FOR IMMEDIAT E RELEASE Aton reports final diamond drill results from Hamama, including 4.28 g/t Au Eq over an interval of 20.78m
FOR IMMEDIAT E RELEASE
Aton reports final diamond drill results from Hamama,
including 4.28 g/t Au Eq over an interval of 20.78m
VANCOUVER, BRITISH COLUMBIA , April 2 6, 202 3: Aton Resources Inc. (AAN: TSX -V) (“Aton” or the
“Company") is pleased to update investors on the final assay results from the recent diamond drilling
programme at Hamama, located in the Company’s 100% owned Abu Marawat Concession (“Abu Marawat” or
the “Concession”), in the Eastern Desert of Egypt (Figure 1).
Highlights:
• A total of 545.8 metres was drilled from 15 shallow holes at the Crocs Nose Zone (“CNZ”) at Hamama
West, completing the short Hamama 2023 diamond drilling programme. The programme was designed
to test for potential near-surface oxide gold-silver mineralisation that had been previously intersected
in a limited number of holes;
• Results from the programme included the following mineralised intersections:
• 1.57 g/t Au, 230.6 g/t Ag, and 4.28 g/t Au equivalent (“AuEq”), over an interval of 20.78m from
12.66m downhole depth (HAD-054);
• 1.84 g/t Au, 62.20 g/t Ag, and 2.57 g/t AuEq, over an interval of 24.55m from 6.45m downhole
depth (HAD-052);
• 1.37 g/t Au, 52.81 g/t Ag, and 1.99 g/t AuEq, over an interval of 34.80m from 2.00m downhole
depth (HAD-042);
• 1.63 g/t Au, 7.01 g/t Ag, and 1.71 g/t AuEq, over an interval of 16.30m from surface (HAD-049),
and;
• 1.23 g/t Au, 41.01 g/t Ag, and 1.72 g/t AuEq, over an interval of 18.90m from 0.80m downhole
depth (HAD-045);
• Preparations are well underway for the upcoming RC exploration drilling programme, with drilling
expected to commence within the first fortnight of May at West Garida.
“These final results from the Crocs Nose exceeded expectations, and we are very pleased with them ” said
Tonno Vahk, Interim CEO. “The Crocs Nose Zone represents a structural offset of the main mineralised zone
at Hamama West and was not included in the 2017 mineral resource es timate. The grades intersected in this
programme are notably higher than the overall grade of the Hamama West oxide resource, and this zone
should be a nice sweetener to the planned starter open pit mining operation at Hamama. We are also pleased
to have now signed the RC drilling contract with Geodrill and look forward to starting the drilling at West Garida
in May. We believe there is good potential to rapidl y add significant near-surface ounces from the high-grade
quartz veins we drilled at West Garida last summer to the overall resource base at Hamama.”
2023 Hamama diamond drilling programme
Diamond drilling re -commenced at Hamama in mid -January 2023, and was completed on March 11, 2023,
with a total of 1,612.7 metres drilled . The mineralisation at Hamama is hosted in a stratiform silica -carbonate
horizon (“SCMH”) that out crops over an approximately 3.2 km strike length, and is variable in thickness. At
Hamama West the SCMH is greater than 60m in thickness in places , and is typically iron oxide -rich and
gossanous at surface and throughout the oxide zone.
