Saturday, September 26, 2026
MiningNewsTerminal
Saturday, September 26, 2026 Admin

AIR.V ·

Clean Air Metals Intersects 41.0m Grading 13.2 g/t Pt.eq at the Current Project

Drill Results

1

Clean Air Metals Intersects 41.0m Grading 13.2

g/t Pt.eq at the Current Project

Thunder Bay, ON, March 4, 2025 – Clean Air Metals Inc. (“Clean Air Metals” or the

“Company”) (TSX.V: AIR; FRA: CKU; OTCQB: CLRMF) is pleased to announce the latest

results from its ongoing winter drilling program at its 100%-owned Thunder Bay North

Critical Minerals Project (“TBN”). The second set of assay results has confirmed that the

near-surface, high-grade mineralization at the Current deposit is more extensive and

significant than previously anticipated. Notably, one hole intersected 41.0 meters

grading 13.2 g/t Pt.eq including 10.0 meters with 1.57% Cu and 22.39 g/t Pt.eq. The

newly modeled shape of this high-grade area strongly resembles the “Ballroom”

structures associated with the JM Reef in the Stillwater Complex in Montana. The high-

grade zone intersected in hole CL25-005 and in several adjacent high-grade areas

remains open laterally and at depth, significantly enhancing the exploration potential

at the Current deposit. Assay results for the remaining seven holes are pending and will

be released once received.

Assay highlights:

• 41.0 m of 4.52 g/t Pt, 4.29 g/t Pd, 0.97% Cu and 0.52% Ni (13.20 g/t Pt.eq1;

4.42% Cu.eq2) from 110 m downhole in Hole CL25-005, including

o 5.75 g/t Pt, 5.37 g/t Pd, 1.18% Cu and 0.61% Ni (16.42 g/t Pt.eq1;

5.50% Cu.eq2) over 28.0m from 121.0 m, and

o 7.87 g/t Pt, 7.34 g/t Pd, 1.57% Cu and 0.90% Ni (22.39 g/t Pt.eq1 ;

7.50% Cu.eq2) over 10.0 m from 138.0 m

o 12.08 g/t Pt, 10.87 g/t Pd, 2.38% Cu and 1.05% Ni (33.30 g/t Pt.eq1

; 11.16% Cu.eq2) over 2.0 m from 146.0 m

Notes

1. Platinum equivalent are calculated as follows: Pt.eq = (Pt grade/31.1035 x $976 + Pd

grade x 31.1035 x 86.2% x $966 + Cu grade x 2204 x 95.9% x $4.25 + Ni grade x

2204 x 57% x 6.98 + Au grade/31.1035 x 85% x $2,939 + Ag grade/31.1035 x 65.2%

x $32.89) / $976 x 31.1035

2. Copper equivalents are calculated as follows: Cu.eq= (Cu grade x 2204 x $4.25 + Pt

grade x 31.1035 x 80.6% x $976 + Pd grade x 31.0135 x 86.2% x $966 + Ni grade x

2204 x 57% x $6.98 + Au grade/31.1035 x 85% x $2,9392 + Ag grade/31.1035 x

65.2% x $32.89) / $4.25 / 2204

Equivalents are based on the following recoveries Pt 80.6%, Pd 86.2%, Cu 95.9% Ni

57%, Au 85%, Ag 65.2%; and metal prices from February 20, 2025, US Spot; Pt $976,

Pd $966, Cu $4.25, Ni $6.98, Au $2939, Ag $32.89

2

Mike Garbutt, CEO of Clean Air Metals, remarked, “These latest results have validated

our belief that the Current deposit hosts more near-surface high-grade mineralization

than previously estimated. The impressive grade and significant thickness encountered

during the recent drilling programs provide additional support for establishing a more

robust, high-grade production model. These results have also highlighted the critical

importance of leveraging downhole geophysics to locate the highest-value

mineralization targets at Current and Escape as we continue to advance the Thunder

Bay North Project.”

Table 1. Assay results from reported holes

Hole ID From

(m)

To

(m)

Length

(m)

Pt

(g/t)

Pd

(g/t)

Cu

(%)

Ni

(%)

Pt+Pd

(g/t)

Cu+Ni

(%)

Pteq1

(g/t)

Cueq2

(%)

