Saturday, September 26, 2026
MiningNewsTerminal
Saturday, September 26, 2026 Admin

APGO.V ·

166 Million Ounces of Silver Declared IN Calico Project Maiden Resource Estimate Substantial Resource Growth Opportunities Confirmed

Resource Estimates

*For the purposes of NI 43-101 reporting, the Waterloo and Langtry projects are now considered to be part of an expanded Calico Project, based on the reasonable expectation

that if put into production, the deposits would likely share common infrastructure.

- 1 -

166 MILLION OUNCES OF SILVER DECLARED IN CALICO PROJECT

MAIDEN RESOURCE ESTIMATE

SUBSTANTIAL RESOURCE GROWTH OPPORTUNITIES CONFIRMED

VANCOUVER, British Columbia, February 9, 2022 – Apollo Silver Corp. (“Apollo” or the

“Company”) (TSX.V:APGO, OTCQB:APGOF, Frankfurt:6ZF0) is pleased to announce its Maiden

National Instrument (“ NI”) 43-101 Mineral Resource Estimates (“ MRE”) for the Waterloo and

Langtry silver properties, now collectively referred to as the Calico Silver Project1 (“Calico” or the

“Project”), located in San Bernardino County, California. An Inferred resource estimate of 166

million ounces (“Moz”) of silver contained in 58.1 million tonnes (“Mt”) at an average grade

of 89 grams per tonne (“g/t”) has been defined at Calico by Derek Loveday, P.Geo., of Stantec

Consulting Services Ltd. (“Stantec”), the Company’s independent Qualified Person.

“This resource estimate represents the achievement of a significant milestone,” Apollo CEO, Tom

Peregoodoff, commented. “The outcome we are announcing today confirms Calico as one of the

largest undeveloped silver deposits in the USA and positions Calico as one of the largest globally.

The conservative cut-off grade, low strip ratio, and coherent distribution of silver mineralization

provide a solid foundation for Apollo to advance the project. Calico represents an exciting

development opportunity and provides low risk leverage to future silver prices. For investors

looking for exposure to silver in a Tier 1 jurisdiction, Calico represents a compelling opportunity.”

RESOURCE HIGHLIGHTS

 Robust Inferred MRE of 166 Moz silver contained in 58.1 Mt at an average grade of

89 g/t silver for Calico at a 50 g/t cut-off grade (see Table 1):

o Includes high-grade subset of 71 Moz silver contained in 15.9 Mt at an average grade

of 139 g/t silver.

o The MRE is an optimized pit-constrained estimate supported by 42,091 m (138,094 ft)

of historic drilling in 438 holes and incorporates recent geologic mapping and

modeling.

Table 1: Calico Project Inferred Mineral Resource Estimate at a 50 g/t Ag Cut-Off Grade. Effective Jan 28, 2021.

Class Deposit

Imperial Units Metric Units Strip

Ratio

(t:t)

Contained Silver

Volume

Million

(yd3)

Tons

Million

(st)

Ag

Grade

(oz/st)

Volume

Million

(m3)

Tonnes

Million

(t)

Ag

Grade

(g/t)

Million

(oz)

Inferred

Waterloo 20.8 42.8 2.98 15.9 38.9 93 2.2 116

Langtry 10.3 21.3 2.59 7.9 19.3 81 6.0 50

Calico

(Total) 31.2 64.1 2.85 23.8 58.1 89 3.4 166

 Base-case resource estimates reported in Table 1. Ounces are reported as troy ounces.

 Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum (“CIM”) definitions are followed for classification of the Mineral Resource.

 Prospects for eventual economic extraction determined using surface mining operating costs of US$2.50/st, processing costs of US$29.00/st and

silver price of US$23.00/oz.

 Specific gravity for the mineralized zone is fixed at 2.44 kg/m 3 (13.13 ft3/st). Silver grade was capped at 400 g/t only for Waterloo estimation.

 Resources are constrained to within an economic pit shell targeting mineralized blocks with a minimum of 50 ppm (50 g/t) silver.

 Totals may not represent the sum of the parts due to rounding.

 The Mineral Resource estimate has been prepared by Derek Loveday, P. Geo. of Stantec Consulting Services Ltd. in conformance with CIM

“Estimation of Mineral Resource and Mineral Reserves Best Practices” guidelines and are reported in accordance with the Canadian Securities

Administrators NI 43-101. Mineral resources are not mineral reserves and do not have demonstrated economic viability. There is no certainty that

any mineral resource will be converted into a mineral reserve .

