Saturday, September 26, 2026
MiningNewsTerminal
Saturday, September 26, 2026 Admin

AUXX.V ·

Goldshore Expands Gold Mineralization Along Strike and at Depth at the Southwest Zone Includes Intersects 2.17 g/t Au over 50.35m and 6.96 g/t Au over 15.05m

Drill Results

EE

Goldshore Expands Gold Mineralization Along Strike and at Depth at the Southwest Zone

Includes Intersects 2.17 g/t Au over 50.35m and 6.96 g/t Au over 15.05m

VANCOUVER, B.C., April 20, 2023: Goldshore Resources Inc. (TSXV: GSHR / OTCQB:

GSHRF / FWB: 8X00) (“Goldshore” or the “ Company”), is pleased to announce assay results

from its recently completed drill program at the Moss Lake Project in Northwest Ontario, Canada

(the “Moss Gold Project”).

Highlights:

• Results from seven holes testing the extension of the Southwest Zone toward the Main

Zone have delineated a new high-grade lens, including visible gold, northeast of the

Southwest Zone resource that extends from surface to at least 250 meters depth

with best intercepts of:

o 6.96 g/t Au over 15.05m from 189.4m depth in MMD-22-105, including

 54.4 g/t Au over 1.6m from 189.4m

o 2.17 g/t Au over 50.35m from 103.55m depth in MMD-23-114, including

 3.47 g/t Au over 26.05m from 120.35m

o 1.30 g/t Au over 21.35m from 214m depth in MMD-22-108, including

 2.60 g/t Au over 7.35 from 228.0m

• These drill results prove that the Southwest Zone is a continuation of the Main Zone

and not a fault offset as previously interpreted. They also show that the Southwest Zone

extends to depth and is potentially as large as the Main Zone.

• With drilling recently completed, the Company is preparing an updated mineral resource

expected in May. The updated resource will use data from an additional 72 holes

compared to the November 2022 resource. Mineralization in the resource area remains

open in multiple directions.

President and CEO Brett Richards stated: “These results continue to support our belief that the

size and scale of the Moss Gold Project is much larger and continues to be open at all directions,

along strike both to the northeast and southwest, as well as our understanding of lateral

mineralized targets to the south -east of the Southwest Zone and the Main Zone. For now, we

have halted the program to step back; understand the quantum of this resource, and prepare for

a mineral resource update in early May, we can now see a viable path to a meaningful project

2

PEA (preliminary economic analysis). We look forward to those results in the coming months, as

we start to plan for an infill drilling program working towards a pre-feasibility study in the future.”

Technical Overview

Figure 1 shows the location of the drill holes in this press release and Figure 2 shows a close up

of the drilled area with significant intercepts. Figure 3 is a typical section through hole MMD-22-

105, -108 and -109. Table 1 shows the significant intercepts. Table 2 shows the drill hole locations.

Figure 1: Location of drill holes in this release relative to the November 2022 resource model and $1500 open

pit shell constraint

3

Figure 2: insert close up of Southwest Zone with significant intercepts relative to the November 2022

resource model and $1500 open pit shell constraint

Figure 3: Drill section through holes MMD-22-105, -108 and -109 showing the significant expansion of the

mineralized model beneath the November 2022 resource model and $1500 open pit shell constraint, which

should add to mineral resources in the upcoming update

4

Continued infill of the Southwest Zone has delineated a new continuous high-grade structure over

a 250m strike length from near surface to 200m depth immediately northeast of the historical

Southwest Zone. Holes MMD -22-105, -108, -109 and MMD -23-113, and - 114 intersected this

structure along with previously rel eased holes MMD -22-031, -042, -063, and -064. The newly

understood zone orientation was tested against the phase 1 drill results and confirmed the

continuity of the high-grade structures controlling the mineralization.

The mineralized zone occurs within an albitite+hematite altered diorite intrusion complex cut by

closely spaced, texturally destructive sericite+chlorite+carbonate altered shears. Additional

shearing, and subsequent alteration, is seen extending into the neighboring intermediate

volcanics but is poorly mineralized.

The gold mineralization appears more nuggety than elsewhere in the deposit with a greater

portion of the mineralization attributed to pyrite ±chalcopyrite bearing quartz -carbonate veins

within the sheared intervals. Mineralization includes visible gold (Figure 4) . Several very high-

grade intercepts include:

o 54.4 g/t Au over 1.6m from 189.4m depth in MMD-22-105

o 11.3 g/t Au over 0.5m from 147.7m depth in MMD-22-108 and

o 11.5 g/t Au over 0.7m from 232.35m

o 10.6 g/t Au over 0.95m from 323.3m depth in MMD-23-112

o 19.0 g/t Au over 0.65m from 54m depth in MMD-23-114 and

o 22.9 g/t Au over 1m from 128m depth and

o 14.4 g/t Au over 1m from 137m depth

Holes MMD- 22-109 and MMD -23-113 intersected the high- grade structure but encountered

lesser vein mineralization resulting in more modest grade intercepts including:

o 0.44 g/t Au over 81.2m from 298.8m depth in MMD-22-109, including

 1.08 g/t Au over 8.60m from 335.35m

o 0.63 g/t Au over 29.5m from 129.55m depth in MMD-23-113, including

 4.76 g/t Au over 2.0m from 140.0m and

o 0.51 g/t Au over 58m from 204.0m depth, including

 1.92 g/t Au over 4.0m from 205.0m and

 1.84 g/t Au over 3.0m from 229.0m

Holes MMD-22-106, and MMD-23-112 were focused on infilling the drill spacing of the existing

