Saturday, September 26, 2026
MiningNewsTerminal
Saturday, September 26, 2026 Admin

AEC.V ·

Anfield Energy Provides 2023 Corporate Review and Outlines Plans for 2024

Corporate Updates

Head Office:

4390 Grange Street, Suite 2005

Burnaby, B.C. V5H 1P6

www.anfieldenergy.com

Office: 604.669.5762

Fax: 604.608.4804

TSX.V: AEC

OTCQB: ANLDF

FRANKFURT: 0AD

Anfield Energy Provides 2023 Corporate Review and Outlines Plans for 2024

VANCOUVER, BRITISH COLUMBIA – GLOBE NEWSWIRE – January 18, 2024 — Anfield Energy, Inc. (TSX.V:

AEC; OTCQB: ANLDF; FRANKFURT: 0AD) (“Anfield” or “the Company”) is pleased to provide a corporate

review of 2023 and discuss its 2024 plans. Anfield continues its advance towards U.S.-based uranium and

vanadium production and is poised to benefit from the escalating world-wide demand for uranium.

Corey Dias, Anfield CEO states, “We at Anfield are very proud of our transformational 2023

accomplishments to meet our production goals. Given our 2023 accomplishments and continued

furtherance of our two -fold production strategy – underpinned by the licensed, permitted and

constructed Shootaring Canyon mill – we expect to see the valuation gap between Anfield and other

producing and near-producing peers narrow significantly in 2024.

Significant accomplishments were made throughout 2023 which will propel the Company forward in 2024.

Notably, we established the viability of our asset portfolio by both finalizing and issuing the first

Preliminary Economic Assessment of our core assets. It provided us with a baseline from which to pursue

additional “spokes” in our hub-and-spoke production strategy – while expanding our potential capacity –

and to incorporate additional internal and external uranium and vanadium projects into our production

roadmap. Moreover, our ability to raise sufficient funds to both advance our existing asset portfolio and

acquire complementary assets proved an important step in progressing our strategy.

To Anfield’s advantage, in the last decade and a half the timing has never been better for entering into

the production and sale of uranium. At the same time, however, barriers for new companies to enter into

production are steep. Uniquely, Anfield is in the right place at the right time with the right assets -- and

has cleared major hurdles for a production decision.”

HIGHLIGHTS OF THE COMPANY’S 2023 ACHIEVEMENTS:

Shootaring Canyon Mill and Core Asset Advancement -

• Received a Preliminary Economic Assessment for the Company’s Hub- And-Spoke production

plan which incorporated the Shootaring Canyon mill, the core Velvet-Wood and the Slick Rock

Projects.

The Company commissioned BRS, Inc., an engineering firm, to complete a Preliminary Economic

Assessment for its hub -and-spoke uranium and vanadium production plan which incorporated Anfield’s

Shootaring Canyon Mill, and the core Velvet-Wood and Slick Rock assets. The PEA returned a Net Present

Value (NPV) of US$238 million using a discount rate of 8%, a uranium price of US$70 per pound (the

current spot price is over US$100 per pound) and a vanadium price of US$12 per pound.

• Widened the scope of its Precision Systems Engineering engagement to incorporate an increase

in Shootaring’s mill throughput and output.

In November 2022, Anfield announced that it had commissioned Precision Systems Engineering (PSE), a

Utah-based engineering firm, to complete a reactivation proposal for the Shootaring Canyon mill. In

2023, following the completion of the reactivation proposal, the Company widened the scope of its

engagement of PSE to incorporate – in an updated plan for the Company’s License upgrade submittal –

an increase to the Shootaring Canyon mill’s throughput to 1,000 tons per day from 750 tons per day

and, separately, expanding Shootaring’s licensed uranium production capacity to 3 million pounds per

year from its current 1 million pounds per year.

• Applied for a drill program permit for its Slick Rock uranium and vanadium project in Colorado.

The Company, through BRS, submitted an application to the U.S. Bureau of Land Management (BLM) for

a drilling permit to conduct a 20 -hole drill program at its Slick Rock project in Colorado. This drilling will

allow Anfield to further develop its mine plan as it advances Slick Rock to production-ready status.