- 2 -

 Optimized pit-constrained resource uses conservative cut-off grade of 50 g/t silver

o The base-case cut-off grade (“ COG”) was determined using the following

assumptions:

 Silver price of US$23 per troy ounce (“ oz”)

 Processing costs of US$29 per short ton (“ st”).

 Mining costs of US$2.50/st

 Silver recovery of 80%

o Silver price was determined by averaging the price from the last 24 months up to

December 31, 2021, based on data from the World Bank. Processing cost was

based on published estimates for similar deposit types, cross-checked against

historical processing costs determined by ASARCO in their 1980 historical

feasibility study for Waterloo, and adjusted for inflation to 2022 prices. Increased

silver prices, optimised processing parameters and/or improved silver recoveries

will all impact the COG and the resultant MRE.

 Resource estimates comprise oxide mineralization only

o The MRE is entirely contained within an extensive, near-surface oxidized silver

mineralized zone that shows excellent continuity at both Waterloo and Langtry.

o The depth of the oxide/sulphide boundary below the current depth extent of the

resource is poorly constrained, presenting opportunities to define additional oxide

resource at depth. See Growth Opportunities section below.

 High continuity of shallow mineralization amenable to bulk mining methods

o The near-surface resource is calculated to a maximum depth below surface of

~125 m (415 ft) at Waterloo and 146 m (480 ft) at Langtry. Using conservative

open pit optimization to determine reasonable prospects for economic extraction,

the calculated waste to mineralized zone ratio for Waterloo is 2.2:1.

o Drilling demonstrates that mineralization is continuous and extensive: at Waterloo

it extends along a strike length of 1,860 m (6,100 ft), and 1,250 m (4,100 ft) at

Langtry.

 Significant resource growth opportunities identified

o Untested silver host stratigraphy identified below ~125 m (415 ft) within current

resource extents and along strike at both Waterloo and Langtry.

o Expansion of high-grade silver mineralization.

o Gold and barite both have potential to make meaningful contribution.

 Clear path to resource advancement identified

o 2022 drill program designed to increase resource confidence and expand metal

inventory.

o Metallurgical testing program defined. Results are expected in Q3 of 2022.

Refer to the Appendix for images of the Waterloo and Langtry mineral resource estimate block

models.

“I am very pleased with the outcome of our MRE,” Apollo Vice President Exploration and Resource

Development, Cathy Fitzgerald, commented. “Through this process we have confirmed the silver

mineralization at Calico and firmly established that it is continuous over extensive strike lengths

- 3 -

at both the Waterloo and Langtry deposits. Our teams’ focus now turns to drill testing the important

resource growth opportunities that this work has confirmed and to upgrading the confidence in

the current silver MRE. The upcoming, fully permitted drill program, together with the metallurgical

work program we are commencing, will put us in an excellent position to update the MRE and

commence initial engineering studies later this year.”

GROWTH OPPORTUNITIES

 Several opportunities exist at Calico to expand silver mineralization within and

near the current MRE footprint:

o Historical drilling is shallow (average drill hole depth at Waterloo was 73 m (240 ft)

and at Langtry was 128 m (420 ft)). A number of holes terminated prior to

intersecting the footwall contact and/or ended in mineralization. The opportunity

exists to test for additional silver mineralization at depth within the mineralized

Barstow formation.

o There are indications that footwall Pickhandle formation volcaniclastic rocks may

also host disseminated silver mineralization. These remain poorly tested.

o At Langtry, extensive Quaternary cover is present, and many areas remain

untested.

o Across the Project, several areas within or near the current MRE envelope have

not been drill tested and have high potential to host silver mineralization.

o High-grade silver feeder zones require further drill testing and may add additional

+100 g/t silver mineralization.

 Opportunity exists to expand the mineral inventory by defining the extent of gold

and barite mineralization:

o The extent of gold mineralization remains poorly constrained. Drilling on the

Waterloo property by previous operator Pan American Minerals Inc., identified a

gold mineralized horizon 2 km northwest of the historical gold producing Burcham

mine. This drilling intersected 25 m (true thickness) of 0.59 g/t at 132.60 m below

surface, including 1.52 m of 5.52 g/t Au. This horizon is 60 m wide and 110 m in

length (down-dip) and open in all directions. There is potential for meaningful gold

mineralization along the entire 2.2 km long contact for which most historic drill

holes did not test (see news release from January 11, 2022).

o Extent of barite mineralization remains poorly constrained. Historic assay

techniques both at Waterloo and Langtry tended to under report barium because

it was not consistently analyzed using appropriate methods. Analysis of historical

pulps and duplicates along with new drilling material using ideal methods will be

critical in defining the barite mineralization so that it may potentially be included in

a MRE update.