Southwest Zone. All three holes intercepted broad zones of mineralization hosted primarily within

altered granodiorite containing narrow higher grade shear zones. Best intercepts include:

o 0.47 g/t Au over 63m from 277m depth in MMD-22-106

o 0.61 g/t Au over 41.25m from 232m depth in MMD-23-112

o 0.39 g/t Au over 53.5m from 301m depth in MMD-23-112

5

Figure 4: Visible gold flake within a quartz -carbonate-pyrite vein at 190.42m (1.6 m @ 54.4 g/t Au) in MMD -22-

105 within the sheared, altered intrusion of the Southwest zone . Note that th is photo is not intended to be

representative of broader mineralization on the Moss Lake Gold Project.

Pete Flindell, VP Exploration for Goldshore, said “These results show that the Southwest Zone is

much larger and better mineralized than historical drillholes suggested; and is potentially as large

as the Main Zone. We await the results from the final batch of assays that are expected to provide

critical infill beneath the heart of the Southwest Zone.”

Table 1: Significant downhole gold intercepts

HOLEID FROM TO LENGTH (m) TRUE WIDTH

(m)

CUT GRADE

(g/t Au)

UNCUT GRADE

(g/t Au)

MMD-22-105 45.00 48.00 3.00 2.3 0.33 0.33

62.00 66.45 4.45 3.5 0.34 0.34

117.55 125.00 7.45 6.0 0.38 0.38

189.40 204.45 15.05 12.5 3.64 6.96

including 189.40 191.00 1.60 1.3 30.0 54.4

6

MMD-22-106 165.00 187.00 22.00 15.7 0.33 0.33

204.20 229.00 24.80 18.0 0.50 0.50

256.00 263.00 7.00 5.2 0.34 0.34

277.00 292.40 15.40 11.5 0.37 0.37

299.20 340.00 40.80 30.9 0.59 0.59

including 325.00 335.00 10.00 7.6 1.17 1.17

353.15 384.00 30.85 23.9 0.61 0.61

including 359.00 368.70 9.70 7.5 1.08 1.08

MMD-22-108 126.55 133.15 6.60 4.7 0.36 0.36

143.55 168.00 24.45 17.6 0.62 0.62

including 143.55 148.20 4.65 3.3 1.99 1.99

including 147.70 148.20 0.50 0.4 11.3 11.3

190.80 196.25 5.45 4.0 0.31 0.31

214.00 235.35 21.35 15.9 1.30 1.30

including 215.40 218.00 2.60 1.9 1.10 1.10

and 228.00 235.35 7.35 5.5 2.60 2.60

including 232.35 233.05 0.70 0.5 11.5 11.5

319.00 322.15 3.15 2.5 0.37 0.37

MMD-22-109 238.35 244.00 5.65 4.1 0.52 0.52

271.00 274.00 3.00 2.2 0.37 0.37

298.80 380.00 81.20 61.2 0.44 0.44

including 335.35 343.95 8.60 6.5 1.08 1.08

395.10 404.65 9.55 7.4 0.39 0.39

MMD-23-112 103.35 106.85 3.50 2.5 0.38 0.38

118.00 138.00 20.00 14.3 0.39 0.39

179.00 182.00 3.00 2.2 0.57 0.57

207.00 218.90 11.90 8.9 1.17 1.17

including 207.00 215.00 8.00 6.0 1.63 1.63

232.00 273.25 41.25 31.5 0.61 0.61

287.10 290.10 3.00 2.3 0.33 0.33

301.00 309.00 8.00 6.3 0.32 0.32

313.00 354.05 41.05 32.8 0.42 0.42

including 323.00 325.60 2.60 2.1 4.41 4.41

including 323.30 324.25 0.95 0.8 10.6 10.6

368.00 370.00 2.00 1.6 0.71 0.71

423.85 428.50 4.65 3.8 0.33 0.33

462.00 472.75 10.75 9.0 0.56 0.56

526.80 532.00 5.20 4.4 0.37 0.37

MMD-23-113 18.00 42.00 24.00 16.2 0.42 0.42

including 31.00 34.00 3.00 2.0 1.55 1.55

129.55 132.00 2.45 1.8 0.41 0.41

136.00 165.50 29.50 21.6 0.63 0.63

7

including 140.00 142.00 2.00 1.5 4.76 4.76

204.00 262.00 58.00 44.5 0.51 0.51

including 205.00 209.00 4.00 3.0 1.92 1.92

and 229.00 232.00 3.00 2.3 1.84 1.84

274.00 276.00 2.00 1.6 0.33 0.33

289.00 291.00 2.00 1.6 0.31 0.31

332.00 334.30 2.30 1.8 0.82 0.82

MMD-23-114 30.00 32.25 2.25 1.7 0.33 0.33

40.65 62.65 22.00 16.3 0.78 0.78

including 54.00 54.65 0.65 0.5 19.0 19.0

103.55 153.90 50.35 38.8 2.17 2.17

including 120.35 146.40 42.85 20.0 3.47 3.47

including 128.00 129.00 1.00 0.8 22.9 22.9

and 137.00 138.00 1.00 0.8 14.4 14.4

183.00 189.85 6.85 5.4 0.36 0.36

Intersections calculated above a 0.3 g/t Au cut off with a top cut of 30 g/t Au and a maximum internal waste interval of 10

metres. Shaded intervals are intersections calculated above a 1.0 g/t Au cut off. Intervals in bold are those with a grade

thickness factor exceeding 20 gram x metres / tonne gold. True widths are approximate and assume a subvertical body.

Table 2: Location of drill holes in this press release

HOLE EAST NORTH RL AZIMUTH DIP EOH

MMD-22-105 668,498 5,378,484 438 110° -41° 249

MMD-22-106 668,438 5,378,379 440 126° -50° 450

MMD-22-108 668,524 5,378,519 437 125° -50° 450

MMD-22-109 668,466 5,378,591 427 125° -51° 501

MMD-23-112 668,172 5,378,186 443 125° -50° 600

MMD-23-113 668,494 5,378,469 438 126° -50° 450

MMD-23-114 668,533 5,378,424 428 123° -44° 402

Analytical and QA/QC Procedures

