Saturday, September 26, 2026
MiningNewsTerminal
Saturday, September 26, 2026 Admin

AUXX.V ·

Gold X2 Discovers Two Mineralized Shears on the Deaty Trend

Drill Results

Gold X2 Discovers Two Mineralized Shears on the Deaty Trend

Including 17.0m @ 1.23 g/t Au

VANCOUVER, B.C., February 05, 2026: Gold X2 Mining Inc. (TSXV: AUXX / OTCQB: GSHRF

/ FWB: DF8) (“Gold X2” or the “Company”), is pleased to announce the assay results from the

four hole phase one test program of the Bunker target along the prospective 5km long Deaty trend

at the Moss Gold Project in Northwest Ontario, Canada (the “Moss Gold Project”).

Michael Henrichsen, CEO of Gold X2, commented, "We are very excited to have intersected two

mineralized shear zones in our first pass drilling across the Deaty trend at the Bunker target. This

area is completely under glacial cover, and the discovery of these mineralized zones has

demonstrated that our greenfields exploration techniques are effective. We very much look

forward to continuing an aggressive exploration program along the Deaty trend as we believe

there is excellent potential for a meaningful discovery within 2-3 kilometers of the moss deposit.”

Highlights

• Four scout holes were drilled at the Bunker Target, approximately 2km south of the Moss

Gold Deposit, to test one of five highly prospective targets concealed by glacial cover

along the anomalous Deaty Trend (press release dated October 16, 2025) . The drilling

identified two new parallel mineralized structures – the Sand Shear and the Wedge Shear

– approximately 250 meters apart. Drill intercepts include:

Sand Shear

o 5.6m of 2.24 g/t Au from 163.4m in DBD-25-001 including

 3.7m of 3.28 g/t Au from 163.4m, and

o 19.0m of 0.43 g/t Au from 192.0m including

 2.0m of 1.59 g/t Au from 193.0m

Wedge Shear

o 17.0m of 1.23 g/t Au from 21.0m in DBD-25-003, including

 8.0m of 2.50 g/t Au from 30.0m, including

• 1.45m of 12.0 g/t Au from 30.0m

• The encouraging results from this first phase of scout drilling reinforce the successful

approach of utilizing systematic bedrock sampling and gradient array geophysics to

discern concealed bedrock mineralization. Scout drilling of additional targets along the

Deaty Trend is scheduled to begin Q1 2026 with follow up drilling of the Bunker target

expected in late Q2 2026.

2

Technical Overview

The results of the Bunker scout drilling program are illustrated in the following figures and tables.

Figure 1 shows the location map of the drill holes reported in this release. Figure 2 provides a

cross-section through drill holes DBD-25-001 and DBD-25-003. The results are summarized in

Tables 1 and 2, which include significant intercepts (Table 1) and drill hole locations (Table 2).

Figure 1: Illustrates the Bunker scout drill program. Drill holes being reported are highlighted in gold.

3

Figure 2: Shows the section across the Bunker Target.

Holes DBD- 25-001, 002, and 003 targeted a wide anomalous zone outlined by systematic

bedrock geochemistry and gradient array geophysics (press release dated October 16, 2025)

concealed beneath glacial cover that is 10 to 50 meters thick.

Hole DBD-25-001 was drilled towards the northwest and intersected a sequence of andesitic

lavas and tuffs with localized meter -scale metasedimentary beds, which frequently contain

exhalative pyrite and strongly sheared graphitic argillite beds. The sequence is intruded by several

10-20m wide gabbroic bodies and remains in a wide gabbro-diorite intrusion beneath 172 meters

depth. The entirety of the hole has experienced moderate to strong shearing, believed to be

related to the nearby crustal-scale Knife Lake Fault, and is pervasively chloritized.

DBD-25-001 intersected two mineralized zones. The first – the Sand Shear – is hosted within an

exhalative sulphide bearing graphitic argillite horizon along the contact of the sizeable gabbro-

diorite (Figure 3). The Sand Shear returned a mineralized interc ept of 5.6m of 2.24 g/t Au from

163.4m. The second mineralized zone, 19.0m of 0.43 g/t Au from 192.0m, is hosted within a more

strongly sheared zone of the gabbro- diorite. Both zones contain elevated deformed quartz -

carbonate veining.