Pipeline for Secondary Production -

• Acquired the Marquez- Juan Tafoya uranium project in New Mexico, now the largest -single

uranium resource in Anfield’s portfolio.

Anfield acquired the Marquez- Juan Tafoya uranium project in New Mexico . The project was purchased

with a combination of cash and equity , resulting in enCore Energy bec oming Anfield’s largest single

shareholder. Marquez-Juan Tafoya is the anchor asset for Anfield’s secondary production plan , which

primarily consists of this asset and the Company’s Arizona and Utah holdings (see below).

• Acquired and expanded Arizona -based Artillery Peak claims to complement Anfield’s existing

Date Creek Basin holdings.

The Company acquired a 100% interest in 50 unpatented mining claims and staked an additional 54

claims in the uranium-rich Artillery Peak project area which are adjacent to Anfield’s current properties

in Date Creek Basin. This combined project will form part of Anfield’s two-fold strategy as it represents

an important piece of the Company’s secondary production pipeline to complement Anfield’s core

production assets.

• Acquired the Dripping Springs Quartzite project in Arizona.

In 2023, Anfield acquired the Dripping Springs Quartzite project in Arizona, a project that lies within a

region in which eight past-producing mines are located. It also sits close to both Anfield’s other Arizona

holdings and the Workman Creek project held by another uranium company.

• Acquired Calf Mesa and Marysvale projects in Utah, increasing Anfield’s secondary asset pool.

In 2023, Anfield acquired the Calf Mesa and Maryvale uranium projects in Utah. These projects form part

of Anfield’s secondary production plan and are located in close proximity to the Shootaring Canyon mill.

• Acquired additional claims in Utah.

Anfield acquired an additional 175 claims in Utah in close proximity to the Shootaring Canyon mill.

Equity And Debt Capital Raises –

• Raised approximately $12 million in a combination of equity and debt to fund both acquisitions

and asset advancement.

Anfield raised approximately $12 million through a combination of both equity and debt which provided

the Company with sufficient funds to both acquire the Marquez- Juan Tafoya uranium project in New

Mexico and fund the advancement of its uranium and vanadium assets.

CATALYSTS FOR 2024

• Submittal of Shootaring Canyon Mill uranium production restart application with the State of

Utah in Q1/24.

Anfield plans to submit its Shootaring Canyon Mill uranium production restart application with the State

of Utah in Q1/24. This is a milestone event for the Company, as it will move Anfield’s current Radioactive

Materials License from its current standby status to operational status which, critically, would position

Anfield to commence uranium production once refurbishment of Shootaring is completed. The review is

expected to take approximately 12 months, during which time Anfield will be able to commence initial

refurbishment at the mill. Completion of the refurbishment of the mill is expected to be completed

approximately 12 months following the License upgrade, resulting in a 24-month timeframe from restart

application submittal to completion of mill refurbishment.

• Acquisition of 12 additional DoE leases to strengthen Anfield’s primary uranium and vanadium

production pipeline.

Anfield recently reached an agreement to acquire an additional 12 DoE leases in Colorado to complement

the 9 leases acquired via the Company’s acquisition of the West Slope properties from Cotter Corporation

in 2018. Anfield now holds 21 of the 31 DoE leases in Colorado, underscoring the Company’s commitment

to the pursuit of uranium and vanadium production in this State. The assets are considered as part of

Anfield’s production pipeline, providing additional flexibility in terms of economies of scale and the

opportunity to initially focus on the most prospective leases within the DoE lease portfolio.

• Updated Preliminary Economic Assessment which will include additional uranium and

vanadium projects already held within Anfield’s asset portfolio.

Anfield expects to issue an updated Preliminary Economic Assessment (PEA) for Shootaring, Velvet Wood

and Slick Rock, given the improvement in the uranium price since the publication of the initial PEA. In

addition, an updated PEA will likely include additional uranium and vanadium assets from within Anfield’s

portfolio, potentially including both the recent transaction by which Anfield acquired 12 Department of

Energy (DoE) leases in Colorado and the West Slope project. This PEA is important to Anfield’s hub-and-

spoke strategy as we expect i t to underscore the significant inherent value and attractiveness of the

Company’s uranium and vanadium production assets under an expanded production scenario.

• Acquisition of additional uranium and vanadium assets.