Figure 1: Geology plan of the Abu Marawat Concession showing the location of the Hamama project
Figure 2: Location of the Crocs Nose Zone at Hamama West
Discussion of results
15 shallow holes (HAD-041 to HAD-055) were drilled at the CNZ for a total of 545.8m (see Table 1 and Figure
3), completing the short 2023 Hamama diamond drilling programme . Final assay results are now available
from these last holes. The collar coordinates of these holes are provided in Table 1 below:
Hole ID
Collar co-ordinates 1
Dip 2 Grid
azimuth 2
EOH
depth (m) Comments
X Y Z
HAD-041 533891.2 2913649.4 515.4 -30.6 153.9 36.1 CNZ (north side, under NS)
HAD-042 533886.5 2913648.5 515.4 -33.1 204.1 42.0 CNZ (north side, under NS)
HAD-043 533827.8 2913611.6 508.9 -0.7 51.6 98.6 CNZ (west side, under NS)
HAD-044 533828.3 2913609.2 508.6 -10.2 120.1 46.0 CNZ (west side, under NS)
HAD-045 533795.1 2913603.4 506.9 -65.3 178.6 30.0 CNZ (west side)
HAD-046 533808.9 2913611.1 506.5 -44.9 181.3 31.4 CNZ (west side)
HAD-047 533809.0 2913602.6 507.2 -43.6 182.4 26.1 CNZ (west side)
HAD-048 533823.1 2913614.7 507.3 -44.2 177.6 29.4 CNZ (west side)
HAD-049 533824.7 2913603.4 507.6 -43.9 178.7 22.3 CNZ (west side)
HAD-050 533795.6 2913611.5 506.2 -69.3 182.1 36.1 CNZ (west side)
HAD-051 533789.3 2913612.1 505.7 -69.4 179.8 19.6 CNZ (west side)
HAD-052 533808.5 2913612.8 506.5 -69.8 187.1 36.9 CNZ (west side)
HAD-053 533809.0 2913615.2 506.4 -74.4 8.4 41.3 CNZ (west side)
HAD-054 533884.3 2913658.5 515.0 -44.6 181.5 35.1 CNZ (north side, under NS)
HAD-055 533903.7 2913662.1 514.0 -44.6 182.3 14.9 CNZ (north side)
Notes:
1) Collar co-ordinates surveyed by Leica TCRA1203+ R1000 Robotic total station
2) Collar surveys of drill holes undertaken at c. 5-6m depth, using Reflex EZ-Trac survey tool
3) All co-ordinates are UTM (WGS84) Zone 36R
4) NS: Nubian Sandstone (outlier)
Table 1: Collar details of diamond drill holes HAD-041 to HAD-055
The mineralisation at the CNZ appears to be located in a faulted offset of the main mineralised zone at
Hamama West (Figures 2 and 3). The SCMH appears to have been sinistrally offset approximately 150m to
the south along a shallow west -dipping fault, which terminates the outcropping mineralisation to the west. At
the CNZ this fault represents the underlying footwall of the mineralised block, while at Hamama West the
mineralisation continues along strike to the west beneath this structure, and has recently returned intersections
including 1.57 g/t Au, 29.99 g/t Ag and 1.92 AuEq over a 47m interval, from 26m depth (hole HAP -192, see
news release dated October 20, 2022). The CNZ mineralisation was not included in the maiden Hamama West
mineral resource estimate (see news release dated January 24, 2017).
SCMH-hosted mineralisation at the CNZ outcrops at surface on both the northern and western flanks of the
Cretaceous Nubian Sandstone (“NS”) outlier, which unconformably overlies the Neoproterozoic rocks hosting
the mineralisation at Hamama (Figure 3). Surface trenching of the unconformity has clearly shown that the
mineralisation continues under and immediately beneath the NS outlier.
Previous diamond drilling at the CNZ has returned intersections including 2.4 6 g/t Au, 157.3 g/t Ag, and 4.73
g/t AuEq, over a 19m interval from 12m depth (hole AHA -046, see news release dated June 9, 2015, and
Figure 3), 2.05 g/t Au, 168.9 g/t Ag and 4.48 g/t AuEq, over a 12m interval from 27m depth (hole AHA -045,
see also news release dated June 9, 2015), and 1.65 g/t Au, 82.7 g/t Ag and 1.92 g/t AuEq over a 28m interval,
from 7m depth (hole HAD-007, see news release dated May 18, 2017). Previous surface trenching at the CNZ
also returned intersections of mineralisation outcroppin g at surface including 3.47 g/t Au, 118.2 g/t Ag, and
5.35 g/t AuEq over a 26m width (trench AHA-T-113, see news release dated July 9, 2014).