4

Figure 3: Hole DBD-25-001: Sheared metasedimentary rock horizon containing exhalative pyrite and strongly

sheared graphitic argillite beds with deformed quartz-carbonate veins returning an intersection of 5.6m of 2.24 g/t Au

from 163.4m, including 3.7m of 3.28 g/t Au from 163.4m.

Hole DBD-25-002 was drilled from a nearby setup towards the southeast and the nearby Hood

Lake granitoid stock. The hole intersected a wide gabbro-diorite intrusion, locally porphyritic, until

approximately 140m after which it intersected a similar andesitic volcanic package as

encountered in DBD -25-001 until 215m, where it encountered a series of sheeted diorite

intrusions, likely related to the stock. No mineralized zones were intersected.

Hole DBD-25-003 was drilled approximately 400 meters northwest of DBD-25-001 and 002 and

drilled southeast towards them. The hole intersected a complex sequence of dacite volcanics

intruded by strongly sheared gabbroic dykes and late syenite dykes until approximately 108

meters depth. Below this, it intersected a wide diorite intrusion, likely the same intrusion

encountered at the end of DBD-25-001. The sheared gabbroic dykes are strongly chloritized and

contain abundant pyrite-bearing quartz and quartz-carbonate veins. The late syenite dykes have

a strong hematite-silica alteration overprint, which bleeds 5-10 meters into the surrounding wall

rock, overprinting chlorite alteration, and hosts an additional non -sulphide bearing quartz -

carbonate veining event.

The mineralized zone in DBD-25-003 is related to the sheared gabbro dykes – the Wedge Shear

– near the boundary of the chlorite and hematite alteration systems (Figure 4). The Wedge Shear

returned a mineralized intercept of 17.0m of 1.23 g/t Au from 21.0m, including 8.0m of 2.50 g/t Au

from 30.0m based around an interval of 1.45m of 12.0 g/t Au from 30.0m.

5

Figure 4: Hole DBD-25-003: Strongly chloritized and sheared gabbro intrusion overprinted by silica-hematite

alteration returning an intersection of 17.0m of 1.23 g/t Au from 21.0m, including 8.0m of 2.50 g/t Au from 30.0m,

including 1.45m of 12.0g/t Au from 30.0m.

Hole DBD- 25-004 was drilled approximately 850 m eters west, targeting a second, weaker

anomalous zone outlined by the systematic bedrock geochemistry pattern, along strike from the

first. The hole collared in 13 meters of till before intersecting a wide dioritic intrusive package until

190 meters depth. Below this, the hole intersected a dominantly clastic sedimentary sequence,

containing exhalative pyrite and strongly sheared graphitic argillite beds with 5-10m scale diorite

intrusions and tuffaceous andesites. Overall, the hole has notably weaker shear intensity and

lacks the pervasive chlorite overprint. A minor mineralized zone, intersecting 2.0m of 1.29 g/t Au

from 236m, is hosted within a graphitic argillite, like that in DBD-25-001 but with less shearing

and veining.

The results of the initial scout drill program have been very encouraging and support the drill

testing of the remaining four anomalies along the Deaty Trend that are outlined by the systematic

bedrock geochemistry and gradient array geophysics program s that defined the Bunker Target

discovery. Scout drilling of the remaining anomalies is expected to begin in Q1 2026. Follow up

drilling at the Bunker Target is being planned for late Q2.

Table 1: Significant intercepts

HOLE ID FROM TO LENGTH (m) TRUE WIDTH

(m)

CUT GRADE

(g/t Au)

UNCUT GRADE

(g/t Au)

DBD-25-001 163.40 169.00 5.60 2.7 2.24 2.24

DBD-25-001 163.40 167.10 3.70 1.8 3.28 3.28

DBD-25-001 192.00 211.00 19.00 9.2 0.43 0.43

DBD-25-001 193.00 195.00 2.00 1.0 1.59 1.59

DBD-25-003 21.00 38.00 17.00 8.3 1.23 1.23

6

DBD-25-003 30.00 38.00 8.00 3.9 2.50 2.50

DBD-25-004 236.00 238.00 2.00 1.1 0.65 0.65

Intersections calculated above a 0.3 g/t Au cut off with a top cut of 30 g/t Au and a maximum internal waste

interval of 10 metres. Shaded intervals are intersections calculated above a 1.0 g/t Au cut off. Intervals in bold are

those with a grade thickness factor exceeding 20 gram x metres / tonne gold. True widths are approximate and

assume a subvertical body.

