Saturday, September 26, 2026
MiningNewsTerminal
Saturday, September 26, 2026 Admin

APGO.V ·

Apollo Announces Surface Sampling Results Further Extending Gold Mineralization at Calico Final Results of Phase 1 2022 Drilling Program Reported

Drill Results Exploration Programs

1

Apollo Announces Surface Sampling Results Further Extending Gold

Mineralization at Calico

Final Results of Phase 1 2022 Drilling Program Reported

Vancouver, British Columbia, September 14, 2022 – Apollo Silver Corp. (“Apollo” or the “Company”)

(TSX.V:APGO, OTCQB:APGOF, Frankfurt:6ZF0) is pleased to report assay results from a surficial rock

grab sampling program and remaining assays from the Phase 1 2022 Drill Program at the Calico Silver

Project (“Calico” or the “ Project”) located in San Bernardino County, California. The surficial rock grab

sampling and drilling programs are part of the 2022 Calico Technical Program, which aims to upgrade and

expand the previously announced Inferred M ineral Resource Estimate (“ MRE”) of 166 million ounces

(“Moz”) of silver (“Ag”) contained in 58.1 million tonnes (“Mt”) at an average grade of 89 grams per

tonne (“g/t”) (see news release dated February 9, 2022)1.

A surficial rock grab sampling program completed recently in the Burcham area, 225 metres (“m”) south of

the Waterloo resource area, returned 34 rock samples with 0.1 g/t or more gold (“ Au”), showing that this

region represents a significant gold mineralized prospect outside the current MRE (see Figure 1 below) .

The surface program was designed to follow up on historic work completed in this area between

approximately 1940 and 1989, showing the area exhibited gold mineralization across a broad area. Notable

new surface rock samples reported include 6.280 g/t Au, 2.470 g/t Au, 2.410 g/t Au, and 2.24 0 g/t Au

from subvertical, northwest oriented structures. These results, combined with drilling results to date confirm

that gold mineralization is present over an extensive area at Waterloo (900 m X 400 m) over a variably thick

horizon (approximately 5 m to 45 m true thickness).

In addition to these surface samples, final Phase 1 reverse circulation (“ RC”) drilling assay results show

that seven of nine holes reported herein intersected gold at the Barstow -Pickhandle contact. This latest

drilling shows that gold mineralization is spatially continuous between the Waterloo Ag resource (116 Moz

Ag contained in 38.9 Mt at an average grade of 93 g/t Ag) and Burcham areas. Gold mineralization

represents a compelling prospect with the latest results providing further support for adding to the metal

inventory for the upcoming mineral resource estimate update. These latest results will be followed up in

Phase 2 of the 2022 Calico Technical Program which is expected to recommence in late-September.

As with all previously reported drilling results from the Phase 1 2022 Drill Program, silver mineralization

correlates well with predicted block model grades , with three drill holes intersecting silver mineralization

above the 50 g/t Ag cut-off grade (“COG”) used for the MRE, and one drill hole intersecting silver in excess

of 500 g/t Ag.

GOLD HIGHLIGHTS

Hole W22-RC-030

• 0.225 g/t Au over 27.0 m from 131.5 m depth down hole;

o Including 0.850 g/t Au over 1.5 m from 133.0 m down hole;

Hole W22-RC-036

• 0.315 g/t Au over 6.0 m from 82.0 m down hole;

o Including 0.524 g/t Au over 1.5 m from 82.0 m down hole;

Hole W22-RC-037

• 0.376 g/t Au over 16.5 m from 71.5 m depth down hole;

o including 0.672 g/t Au over 7.5 m from 76.0 m depth down hole;

o and including 1.200 g/t Au over 1.5 m from 82.0 m depth down hole.

2

Gold assays are reported at a 0.1 g/t gold cut -off grade with up to 4.5 m dilution and are uncapped. Lengths

are down hole lengths and may not represent true widths.

SILVER HIGHLIGHTS

Hole W22-RC-029

• 151 g/t Ag over 94.5 m from 1.0 m depth down hole;

o including 289 g/t Ag over 1.5 m from 5.5 m depth down hole;

o including 257 g/t Ag over 6.0 m from 61.0 m depth down hole; and

o including 734 g/t Ag over 1.5 m from 86.5 m depth down hole.

Hole W22-RC-030

• 92 g/t Ag over 40.0 m from surface; and

• 53 g/t Ag over 6.0 m from 50.5 m depth down hole.