RESOURCE ESTIMATION METHODOLOGY

The MRE was prepared in accordance with the requirements of the Canadian Institute of Mining

Metallurgy and Petroleum’s (“CIM”) National Instrument 43-101 (“NI 43-101”) adopted May 2014.

Mineral Resources are not Mineral Reserves as they do not have demonstrated economic

- 4 -

viability. The quantity and grade of reported Inferred MRE are uncertain in nature as there has

been insufficient exploration to define these Inferred Resources as Indicated or Measured.

The MRE considered drilling information up to and including the most recently completed

programs in 2012 and geological information from Apollo’s 2021 activities. Drilling information

included exploration drilling records for a total of 438 drill holes; 255 holes, 18,626 m (61,108) at

Waterloo and 183 holes, 23,465 m (76,986 ft) at Langtry. Nominal drill hole spacing is 40 x 45 m

(140 x 150 ft) at Waterloo and 50 x 60 m (160 x 200 ft at Langtry. Average drill hole depths at

Waterloo were 73 m (240 ft) and at Langtry 128 m (420 ft). Most holes are vertically oriented

reverse circulation holes, with six holes being diamond drill holes.

The resource estimate only considered silver. Previously, barite has been included in historic

resource statements however the assay technique used tended to under report barium

concentration, rendering some of the barium data unreliable. Gold was evaluated but not enough

data was available from drilling for it to be included in the MRE. Both represent growth

opportunities as previously discussed.

The 3D resource block models were oriented along regional strike of mineralization controlling

range front fault (Calico fault) and bedding, at approximately 045 degrees. Silver grades were

estimated using ordinary kriging into a standard 20 ft x 20 ft x 20 ft block model using 15 ft drill

hole composites and a bulk density of 2.44 kg/m3 (13.13 ft3/st). The block models are constrained

to the west by the Calico range front fault and to the east by the contact between the mineralized

Barstow formation sedimentary rocks and the Pickhandle formation rhyolitic rocks. Both structures

are mineralization controlling features. A grade capping evaluation was performed, and silver

grades were capped at 400 g/t Ag for the Waterloo resource estimate only. The near-surface

resource is calculated to a maximum depth of ~125 m (415 ft) at Waterloo and 146 m (480 ft) at

Langtry, both comprise only oxide mineralization. The calculated waste to ore ratio for Waterloo

is 2.2:1 and for Langtry is 6:1.

Verification of exploration data used for MRE was performed by the independent Qualified

Person. The MRE was internally audited and peer reviewed by Stantec prior to being released to

Apollo and being declared final. Additionally, Apollo completed an internal review of the MRE as

supplied by Stantec. A full description of the data and project verification process will be detailed

in the technical report for the MRE, which will be prepared in accordance with NI 43-101

Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects and filed within 45 days of this news release on

Apollo’s website and on SEDAR at www.sedar.com.

Reasonable Prospects for Economic Extraction and COG Sensitivities

Reasonable prospects for eventual economic extraction were assessed by calculating a base-

case COG for silver at 50 g/t. This was achieved by estimating a surface mining operating cost of

US$2.50/st, processing operating cost of US$29.00/st and silver price of US$23.00/oz. Block

revenue estimates for silver grade blocks greater than 50 g/t, less surface mining costs, were

used to generate an optimized Lerchs-Grossman economic pit shell at constant slope of 45

degrees and constrained to within the property claim boundaries.

The processing cost chosen for the MRE was based on published estimates for similar deposit

types and cross checked against historical processing costs determined by ASARCO in their 1980

historical feasibility study for Waterloo, adjusted for inflation to 2022 prices. The silver price was

- 5 -

determined by averaging the price from the last 24 months up to end-December 2021, based on

data from the World Bank.

Variations in processing costs, silver price and silver recovery may impact COG and the resultant

MRE. A sensitivity analysis was undertaken to examine the impacts of changing these variables

on the MRE at Calico (see Table 2).

Table 2: Sensitivity analysis of the grade and tonnage relationships at varying pit-constrained cut-

off grades for the Calico project. Effective January 28, 2022.