Table 2: Drill Collars

HOLE EAST NORTH RL AZIMUTH DIP EOH

DBD-25-001 670,189 5,376,722 444 330.0 -45.1 252.00

DBD-25-002 670,159 5,376,764 444 150.0 -46.3 273.00

DBD-25-003 669,983 5,377,057 429 149.9 -44.5 312.00

DBD-25-004 669,354 5,376,522 434 151.0 -45.5 411.00

Equity Grant to Management and Consultants

The Company also wishes to announce that, pursuant to the Company’s omnibus incentive plan,

it granted a total of 2,100,000 incentive stock options (“Options”) and 1,400,000 restricted share

units (“RSU”) to management and consultants of the Company. The Options are each exercisable

to purchase one common share of the Company (a “ Common Share”) at an exercise price of

$1.19 for a period of five (5) years. Each RSU entitles the holder to be issued one Common Share

of the Company upon vesting, the RSUs will vest one year from grant.

Analytical and QA/QC Procedures

The NQ diameter drill core has been oriented using ACTIII or equivalent tools and validated in

the core shack. All core has been sawed in half cut just off the core orientation line (bottom of

hole) with the right half (looking down hole) of the core bagged and sent a third -party analytical

laboratory. The left half of the core was returned to core boxes and is stored at Gold X2’s

Kashabowie core yard facility.

All samples were sent to ALS Geochemistry in Thunder Bay for preparation and analysis was

performed in the ALS Vancouver analytical facility. ALS is accredited by the Standards Council of

Canada (SCC) for the Accreditation of Mineral Analysis Testing Laboratories and CAN -P-4E

ISO/IEC 17025. Samples were analysed for gold via fire assay with an AA finish (“Au-AA23”) and

48 pathfinder elements via ICP-MS after four-acid digestion (“ME-MS61”). Samples that assayed

over 10 ppm Au were re-run via fire assay with a gravimetric finish (“Au-GRA21”).

In addition to ALS quality assurance / quality control (“ QA/QC”) protocols, Gold X2 has

implemented a quality control program for all samples collected through the drilling program. The

quality control program was designed by a qualified and independent third party, with a focus on

the quality of analytical results for gold. Analytical results are received, imported to our secure on-

line database and evaluated to meet our established guidelines to ensure that all sample batches

pass industry best practice for analytical quality control. Certified reference materials are

considered acceptable if values returned are within three standard deviations of the certified value

reported by the manufacture of the material. In addition to the certified reference material, certified

blank material is included in the sample stream to monitor contamination during sample

preparation. Blank material results are assessed based on the returned gold result being less

than ten times the quoted lower detection limit of the analytical method. The results of the on -

7

going analytical quality control program are evaluated and reported to Gold X2 by Orix

Geoscience Inc.

Qualified Person

Peter Flindell, PGeo, MAusIMM, MAIG, Vice- President, Exploration, of the Company, and a

qualified person under National Instrument 43-101 – Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects,

has approved the scientific and technical information contained in this news release.

Mr. Flindell has verified the data disclosed. To verify the information related to the winter drill

program at the Moss Gold Project, Mr. Flindell has visited the property several times; discussed

and reviewed logging, sampling, bulk density, core cutting and sample shipping processes with

responsible site staff; discussed and reviewed assay and QA/QC results with responsible

personnel; and reviewed supporting documentation, including drill hole location and orientation

and significant assay interval calculations. He has also overseen the Company’s health and safety

policies in the field to ensure full compliance, and consulted with the Project’s host indigenous

communities on the planning and implementation of the drill program, particularly with respect to

its impact on the environment and the Company’s remediation protocols.