Hole W22-RC-031

• 123 g/t Ag over 26.5 m from surface.

Silver assays are reported at a 50 g/t silver COG with up to 4.5 m dilution and are uncapped. Lengths

are down hole lengths and may not represent true widths.

1The MRE has been prepared by Derek Loveday, P. Geo. of Stantec Consulting Services Ltd., in conformance with Canadian Institute

of Mining and Metallurgy’s “Estimation of Mineral Resource and Mineral Reserves Best Practices” guidelines and are reported i n

accordance with the Canadian Securities Administrators NI 43-101. It is effective January 28, 2022. Mineral resources are not mineral

reserves and do not have demonstrated economic viability. There is no certainty that any mineral resource will be converted into a

mineral reserve. Mr. Loveday is an independent Qualified Person for Apollo’s MRE. Please refer to the Company’s news release dated

February 9, 2022, for more information.

“These results have confirmed the significant gold potential at Calico ” commented Apollo CEO Tom

Peregoodoff. “The surficial sampling combined with Apollo’s drilling have defined an extensive gold horizon

that has never been fully delineated by previous operators. This horizon has the potential to add significant

value to the Calico silver resource and further work is planned as part of the second phase of our 2022

Calico Technical P rogram to define this zone such that gold can be included in the upcoming revised

resource estimate. With drilling set to commence this month, we are on track to deliver a revised resource

estimate in early 2023 and will commence engineering studies shortly thereafter.”

SURFACE SAMPLING RESULTS

The surface rock grab sampling program was undertaken in July 2022 over a three- day period. A total of

46 rock samples were collected to confirm the historically reported disseminated nature of gold in the basal

Barstow formation rocks in an area 225 m southeast of the Waterloo resource. This area, referred to as the

Burcham area, hosted the Burcham mine, the only mine in the Calico mining district that produced gold as

its primary commodity. The mine was active in the 1940s and comprised two underground drifts that

exploited gold mineralized subvertical northwest oriented structures (refer to Figure 1) . Total production

figures are unknown. In 1985 and 1989, ASARCO completed 196.6 m of rotary drilling and 335.4 m of

diamond drilling and sampled the underground workings at Burcham to determine the extent of

mineralization in the Barstow-Pickhandle rocks. The new rock sample results follow up on and confirm that

work and show that discrete sub-vertical structures host gold with concentrations varying from 1 to over 6

g/t Au in bleached and brecciated fault gouge in Barstow formation siltstones. The broader rock package

across the sampled region (down to ~ 45 m depth) is mineralized with at least 0.1 g/t Au, hosted in variably

silicified (cherty), bleached bedding horizons in the Barstow formation siltstones and sandstones . Refer to

Figure 1 showing the distribution of surface rock samples reported herein.

3

Table 1: Surface rock grab sample results for samples above 0.5 g/t Au.

Sample ID Easting

(m)

Northing

(m)

Elevation

(m) Au (g/t) Ag (g/t)

E569062 511279 3867390 701 1.555 18

P715865 511316 3867460 717 2.470 27

P715873 511296 3867501 744 6.280 13

P715879 511290 3867536 753 0.572 13

P715881 511260 3867499 740 1.340 8

P715908 511436 3867429 737 2.240 39

P715910 511419 3867435 742 0.507 11

P715911 511422 3867437 743 2.410 65

The reader is cautioned that grab samples are selective by nature and do not necessarily

represent the true metal content of the mineralized zones. Complete rock sampling results are

available on the Company’s website.

Figure 1: Drill hole and surface rock sample locations map as reported September 14, 2022, for the 2022 Calico

Technical Program.

4

DRILLING ASSAY RESULTS

Results below are reported for the remaining drill holes from the Phase 1 2022 Drill P rogram. These nine

RC drill holes were completed between mid-J une and early -July 2022, bringing the results released to

market for the Phase 1 2022 Drill Program to a total of 42 holes (4,909.5 m), of the 44 holes completed

(5,021.0 m). Two drill holes (W22-RC-003 and W22-RC-004) were not assayed, as there was evidence of

material mixing during sampling at the drill rig. These two drill holes were re-drilled as holes W22-RC-03B

and W22-RC-04B (reported in news release dated June 29, 2022).