Figure 3: Crocs Nose Zone area - geology and drill hole collar plan
The recent drilling has confirmed the presence of outcropping gold -silver mineralisation at the CNZ, with all
holes intersecting mineralisation, as expected. Details of all mineralised intersections are provided in Table 2,
and selected intersections are shown below:
• HAD-054: 1.57 g/t Au, 230.6 g/t Ag, and 4.28 g/t AuEq, over a 20.78m interval, from 12.66m depth
• HAD-052: 1.84 g/t Au, 62.2 g/t Ag, and 2.57 g/t AuEq, over a 24.55m interval, from 6.45m depth
• HAD-042: 1.37 g/t Au, 52.81 g/t Ag, and 1.99 g/t AuEq, over a 34.80m interval, from 2.00m depth
• HAD-049: 1.63 g/t Au, 7.01 g/t Ag, and 1.71 g/t AuEq, over a 16.30m interval, from surface
• HAD-045: 1.23 g/t Au, 41.01 g/t Ag, and 1.72 g/t AuEq, over an 18.90m interval, from 0.80m depth
Mineralisation at the CNZ is apparently associated with the SCMH, but is quite variable in nature. The
mineralisation is hosted in a variety of rock types from hard, dense haematite gossan , to kaolinitic apparently
altered felsic rocks and typically pink to yellowish jarositic clays. In places it is very rubbly and heavily fractured,
resulting in significant core loss from several holes. Poor core recovery was typically associated with zones of
higher grade mineralisation. Where core loss has been recorded, these zones of core loss were allocated zero
grade, so it is likely that the reported intersection grades actually underestimate the true grade of the
mineralised intervals. The mineralisation is typically base metal poor, but in places carries significantly elevated
Pb values, and to a lesser extent Zn and Cu. Silver grades vary from being very low ( eg. hole HAD-049) to
very high, in the order of hundreds of ppm. Zones of high grade silver are frequently associated with the
jarositic clays, and are spatially discrete within the overall SCMH unit.
Hole ID
Intersection (m) 1 Au
(g/t)
Ag
(g/t)
AuEq
(g/t) 2
Cu
(%)
Pb
(%)
Zn
(%) Comments 3
From To Interval
HAD-041 2.00 15.80 13.80 1.50 72.70 2.36 0.01 0.02 0.01
HAD-042 2.00 36.80 34.80 1.37 52.81 1.99 0.01 0.03 0.04
HAD-043 31.50 54.30 22.80 0.89 4.67 0.95 0.01 0.02 0.02 includes 0.3m of
core loss
and 70.35 85.95 15.60 0.52 54.49 1.16 0.01 0.01 0.02
HAD-044 6.80 23.85 17.05 0.52 13.08 0.67 0.02 0.03 0.03
and 28.95 31.15 2.20 1.78 28.95 2.12 0.01 0.01 0.05
HAD-045 0.80 19.70 18.90 1.23 41.01 1.72 0.01 0.31 0.04 includes 1.3m of
core loss
HAD-046 12.60 23.70 11.10 0.47 37.25 0.91 0.01 0.37 0.02 includes 7.2m of
core loss
HAD-047 0.00 6.40 6.40 1.00 67.67 1.80 0.01 0.04 0.03
HAD-048 0.00 17.35 17.35 0.75 54.98 1.39 0.06 0.45 0.02 includes 2.2m of
core loss
HAD-049 0.00 16.30 16.30 1.63 7.01 1.71 0.01 0.04 0.04 includes 3.2m of
core loss
HAD-050 1.45 11.45 10.00 0.28 6.27 0.35 0.18 0.03 2.48
HAD-051 - - - - - - - - - Not assayed 4
HAD-052 6.45 31.00 24.55 1.84 62.20 2.57 0.03 0.50 0.11 includes 5.7m of
core loss
HAD-053 13.52 18.70 5.18 0.61 21.35 0.87 0.44 2.61 2.16
HAD-054 12.66 33.44 20.78 1.57 230.6 4.28 0.01 0.02 0.01 includes 2.9m of
core loss
HAD-055 0.00 5.81 5.81 1.88 18.22 2.09 0.01 0.02 0.03
Notes:
1) Intersections calculated at a nominal cut-off grade of 0.3 g/t AuEq in runs of continuous mineralisation
2) Gold equivalent, AuEq, is calculated at a ratio of 85:1 Au:Ag (ie. 1 g/t Au = 85 g/t Ag)
3) Zones of poor (or no) recovery through voids and cavities were not sampled, and allocated zero grade
4) Hole HAD-051 intersected SCMH-hosted mineralisation but was not assayed, as it was collared in the wrong position
Table 2: Mineralised intersections from the Crocs Nose Zone (Hamama West)
As at the main zone of Hamama West, the SCMH dips to the north in an overturned sequence, with its
immediate stratigraphic footwall ( ie. the structural or mining hangingwall to the mineralisation ) consisting of
totally oxidised, kaolin-rich, brecciated and heavily altered apparently felsic rocks. The mineralisation appears
to be cut off at depth by the west-dipping strike-slip fault which has displaced it from the main zone at Hamama
West. There appears to be a north-south trending fault which displaces the mineralisation at the CNZ, although
this is not clear, as its interpreted location lies beneath the NS outlier. The CNZ mineralisation appears to be
pinching out to the west.