CL25-004 117 136 19.0 1.11 1.00 0.25 0.21 2.11 0.46 3.51 1.17

Incl 128 134 6.0 2.32 2.06 0.54 0.31 4.38 0.85 7.00 2.35

Incl 128 132 4.0 2.73 2.43 0.61 0.34 5.16 0.95 8.13 2.72

CL25-005 110.0 151.0 41.0 4.52 4.29 0.97 0.52 8.81 1.49 13.20 4.42

incl. 121.0 149.0 28.0 5.75 5.37 1.18 0.61 11.12 1.79 16.42 5.50

incl. 138.0 148.0 10.0 7.87 7.34 1.57 0.90 15.20 2.47 22.39 7.50

Incl. 146.0 148.0 2.0 12.08 10.87 2.38 1.05 22.95 3.42 33.30 11.16

CL25-006 125.0 140.5 15.5 2.72 2.48 0.65 0.35 5.20 0.99 8.26 2.77

Incl 126.0 135.5 9.5 2.95 2.70 0.68 0.35 5.65 1.03 8.80 2.95

Incl 130.0 135.5 5.5 3.95 3.68 0.95 0.47 7.63 1.42 11.80 3.85

The Winter 2025 drilling program is strategically designed to increase the size, number,

and grade of near-surface high-grade areas at the Current deposit, building on the

strong results from the Summer 2024 program. The latest findings, in conjunction with

earlier data, further validate the extension of mineralized zones beyond the scope of

the most recent resource model (NI 43-101 technical report on the Thunder Bay North

Project, Ontario, Canada, SLR Consulting Canada Ltd, June 19, 2023).

Unlike previous drilling, this hole intersected a high-grade zone carved into the footwall

of the deposit, indicating a more expansive distribution of mineralization than is

presently modeled. This result significantly alters the interpretation of the Current

deposit, as it suggests that areas previously considered outside the core mineralized

body may also host high-grade mineralization much like the irregular, high-

concentration zones seen in the "ballrooms" below the JM Reef of the Stillwater

Complex in Montana.

This discovery is pivotal for resource estimation, as it changes the parameters that will

be used to estimate the sulfide-rich, high-grade zones. The new understanding of

mineralization extending into the footwall and beyond the limits of previous models

calls for a reassessment of the resource potential, particularly in terms of accurately

capturing the extent of these higher-grade zones.

3

Furthermore, the potential for additional high-grade subzones in the region is

significant. With continued drilling and an increased density of borehole

electromagnetic (BHEM) surveys, we expect to identify new areas where mineralization

could mirror the high-grade characteristics observed in CL25-005. Increasing drill

density and utilizing BHEM to guide future drill targets will be essential to fully unlocking

the high-grade potential of the Current and Escape deposits and identifying similar

subzones that may have been missed by earlier exploration.

Figure 1. Plan view map showing drill hole locations for the ongoing 13-hole program

at the Current deposit.

Clean Air Metals’ Vice President of Exploration, Lionnel Djon, commented, “The

extension of high-grade mineralization into the footwall in hole CL25-005, combined

with the fact that it remains open to the southwest, highlight the clear opportunity to

increase the percentage of high-grade resource at Current. Drawing on the ballroom

analogy, we will continue to target thick and high-grade mineralization in and below the

existing mineralized shell. The use of BHEM surveys will be a critical tool in guiding our

next phase of drilling, allowing us to identify new conductive targets and better define

the full extent of the high-grade areas.”

4

Figure 2. 3D showing drill intersects and the location of the mineralized “Ballroom

structure” within the ultramafic conduit in the Lower Current Zone.

Table 2. Hole Coordinates

Hole ID Easting-

NAD83_16

(m)

Northing

NAD83_16

(m)

Elevation

(m)

Azimuth

(deg)

Dip

(deg)

Hole

length

(m)

CL25-004 357670 5402604 495 34.84 -84.59 165

CL25-005 357670 5402604 495 194.93 -84.43 165

CL25-006 357682 5402598 495 42.31 -84.05 165

Upcoming Investor Event

Clean Air Metals invites shareholders and interested parties to meet with Management

and the Technical team at the upcoming PDAC convention Core Shack (#3107B) on

March 4 and 5, 2025 at the Metro Toronto Convention Centre, Toronto.

Figure 3. Cross section showing along hole CL25-005. High grade mineralization

remains open to the southwest and likely beyond the current limits of the Current

conduit.

5

Qualified Person

Dr. Lionnel Djon, Ph.D., P.Geo., a Qualified Person under National Instrument 43-101

and Vice President of Exploration for the Company, has reviewed and approved all

technical information in this press release.

Quality Assurance / Quality Control

Clean Air Metals uses ALS Global (“ALS”), a well-established and recognized mineral

assay and geochemical analytical services company. The Thunder Bay laboratory holds

ISO-9000 accreditation; the Vancouver facility holds ISO-17025 registration.

All NQ-sized drill cores are cut with a diamond-tipped saw blade, and half are submitted

to ALS for sample preparation and analysis. Sample preparation is completed at the

ALS sample preparation facility in Thunder Bay, ON, and analysis is completed at the

primary ALS assay laboratory in Vancouver, B.C.