Of the nine holes reported herein, four were MRE infill holes targeting near surface silver, and five aimed

to target gold outside the southern margin of the current MRE. The holes targeting gold aimed to determine

if the gold hosted at the Barstow -Pickhandle contact was continuous between the Waterloo resource and

Burcham areas. Results show that it is continuous, and that the gold mineral ization extends up to 900 m

along strike. Refer to Figure 1 (above) and Table 2 (below) for drill hole locations and Table 3 (below) for

gold results from drill holes.

Three of the nine holes intersected silver mineralization at or above the mineral resource silver COG of 50

g/t Ag. As expected, holes W22-RC-036 through W22-RC -041 confirmed the MRE -predicted lower Ag

grade (< 50 g/t COG) in the southeast margins of the deposit and confirmed the continuous nature of Au in

this region. Refer to Figure 1 (above) and Table 2 (below ) for drill hole locations and information Table 4

(below) for silver assay results.

Table 2: Drill hole information for results reported September 14, 2022, for the 2022 Calico Technical Program.

Hole Easting

(m)

Northing

(m)

Elevation

(m)

Total

Depth (m)

Total

Depth (ft) Azimuth Dip

W22-RC-029 510753 3867840 786 202 663 0 -90

W22-RC-030 510844 3867775 785 172 564 247 -75

W22-RC-031 510908 3867764 786 142 466 0 -90

W22-RC-036 511069 3867538 757 139 456 0 -90

W22-RC-037 511114 3867560 753 154 505 0 -90

W22-RC-038 511158 3867607 756 31 102 0 -90

W22-RC-039 511101 3867598 777 109 358 0 -90

W22-RC-040 511033 3867577 774 165 540 0 -90

W22-RC-041 511094 3867568 763 115 377 0 -90

Note: Drill hole assay results are reported as received from the laboratory. Results are not necessarily received in the order holes

were drilled.

5

Table 3: Gold assay results reported September 14, 2022, for the 2022 Calico Technical Program.

Hole From

(m)

To

(m)

Interval

(m)

Au

(g/t)

W22-RC-029 No significant intercepts

W22-RC-030 131.5 158.5 27.0 0.225

including 133.0 134.5 1.5 0.850

W22-RC-031 85.0 88.0 3.0 0.220

W22-RC-036 82.0 88.0 6.0 0.315

including 82.0 83.5 1.5 0.524

W22-RC-037

71.5 88.0 16.5 0.376

including 76.0 83.5 7.5 0.672

and including 82.0 83.5 1.5 1.200

and 95.5 98.5 3.0 0.201

W22-RC-038 14.5 19.0 4.5 0.142

and 25.0 28.0 3.0 0.240

W22-RC-039

53.5 55.0 1.5 0.142

and 85.0 86.5 1.5 0.235

and 100.0 101.5 1.5 0.104

W22-RC-040 No significant intercepts

W22-RC-041 74.5 76.0 1.5 0.112

and 100.0 115.0 15.0 0.157

Gold intercepts calculated using 0.1 g/t cut- off grade with higher-grade intercepts calculated at 0.5 g/t cut- off grade with a maximum of 4.5

m internal dilution and are uncapped. Intercepts are down hole lengths and may not represent true widths.

Table 4: Silver assay results reported September 14, 2022, for the 2022 Calico Technical Program.

Hole From

(m) To (m) Interval

(m)

Ag

(g/t)

Ag

(opt*)

W22-RC-029

1.0 95.5 94.5 151 4.4

including 5.5 7.0 1.5 289 8.4

including 61.0 67.0 6.0 257 7.5

including 86.5 88.0 1.5 734 21.4

W22-RC-030

0.0 40.0 40.0 92 2.7

and 50.5 56.5 6.0 53 1.6

W22-RC-031

0.0 26.5 26.5 123 3.6

and 85.0 86.5 1.5 59 1.7

W22-RC-036 No significant intercepts

W22-RC-037 No significant intercepts

W22-RC-038 No significant intercepts

W22-RC-039 No significant intercepts

W22-RC-040 No significant intercepts

W22-RC-041 No significant intercepts

Silver intercepts calculated using 50 g/t cut- off grade with significantly higher -grade intercepts reported at 250 g/t cut- off grade with a

maximum of 4.5 m internal dilution and are uncapped. Intercepts are down hole lengths and may not represent true widths. *Troy ounces

per US short ton.