All samples were sent to ALS Geochemistry in Thunder Bay for preparation and analysis was

performed in the ALS Vancouver analytical facility. ALS is accredited by the Standards Council of

Canada (SCC) for the Accreditation of Mineral Analysis Testing Laboratories and CAN -P-4E

ISO/IEC 17025. Samples were analyzed for gold via fire assay with an AA finish (“Au-AA23”) and

48 pathfinder elements via ICP-MS after four-acid digestion (“ME-MS61”). Samples that assayed

over 10 ppm Au were re-run via fire assay with a gravimetric finish (“Au-GRA21”).

In addition to ALS quality assurance / quality control (“QA/QC”) protocols, Goldshore has

implemented a quality control program for all samples collected through the drilling program. The

quality control program was designed by a qualified and independent third party, with a focus on

the quality of analytical results for gold. Analytical results are received, imported to our secure on-

line database and evaluated to meet our established guidelines to ensure that all sample batches

pass industry best practice for analytical quality control. Certified reference materials are

considered acceptable if values returned are within three standard deviations of the certified value

8

reported by the manufacture of the material. In addition to the certified reference material, certified

blank material is included in the sample stream to monitor contamination during sample

preparation. Blank material results are assessed based on the returned gold result being less

than ten times the quoted lower detection limit of the analytical method. The results of the on -

going analytical quality control program are evaluated and reported to Goldshore by Orix

Geoscience Inc.

About Goldshore

Goldshore is an emerging junior gold development company, and owns 100% of the Moss Gold

Project located in Ontario. Wesdome is currently a large shareholder of Goldshore with an

approximate 22% equity position in the Company. Well-financed and supported by an industry -

leading management group, board of directors and advisory board, Goldshore is positioned to

advance the Moss Gold Project through the next stages of exploration and development.

Peter Flindell, P.Geo., MAusIMM, MAIG, Vice President – Exploration of the Company, a qualified

person under NI 43- 101 has approved the scientific and technical information contained in this

news release.

Neither the TSXV nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in the policies of

the TSXV) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release.

For More Information – Please Contact:

Brett A. Richards

President, Chief Executive Officer and Director

Goldshore Resources Inc.

P. +1 604 288 4416 M. +1 905 449 1500

E. [email protected]

W. www.goldshoreresources.com

Facebook: GoldShoreRes | Twitter: GoldShoreRes | LinkedIn: goldshoreres

Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

This news release contains statements that constitute “forward-looking statements.” Such forward

looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may

cause the Company’s actual results, performance or achievements, or developments to differ

materially from the anticipated results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by

such forward- looking statements. Forward looking statements are statements that are not

historical facts and are generally, but not always, identified by the words “expects,” “plans,”

“anticipates,” “believes,” “intends,” “estimates,” “projects,” “potential” and similar expressions, or

that events or conditions “will,” “would,” “may,” “could” or “should” occur.

Forward-looking statements in this news release include, among others, statements relating to

expectations regarding the exploration and development of the Moss Lake Gold Project, the

release of an updated mineral resource estimate and preliminary economic assessment, and

other statements that are not historical facts. By their nature, forward-looking statements involve

known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause our actual results,

performance or achievements, or other future events, to be materially different from any future

results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements.

Such factors and risks include, among others: the Company may require additional financing from