The Company continues to seek out additional uranium and vanadium projects to buttress both its

primary hub -and-spoke production pipeline and secondary resource s in order to create a long -term

production portfolio underpinned by the Shootaring Canyon mill.

• Increasing world demand for nuclear energy and uranium supplies.

The macro view of the nuclear and uranium markets is strongly positive. With a shift away from Russia,

the value of European and North American uranium conversion and enrichment has increased significantly

as these continents look to not only pivot from Russian-sourced fossil fuels but to also embrace nuclear

power. In fact, legislation introduced in U.S. Congress seeks to prohibit the import of enriched uranium

from Russia, accelerating the need for increased Western capacity. Moreover, t he challenges related to

Kazakhstan’s uranium supply chain have already disrupted product flow to the West. As a result, China

has taken the opportunity to seek closer ties to Kazakhstan as it continues to build out its extensive nuclear

reactor fleet, negatively affecting uranium supplies available to the U.S. and other Western countries.

At the same time, product flow from the West to the East is increasing. Cameco signed a contract to sell

uranium to China Nuclear International Corporation for first loads in new reactors and for supplying

existing reactors. In addition, Cameco has signed a long- term contract with Ukraine’s Energoatom to

supply it with uranium hexafluoride (consisting of uranium and conversion services) through 2035. Finally,

Cameco’s acquisition of 49% of the nuclear giant Westinghouse, to become a worldwide full- service

nuclear business, has presented further prospects for a stronger market.

In the U.S., the National Nuclear Security Administration’s Uranium Reserve awarded five contracts for

near-term supply of uranium and the Sprott Physical Uranium Trust purchase d millions of pounds of

uranium on the spot market, further removing supply from the market. Moreover, the US government’s

creation of a 200GW energy roadmap to expand domestic milling and mining operations by 500,000MT

per year – 110 million pounds of uranium per year – is a significant catalyst for US-based producers. This

is taking place while U.S. uranium production fell to essentially zero in the fourth quarter of 2023.

Significantly, Japan has begun to restart its nuclear reactors, extend the life of others and commission

additional ones , underscoring Japan’s 180 -degree turn regarding nuclear. This decision reflects the

worldwide recognition of the need for new reactors to meet population increases, economic growth,

electrical intensification and the critical task of meeting carbon emission targets. The requirement for

increased baseload supply is sizeable. In fact, Ontario’s Independent System Operator (IESO) projects that

electricity demand in Ontario could more than double in the next 26 years. Th e worldwide requirement

for major new baseload supply is being met with plans in many countries for both large -scale (1GW)

reactors and Small Mo dular Reactors (SMRs). The World Nuclear Association currently in January 2024

records that there are 61 reactors under construction world-wide and another 113 reactors planned. In

short, it is a story of supply and demand; demand is rapidly growing, while supply is shrinking.

Qualified Persons

Douglas L. Beahm, P.E., P.G., principal engineer at BRS Inc., is a Qualified Person as defined in NI 43 -101

and has reviewed and approved the technical content of this news release.

About Anfield

Anfield is a uranium and vanadium development and near-term production company that is committed

to becoming a top -tier energy -related fuels supplier by creating value through sustainable, efficient

growth in its assets. Anfield is a publicly traded corporation listed on the TSX Venture Exchange (AEC-V),

the OTCQB Marketplace (ANLDF) and the Frankfurt Stock Exchange (0AD). Anfield is focused on its

conventional asset centre, as summarized below:

Arizona/Utah/Colorado – Shootaring Canyon Mill

A key asset in Anfield’s portfolio is the Shootaring Canyon Mill in Garfield County, Utah. The Shootaring

Canyon Mill is strategically located within one of the historically most prolific uranium production areas

in the United States, and is one of only three licensed uranium mills in the United States.

Anfield’s conventional uranium assets consist of mining claims and state leases in southeastern Utah ,

Colorado, and Arizona, targeting areas where past uranium mining or prospecting occurred. Anfield’s

conventional uranium assets include the Velvet -Wood Project, the Slick Rock Project, the West Slope

Project, the Frank M Uranium Project , the Findlay Tank breccia pipe as well as an additional 12 U.S.