6

SAMPLING AND QUALITY ASSURANCE/QUALITY CONTROL

Drilling is being undertaken by Cooper Drilling LLC, of Monte V ista, C olorado. RC chip samples were

collected in 1.5 m lifts with 15 lb representative samples sent for analysis. Grab samples were collected in

the field and a 2 kg representative sample was sent for analysis. Representative chip samples were also

collected for logging purposes (lithology, alteration, mineralization) , detailed photography and analysis by

portable X -Ray Fluorescence. RC and rock grab samples are catalogued and securely stored in a

warehouse facility in Barstow, C alifornia until they are ready for secure s hipment to ALS Global -

Geochemistry in Reno, Nevada (“ALS Reno”) for sample preparation and gold analysis. ALS Reno may

selectively ship samples to other laboratories, such as ALS Global -Geochemistry in Carson City, Nevada

(“ALS Carson City”) for preparation. After preparation, splits of prepared pulps are securely shipped to

ALS Vancouver, British Columbia for multi-element analysis.

Samples were prepared at either ALS Reno or ALS Carson City (Prep-31 package) with each sample

crushed to better than 70% passing a 2 mm (Tyler 9 mesh, U.S. Std. No.10) screen. A split of up to 250 g

is taken and pulverized to better than 85% passing a 75-micron (Tyler 200 mesh, U.S. Std. No. 200) screen.

All RC samples were analyzed for 48 elements via ICP-MS following a four-acid digestion with reportable

ranges for silver of 0.01 to 100 ppm (method ME-MS61). Over-range samples analyzed for silver were re-

submitted for analysis using a four -acid digestion and ICP -AES finish with a silver range of 1-1,500 ppm

(method Ag-OG62). When results were over 400 ppm silver, they were re-su bmitted for analysis by fire

assay with a gravimetric finish using a 30 g nominal sample weight with reportable silver range of 5-10,000

ppm (method Ag-GRA21). Over -range samples analyzed for copper, lead and zinc were re-submitted for

analysis using a four-acid digestion and ICP-AES finish (method OG62) with range of 0.001-50% for copper,

0.001-20% for lead, and 0.001-30% for zinc. Gold was analyzed by fire assay with atomic absorption finish

(method Au -AA26) with a reportable range of 0.01-100 ppm Au. Of the 46 surface rock grab samples

collected, 36 were analyzed by method ME-MS-61 only, with the remaining 10 analyzed using complete

characterization via the CCP -PK05 method which includes whole rock analysis (ME -ICP06), ME-MS61,

single element trace method using aqua regia digestion and ICP-MS (ME-MS42) and rare earth elements

using method ME-ME81 which consist of lithium borate fusion followed by ICP-MS. All surface rock samples

were submitted for gold analysis by fire assay (Au-AA26). All analyses were completed at ALS Vancouver

except for gold by fire assay, which was completed at ALS Reno.

The Company maintains its own comprehensive quality assurance and quality control (“QA/QC ”) program

to ensure best practices in sample preparation and analysis for samples. The QA/QC program includes the

insertion and analysis of certified reference materials, commercial pulp blanks, preparation blanks, and field

duplicates to the laboratories. Apollo’s QA/QC program includes ongoing auditing of all laboratory results

from the laboratories. The Company’s Qualified Person is of the opinion that the sample preparation,

analytical, and security procedures followed are sufficient and reliable. The Company is not aware of any

drilling, sampling, recovery, or other factors that could materially affect the accuracy or reliability of the data

reported herein.

ABOUT THE PROJECT

Location

The Project is located in San Bernardino County, California and comprises the adjacent Waterloo and

Langtry properties which total 2,950 acres. The Project is 15 km (9 miles) from the city of Barstow and has

an extensive private gravel road network spanning the property. There is commercial electric power within

5 km (3 miles) of the Project.

7

Geology and Mineralization

The Project is situated in the southern Calico Mountains of the Mojave Desert, in the south-western region of

the Basin and Range tectonic province. This mountain range is a 15 km (9 mile) long northwest- southeast

trending range dominantly composed of Tertiary (Miocene) volcanics, volcaniclastics, sedimentary rocks

and dacitic intrusions. Mineralization at the Project comprises high-level low -sulfidation silver -dominant

epithermal vein-type and disseminated-style deposits associated with northwest-trending faults and fracture

zones and mid-Tertiary volcanic activity. The Project represents a district-scale mineral system endowment

with approximately 6,000 m (19,685 ft) in mineralized strike length controlled by Apollo. Oxidized,

disseminated and stockwork-style mineralization is primarily hosted in the Barstow sedimentary formation

and is the subject of the MRE.

