is wholly owned by Jay Martin. To the Company’s knowledge,

neither Cambridge House nor Jay Martin have any interest, directly or indirectly, in the securities

of the Company.

The Company has entered into an agreement (the "SRC Agreement") with SRC Swiss Resource

Capital AG (" SRC") for investor relations and communications services in Europe. The SRC

Agreement is effective as of January 15, 2025, for a period of one year, after which time the SRC

Agreement is renewable on a quarterly basis. The services to be provided by SRC to the

Company include communications services, generally viewed as investor relations, including

dissemination of information to existing and potential shar eholders, creating media through

interview and videos as well as supporting or representing the Company at trade and investment

shows. Pursuant to the terms of the SRC Agreement, SRC is to be paid 5,000 CHF per month

with additional fees for special services such as trade and investment shows.

SRC is a private company with a business address at Poststr. 1, CH-9100, Herisau, Switzerland.

SRC is led by Jochen Staiger, Chief Executive Officer. To the best of the Company’s knowledge,

neither SRC nor Jochen Staiger have any interest, directly or indirectly, in the securities of the

Company.

About Goldshore

Goldshore is a growth- oriented gold company focused on delivering long-term shareholder and

stakeholder value through the acquisition and advancement of primary gold assets in tier -one

jurisdictions. It is led by the ex -global head of structural geology for the world’s largest gold

company and backed by one of Canada’s pre-eminent private equity firms. The Company’s

current focus is the advanced stage 100% owned Moss Gold Project which is positioned in

Ontario, Canada, with direct access from the Trans -Canada Highway, hydroelectric power near

site, supportive local communities and skilled workforce. The Company has invested over $60

million of new capital and completed approximately 80,000 meters of drilling on the Moss Gold

Project, which, in aggregate, has had over 235,000 meters of drilling. The 2024 updated NI 43-

101 mineral resource estimate (“MRE”) has expanded to 1.54 million ounces of Indicated gold

resources at 1.23 g/t Au and 5.20 million ounces of Inferred gold resources at 1.11 g/t Au. The

MRE only encompasses 3.6 kilometers of the 35+ ki lometer mineralized trend, remains open at

depth and along strike and is one of the few remaining major Canadian gold deposits positioned

for development in this cycle. Please see NI 43-101 technical report titled: “Technical Report and

Updated Mineral Resource Estimate for the Moss Gold Project, Ontario, Canada,” dated March

20, 2024 with an effective date of January 31, 2024 available under the Company’s SEDAR+

profile at www.sedarplus.ca. For more information, please visit SEDAR+ (www.sedarplus.ca) and

the Company’s website (www.goldshoreresources.com).

For More Information – Please Contact:

Michael Henrichsen

President, Chief Executive Officer and Director

8

Goldshore Resources Inc.

E: [email protected]

W: www.goldshoreresources.com

Neither the TSXV nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in the policies of

the TSXV) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release.

Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

This news release contains statements that constitute “forward-looking statements.” Such forward

looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may

cause the Company’s actual results, performance or achievements, or developments to differ

materially from the anticipated results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by

such forward-looking statements. Forward looking statements are statements that are not

historical facts and are generally, but not always, identified by the words “expects,” “plans,”

“anticipates,” “believes,” “intends,” “estimates,” “projects,” “potential” and similar expressions, or

that events or conditions “will,” “would,” “may,” “could” or “should” occur. Forward-looking

statements in this news release include, among others, statements relating to expectations

regarding the exploration and development of the Moss Gold Project; the potential mineralization

at the Moss Gold Project based on the winter drill program, including the potential for additional

mineral resources; the enhancement of the Moss Gold Project and potential mining methods; the

timing of technical reports and economic studies; statements regarding the Company’s future drill

programs, including the expected benefits and results thereof ; and other statements that are not

historical facts.

By their nature, forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and

other factors which may cause our actual results, performance or achievements, or other future

events, to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed

or implied by such forward-looking statements. Such factors and risks include, among others:

uncertainty and variation in the estimation of mineral resources; risks related to exploration,

development, and operation activities; exploration and development of the Moss Gold Project will

not be undertaken as anticipated; the Company may require additional financing from time to time

in order to continue its operations which may not be available when needed or on acceptable

terms and conditions acceptable; the fluctuating price of gold; unknown labilities in connection

with acquisitions; compliance with extensive government regulation; delays in obtaining or failure

to obtain governmental permits, or non-compliance with permits; environmental and other

regulatory requirements; domestic and foreign laws and regulations could adversely affect the

Company’s business and results of operations; risks related to natural disasters, terrorist acts,

health crises, and other disruptions and dislocations; global financial conditions; uninsured risks;

climate change risks; competition from other companies and individuals; conflicts of interest; risks

related to compliance with anti -corruption laws; the Company’s limited operating history;

intervention by non-governmental organizations; outside contractor risks; the stock markets have

experienced volatility that often has been unrelated to the performance of companies and these

fluctuations may adversely affect the price of the Company’s securities, regardless of its operating

performance; and other risks associated with executing the Company’s objectives and strategies

as well as those risk factors discussed in the Company’s continuous disclosure documents filed

under the Company’s SEDAR+ profile at www.sedarplus.ca.

The forward-looking information in this news release is based on management’s reasonable

expectations and assumptions as of the date of this news release. Certain material assumptions