Clean Air Metals follows a quality control procedure for its core assay sampling

program: inserting blind blanks and certified Palladium-Platinum and Copper-Nickel

6

standards into the sample stream. The insertion procedure follows industry standards

with control sample frequency depending on the length of the sampled interval.

Gold, platinum, and palladium are analyzed using fire assay (FA) with an inductively

coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) finish. Samples with grades above the

optimal ICP-MS detection limits are analyzed using optical emission spectroscopy (ICP-

OES).

Also, thirty-three (33) elements of each sample, including copper, nickel, silver,

chromium, cobalt, and sulphur, are analyzed by a multi-element analytical method

using the atomic emission spectroscopy (ICP-AES) technique following four-acid

digestion of the sample. When samples have grades above the optimal detection limits

for this analytical method, they are re-analyzed using a high-grade assay method with

an ICP finish.

About Clean Air Metals

Clean Air Metals is a development and exploration company advancing its flagship,

100% owned Thunder Bay North Critical Minerals (“TBN”) project, 40 km northeast of

Thunder Bay, Ontario. The TBN project, accessible by road and next to established

infrastructure, hosts two (2) deposits - the Current and Escape deposits, only 2.5 km

apart. Together, the deposits host a 13.8 Mt indicated mineral resource containing

2.4M Pt eq. oz (Technical Report on the Thunder Bay North Project, Ontario Canada,

NI43-101, SLR Consulting Canada Ltd, June 19, 2023) with significant potential for

expansion down-plunge.

One of the rare primary platinum resources outside of South Africa, the TBN project is

in a stable and mining-friendly jurisdiction and benefits from longstanding relationships

with local First Nations. With its proven technical team, Clean Air Metals is committed

to growing the resources at the TBN project and creating long-term value for

shareholders.

Social Engagement

Clean Air Metals Inc. acknowledges that the Thunder Bay North Critical Minerals Project

is located within the area encompassed by the Robinson-Superior Treaty of 1850 and

includes the territories of the Fort William First Nation, Red Rock Indian Band,

Biinjitiwabik Zaaging Anishinabek and Kiashke Zaaging Anishinaabek. Clean Air Metals

also acknowledges the contributions of the Métis Nation of Ontario, Region 2 and the

Red Sky Métis Independent Nation to the rich history of our area. 

The Company appreciates the opportunity to work in these territories and remains

committed to the recognition and respect of those who have lived, travelled, and

gathered on the lands since time immemorial. Clean Air Metals is committed to

stewarding Indigenous heritage and remains committed to building, fostering and

encouraging a respectful relationship with First Nations, Métis and Inuit peoples based

7

upon principles of mutual trust, respect, reciprocity and collaboration in the spirit of

reconciliation.

ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

"Mike Garbutt"

Mike Garbutt, CEO of Clean Air Metals Inc.

Connect with us on X/ Facebook/ Instagram.

Visit www.cleanairmetals.ca for more information or contact:

Mia Boiridy

Director of Communications and Investor Relations

250-575-3305

[email protected]

Neither TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is

defined in policies of the TSX Venture Exchange) accepts responsibility for the

adequacy or accuracy of this release.

Cautionary Note

The information contained herein contains "forward-looking statements" within the

meaning of applicable securities legislation. Forward-looking statements relate to

information that is based on assumptions of management, forecasts of future results,

and estimates of amounts not yet determinable. Any statements that express

predictions, expectations, beliefs, plans, projections, objectives, assumptions or, future

events or performance are not statements of historical fact and may be "forward-looking

statements." Forward-looking statements are subject to a variety of risks and

uncertainties which could cause actual events or results to differ from those reflected in

the forward-looking statements, including, without limitation: political and regulatory

risks associated with mining and exploration; risks related to the maintenance of stock

exchange listings; risks related to environmental regulation and liability; the potential

for delays in exploration or development activities or the completion of feasibility

studies; the uncertainty of profitability; risks and uncertainties relating to the

interpretation of drill results, the geology, grade and continuity of mineral deposits;

risks related to the inherent uncertainty of production and cost estimates and the

potential for unexpected costs and expenses; results of prefeasibility and feasibility

studies, and the possibility that future exploration, development or mining results will

not be consistent with the Company's expectations; risks related to commodity price

fluctuations; and other risks and uncertainties related to the Company's prospects,

properties and business detailed elsewhere in the Company's disclosure record.

Should one or more of these risks and uncertainties materialize, or should underlying

8

assumptions prove incorrect, actual results may vary materially from those described in

forward-looking statements. Investors are cautioned against attributing undue certainty

to forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are made as of the

date hereof, and the Company does not assume any obligation to update or revise

them to reflect new events or circumstances except in accordance with applicable

securities laws. Actual events or results could differ materially from the Company's

expectations or projections.