QUALIFIED PERSONS

The scientific and technical data contained in this news release was reviewed, and approved by Cathy

Fitzgerald, M.Sc., P.Geo., Apollo’s Vice President Exploration and Resource Development, a Qualified Person

as defined by NI 43-101 Standards of Disclosure for Minerals Projects. Ms. Fitzgerald is a registered

Professional Geoscientist in British Columbia, Canada.

Please visit www.apollosilver.com for further information.

ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

Tom Peregoodoff

Chief Executive Officer

For further information, please contact:

Tom Peregoodoff

Chief Executive Officer

Telephone: +1 (604) 428-6128

[email protected]

About Apollo Silver Corp.

Apollo Silver Corp. has assembled an experienced and technically strong leadership team who have joined to advance

world class precious metals projects in tier-one jurisdictions. The Company is focused on advancing its portfolio of two

significant silver exploration and resource development projects, the Calico Silver Project, in San Bernardino County,

California and Silver District Project in La Paz County, Arizona.

Neither the TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in policies of the TSX

Venture Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release.

Cautionary Statement Regarding “Forward-Looking” Information

This news release includes “forward -looking statements” and “forward -looking information” within the meaning of

Canadian securities legislation. All statements included in this news release, other than statements of historical fact,

are forward-looking statements including, without limitation, statements with respect to the potential of the Calico

Project; the potential for identification of gold and barite resources at Calico; the potential to expand the resource

estimate and upgrade its confidence level, including prospective mineralization on strike and at depth; timing of drilling

and exploration activities. Forward- looking statements include predictions, projections and forecasts and are often,

but not always, identified by the use of words such as “anticipate”, “believe”, “plan”, “estimate”, “expect”, “potential”,

8

“target”, “budget” and “intend” and statements that an event or result “may”, “will”, “should”, “could” or “might” occur or

be achieved and other similar expressions and includes the negatives thereof.

Forward-looking statements are based on the reasonable assumptions, estimates, analysis, and opinions of the

management of the Company made in light of its experience and its perception of trends, current conditions and

expected developments , as well as other factors that management of the Company believes to be relevant and

reasonable in the circumstances at the date that such statements are made. Forward-looking information is based on

reasonable assumptions that have been made by the Compa ny as at the date of such information and is subject to

known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may have caused actual results, level of activity,

performance or achievements of the Company to be materially different from those expres sed or implied by such

forward-looking information, including but not limited to: risks associated with mineral exploration and development;

metal and mineral prices; availability of capital; accuracy of the Company’s projections and estimates; realization of

mineral resource estimates, interest and exchange rates; competition; stock price fluctuations; availability of drilling

equipment and access; actual results of current exploration activities; government regulation; political or economic

developments; environmental risks; insurance risks; capital expenditures; operating or technical difficulties in

connection with development activities; personnel relations; contests over title to properties; changes in project

parameters as plans continue to be refined; and impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. The estimate of mineral resources

may be materially affected by environmental, permitting, legal, title, taxation, sociopolitical, marketing, or other relevant

issues. The quantity and grade of reported inferred mineral resources in this estimation are uncertain in nature and

there has been insufficient exploration to define these inferred mineral resources as an indicated or measured mineral

resource and it is uncertain if further exploration will result in upgrading them to an indicated or measured mineral

resource category. Forward-looking statements are based on assumptions management believes to be reasonable,

including but not limited to the price of silver, gold and barite; the demand for silver, gold and barite; the ability to carry

on exploration and development activities; the timely receipt of any required approvals; the ability to obtain qualified

personnel, equipment and services in a timely and cost-efficient manner; the ability to operate in a safe, efficient and

effective matter; and the regulatory framework regarding environmental matters, and such other assumptions and

factors as set out herein. Although the Company has attempted to identify important factors that could cause actu al

results to differ materially from those contained in forward-looking information, there may be other factors that cause

results not to be as anticipated, estimated or intended. There can be no assurance that forward-looking statements will

prove to be accurate and actual results, and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such

statements. Accordingly, readers should not place undue reliance on forward looking information contained herein,

except in accordance with applicable securities laws. The forward-looking information contained herein is presented for

the purpose of assisting investors in understanding the Company’s expected financial and operational performance and

the Company’s plans and objectives and may not be appropriate for other purposes. The Company does not undertake

to update any forward-looking information, except in accordance with applicable securities laws.