Department of Energy (DoE) leases in Colorado. A combined NI 43-101 PEA has been completed for the

Velvet-Wood Project and the Slick Rock Project . The PEA is preliminary in nature, and includes inferred

mineral resources that are considered too speculative geologically to have economic considerations

applied to them that would enable them to be categorized as mineral reserves, and there is no certain ty

that the preliminary economic assessment would be realized. All conventional uranium assets are situated

within a 200-mile radius of the Shootaring Mill.

See table and footnote below for additions.

Technical Disclosure

Table 1. Anfield’s existing conventional uranium-vanadium project portfolio resources.

Project Location Classification Tons (kt)

Uranium

Grade

(% U3O8)

Contained

Uranium

(Mlbs U3O8)

Vanadium

Grade

(% V2O5)

Contained

Vanadium

(Mlbs V2O5)

Velvet-Wood Utah M & I 811 0.29% 4.6 - -

Inferred 87 0.32% 0.6 0.404% 7.3

West Slope Colorado Indicated 1,367 0.197% 5.4 - -

Inferred 1,367 - - 0.984% 26.9

Historic* 630 0.31% 3.9 1.59% 20.0

Slick Rock Colorado Inferred 1,760 0.224% 7.9 1.35% 47.1

Frank M Utah Historic* 1,137 0.101% 2.3 - -

Findlay Tank Arizona Historic* 211 0.226% 1.0 - -

Date

Creek/Artillery

Peak

Arizona Historic* 2,602 0.054% 2.8

Marquez-Juan

Tafoya New Mexico Historic* 7,100 0.127% 18.1

* The Company’s Qualified Person has not done sufficient work to classify these historic estimates as current mineral resources and Anfield is not

treating such historical resources as current mineral resources.

Velvet-Wood: The PEA for Velvet-Wood/Slick Rock was authored by Douglas L. Beahm, P.E., P.G. Principal Engineer, of BRS Inc., Harold H. Hutson,

P.E., P.G., Carl D. Warren, P.E., P.G., and Terence P. (Terry) McNulty, P.E., D. Sc., of T.P. McNulty and Associates Inc. (May 6, 20 23). Mineral

resources are not mineral reserves and do not have demonstrated economic viability in accordance with CIM standards. GT cut-off varies by

locality from 0.25%-0.50%.

West Slope: NI 43 -101 resource estimate for the JD -6, JD-7, JD-8 and JD- 9 properties, completed by BRS Inc. (effective March 2022); Historic

resource estimate for the SR -11, SR-13A, SM-18 N, SM-18 S, LP-21 and CM-25 properties, completed by Behre Dolbear for Cotter Corporation

(August 2007). Indicated and Inferred resources using GT cut-off of 0.1 ft% eU3O8; historic resources using cut-off of 0.05% U3O8.

Slick Rock: The PEA for Velvet-Wood/Slick Rock was authored by Douglas L. Beahm, P.E., P.G. Principal Engineer, of BRS Inc., Harold H. Hutson,

P.E., P.G., Carl D. Warren, P.E., P.G., and Terence P. (Terry) McNulty, P.E., D. Sc., of T.P. McNulty and Associates Inc. (May 6, 20 23). Mineral

resources are not mineral reserves and do not have demonstrated economic viability in accordance with CIM standards. GT cut-off varies by

locality from 0.25%-0.50%.

Frank M: Historic Technical Report for Frank M, prepared for Uranium One Americas, was authored by Douglas L. Beahm, P.E., P.G. Principal

Engineer of BRS Inc., and Andrew C. Anderson, P.E., P.G. Senior Engineer/Geologist of BRS Inc., dated June 10, 2008. Frank M hi storic resource

used a GT cut-off of 0.25%.

Findlay Tank: Historic Technical Report for Findlay Tank, prepared for Uranium One Americas, was authored by Douglas L. Beahm, P.E., P.G.

Principal Engineer of BRS Inc., dated October 2, 2008. Findlay Tank historic resource used a grade cut-off of 0.05% eU3O8.