About Gold X2 Mining

Gold X2 is a growth -oriented gold company focused on delivering long- term shareholder and

stakeholder value through the acquisition and advancement of primary gold assets in tier -one

jurisdictions. It is led by the ex -global head of structural geology for the world’s largest gold

company and backed by one of Canada’s pre- eminent private equity firms. The Company’s

current focus is the advanced stage 100% owned Moss Gold Project which is positioned in

Ontario, Canada, with direct access from the Trans -Canada Highway, hydroelectric power near

site, supportive local communities and skilled workforce. The Company has invested over $100

million of new capital and completed approximately 100,000 meters of drilling on the Moss Gold

Project, which, in aggregate, has had over 300,000 meters of drilling. The 2026 updated NI 43 -

101 mineral resource estimate (“MRE”) for the Moss and East Coldstream Deposits has expanded

to 2.458 million ounces of Indicated gold resources at 1.04 g/t Au, contained within 73.8 million

tonnes and 4.209 million ounces of Inferred gold resources at 0.97 g/t Au contained within 134.7

million tonnes. The Moss Deposit also has a silver MRE of 3.160 million ounces of indicated silver

resources at 1.53 g/t Ag contained within 64.3 Mt and 6.273 mill ion ounces of inferred silver

resources at 1.55 g/t Ag contained within 125.9 Mt. Results of a preliminary economic assessment

(“PEA”) of the Moss Gold Project suggest the potential for the deposit to support a long-life mining

operation with a strong production profile and low production costs. The MRE and PEA are

supported by a NI 43-101 technical report for the Moss Gold Project which will be filed on SEDAR+

(www.sedarplus.ca) and the Company’s website by March 12, 2026. For more information, please

visit SEDAR+ (www.sedarplus.ca) and the Company’s website (www.goldx2.com).

For More Information – Please Contact:

Michael Henrichsen

President, Chief Executive Officer and Director

Gold X2 Mining Inc.

E: [email protected]

W: www.goldx2.com

T: 1-604-404-4335

8

Neither the TSXV nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in the policies of

the TSXV) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release.

Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

This news release contains statements that constitute “forward-looking statements.” Such forward

looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may

cause the Company’s actual results, performance or achievements, or developments to differ

materially from the anticipated results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by

such forward- looking statements. Forward looking statements are statements that are not

historical facts and are generally, but not always, identified by the words “expects,” “plans,”

“anticipates,” “believes,” “intends,” “estimates,” “projects,” “potential” and similar expressions, or

that events or conditions “will,” “would,” “may,” “could” or “should” occur. Forward -looking

statements in this news release include, among others, statements relating to expectations

regarding the exploration and development of the Moss Gold Project; the potential mineralization

at the Moss Gold Project based on the winter drill program, including the potential for additional

mineral resources; the enhancement of the Moss Gold Project; statements regarding the

Company’s future drill plans, including the expected benefits and results thereof; that the Superion

target has the potential to significantly add to the current mineral resource estimate within the top

200 meters from surface with continued drilling and to reduce the overall strip ratio of the deposit;

the potential for resource growth at Moss and the fact that the results have the potential to

significantly impact the economic performance of the deposit moving forward; the potential for a

much larger mineralized system and that it will be pursued in the near future through

additional drilling; and other statements that are not historical facts.

By their nature, forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and

other factors which may cause our actual results, performance or achievements, or other future

events, to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed

or implied by such forward- looking statements. Such factors and risks include, among others:

uncertainty and variation in the estimation of mineral resources; risks related to exploration,

development, and operation activities; exploration and development of the Moss Gold Project will

not be undertaken as anticipated; the Company may require additional financing from time to time

in order to continue its operations which may not be available when needed or on acceptable

terms and conditions acceptable; the economic performance of the deposit may not be consistent

with management’s expectations; the Company’s exploration work may not deliver the results

expected; the fluctuating price of gold; unknown l iabilities in connection with acquisitions ;

compliance with extensive government regulation; delays in obtaining or failure to obtain

governmental permits, or non- compliance with permits; environmental and other regulatory

requirements; domestic and foreign laws and regulations could adversely affect the Company’s

business and results of operations; risks related to natural disasters, terrorist acts, health crises,

and other disruptions and dislocations; global financial conditions; uninsured risks; climate change

risks; competition from other companies and individuals; conflicts of interest; risks related to

compliance with anti- corruption laws; the Company’s limited operating history; intervention by

non-governmental organizations; outside contractor risks; the stock markets have experienced

volatility that often has been unrelated to the performance of companies and these fluctuations

may adversely affect the price of the Company’s securities, regardless of its operating

performance; the Superion target may not add to the current mineral resource; and other risks

associated with executing the Company’s objectives and strategies as well as those risk factors

discussed in the Company’s continuous disclosure documents filed under the Company’s

SEDAR+ profile at www.sedarplus.ca.