Sample processing and analytical procedures
Drill core was logged by Aton geologists, and marked up for cutting and sampling at the Hamama core farm.
Samples were typically selected over nominal 1m intervals, but as determined by the logged lithologies. The
core was half-cut by Aton staff at the onsite Hamama sample preparation facility.
The split half-core samples were collected and bagged up in cloth bags, weighed and crushed to -4mm onsite,
and split to a nominal c. 250-500g sample size. The coarse crushed reject samples are retained onsite at the
Hamama sample prep facility.
QAQC samples are inserted at a rate of approximately 1 certifi ed reference material (or “standard” sample)
every 30 samples, 1 blank sample every 15 samples, and 1 duplicate split sample every 15 samples.
The c. 250-500g dried, crushed and split samples were shipped to ALS Minerals sample preparation laboratory
at Marsa Alam, Egypt where they were pulverised to a size fraction of better than 85% passing 75 microns.
From this pulverised material a further sub-sample was split off with a nominal c. 50g size, which was shipped
on to ALS Minerals at Rosia Montana, Romania for analysis.
Samples were analysed for gold by fire assay with an atomic absorption spectroscopy (“AAS”) finish (analytical
code Au-AA23), and for silver, copper, lead and zinc using an aqua regia digest followed by an AAS finish
(analytical code AA45). Any high grade gold samples (>10 g/t Au) were re-analysed using analytical code Au-
GRA21 (also fire assay, but with a gravimetric finish). Any high grade Ag and base metal samples (Ag >100
g/t, and Cu, Pb and Zn >10,000ppm or >1%) were re -analysed using the ore grade technique AA46 (also an
aqua regia digest followed by an AAS finish).
About Aton Resources Inc.
Aton Resources Inc. (AAN: TSX-V) is focused on its 100%
owned Abu Marawat Concession (“Abu Marawat”),
located in Egypt’s Arabian -Nubian Shield, approximately
200 km north of Centamin’s world-class Sukari gold mine.
Aton has identified numerous gold and base metal
exploration targets at Abu Marawat, including the
Hamama deposit in the west, the Abu Marawat deposit in
the northeast, and the advanced Rodruin exploration
prospect in the south of the Concession. Two historic
British gold mines are also located on the Concession at
Sir Bakis and Semna. Aton has identified several distinct
geological trends within Abu Marawat, which display
potential for the development of a variety of styles of
precious and base metal mineralisation. Abu Marawat is
447.7 km 2 in size and is located in an area of excellent
infrastructure; a four -lane highway, a 220kV power line,
and a water pipeline are in close proximity, as are the
international airports at Hurghada and Luxor.
Qualified person
The technical information contained in this News Release
was prepared by Javier Orduña BSc (hons), MSc, MCSM,
DIC, MAIG, SEG(M), Exploration Manager of Aton
Resources Inc. Mr. Orduña is a qualified person (QP) under
National Instrument 43 -101 Standards of Disclosure for
Mineral Projects.
For further information regarding Aton Resources Inc.,
please visit us at www.atonresources.com or contact:
TONNO VAHK
Interim CEO
Tel: +1 604 318 0390
Email: [email protected]
Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
Some of the statements contained in this release are forward -looking statements. Since forward -looking statements
address future events and conditions; by their very nature they involve inherent risks and uncertainties. Actual results
in each case could differ materially from those currently anticipated in such statements.
Neither TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in policies of the TSX
Venture Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release.