Artillery Peak: Artillery Peak Exploration Project, Mohave County, Arizona, 43-101 Technical Report, authored by Dr. Karen Wenrich, October 12,

2010. GT cut-off varies by locality from 0.01%-0.05%.

Marquez-Juan Tafoya: The Historical Technical Report, Preliminary Economic Assessment, for Marquez-Juan Tafoya, prepared for Uranium Energy

Corporation, was authored by Douglas L. Beahm, P.E., P.G., Principal Engineer of BRS Inc., and Terence P. McNulty, P .E., PhD, McNulty &

Associates, dated June 9, 2021. The mineral resources are reported at a 0.60 GT cut-off.

On behalf of the Board of Directors

ANFIELD ENERGY INC.

Corey Dias, Chief Executive Officer

Neither TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in the policies

of the TSX Venture Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release.

Contact:

Anfield Energy, Inc.

Clive Mostert

Corporate Communications

780-920-5044

[email protected]

www.anfieldenergy.com

Safe Harbor Statement

THIS NEWS RELEASE CONTAINS “FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS”. STATEMENTS IN THIS NEWS

RELEASE THAT ARE NOT PURELY HISTORICAL ARE FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS AND INCLUDE ANY

STATEMENTS REGARDING BELIEFS, PLANS, EXPECTATIONS OR INTENTIONS REGARDING THE FUTURE.

EXCEPT FO R THE HISTORICAL INFORMATION PRESENTED HEREIN, MATTERS DISCUSSED IN THIS NEWS

RELEASE CONTAIN FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS THAT ARE SUBJECT TO CERTAIN RISKS AND

UNCERTAINTIES THAT COULD CAUSE ACTUAL RESULTS TO DIFFER MATERIALLY FROM ANY FUTURE

RESULTS, PERFORMANCE OR ACHIEVEMENTS EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED BY SUCH STATEMENTS.

STATEMENTS THAT ARE NOT HISTORICAL FACTS, INCLUDING STATEMENTS THAT ARE PRECEDED BY,

FOLLOWED BY, OR THAT INCLUDE SUCH WORDS AS “ESTIMATE,” “ANTICIPATE,” “BELIEVE,” “PLAN” OR

“EXPECT” OR SIMILAR STATEMENTS ARE FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS. RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES

FOR THE COMPANY INCLUDE, BUT ARE NOT LIMITED TO, THE RISKS ASSOCIATED WITH MINERAL

EXPLORATION AND FUNDING AS WELL AS THE RISKS SHOWN IN THE COMPANY’S MOST RECENT ANNUAL

AND QUARTERLY REPORTS AND FROM TIME-TO-TIME IN OTHER PUBLICLY AVAILABLE INFORMATION

REGARDING THE COMPANY. OTHER RISKS INCLUDE RISKS ASSOCIATED FUTURE CAPITAL REQUIREMENTS

AND THE COMPANY’S ABILITY AND LEVEL OF SUPPORT FOR ITS EXPLORATION AND DEVELOPMENT

ACTIVITIES. THERE CAN BE NO ASSURANCE THAT THE COMPANY’S EXPLORATION EFFORTS WILL SUCCEED

OR THE COMPANY WILL ULTIMATELY ACHIEVE COMMERCIAL SUCCESS. THESE FORWARD-LOOKING

STATEMENTS ARE MADE AS OF THE DATE OF THIS NEWS RELEASE, AND THE COMPANY ASSUMES NO

OBLIGATION TO UPDATE THE FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS, OR TO UPDATE THE REASONS W HY

ACTUAL RESULTS COULD DIFFER FROM THOSE PROJECTED IN THE FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS.

ALTHOUGH THE COMPANY BELIEVES THAT THE BELIEFS, PLANS, EXPECTATIONS AND INTENTIONS

CONTAINED IN THIS NEWS RELEASE ARE REASONABLE, THERE CAN BE NO ASSURANCE THOSE BELIEFS,

PLANS, EXPECTATIONS OR INTENTIONS WILL PROVE TO BE ACCURATE. INVESTORS SHOULD CONSIDER ALL

OF THE INFORMATION SET FORTH HEREIN AND SHOULD ALSO REFER TO THE RISK FACTORS DISCLOSED

IN THE COMPANY’S PERIODIC REPORTS FILED FROM TIME-TO-TIME.

THIS NEWS RELEASE HAS BEEN PREPARED BY MANAGEMENT OF THE COMPANY WHO TAKES FULL

RESPONSIBILITY FOR ITS CONTENTS.