Classification Silver

COG

(g/t)

Imperial Units Metric Units

Strip

Ratio

(t:t)

Contained

Silver

Volume

Million

(yd3)

Tons

Million

(st)

Ag

Grade

(oz/st)

Volume

Million

(m3)

Tonnes

Million

(t)

Ag

Grade

(g/t)

Million (oz)

Waterloo Pit Constrained Silver Mineral Resource Estimate

Inferred

≥ 25.0 27.6 56.8 2.54 21.1 51.5 79 0.4 131

≥ 50.0 20.8 42.8 2.98 15.9 38.9 93 2.2 116

≥ 75.0 12.2 25.1 3.69 9.3 22.8 115 6.2 84

≥ 100.0 6.7 13.8 4.43 5.1 12.5 138 13.8 56

Langtry Pit Constrained Silver Mineral Resource Estimate

Inferred

≥ 25.0 18.5 38.0 1.97 14.1 34.4 61 1.9 68

≥ 50.0 10.3 21.3 2.59 7.9 19.3 81 6.0 50

≥ 75.0 4.3 8.9 3.47 3.3 8.1 108 18.0 28

≥ 100.0 1.8 3.7 4.47 1.4 3.4 139 46.4 15

Calico Project Pit Constrained Silver Mineral Resource Estimate

Inferred

≥ 25.0 46.1 94.8 2.31 35.2 86.0 72 1.0 199

≥ 50.0 31.2 64.1 2.85 23.8 58.1 89 3.4 166

≥ 75.0 16.5 34.0 3.63 12.6 30.8 113 9.2 112

≥ 100.0 8.5 17.6 4.44 6.5 15.9 139 20.8 71

 Base-case resource estimates reported in Table 1. Ounces are reported as troy ounces.

 Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum (“CIM”) definitions are followed for classification of the Mineral Resource.

 Prospects for eventual economic extraction determined using surface mining operating costs of US$2.50/st, processing costs of

US$29.00/st and silver price of US$23.00/oz.

 Specific gravity for the mineralized zone is fixed at 2.44 kg/m 3 (13.13 ft3/ton). Silver grade was capped at 400 g/t only for Waterloo estimation.

 Resources are constrained to within an economic pit shell targeting mineralized blocks with a minimum of 50 ppm (50 g/t) silver.

 Totals may not represent the sum of the parts due to rounding.

 The Mineral Resource estimate has been prepared by Derek Loveday, P. Geo. of Stantec Consulting Services Ltd. in conformance

with CIM “Estimation of Mineral Resource and Mineral Reserves Best Practices” guidelines and are reported in accordance with the

Canadian Securities Administrators NI 43-101. Mineral resources are not mineral reserves and do not have demonstrated economic

viability. There is no certainty that any mineral resource will be converted into a mineral reserve.

ABOUT THE CALICO PROJECT

Location

The Project is located in San Bernardino County, California and comprises the adjacent Waterloo

and Langtry properties which total 2,950 acres. The Project is 15 kilometers (9 miles) from the

city of Barstow and has an extensive private gravel road network spanning the property. There is

commercial electric power within 5 kilometres (3 miles) of the Project.

- 6 -

Geology and Mineralization at Calico

The Calico Project is situated in the southern Calico Mountains of the Mojave Desert, in the south-

western region of the Basin and Range tectonic province. This mountain range is a 15 km (9 mile)

long northwest-southeast trending range dominantly composed of Tertiary (Miocene) volcanics,

volcaniclastics, sedimentary rocks and dacitic intrusions. Mineralization at Calico comprises high-

level low-sulfidation silver-dominant epithermal vein-type and disseminated-style deposits

associated with northwest-trending faults and fracture zones and mid-Tertiary volcanic activity.

The Project represents a district-scale mineral system endowment with approximately 6,000

metres (19,685 feet) in mineralized strike length controlled by Apollo. Oxidized, disseminated and

stockwork-style mineralization is primarily hosted in the Barstow sedimentary formation and is the

focus of this MRE.

QUALIFIED PERSONS

Derek Loveday, P.Geo., of Stantec Consulting Services Ltd., is an independent Qualified Person

as defined by NI 43-101 Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects. Mr. Loveday has supervised

and approved the technical contents of this news release as it pertains to the disclosed Mineral

Resource Estimates. Mr. Loveday is a registered Professional Geoscientist, registered in Alberta,

Canada.

