Saturday, September 26, 2026
MiningNewsTerminal
Saturday, September 26, 2026 Admin

AUXX.V ·

Goldshore Announces Strong Initial Drilling Results from the East Coldstream Deposit 13 Kilometers Northeast of Moss Lake

Drill Results

EE

Goldshore Announces Strong Initial Drilling Results from the East Coldstream Deposit 13

Kilometers Northeast of Moss Lake

VANCOUVER, B.C., September 12, 2022: Goldshore Resources Inc. (TSXV: GSHR / OTCQB:

GSHRF / FWB: 8X00) (“Goldshore” or the “ Company”), is pleased to announce assay results

from eight holes drilled to test gold mineralization at the East Coldstream deposit at the Moss

Lake Project in Northwest Ontario, Canada (the “Moss Lake Gold Project”).

Highlights:

• Results for eight holes, drilled to better define the gold miner alization of the East

Coldstream deposit, have confirmed three broad lenses of gold mineralization within

the two main shear zones with best intercepts of:

o 23m @ 1.34 g/t Au from 244m depth in CED-22-004, including

 7.35m @ 3.77 g/t Au from 254.2m

o 17.3m @ 1.55 g/t Au from 487m depth in CED-22-005

o 20m @ 1.15 g/t Au from 402m depth in CED-22-006

o 26m @ 1.66 g/t Au from 451m, including

 7.9m @ 4.20 g/t Au from 465m

o 25.7m @ 2.07 g/t Au from 488m

o 37.05m @ 1.54 g/t Au from 209.3m depth in CED-22-007

o 27.9m @ 1.14 g/t Au from 387m depth in CED-22-008, including

 13m @ 2.14 g/t Au from 401m

• The better intercepts are all centered around five high-grade gold zones of mineralized

breccia, including:

o 1.05m @ 15.8 g/t Au from 257.95m depth in CED-22-004

o 0.9m @ 14.3 g/t Au from 472m depth in CED-22-006, and

o 0.65m @ 13.5 g/t Au from 502m

o 0.85m @ 10.6 g/t Au from 244.35m depth in CED-22-007, and

o 0.4m @ 12.6 g/t Au from 418m

• These results show that the three gold mineralized lenses have a clear steep plunge and

highlight significant upside potential at depth within structurally controlled shoots.

2

President and CEO Brett Richards stated: “These first results are extremely encouraging and

significant to the overarching strategy of developing a secondary resource to Moss Lake. This will

provide optionality that can only help improve the new PEA study next year. The results also point

to a second significant project within our land package, which highlights the potential for further

discoveries.”

Technical Overview

Figure 1 shows the location of the East Coldstream deposit relative to the Moss Lake deposit and

the Archean Shebandowan Greenstone Belt. Table 1 and Figure 3 show the significant intercepts.

Table 2 and Figure 2 show the drill hole locations. Figures 4 and 5 show a cross section through

CED-22-006 and long section along the southern zone, respectively.

Figure 1: Location map showing East Coldstream relative to Moss Lake

3

Figure 2: Drill plan showing drill holes (long section is Figure 5)

Figure 3: Drill plan showing best of several +1 g/t Au intercepts

4

Figure 4: Drill section through CED-22-006 and the Main Lens

Figure 5: Long section through the Main and Sanders Lenses

5

Table 1: Significant downhole gold intercepts

HOLE ID FROM TO LENGTH

(m)

TRUE

WIDTH (m)

CUT

GRADE

(g/t Au)

UNCUT

GRADE

(g/t Au)

CED-22-001 322.00 324.45 2.45 1.8 0.80 0.80

420.00 428.50 8.50 6.6 0.51 0.51

CED-22-002 No significant assays

CED-22-003 168.85 171.90 3.05 2.2 0.61 0.61

252.30 258.80 6.50 4.8 0.76 0.76

including 253.95 256.90 2.95 2.2 1.07 1.07

269.55 288.70 19.15 14.4 0.61 0.61

including 283.30 288.70 5.40 4.1 1.31 1.31

CED-22-004 5.00 7.00 2.00 1.0 0.76 0.76

149.00 157.00 8.00 4.4 0.45 0.45

168.00 216.00 48.00 27.5 0.39 0.39

including 168.95 173.00 4.05 2.3 1.29 1.29

244.00 267.00 23.00 13.6 1.34 1.34

including 254.20 261.55 7.35 4.3 3.77 3.77

0.0

CED-22-005 487.00 504.30 17.30 11.0 1.55 1.55

including 489.00 504.30 15.30 9.7 1.69 1.69

571.55 575.00 3.45 2.2 0.55 0.55

CED-22-006 311.00 322.40 11.40 6.4 0.33 0.33

334.90 346.00 11.10 6.3 0.41 0.41

394.00 440.00 46.00 26.8 0.63 0.63

including 402.00 422.00 20.00 11.6 1.15 1.15

451.00 477.00 26.00 15.5 1.66 1.66

including 457.00 460.00 3.00 1.8 1.51 1.51

and 465.00 472.90 7.90 4.7 4.20 4.20

488.00 513.70 25.70 16.3 2.07 2.07

including 488.00 513.00 25.00 15.9 2.10 2.10

CED-22-007 209.30 246.35 37.05 21.6 1.54 1.54

including 213.30 246.35 33.05 19.3 1.67 1.67

289.00 291.00 2.00 1.2 0.43 0.43

319.00 321.15 2.15 1.3 0.71 0.71

367.10 376.00 8.90 5.5 0.60 0.60

387.75 390.60 2.85 1.8 0.63 0.63

438.00 440.00 2.00 1.3 0.64 0.64

446.00 460.50 14.50 9.2 0.58 0.58

6

CED-22-008 91.95 94.00 2.05 1.4 0.87 0.87

300.80 312.00 11.20 8.9 0.54 0.54

387.00 414.90 27.90 22.8 1.14 1.14

including 401.00 414.00 13.00 10.6 2.14 2.14

Intersections calculated above a 0.3 g/t Au cut off with a top cut of 30 g/t Au and a maximum internal waste

interval of 10 metres. Shaded intervals are intersections calculated above a 1.0 g/t Au cut off. Intervals in bold

are those with a grade thickness factor exceeding 20 gram x metres / tonne gold. True widths are approximate

and assume a subvertical body.

Table 2: Location of drill holes in this press release

HOLE EAST NORTH RL AZIMUTH DIP EOH

CED-22-001 681,136 5,386,570 479 337° -50° 483.0m

CED-22-002 681,420 5,386,640 479 335° -50° 494.85m

CED-22-003 680,507 5,386,473 481 336° -50° 360.0m

CED-22-004 680,008 5,386,430 477 155° -60° 302.8m

CED-22-005 680,559 5,386,340 486 342° -60° 810.1m

CED-22-006 680,010 5,386,586 475 140° 60° 600.0m

CED-22-007 680,085 5,386,604 473 138° -59° 657.05m

CED-22-008 680,559 5,386,340 483 340° -50° 603.0m

Approximate collar coordinates in NAD 83, Zone 15N

Results have been received for eight of the initial 17 holes in the first pass drilling program at East

Coldstream. These drillholes tested the existing mineralized lenses, as well as possible eastern

and down-dip extensions.

Our work on the mineralization paragenesis and its structural controls has shown that gold

mineralization is related to pervasive silica-hematite alteration and sulfide veining associated with

an extensional brecciation event following extensive shearing. At the deposit scale, this for med

three lenticular bodies within two main shear zones (Figure 1). Based on structural measurements

from oriented core, e ach body has a steeply west-dipping plunge and a gently east-pitching

stretching lineation that creates an internal fabric to mineralization (Figure 4). This structural

control creates the potential for additional high-grade mineralization to occur below the shallowly

drilled portions of the shears zones such as encountered in CED-22-007.

CED-22-001 and -002 tested a similar geophysical feature to the east of the East Coldstream

deposit. CED-22-001 was drilled closest to East Coldstream and encounter ed narrow zones of

mineralization, while CED -22-002 was drilled 300 m eters further east and did not encounter

significant results. This sterilizes the immediate extension, but given the lenticular geometry of

mineralization, leaves open the prospectively of the structure further to the east.

CED-22-003 and -004 drilled the North and Main Lenses, respectively. Both holes intersected

broad low-grade mineralized zones, including 19.15m @ 0.61 g/t Au from 269.55m in CED-22 -

003; and 48m @ 0.39 g/t Au from 168m and 23m @ 1.34 g/t Au in CED-22-004.

7

Holes CED-22-005 to -008 tested down plunge extensions of the known mineralization. All holes

intersected variable widths of higher grade mineralization, including 17.3m @ 1.55 g/t Au from

487m in CED-22-005; 20.0m @ 1.15 g/t Au from 402m , 26.0m @ 1.66 g/t Au from 451m, and

25.7m @ 2.07 g/t Au from 488m in CED-22-006; 37.05m @ 1.54 g/t Au from 209.3m in CED-22-

007; and 27.9m @ 1.14 g/t Au from 387m in CED-22-008.

Pete Flindell, VP Exploration for Goldshore, said “Our analysis of drill results at East Coldstream

confirms the two parallel shear zones that were modelled in the past. The recognition of a greater

structural control within these shears has led to the modelling of three steeply dipping lenticular

shoots that remain open at depth. A gently dipping internal fabric suggests that mineralization is

focused within discrete structures that may allow us to model a higher-grade resource than exists

in the historic estimate.”

Analytical and QA/QC Procedures

All samples were sent to ALS Geochemistry in Thunder Bay for preparation and analysis was

performed in the ALS Vancouver analytical facility. ALS is accredited by the Standards Council of

Canada (SCC) for the Accreditation of Mineral Analysis Testing Laboratories and CAN -P-4E

ISO/IEC 17025. Samples were analyzed for gold via fire assay with an AA finish (“Au-AA23”) and

48 pathfinder elements via ICP-MS after four-acid digestion (“ME-MS61”). Samples that assayed

over 10 ppm Au were re-run via fire assay with a gravimetric finish (“Au-GRA21”).