The scientific and technical data contained in this news release was also reviewed, and approved

by Cathy Fitzgerald, P.Geo., Apollo’s Vice President Exploration and Resource Development, a

Qualified Person as defined by NI 43-101 Standards of Disclosure for Minerals Projects. Ms.

Fitzgerald is a registered Professional Geoscientist in British Columbia, Canada.

Please visit www.apollosilver.com for further information.

ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

Tom Peregoodoff

Chief Executive Officer

For further information, please contact:

Tom Peregoodoff

Chief Executive Officer

Telephone: +1 (604) 428-6128

[email protected]

About Apollo Silver Corp.

Apollo Silver Corp. has assembled an experienced and technically strong leadership team who

have joined to advance world class precious metals projects in tier-one jurisdictions. The

Company is focused on advancing its portfolio of two significant silver exploration and resource

development projects, the Calico Silver Project, in San Bernardino California and Silver District

Project in Arizona.

- 7 -

Neither TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in

policies of the TSX Venture Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this

release.

Cautionary Statement Regarding “Forward-Looking” Information

This news release includes “forward-looking statements” and “forward-looking information” within the meaning of

Canadian securities legislation. All statements included in this news release, other than statements of historical

fact, are forward-looking statements including, without limitation, statements with respect to the potential of the

Calico Project; the potential for identification of gold and barite resources at Calico; the potential to expand the

resource estimate and upgrade its confidence level, including prospective mineralization on strike and at depth.

Forward-looking statements include predictions, projections and forecasts and are often, but not always,

identified by the use of words such as “anticipate”, “believe”, “plan”, “estimate”, “expect”, “potential”, “target”,

“budget” and “intend” and statements that an event or result “may”, “will”, “should”, “could” or “might” occur or be

achieved and other similar expressions and includes the negatives thereof.

Forward-looking statements are based on the reasonable assumptions, estimates, analysis and opinions of the

management of the Company made in light of its experience and its perception of trends, current conditions and

expected developments, as well as other factors that management of the Company believes to be relevant and

reasonable in the circumstances at the date that such statements are made. Forward-looking information is

based on reasonable assumptions that have been made by the Company as at the date of such information and

is subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may have caused actual results, level

of activity, performance or achievements of the Company to be materially different from those expressed or

implied by such forward-looking information, including but not limited to: risks associated with mineral exploration

and development; metal and mineral prices; availability of capital; accuracy of the Company’s projections and

estimates; realization of mineral resource estimates, interest and exchange rates; competition; stock price

fluctuations; availability of drilling equipment and access; actual results of current exploration activities;

government regulation; political or economic developments; environmental risks; insurance risks; capital

expenditures; operating or technical difficulties in connection with development activities; personnel relations;

contests over title to properties; changes in project parameters as plans continue to be refined; and impact of

the COVID-19 pandemic. The estimate of mineral resources may be materially affected by environmental,

permitting, legal, title, taxation, sociopolitical, marketing, or other relevant issues. The quantity and grade of

reported inferred mineral resources in this estimation are uncertain in nature and there has been insufficient

exploration to define these inferred mineral resources as an indicated or measured mineral resource and it is

uncertain if further exploration will result in upgrading them to an indicated or measured mineral resource

category. Forward-looking statements are based on assumptions management believes to be reasonable,

including but not limited to the price of silver, gold and barite; the demand for silver, gold and barite; the ability to

carry on exploration and development activities; the timely receipt of any required approvals; the ability to obtain

qualified personnel, equipment and services in a timely and cost-efficient manner; the ability to operate in a safe,

efficient and effective matter; and the regulatory framework regarding environmental matters, and such other

assumptions and factors as set out herein. Although the Company has attempted to identify important factors

that could cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in forward-looking information, there may

be other factors that cause results not to be as anticipated, estimated or intended. There can be no assurance

that forward-looking statements will prove to be accurate and actual results, and future events could differ

materially from those anticipated in such statements. Accordingly, readers should not place undue reliance on

forward looking information contained herein, except in accordance with applicable securities laws. The forward-

looking information contained herein is presented for the purpose of assisting investors in understanding the

Company’s expected financial and operational performance and the Company’s plans and objectives and may

not be appropriate for other purposes. The Company does not undertake to update any forward-looking

information, except in accordance with applicable securities laws.

- 8 -

Appendix 1: Figures

Figure 1: Calico Project Inferred Mineral Resource: Block Model of the Waterloo Deposit.

Figure 2: Calico Project Inferred Mineral Resource: Waterloo Block Model Cross Section.