In addition to ALS quality assurance / quality control (“QA/QC”) protocols, Goldshore has

implemented a quality control program for all samples collected through the drilling program. The

quality control program was designed by a qualified and independent third party, with a focus on

the quality of analytical results for gold. Analytical results are received, imported to our secure on-

line database and evaluated to meet our established guidelines to ensure that all sample batches

pass industry best practice for analytical quality control. Certified reference materials are

considered acceptable if values returned are within three standard deviations of the certified value

reported by the manufacture of the material. In addition to the certified reference material, certified

blank material is included in the sample stream to monitor contamination during sample

preparation. Blank material results are assessed based on the returned gold result being less

than ten times the quoted lower detection limit of the analytical method. The results of the on-

going analytical quality control program are evaluated and reported to Goldshore by Orix

Geoscience Inc.

About Goldshore

Goldshore is an emerging junior gold development company, and owns the Moss Lake Gold

Project located in Ontario. Wesdome Gold Mines Ltd. (“ Wesdome”), is currently a large

shareholder of Goldshore with an approximate 27% equity position in the Company. Well-

financed and supported by an industry -leading management group, board of directors and

advisory board, Goldshore is positioned to advance the Moss Lake Gold Project through the next

stages of exploration and development.

About the Moss Lake Gold Project

8

The Moss Lake Gold Project is located approximately 100 km west of the city of Thunder Bay,

Ontario. It is accessed via Highway 11 which passes within 1 km of the property boundary to the

north. The Moss Lake Gold Project covers 14,292 hectares and consists of 282 unpatented and

patented mining claims.

The Moss Lake Gold Project hosts a number of gold and base metal rich deposits including the

Moss Lake Deposit, the East Coldstream Deposit ( Table 3), the historically producing North

Coldstream Mine ( Table 4), and the Hamlin Zone, all of which occur over a mineralized trend

exceeding 20 km in length. A historical preliminary economic assessment (the “ Moss Lake

Historical Estimate”) was completed on the Moss Lake Gold Project in 2013 and published by

Moss Lake Gold Mines Ltd. (“Moss Lake Gold Mines”)1,3. A historical mineral resource estimate

(the “East Coldstream Historical Estimate”) was completed on the East Coldstream Deposit in

2011 by Foundation Resources Inc .2,3 In addition to these zones, the Moss Lake Gold Project

also hosts a number of under -explored mineral occurrences which are reported to exist both at

surface and in historically drilled holes. The Moss Lake Deposit is a shear-hosted disseminated-

style gold deposit which outcrops at surface. It has been drilled over a 2.5 km length and to depths

of 300 m with 376 holes completed between 1983 and 2017. The last drilling program conducted

in 2016 and 2017 by Wesdome, which consisted of widely spaced holes along the strike extension

of the deposit was successful in expanding the mineralized footprint and hydrothermal system 1.6

km to the northeast. Additionally, the deposi t remains largely open to depth. In 2017, Wesdome

completed an induced polarization survey which traced the potential extensions of pyrite

mineralization associated with the Moss Lake Deposit over a total strike length of 8 km and

spanning the entire extent of the survey grids.

The East Coldstream Deposit is a shear -hosted disseminated-style gold deposit which locally

outcrops at surface. It has been drilled over a 1.3 km length and to depths of 200 m with 138

holes completed between 1988 and 2017. The deposit remains largely open at depth and may

have the potential for expansion along strike. Historic drill hole highlights from the East

Coldstream Deposit include 4.86 g/t Au over 27.3 m in C-10-15.

The historically producing North Coldstream Mine is repor ted to have produced significant

amounts of copper, gold and silver 4 from mineralization with potential iron-oxide-copper -gold

deposit style affinity. The exploration potential immediately surrounding the historic mining area

is not currently well understood and historic data compilation is required.

The Hamlin Zone is a significant occurrence of copper and gold mineralization, and also of

potential iron-oxide-copper-gold deposit style affinity. Between 2008 and 2011, Glencore tested

Hamlin with 24 drill holes which successfully outlined a broad and intermittently mineralized zone

over a strike length of 900 m. Historic drill hole highlights from the Hamlin Zone include 0.9 g/t Au

and 0.35% Cu over 150.7 m in HAM-11-75.

The Moss Lake, East Coldstream and North Coldstream deposits sit on a mineral trend marked

by a regionally significant deformation zone locally referred to as the Wawiag Fault Zone in the

area of the Moss Lake Deposit. This deformation zone occurs over a length of approximately 20

km on the M oss Lake Gold Project and there is an area spanning approximately 7 km between

the Moss Lake and East Coldstream deposits that is significantly underexplored.